Slashdot Mirror


Belgian Raid Kills 2, Said To Avert "Major Terrorist Attacks"

As reported by CNN, Reuters, and other outlets, a raid in the Belgian city of Verviers -- one of several counter-terrorism actions in the country today -- ended in the death of two men, and the capture of a third, who are said to have been planning imminent acts of violence akin to the ones earlier this month in France. From Reuters' coverage: Coming a week after Islamist gunmen killed 17 people in Paris, the incident heightened fears across Europe of young local Muslims returning radicalised from Syria. But prosecutors' spokesman Eric Van Der Sypt said the Belgian probe had been under way before the Jan. 7 attack on French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo. ... Describing events in the quiet provincial town just after dark, he said: "The suspects immediately and for several minutes opened fire with military weaponry and handguns on the special units of the federal police before they were neutralised." ... Earlier in the day, prosecutors said they had detained a man in southern Belgium whom they suspected of supplying weaponry to Amedy Coulibaly, killer of four people at a Paris Jewish grocery after the Charlie Hebdo attack. After the violence in Verviers, La Meuse newspaper quoted an unidentified police officer saying: "We've averted a Belgian Charlie Hebdo."

16 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Prepare for more by HBI · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They'll keep doing it till they're kept so busy at home that they don't have time for this foreign adventurism. It's an asymmetric war. You can choose to ignore it and the murders, or you can fight it. Staying neutral isn't an option.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Prepare for more by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but the real war won't be won on the battlefield any more than the war against the Soviets was won on the battlefield.

      It all depends on what kind of battlefield warfare you're willing to fight.

      The TV news friendly, politically popular war where we're real careful about the destruction we cause and the collateral damage and winning hearts and minds is a sure loser.

      Scorched earth total warfare where you ring a population center and utterly bomb it to rubble without any consideration for civilians is winnable. You win a war by utterly destroying your enemies ability AND their will to fight. And you do by inflicting massive death and destruction.

      The of the firebombing of Tokyo and the A-bomb strikes. The Japanese were infamous for fighting to the last man and never surrendering. Once we demonstrated the ability and willingness to just level cities until they capitulated, they capitulated. The alternative was not capitulating and risking the reduction of the Japanese nation to the same footnote status of Carthage.

      How do you think Julius Ceasar won the Gallic campaign? By building roads and schools and promising H1-B visas? You were given an offer to disarm and pledge allegiance to Rome. Your alternative was to have your people killed, your treasure seized and anyone left standing sold into slavery or crucified.

      No, it is not nice in any sense of the word. It is utter brutality and bloodshed. Which is why we should never, ever get into these conflicts unless we're willing to do what successful armies for centuries have done to actually conquer a people.

    2. Re:Prepare for more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I have to agree in this conflict, bombing is too inefficient and costly. A bullet (or several) to the head is much more personal. Still, it was disturbing to hear the Pope speak on the wrong side of this issue. This is the same guy that is issueing an encyclia on global warming. He should probably pray more and talk less. His statements don't seem to be inspired by deep spiritual insight, rather, they seem deeply involved in worldly matters which simply do not inspire me. This is nuts! You've got Popes quitting on God like the last guy. Believe me, we need someone to convince us that eradicating muslims from the planet is wrong, not someone that is fighting with Obama for title of the most traitorous leader of his people! Anyway at least 2 more thug muslims went to heaven today, and that's a win-win as the liberal socialist fucktards say.

    3. Re:Prepare for more by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is actually a difference between a normal Muslim who has his religion and wants to live his everyday life and an Islamist nutjob hellbent on screwing up the country he lives in.

      To give you an example you might understand, think of it like some everyday Christian vs. the Westboro Baptist loonies.

      So has the Westboro Baptist lopped off anyone's head because they were the wrong version of Christianity or didn't convert to their looniness? Very very few Christian terrorists, Northern Irland has some kooks, but otherwise, I wouldn't mind being filled in on the multitudes of Christians bringing down planes, bombing churches, removing peoples heads, or other fun stuff.

      As far as I know, there aren't a lot of Catholics strapping bombs to themselves, and chanting, "In the name of the Father, the Son, and the holy Ghost, amen.", detonating it on the end of "amen".

      There is no question that most Muslims are not terrorists. But it is denial of the most dangerous sort to deny that most terrorists are Muslim. You just have to decide whether you accept terrorism in the name of religion. You statement makes me believe you do.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Prepare for more by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are roughly 1.6 billion Muslims in the world but only 320 million Americans. There are five Muslims in the world for every one American. It's not clear that there would be any point to an all out war between the all the Muslims of the world and the USA (i.e. both sides would lose far more than they could hope to gain). But it's also far from clear that the USA could win such a war with brutality alone. Most likely other countries would get involved and the outcome would be determined by which side could build the strongest alliances.

      Total warfare is an overarching military philosophy, it is not a specific campaign strategy.

      We speak of Islamic extremism, but most generally we experience a particular flavor of Arab-dominated Islamic extremism made possible right now by a handful of weak and failed Arab states, bounded by Lebanon on the North and West, Syria and Northern Iraq in the Center and Yemen in the South. Arab states with functioning governments and effective central control have little problems with jihadis, they are treated as an internal problem.

      Imposing order on these areas would vastly minimize the breeding ground for this kind of terrorism.

  2. How many attacks will it take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems like ISIS has effectively declared war on the US and Europe. How many attacks like the ones in France, and how many thwarted attacks like the ones discussed here, will it take before we decide to load up and actually take them out? This is different than the last two Iraq wars, and different than Afghanistan. Does anyone know what we are actually waiting for? Is it because there is no oil, or not enough public outrage? Are we waiting for another catastrophic attack to justify our actions? Why are we not taking them out now?

    1. Re:How many attacks will it take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Europe is doing the same Chamberlain-esque tactics that they did when Germany rose to power in the 1930s. However, instead of land, it is "maybe, we shouldn't 'blasphemy'", which is turning into "maybe we need to pass laws punishing those to speak bad about Islam or else we get bombed". Europe has done nothing to stop ISIS, and in fact has condoned, if not starting to actively recognize IS as a sovereign state.

      Well, not all of Europe. France has had the willpower to stabilize Libya and try to do something in the Middle East while the rest of the continent has been happy to surrender to the religious zealots. France also has had the gumption to say "no" to burqas. Of course, this is why France gets targeted. People may joke about "surrender monkeys", but they step forward while the rest of Europe kneels. Some of the Scandinavian nations refuse to have minarets put up and resist having another foreign violent culture overrun them.

      I am not surprised that IS's propaganda showed Europe under their flag in two years. Hell, it seems that the continent, except for a few holdout nations, will happily cede them the caliphate... just like how Czechoslovakia became Germany's.

  3. Major? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like Charlie Whosit major? We are so weak and pathetic. What was the toll? 10? 15? More people probably choked and died eating fast food that day. And thousands march supposedly to defend "freedom of speech" at the same time their leaders/legislators wish to take as much of it away as possible.

    Oh did anybody march in Nigeria this week? Last month? How many world "leaders" showed up there? More died as a result of terrorism there in the past month than probably in the past five years (if not quite a bit more) in Europe.

    Terrorism as existed for ages. To get wound up and bent out of shape the way people do now over a handful of deaths is insane and contributes to the continuation of the attacks.. If this is the best that Al or Bob Qaeda and ISIS can manage can't we all just give it a freakin rest? It is one thing to feel some sorrow for the families of those kiled but quite another for whole societies to change their principals and ways of life.

  4. How could this all happen? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't that what we're asking? How could this all happen? Why did those kids become radical jihadists? Do we have to be afraid of Islam now? Is there going to be another threat to the Occident from the Turkish raiders like in 1600s and 1700s? Should we kick all Muslims out? Or put them in camps to give them a chance to concentrate better? And anti-Islam organizations are forming already. In Germany, PEGIDA formed. Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West (it does work as an acronym in German, but PEATIOTW simply has no ring to it). And every right wing nutjob party left and right jumped up and cried that THEY are the REAL pegidiots. And everyone is wondering just why this all happens and what we can do now.

    Why, what, how?

    It's actually quite simple. And it's no wonder that it started in France. Europe has had a lot of immigration from Arab and Maghreb countries. Middle Europe more from Turkey, France more from North Africa. And those immigrants have two things in common: They're mostly Muslim, and they're treated like shit in the countries they went to. They were dumped into ghettos ... sorry, into certain areas that are suitable for them to settle in "so they can be among themselves", got shitty jobs nobody else wanted to do, get inferior payment to "good native" citizens, are looked down upon ... in a nutshell, they're second class citizens. If that.

    But, well, they didn't complain. As odd as it may sound, they didn't think this was wrong. They came here because, well, the situation at home was not too great and they were needed as workers. Yes, really. Back when most of these people came there was actually a shortage of laborers. People who'd clean our floors, empty our waste baskets, cleaned our yards and did all the other petty crap nobody wanted to do for the pennies offered. They were actually content with it, they looked back at their former home country and could at least say, hey, it's better than that shit! And our kids will one day be living here and they'll have it better. They were mostly accepting it with the prospect that their kids will be French/German/Austrian/Danish/Dutch/Belgian/yougettheidea, and then they'll no longer be second class but they'll be one of "the good natives". And while usually religious, they were hardly what we today would consider fundamentalists. They were Muslims, often quite devout, but not out to preach or even kill the Infidels.

    Well, time went on and the second generation came to be. They were born "here". They had no real ties to their parents' native country except that they'd maybe remember having family there, maybe even going there to visit Grandfather and Grandmother, along with the others that stayed. For the US people here, think of it as if your forefathers once came from Europe, say, after WW2, and you're visiting those relatives. Yes, sure, you remember that your family has ties there. But you feel like you're from the US, don't you? Well, these people feel like they should be French/German/..., but they cannot. To the French/German/... they're still "the African" and "the Turk". They're not "one of us". They're still "one of them". They still get only the crappy homes, can only get the crappy job, can still just get shitty payment and are still looked down as second class citizens.

    And that's something that's hard to digest. Because the message is clear: You'll never be one of us. That you're born here means jack. You're still the African to us. You're still the Turk to us. You're still second class. You will never belong here. And you can't even hope that your kids will.

    Now, for a moment think how you'd feel if the country you call home considers you "inferior" and a good portion of the people would just love to "send you back home", to a country you have no ties at all to. With a good chance that you don't even speak the language properly, if at all.

    You might understand that this does breed some contempt. And you

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:How could this all happen? by cheesybagel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're wrong if you think they cannot get jobs because of some ethnic connotation. Much like the blacks in America a lot of them do not have an education and do not want an education. For whatever reason none of these problems happen with Asians even though they aren't Europeans either. Guess why.

    2. Re:How could this all happen? by thesupraman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Could you please let me know which Govt Department I go to in France to apply for the location I am allowed to live in?
      I seem to be having trouble finding it - hell - last time I was there I just lived where I damn well wanted to and could afford..
      Lucky I wasnt tracked down, I assume the penalty for living in the wrong place ispretty damn severe!

      Oh, sorry, you mean you were talking figuratively, not literally? or some BS excuse like that?
      Do you realise that the rhetoric you are spouting here is almost EXACTLY from the playbook of pre-soviet communism?
      Didnt work out too well then either, for those who believed it.. unless you consider life under stalinist russia, or maoist
      china to have worked out well for minorities (and I DO suggest you go and find out what did happen to them..).

