Slashdot Mirror


Silicon Valley Security Experts Give 'Blackhat' a Thumbs-Up; Do You?

HughPickens.com writes Cade Metz writes that last week Parisa Tabriz, head of Google's Chrome security team, helped arrange an early screening of Michael Mann's Blackhat in San Francisco for 200-odd security specialists from Google, Facebook, Apple, Tesla, Twitter, Square, Cisco, and other parts of Silicon Valley's close-knit security community, and their response to the film was shockingly positive. "Judging from the screening Q&A—and the pointed ways this audience reacted during the screening—you could certainly argue Blackhat is the best hacking movie ever made," writes Metz. "Many info-sec specialists will tell you how much they like Sneakers—the 1992 film with Robert Redford, Sidney Poitier, Dan Ackroyd, Ben Kingsley, and River Phoenix—but few films have so closely hewed to info-sec reality as Mann's new movie, fashioned in his characteristic pseudo-documentary style." "Unlike others, this is a film about a real person, not a stereotype—a real guy with real problems thrust into a real situation," says Mark Abene. "The technology—and the disasters—in the film were real, or at least plausible.

Director Michael Mann worked closely with Kevin Poulsen in researching, writing, and shooting the film. Like Hemsworth's character, Poulsen spent time in prison for his hacking exploits, and Mann says his input was invaluable. "It's the first crime-thriller to hinge so heavily on hacking without becoming silly." says Poulson. "We put a lot of work into finding plausible ways that malware and hosting arrangements and all these other things could be used to advance the plot and all of that I think turned out pretty nice."
I'm a fan of Michael Mann, and the previews I've seen of Blackhat make it look at least like a passable thriller. For anyone who's seen the film already, what did you think?

98 comments

  1. There is only one hacker who can.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is only one hacker who can stop him and he is in jail.
    That is all I need to not see it.

    1. Re:There is only one hacker who can.. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I think it could work if they get the governor to arrange time that he can spend outside periodically as a quid pro quo, which ends with him eating his captors and escaping.

    2. Re:There is only one hacker who can.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's presented like that but it isn't the case. The movie explains it well, but it would ruin the plot. He isn't the only one that can save it

    3. Re:There is only one hacker who can.. by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      My guess is that he is the only one that they are willing to hang out as bait and get wasted so they can identify their target without any down-side of somebody else caring what happens to him

      A lamb staked out to draw in the wolves

      I'll probably wait to watch it on netfix in a few years, no rush to see it on the big screen

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    4. Re:There is only one hacker who can.. by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Well, there is precedent -- wasn't the title "The Dirty Dozen"? Convicts just have to Save The Free World to earn their freedom, plus explosions.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  2. Hellooooo is anybody home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A. It's me! Timothy, your editor at Slashdot.

    Q. (pause)

    Q. Is Anyone else home?

    1. Re:Hellooooo is anybody home? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      For a while there were zero comments and a little box that said "This discussion has been archived." Of course, the little box was partially unreadable because of the broken css, but you get my point.

      As for the movie, if it's as "accurate" as Argo, then it's two thumbs down.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Hellooooo is anybody home? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      For a while there were zero comments and a little box that said "This discussion has been archived." Of course, the little box was partially unreadable because of the broken css, but you get my point.

      As for the movie, if it's as "accurate" as Argo, then it's two thumbs down.

      Hollywood is unable to present an accurate portrayal of actors, directors, and screenwriters let alone hackers.
      The question is not if it is accurate (Chris Hemsworth as a hacker? Get real. Any accuracy in this film is almost certainly accidental.) but if it is an entertaining film.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    3. Re:Hellooooo is anybody home? by HughPickens.com · · Score: 1

      For the first half hour after the story went up, when you clicked on "Read," you couldn't leave comments. i was going to send an email but then it went good.

    4. Re:Hellooooo is anybody home? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      TFS asked for comments from people who have seen the movie... maybe nobody has seen the movie.
      It's clear that you haven't seen the movie and from your comment it's clear why they asked for comments from people who have seen the movie.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:Hellooooo is anybody home? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Doesn't explain why people couldn't post, or the erroneous presence of "This discussion is archived".

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re: Hellooooo is anybody home? by jakesyl · · Score: 1

      Say what you will, but Argo was a good movie and it got most of the important points right. Except for that little chasing the airplane in a jeep at the end it wasn't bad

  3. Close knit? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    Since when was the security community close knit?

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re: Close knit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A long time.

