Slashdot Mirror


Bill Would Ban Paid Prioritization By ISPs

jfruh writes In the opening days of the new U.S. Congress, a bill has been introduced in both the House and Senate enforcing Net neutrality, making it illegal for ISPs to accept payment to prioritize some traffic packets over others. But the sponsors are all Democrats, and with Republicans now in charge of both house of Congress, the chances of it passing seem slim.

7 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Fuck the libs! by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny. Their actions would suggest they believe in pork barrels.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. Proper Net Neutrality by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've not been a fan of previous "Net Neutrality" efforts, because they didn't seem likely to fix the problem. This, however, is great. It totally undercuts the ISP extortion racket, without trying to fix a technical problem.

    The big ISPs can always find a loophole in any law that tries to prevent throttling by some technical rules - that's what engineers do: we game a system to maximize some value. Bad approach. By instead saying "do whatever, but you can't charge money for priority access simply removes the incentive to do it in the first place. Good approach.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  3. Democrats don't want this to pass by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the Democrats wanted this to pass, they would have brought the bill to floor when they had a chance of it actually passing. Far too many in the Democratic party are in the pockets of those that won't let this pass, but by bringing it up now, it can look like the Republicans are the bad guys.

    Which, they are. Both parties are opposed to net neutrality. But this bill is just there for grandstanding. The Democrats could have made net neutrality happen MANY times in the last few years, so this is just to try to smear team red, even though team blue agrees with them totally on this issue.

  4. Re:Better bill than the other net neutrality bills by Shatrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This still doesn't address the real problem, when an ISP degrades traffic which competes with their other revenue streams. I.E. a cable company degrading netflix traffic or a telephone company degrading skype.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  5. Fuck the libs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Republicans believe in "free" market that helps the most powerful Corporations.

  6. Re:Fuck the libs! by dywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oddly enough, Net Neutrality is about protecting and strengthening the free market such that it remains free and competitive.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  7. This is what's wrong... by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and with Republicans now in charge of both house of Congress, the chances of it passing seem slim.

    To preface, this is not a partisan-based slam. This is a slam on our entire system. The fact that we accept something won't pass despite it being universally wanted by "the people" (not pronounced "corporations") shows our biggest hurdle that we as a country need to overcome. Not race/gender equality or financial disparity, but the ability of this country to be propelled forward by a system that is representative to the needs of the many, not the powerful.