Slashdot Mirror


Hubble Takes Amazing New Images of Andromeda, Pillars of Creation

The Hubble Space Telescope was launched in April, 1990. In 1995, it presented us with one of its most iconic images: a close-up of gas pillars in the Eagle Nebula, dubbed the "Pillars of Creation." Now, as HST approaches its 25th anniversary, astronomers have re-shot the pillars at a much higher resolution. Here are direct images links: visible light, comparison with old image, near-infrared light. "The infrared view transforms the pillars into eerie, wispy silhouettes seen against a background of myriad stars. That's because the infrared light penetrates much of the gas and dust, except for the densest regions of the pillars. Newborn stars can be seen hidden away inside the pillars."

That's not the only new image from Hubble today: NASA has also released the most high definition view of the Andromeda Galaxy that we've ever seen. Here's a web-friendly image, but that doesn't really do it justice. The full image is 69,536 px by 22,230 px. To see Andromeda in all its glory, visit the ESA's dedicated, zoomable site that contains all the image data. At the highest zoom levels, you can make out a mind-blowing number of individual stars. Andromeda is over 2 million light-years distant.

20 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Cool 3D effect... by mpthompson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the pillars comparison image, if you cross your eyes to superimpose the old image over the new image you'll see a pretty cool 3D effect. Not sure if it's something in my imagination or if the stellar motion over 20 years gives us two slightly different view of the pillars to create a kind of stereo image.

  2. HST's M31 vs R.Gendler's M31 by Arkh89 · · Score: 2

    This image is so cool : http://hubblesite.org/newscent...
    Robert Gendler's gallery is visible here

  3. Extending the life of Hubble... by mpthompson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These images demonstrate that the Hubble is a national (if not international) treasure. With two U.S. rockets soon capable of delivering astronauts to LEO, there must be some way to perform some type of minimal maintenance mission to the Hubble so it can continue its mission beyond the current EOL deadline. With no suitable visible light replacement telescope on the horizon, dumping the telescope into the ocean will be a crime. This would be a marvelous opportunity for someone like Elon Musk or the executives at Boeing to step up and lobby the government to be allowed to put together such a mission.

    1. Re:Extending the life of Hubble... by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With two U.S. rockets soon capable of delivering astronauts to LEO, there must be some way to perform some type of minimal maintenance mission to the Hubble so it can continue its mission beyond the current EOL deadline.

      There isn't. The manned vehicles on the horizon are simply are not capable of doing so. Everyone wanted "cheap and safe" capsules, and losing practically all but the most basic manned capability in space is the price of that.

    2. Re:Extending the life of Hubble... by necro81 · · Score: 2

      In what way aren't they capable?

      Well, the big one I can see is that they lack an airlock for EVAs. They also lack a cargo bay for bringing up tools and replacement parts. Lastly, they don't have a remote manipulator like the shuttle's arm, which was an essential tool for the servicing missions - first for capturing and positioning the telescope, then for moving the astronauts around.

      With several launches, you could put together an orbiting service platform that contains these things. Unless things change greatly, however, the cost of putting together such a platform approaches the cost of building a whole new telescope!

      I'm sure that we'll get there eventually (a LEO servicing platform), if only because fixing satellites could be a genuine business venture, but I don't think it'll happen within Hubble's remaining life.

    3. Re:Extending the life of Hubble... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      Last century's motto: To Boldly Go

      This century's motto: Always the Low Price. Always.

  4. Re:Stars or noise by mpthompson · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stars... If you pan around the outskirts of the image you will see that the density drops off defining the shape of the galaxy.

  5. I can imagine... by mpthompson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...somewhere 2 million lightyears away in the Andromeda galaxy a nerd zooming into a similar high resolution image of the Milky Way galaxy, seeing a faint yellow smudge no larger than a pixel and wondering if it's a star or noise in the image.

    1. Re:I can imagine... by flappinbooger · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...somewhere 2 million lightyears away in the Andromeda galaxy a nerd zooming into a similar high resolution image of the Milky Way galaxy, seeing a faint yellow smudge no larger than a pixel and wondering if it's a star or noise in the image.

      (reaches over and closes blinds)

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  6. Re:Just a simple question... by davester666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Go outside and download the image at the resolution you want.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  7. how many megapixels is that? by dudpixel · · Score: 3, Funny

    The full image is 69,536 px by 22,230 px

    Who said the megapixel war was over?

    --
    This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
  8. Re:Stars or noise by vix86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The sheer number of stars in the Andromeda photo is humbling. While panning through it, the thought struck me that perhaps around one of those stars exists a planet with intelligent life that might also be looking at a high res image of the Milky Way and be thinking the same thing about them.

  9. Leading Edge? by CaptainLard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks like the pillars have a leading edge with debris trailing off. What set something that massive, with that shape, in motion? And where is it going?

  10. Re:Just a simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here

    Gotta give credit to NASA. They made a 25 year old space telescope that is still better than anything that anyone else has.

  11. Re:Stars or noise by turbidostato · · Score: 2

    "Are those stars or just noise?"

    It's really full of stars, Bowman.

  12. Re:Stars or noise by michelcolman · · Score: 2

    Only they wouldn't be able to see any intelligent life here, since we didn't exist yet two million years ago. By the time they can actually see us, we may have gone extinct.

  13. Re:Stars or noise by Whiternoise · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the amazing thing about this image - from a low zoom level it looks like CCD shot noise. Then you realise that the zoom slider is fully out and you can go in.. and in.. and in.. until you see that the noise isn't noise, it's actually all stars. You can verify this by panning to the edge of the frame where the galaxy is far less dense and you can see stars with the (low noise) darkness of the universe behind them.

  14. The Price of Art by hyades1 · · Score: 2

    Average out the cost of designing, building and orbiting a newer, better Hubble across all the people in the world who have a few extra bucks and an appreciation of that iconic photo as art...worthwhile for no other reason than for us to stare at it and be profoundly moved.

    I wonder how much it would cost each person to "git 'er done".

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  15. Re:Stars or noise by dpilot · · Score: 2

    But the Earth had an oxygen (potentially biosculpted) atmosphere some 500 million years ago. So if someone there has been able to observe Earth and know something about its atmosphere, they'd know that there might be life here. We would count as "interesting".

    I've read more recently that there may be other ways to have significant amounts of free oxygen in a planetary atmosphere besides biological processes. I have no idea how probable those ways are compared to life, how stable they are, how "interesting" they are compared to life, etc.

    But for the remote sensing schemes we've used on exoplanets, as well as foreseeable improvements to those schemes, Earth would definitely count as "interesting".

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  16. Re:Just a simple question... by ihtoit · · Score: 2

    after a bit of digging around I managed to locate a magnet link for the 4.31GB 60kx20k image.

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:5BE3C93B5C5D9150AB819B14B90360182BD3E26C&tr=udp://tracker.publicbt.com:80&tr=udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80&tr=udp://tracker.istole.it:80&tr=http://denis.stalker.h3q.com:6969/announce&tr=udp://tracker.ccc.de:80

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel