Slashdot Mirror
Publications Divided On Self-Censorship After Terrorist Attack
New submitter wmofr writes: Major U.S. and British publications refused to publish related satirical cartoons, at least those about the "prophet", after the terrorist attack in Charlie Hebdo's office, which had 12 people killed. An editor of the Independent said:"But the fact is as an editor you have got to balance principle with pragmatism, and I felt yesterday evening a few different conflicting principles: I felt a duty to readers; a duty to the dead; I felt a duty to journalism – and I also felt a duty to my staff. I think it would have been too much of a risk to unilaterally decide in Britain to be the only newspaper that went ahead and published so in a sense it is true one has self-censored in a way I feel very uncomfortable with. It's an incredibly difficult decision to make." But still many media organizations bravely publishing those cartoons, declining self-censorship.
Charlie Hebdo's surviving staff say the magazine will publish again next week, saying, "stupidity will not win." Meanwhile, cartoonists around the world have published strips in response to the attack. The Onion has a poignant take as well. With regard to the attackers, one suspect turned himself in to police, and the other two remain at large.
Imperialist war agitation paves way for fascist reaction.
UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
You do not solve extremism by stooping to its level.
Make sure, if you're a journalist, to put your entire office building in danger of being bombed for the sake of YOUR choice to stand up for what you believe in. The other 1300 people working in your office building appreciate your willingness to sacrifice their lives. Their families are also happy that you chose to provoke an angry, violent idiot so that they could no longer have fathers, mothers, husbands, and wives for the sake of your unilateral decision to flip someone the ideological bird.
One person, acting alone, is not a culture of violence. Your overly simplistic view is really adorable, but completely useless.
The fact is, one has repeatedly and often had people of its faith killing for no reason other than they are "offended" by western cultural ideals, and the other is a single person killing an abortion doctor. But curiously you said "Terrorism and murder are no more, or less, justified by any particular religious belief." Terrorism and murder do not require religion, as in the case of the Abortion doctor. Just because murder is legal, and you have dehumanized the victims of abortion (fetal tissue).
Hurting other people because you changed your mind at the last second of your pregnancy is kinda the very definition of bat-shit crazy.
It is really easy to demonize people, especially if you dehumanize them. And that makes murder all the more easy for those that kill others.
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.