Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Mystery of Glenn Seaborg's Missing Plutonium: Solved

Posted by Soulskill on from the in-his-other-pants dept.

KentuckyFC writes: In the early 1940s, Glenn Seaborg made the first lump of plutonium by bombarding uranium-238 with neutrons in two different cyclotrons for over a year, The resulting plutonium, chemically separated and allowed to react with oxygen, weighed 2.77 micrograms. It was the first macroscopic sample ever created and helped win Seaborg a Nobel prize ten years later. The sample was displayed at the Lawrence Hall of Science in Berkeley until the early naughties, when it somehow disappeared. Now nuclear detectives say they've found Seaborg's plutonium and have been able to distinguish it from almost all other plutonium on the planet using a special set of non-destructive tests. The team says the sample is now expected to go back on display at Seaborg's old office at Berkeley.

13 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Special non destructive test? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 3, Funny

    They weighed it?

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
    1. Re:Special non destructive test? by bunratty · · Score: 2

      Don't be silly! They asked to see its ID.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:Special non destructive test? by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      They looked at the radiation coming out of the sample to find evidence of Am-241, an impurity that would be formed if the sample were created in a cyclotron but not if it were created in a reactor. This test doesn't require the sample even to be touched.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Special non destructive test? by nojayuk · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's the other way around. Extra neutron captures in plutonium created in a nuclear power reactor produces Pu-241 and by decay, Am-241. The bombardment of U-238 with deuterons doesn't produce Pu-241. No Am-241 in the sample hence it was not produced in a reactor. That's the theory.

      It's more complicated than that, there are ways of producing very pure Pu-239 in a reactor but the extreme purity of the sample in question seems to mitigate against it being produced by the capture of fission neutrons in a reactor.

    4. Re:Special non destructive test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What I want to know is which will work best in my space modulator? It was only design for 36.

  2. I recall.... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Funny

    the early naughties, those were the good ole days.

  3. Re:Early "naughties" by Strider- · · Score: 2

    It ought to be the Noughties, which is the proper pun for that decade.

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  4. Re:Early "naughties" by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    Just like every decade for as long as any of us have been alive?

    --
    Learn to love Alaska
  5. Re:Pu 241 has 14 year half life by fnj · · Score: 4, Informative

    And Pu-239 has a half life of 24,100 years.

  6. Re:They should all be fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, if the terrorists were also able to obtain an equal amount of antimatter, they could liberate about the same amount of energy as you would get from burning 4 gallons of gasoline. You'd also have to worry about 6360 decays per second, which is about as much radiation as you emit. Pu-239 emits quite a bit of radiation per decay, a total of 207.1 MeV of various neutrons, gamma rays, and fission fragments, which is about .2 microwatts.

    The big question though would be, if you made a miniature fission bomb out of it, what would the yield be? Sorry to disappoint, folks, but this is probably not possible. "A spherical untampered critical mass is about 11 kg (24.2 lbs), 10.2 cm (4") in diameter". Calculating the compression required to make the sample mass critical would be nontrivial, but it's well into the "diamond anvil" range, and far beyond what is possible with explosives. Plutonium compresses relatively well, for a metal, but not that well.

    So, in order to avoid the biggest health risks associated with this sample, I recommend that you not eat it.

  7. The bigger loss.. by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2

    Is the gradual re-purposing of the Lawrence Hall Of Science from a museum explaining the history of nuclear research to just another science museum presenting dinosaurs, earthquakes and global warming. LHS used to be a unique historical resource. "Concerns about radiation" and political correctness turned it into a generic and politically correct science museum.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  8. Plutonium in Berkeley?? by berchca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aren't such things illegal in Berkeley because of the Nuclear Free Berkeley Act (Chapter 12.90):
    http://codepublishing.com/CA/Berkeley/cgi/NewSmartCompile.pl?path=Berkeley12/Berkeley1290/Berkeley1290.html

  9. Glenn Seaborg - a great man by Cliff+Stoll · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was honored to know Glenn Seaborg while working at Lawrence Berkeley Labs in the 1980's. By then, Manhattan Project was long behind him, as was his Nobel prize, the Atomic Energy Commission work, and his chancellorship of the University of California. Yet he was still a kind and supportive scientist who was deeply interested in any research - whether in physics, astronomy, chemistry, or biology. He recognized the need to teach music and art alongside science and math, and would visit local high schools to encourage students.

    I once met him at the Lawrence Hall of Science, walking around the old cyclotron. When I asked him about it, he said that he'd been wondering how the field magnets had been mounted (it was perhaps 40 years after the Manhattan Project). After a short chat he invited a few 12 year old kids over, and told stories about using the beast to create new elements. Amazing guy.