      In the end there is a certainly small percentge of ALL populations who will take up any excuse to do bad things.
      They are (some of) the rapists, the murderers, the arsonists, you get the idea...
      These particular ones just grabbed on a different excuse for their actions. Its not the voices in their heads, its not because
      society forced them to, its not to compensate for what their parents did to them, its to 'avenge their religion', and its about
      as BS as the other reasons - but these kinds of people will always find a reason.

      THAT is the important thing to remember. This is no more 'Islam' than the crusaders were 'Christian' (even less so as it is not
      state sponsored). It is the scumm of humanity doing what they have always done.

      And, unfrotunately, there is no law you can pass, no restructions you can place, no force you can empower to stop it.
      the best you can do is EDUCATE PEOPLE, and stop assuming that every nasty little arsehole is actually a wonderful
      person who just needs love and support to help them bloom. Some of them are just nasty little arseholes.

  5. To think, I used to be incredibly liberal by WarSpiteX · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Only 900,000 to go in Belgium.

    --


    I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
  6. Re:BAU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is there the fanatical demand that the GP not 'stop there'? When you have Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Shintos, Hindus, Taoists and others causing terror and other law & order problems, THEN it will make sense equating them with the others. Charlie Hebdo, for instance, insulted the 3 major religions, but did their staff ever get threatened, much less killed, by any Christian or Jewish fanatics? It was only the Muslims who threatened them and carried it out. Where are the Jewish or Catholic ghettos in Paris, which are no go zones for French police? Where are the churches or synagogues that instruct their sheeple on how to carry out a terror attack for $DEITY? Given all the events of the last 2 weeks, people are quite justified in directing their rage at just Muslims, and not other religious groups

  7. Solution? Import more Islamists into Europe ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After the carnage of World War II, Europe used to be a place where people, no matter if they are truly civilized or not, tried to behave with civility
     
    ... until the Europeans decided to "diverse" their society by importing the Islamists in

    With the Islamists came the bombings and killings and mayhems and intimidation and you know what the so-called 'European Leaders' wanna do ?

    Import even more Islamists into Europe !

    As though the cure for a cancer patient is to put even more cancerous cells inside the body

    Sooner or later Europe gonna be overwhelmed by the Islamists

    Sooner or later National Cathedrals will be replaced by National Mosque

    No more bikini, no more women's rights, no more diversity, for all must kow-tow to Allah, or have their heads cut off

    Congratulations, Europeans, for you have brought the troubles all onto yourselves !

    1. Re:Solution? Import more Islamists into Europe ! by hooiberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We have already municipal offices with separate counters for men and for women. Swimming pools and fitness centers with women-only-days (but men still have to pay the same for membership, while they are allowed less entry). Ha, even a swimming pool with separate dress booths for: men without children, women without children, men with sons, men with daughters, women with sons, women with daughters. And cases of violence of non-muslims against muslims is considered a terrible hate crime, but violence of muslims against non-muslims is considered fairly normal... Fortunately, the last politicians who have grown up in our hippie days are retiring, and hopefully we will have a more realistic outlook on politics in the years to come. Our left wing parties are growing smaller and smaller every election. There is hope.

  8. Re:BAU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a pretty good reason for Islam to be singled out. There have been close to 25,000 terror attacks since 9/11. It's the reason security clearances thru airports now involve removing shoes, belts, coats and putting them in baggage trays. Which other religious group has carried out relentless campaigns of terror and intimidation worldwide? When was the last time Jews flew planes into skyscrapers? When was the last time Christians issued death threats against newspapers or cartoonists? When was the last time Hindus went off on a religious war to Nepal, planning to return to the West to carry out terror attacks? When was the last time Buddhists made any part of any city ghettos that the city's police couldn't enter? But each of the above has been done by Muslims, and throughout the world - whether it's Jihadi attacks by Abu Sayyaf in Philippines, to last weeks rampage in Paris.

    It's one thing for a group of people to simply believe in an imaginary leader. It's quite another to try and make the imagined diktats of that leader the law for everybody, regardless of whether they believe in it or not.