  4. turned out pretty nice by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Nice? NICE??!

    Linus would hate it

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  5. Completely believable! by khasim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thor is in jail because he's a hacker. But the bad guys are doing bad things and Thor is the only one who can stop them.

    So people who want to help Thor stop the bad guys get Thor out of jail.

    And a really hot Asian woman falls in love with Thor.

    And Thor and the Asian woman race around the world fighting the bad guys. Literally fighting. Thor kicks physical ass. And he has a hot Asian girlfriend.

    No "restore from backup" or "patch your servers" or "fix your firewall's DMZ". This is REAL hacking.

    1. Re:Completely believable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know, I was gonna point out the serous lack of pasty-faced basement dweller Chris Hemsworth portrays simply by breathing, but yeah, your comment is much better.

      Still...so many "black hat" hackers spend 3-5 hours a day working out you know. *rolleyes*

    2. Re:Completely believable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd pay as much as five British pounds to see that. Six if the hot Asian woman gets her norks out.

    3. Re:Completely believable! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Loved CB's comments!

    4. Re: Completely believable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to workout for three hours a day to build muscles.... An hour 3 times a week will do the trick.

    5. Re:Completely believable! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      And Thor and the Asian woman race around the world fighting the bad guys. Literally fighting. Thor kicks physical ass.

      Well, yeah. What did you expect? I can't speak for you, but that certainly describes my job pretty well - and I'm just a web developer.

      I remember my first day at work. They showed me my office, then they said "here is your hot Asian girlfriend". I explained I was married, but it seemed to be a requirement.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Completely believable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm just a web developer

      You got robbed, dude.

      As a sysadmin, I was given my own plane of existence and a giant world-tree eating serpent to look after/play with on my breaks.

    7. Re:Completely believable! by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      "Inspector Dreyfuss, your wife is on the other line."

    8. Re:Completely believable! by schnell · · Score: 5, Funny

      a.k.a. "NEWS FLASH: Pasty Mountain Dew-Swilling Nerds Praise Film Where Handsome Badass Pretends To Do Their Job While Things Blow Up."

      Hell, if they made a movie called "The Product Manager" and it was Chris Pine seducing inexplicably hot KPI project manager analysts, engaging in high-speed car chases with developers throwing ninja stars and screaming "put this in your requirements document!" and muttering catchphrases like "Oh, it will ship all right. But you can download it in HELL!" while he walks away from explosions, I'd say "yeah, that is exactly like my job."

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    9. Re:Completely believable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, except that I am in cybersecurity and they also gave me a white hat.

    10. Re: Completely believable! by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2

      In my experience, an hour three times a week will carry you for a month or two and then all progress will stop no matter how hard you push during those three hours. To go further, you need a higher volume of work - or maybe anabolic steroids.

      The reason people in boot camp, people in prison, and personal trainers get into great shape isn't an hour of hard work here or there and days of rest. Instead they have work, rest, work, rest, work rest throughout the day for days at a time. The soldiers work that way because they have instructors breathing down their necks, the prisoners work that way because they're totally bored and doing another sets of pushups, pullups, and burpees is just a way to pass the time, and the trainers work that way because they keep demonstrating exercises and moving weights in position and leading exercise classes and working out to kill time between clients.

      Trying to tell John Q Public he can look like Chris Hemsworth on three hours of work a week is a marketing gimmick for people trying to sell exercise DVDs, fitness magazines, and gym memberships. If they said, "You can look like this with just three moderate workouts per day, six days per week!" they couldn't pay rent.

    11. Re:Completely believable! by antdude · · Score: 1

      Which employer was this? :P I'll need a new job soon since I'll be laid off. D:

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    12. Re: Completely believable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the science that shows we don't need to work out an arbitray number of times per week doing a completely made up number of sets and reps per exercise. Check out HIT, basically one set, low reps, once every 5-21 days gives you decent gains. The highest difference shown was a study showing 3x a week is barely 50% better, most is around 30% gains for so much extra effort.

