Tips For Securing Your Secure Shell
jones_supa writes: As you may have heard, the NSA has had some success in cracking Secure Shell (SSH) connections. To respond to these risks, a guide written by Stribika tries to help you make your shell as robust as possible. The two main concepts are to make the crypto harder and make stealing keys impossible. So prepare a cup of coffee and read the tutorial carefully to see what could be improved in your configuration. Stribika gives also some extra security tips: don't install what you don't need (as any code line can introduce a bug), use the kind of open source code that has actually been reviewed, keep your software up to date, and use exploit mitigation technologies.
The average person should be more worried about their sexual partner(s) going through their SMS history than the NSA doing the same. I know it's a shock to the ego but very few of us are interesting enough to be on the radar of any intelligence agency. The lion's share of the population is fat and unimportant.
I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
yeah, check out all the OpenBSD commits. At the bottom they usually say something like "ok deraadt@" or "ok tedu@". That means that another developer actually reviewed every change. If you take a look at the source logs, almost every single commit has these.
I read some study once that says that peer review is one of the most effective techniques for catching bugs but as far as I know, OpenBSD is the only unix OS that's actually doing that.
It's why I've switched all my machines (servers AND desktops) to OpenBSD these days... and that remind me time to go make another donation...
I stopped taking you seriously at the STASI comparison, just so you know, but I'll respond anyway to this point:
All it takes to be on the radar is to (knowingly or not) communicate with someone who (also knowingly or not) communicated with someone who is either of interest or who has been confused with someone who is of interest. And of interest need not be limited to foreign nationals working with terrorists. We know they give tips to the DEA and FBI as well. Are you sure you have never talked to anyone who talked to someone who knows a drug dealer?
The only difference between NSA and a classical gumshoe detective is that the latter's activities aren't easily automated. If you're two degrees removed from a drug dealer you were always going to land on law enforcement's desk. You'll quickly leave that desk when they determine that the lead is a dead end. The Federal Government of the United States isn't going to compromise your SSH server because you called somebody who called somebody who called a terrorist. They aren't even likely to give you more than a cursory look.
Fantasy land: "Oh no! sjames called this guy who ordered a pizza from this place that once sold a pizza to a terrorist! I need his file on my desk YESTERDAY. Find out who his high school sweetheart was; I want her in here for an interview ASAP. Get me his Facebook and Slashdot credentials while you're at it. Don't forget to put this in the President's Daily Brief, this needs to go to the top STAT."
Real world: "Hmm, the computer says we got a hit. Oh, that's a pizza delivery place. Next."
I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.