    13. Re:Completely believable! by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      My favorite is Grandma's Boy where the aging dweeb bangs the hot management consultant would would have had him riffed in real life

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    14. Re: Completely believable! by DuckDodgers · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm aware of the studies. I've read and applied Beyond Brawn by Stuart McRobert, just about half the books by Ellington Darden, the Nautilus Bulletins by Arthur Jones, Heavy Duty 2 by Mike Mentzer, every article at Cyberpump (back when all of the site content was free), Power Factor Training by John Little and Pete Sisco, articles by Doug McGuff and Drew Baye, and even the Power of 10 by Adam Zickerman and Super Slow: The Ultimate Exercise Protocol by Ken Hutchins. I've also read the fitness research paper published in the June 2004 edition of the Journal of Exercise Physiology online. I've worked out as often as every other day to as infrequently as once every three weeks. I've done routines with full body single set circuits at each workout. I've also done routines with different muscle group splits. I've trained to concentric failure, to static failure, and even occasionally to eccentric failure. All that from 1996 to 2014 and in all cases the gains stopped after the first few weeks and plateaued for months until I quit and started over.

      The only thing great about HIT is that it's easier on the joints. When I do higher volume work I tend to develop joint pain, and of course in the long run it's better to have barely-better-than-untrained muscles and healthy joints than strong muscles and damaged joints.

      Strength training studies are problematic. A trainee can hold back at the initial strength test, thus giving false gains at the end of the study. The trainees can do additional workouts outside of the supervision of the study supervisors. Study participants can be using steroids. Perhaps worst of all, regaining muscle mass you formerly possessed tends to be much faster than gaining new muscle mass. ( There are several studies that document this. One such link: http://www.thinkmuscle.com/art... ) Most workout studies don't control for the influence of this factor on outcomes or try to control for it but only rely upon word-of-mouth of the study participants, which is unreliable. So if you conduct a strength study and your random assignment of subjects puts five people that each used to have twenty more pounds of muscle mass in one group, they're going to make much greater gains in a shorter time than other subjects in the same group, and skew your results. If you're familiar with Arthur Jones' "Colorado Experiment", the two research subjects had both gained and then lost over thirty pounds of muscle in the years before the experiment. So the fact that they made massive gains on HIT doesn't mean anything for trainees that had never previously had thirty additional pounds of muscle.

    15. Re: Completely believable! by jakesyl · · Score: 1

      Ahhh Hollywood

  6. Lemme see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No really, let me see. Where's the download link?

  7. Real, real, real... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Unlike others, this is a film about a real person, not a stereotype—a real guy with real problems thrust into a real situation," says Mark Abene. "The technology—and the disasters—in the film were real, or at least plausible.

    Where have I head this before? Oh right - Blackhat is the Interstellar of info-sec terrorism films - sigh

    And the "bad guy" is able to reach "anyone" , "anywhere" , "anytime" - wow, how does he bridge the air-gap for all those disconnected networks? He must have one of those four-dimensional "tesseract" library thingys.

    Director Michael Mann worked closely with Kevin Poulsen in researching, writing, and shooting the film. Like Hemsworth's character, Poulsen spent time in prison for his hacking exploits, and Mann says his input was invaluable.

    Checking out the photo of Kevin Poulsen on Wikipedia, he must be thrilled to have Chris Hemsworth playing him and "us" - seriously how many hackers (elite or otherwise) look like Chris, are firearms experts and, apparently, ninjas? I didn't realize, until just this moment, how physical hacking could be.

    Well as long as the security geeks in Silicon Valley (and their egos) liked it, the critics at Rotten Tomatoes that gave it a 31% *must* be wrong. I'll wait to see this on Amazon Prime or Netflix ...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Real, real, real... by chill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I know several that are gun nuts and are pretty damn accurate with firearms. Mostly when aiming at defenseless, motionless, bloodless targets, but still...

      Geeks and guns is a popular thing, at least in the U.S.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Real, real, real... by sgt_doom · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quite a few Feng Shui experts in IT. Is Feng Shui deadly?

    3. Re:Real, real, real... by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Where have I head this before? Oh right - Blackhat is the Interstellar of info-sec terrorism films - sigh

      Interesting analogy, because the "accuracy" in Interstellar actually was somewhat distracting to me because it made the areas that weren't accurate stand out more.

      OK, so there are magic space aliens driving the plot at some point. That I didn't have a problem with. Magic space aliens doing magic, whatever, it drives the movie, willful suspension of disbelief and all that.

      Infinite fuel space-planes and the magical spaceship that somehow carried enough supplies for a multi-year mission while looking way too small to do that, on the other hand - those annoyed me. If they hadn't gone for the "realistic" initial spaceship launch I probably could have binned those into the "magic space aliens" "suspension of disbelief" category and just ignored them, but when you go for "realism" you need to go for "realism" everywhere.

      Sounds like it's the same with this movie. OK, so the hacking is super realistic, great. Too bad the rest of the movie isn't, making the contrast just that much more jarring.

      (That being said, I enjoyed Interstellar. It's a good movie. The science stuff is still a bit bogus, but the core movie is good. Sounds like the same can't be said for Blackhat based on the reviews I've seen.)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    4. Re:Real, real, real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking out the photo of Kevin Poulsen on Wikipedia, he must be thrilled to have Chris Hemsworth playing him and "us" - seriously how many hackers (elite or otherwise) look like Chris, are firearms experts and, apparently, ninjas? I didn't realize, until just this moment, how physical hacking could be.

      But is Chris Hemsworth a rock star? Isn't that the number one requirement in INFOSEC job listings these days? Oh and a US citizen capable of obtaining TS/SCI clearance too boot.

    5. Re:Real, real, real... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      For the physical fitness - but nothing else - you can assume the guy got into great physical condition after going to prison. According to my cousin the prison guard, a lot of prisoners get into great shape - they have nothing to do all day, so exercising around the clock is just a way to pass the time.

    6. Re:Real, real, real... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes but the very funny thing is many of those "survivalist" gun nuts still couldn't cope in places where 14 year old boy scouts go camping for fun. I suggest more hiking and less playing with guns, and maybe get obsessed with climbing or some other technical stuff that's less of an armchair hobby than guns.

    7. Re:Real, real, real... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Infinite fuel space-planes and the magical spaceship that somehow carried enough supplies for a multi-year mission

      That's something that even movies like "The Black Hole" didn't mess up. The crew may not be large in the older movies but the ships are - plenty of room to stow whatever a plot needs. The practicality of building big shit in space is another story.

    8. Re:Real, real, real... by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Movie isn't out yet. If 200 security experts said that it's fairly accurate, can you at least *wait* to judge it?

      And yes, it makes sense there would be physical fighting.Virtual altercations often become physical.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    9. Re:Real, real, real... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Movie isn't out yet. If 200 security experts said that it's fairly accurate, can you at least *wait* to judge it?

      And yes, it makes sense there would be physical fighting.Virtual altercations often become physical.

      I seriously doubt *any* of those 200 security experts have flown off to Hong Kong with a glock and hot Asian chick strapped to their sides and ninja'd their way through a bunch of bad guys - though I'm sure they've dreamed about doing that.

      Furthermore, only Hollywood would have the must-have elite hacker be Chris Hemsworth. Don't get me wrong, I like Chris, in roles where speaking and the ability to convincingly portray highly technical knowledge isn't important, but if one is going the action-movie route, it would be much more interesting to have the character be a "regular guy" - actually like Kevin Poulsen - thrown into an exceptional situation like this, rather than watch Thor run around saving the day yet again.

      I stand by my preemptive review (and the 31% review on Rotten Tomatoes).

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  8. nope by wbr1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    No matter how good, I won't pay Hollywood or the mpaa. Period.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct answer. Thread closed.

  9. Good looking hacker who can run up flght of stairs by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    without getting winded? You call that believable? :)

  10. Not the hockey-stick guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The directory appears to be Michael Mann, not Michael Mann. As I've never heard of the former before, that had me confused for a while.

  11. Best hacker movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry Michael Mann, but the hacker movie that represented hacker culture best was the Swedish original The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo".

    1. Re:Best hacker movie? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with that!

    2. Re:Best hacker movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, No.......

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105435/

      That is the best black\white\grey hat (covers phreaking, social engineering, cryptography, co-intel and politics) representation in film.

    3. Re:Best hacker movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on! The hacking was ridiculous!

  12. dem haxx0rz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thumbz up from all teh hatwearers in teh computer security industry.

  13. Biz as usual . . . by sgt_doom · · Score: 0

    I guess this just means we still have quite a few fuckwits in the IT Security arena (Exception: Chris S.).

  14. Is this movie a comedy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cuz, according to TFA, it seems the "experts" spent a good bit of the movie laughing at some of the dialog and characterizations of NSA types. Generally, I don't think that the audience reaction that a filmmaker is looking for to a crime thriller.

  15. Re:Oh look by timothy · · Score: 1

    Advertisement? Nah.

    There are ads on Slashdot (they're easy to spot, and they are what keep the lights on), but Nah -- this is just a topic of interest. Or, if there's a conspiracy of the kind you'd like, no one is in on it, which means ... there isn't ;)

    But perhaps if this were a Michael Mann film, there would be.

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  16. Hell Yes by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is Feng Shui deadly?

    If you angle a mirror wrong it will FUCK UP someone walking into the space.

    Not to mention that just one of the precepts of Feng Shui is that you not sit with your back to any openings in a room. They say it's for "good energy" but really it's so you can gun down every motherfucker that comes for you before they even see your face.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Hell Yes by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      They say it's for "good energy" but really it's so you can gun down every motherfucker that comes for you before they even see your face.

      I have no words. That is just gold.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:Hell Yes by Freebirth+Toad · · Score: 1

      Is Feng Shui deadly?
      If you angle a mirror wrong it will FUCK UP someone walking into the space.

      Not to mention that just one of the precepts of Feng Shui is that you not sit with your back to any openings in a room. They say it's for "good energy" but really it's so you can gun down every motherfucker that comes for you before they even see your face.

      It's a deadly martial art.

  17. Awful. Insulted my intelligence. by rjh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Terrible. It insulted my intelligence at every opportunity. To pick just three:

    1. A hard drive that's been at Ground Zero of a Chernobyl-level event, exposed to hundreds of sieverts of ionizing radiation, extraordinary extremes of temperature, a hydrogen-oxygen explosion with such tremendous overpressure that it blew the containment dome, and seawater pumped through the building as a last-ditch effort at cooling the core, is still somehow so readable that it just requires a classified forensics program to recover it fully.
    2. The main bad guy's ultimate plan involves speculating on the future of a commodity that isn't exactly rare.
    3. Targeting nuclear reactors in the U.S. and China as a practice run for the real attack is pretty stupid, as the practice run is so devastating that it guarantees an immediate and vigorous reaction from two world-power countries known to have active cyberwarfare programs, thereby announcing your presence to exactly the people you want to keep completely in the dark

    This movie insulted my intelligence at every turn. I have a long (and spoilerific) list of all the what-the no-they-didn't good-Christ moments I saw in the movie; if there's interest I'll post them here.

    1. Re:Awful. Insulted my intelligence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Trailers didn't look so good, and your confirmation is all that's needed. It's a pass. Spoilers not necessary.

    2. Re:Awful. Insulted my intelligence. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Mann was on Charlie Rose last night. It was interesting listening to them talk about this kind of stuff, but it did sort of feel contrived. I mean, I love Charlie Rose and all, and some of his interviews are incredibly good, but this felt forced.

      They were talking about a scene where good guy gets the drop on bad guy amidst some sort of cultural festival. Bad guy whips out automatic weapon while there's a steady stream of people ignoring them and doing their cultural festival thing. Good guy has no automatic weapon but seems perfectly confident about having a gun pointed at him by someone that looks pretty scared. I'm just not buying it.

      The interview also had loads of praise for Mann as being so thorough and leaving no detail overlooked. Meh, I think he might have missed a few things.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    3. Re:Awful. Insulted my intelligence. by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1


      Saw the interview, too. I think there is a quid-pro-quo with Charlie Rose and Hollywood: He does a certain number of interviews with people who make less than stellar movies, shall we say, but that allows him to arrange interviews with people from Hollywood who might otherwise say no. I have don't problem with the trade and on occasion even the people involved with the movies no one is going to watch are interesting. Alec Baldwin actually talked about this during one interview. He said "Of course we (he and the other actors on the show) are making the rounds to promote the movie, but at least we like talking to you." Pretty open about what was going on, but this it was Alec Baldwin after all...

      There are two reasons I would like to see "Blackhat": The cinematography and Tang Wei. I'm curious to see how Tang Wei is in an American movie after she was blacklisted in China. She seems likes a capable actor so I would like to see her get new opportunities.

      As for Chris Hemsworth, I thought he was good in "Rush". The movie was quite enjoyable and had plenty of interesting technical details for the geek audience. Maybe Ron Howard will make a movie about hacking. I think he would do a good job of it.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    4. Re:Awful. Insulted my intelligence. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Maybe Ron Howard will make a movie about hacking. I think he would do a good job of it.

      Apollo 13 had plenty of good bits but the invented conflict in the crew showed that Ron Howard is a poor choice for director when you what something to approximate reality instead of being a fantasy.
      Unless someone from the documentary side of town gets involved it's going to be Indiana Jones with a keyboard fighting against both the bad guys and some internal traitor.

    5. Re:Awful. Insulted my intelligence. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I have a long (and spoilerific) list of all the what-the no-they-didn't good-Christ moments I saw in the movie; if there's interest I'll post them here.

      Certainly, if the list is entertaining.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Awful. Insulted my intelligence. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Apollo 13 had plenty of good bits but the invented conflict in the crew showed that Ron Howard is a poor choice for director when you what something to approximate reality instead of being a fantasy.

      And you know what? Creative license was taken throughout the movie including the use of composite characters (flight director was not a real person but a composite).

      The reason for this is it's a movie based on a real event. It's a movie, not a documentary, so there has to be certain creative license taken in order to produce something that works with the public.

      The conflict was invented to help move the action along because otherwise you have a rather boring movie - the trick is to do it in such a way that it's realistic (it COULD happen) and minor (so the people portrayed don't get tarred with that "reality").

      Titanic (you know the James Cameron film?) is the same thing - Rosa didn't exist at all, but was a nice plot device to move things along. Again, it was a fictional movie based on a real event, not a documentary.

      There are plenty of documentaries on Apollo 13 and Titanic, go see those if you want the facts. The movies themselves help present the stuff in a more entertaining (asses in seats) way but to accomplish it requires taking creative license.

    7. Re:Awful. Insulted my intelligence. by Pope · · Score: 1

      There are two reasons I would like to see "Blackhat": The cinematography and Tang Wei. I'm curious to see how Tang Wei is in an American movie after she was blacklisted in China. She seems likes a capable actor so I would like to see her get new opportunities.

      For the cinematography, it was decent for the most part. There's still something weird in both Blackhat and Public Enemies where there are a couple of hand-held shots that look like they were shot on cheap camcorders, and it's such a terrible contrast to how the rest of the movie looks. Also there are a few foot chase scenes that are hand-held and the picture just shakes too damn much.

      Tang Wei does a decent job in a pretty thankless role, IMO.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  18. Advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much does it cost for an advertisement like this?

  19. NSA BREACH by TheDarkener · · Score: 2

    In Trailer #2 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ), 1:52 ....HAHAHAHA

    Yeah, that's totally what happens. I mean, they say it's the most realistic hacker movie since Sneakers, but all I see is a bunch of cheezy CG and an overwhelming desire for the movie to portray hackers as either criminals or criminals-turned-nsa-helpie-people.

    Oh, but there's a bash prompt! That makes up for it, right?

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:NSA BREACH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a real trailer? WTF? Comments in what's probably supposed to look like compiled code? The best hacker movie is "Hackers", if you understand that the hacking scenes are visualizations of the mind set, not accurate depictions of the process. It has a reading of the hacker manifesto and references a shitload of script kiddie folklore. And look, it got tankers too!

    2. Re:NSA BREACH by tepples · · Score: 1

      WTF? Comments in what's probably supposed to look like compiled code?

      If it's more than just debugging symbols or Script Host introspection data, then there are plenty of comments in compiled code in Tetris Worlds for Game Boy Advance.

    3. Re:NSA BREACH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "//TODO Add check administrator privileges" (no terminating 0) amidst "binary" code. The rest of the file isn't any better.

  20. don't believe the hype by aepervius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1) still take a very good looking guy able to go into "action scene" mode as heroe (not to count all trope which comes with it rsp the female lead)

    2) the hacking is... Well as hollywoodian as ever

    3) the film villain reach is unebliavable and cartoonish

    4) it ends with ana ction scene.


    Let us get real a real hacker film would be boring for your average hollywood audience. But that does not excuse the rest above which is your average poor heroe trope full film with just "hacking" thin coated over.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  21. How can movie makers be so ignorant? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    NO ONE shown in the trailer seemed like anyone I've known who had technical knowledge. They ALL seemed like people who have made being cute the most important thing and maybe only thing in their lives.

    Also, what about EXPLOSIONS is supposed to make someone want to see a movie? Is the intention to recommend the movie to those who feel attracted to violence?

  22. The most accurate hacking movie currently out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Imitation Game, a ~true story about Alan Turing and how he hacked Enigma.

    That's the movie to watch--not this cheesy Blackhat flick.

  23. The elephant in the room... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't seen the actual movie myself, but the horrific mis-casting of the main protagonist wasn't the only thing that put me off this movie was when I saw the trailer. Basically the film begins with a hacker actually breaking into the control system of a Chinese nuclear power plant and literally blows it up and the plot summaries the movie revolves around catching those behind this.

    If you know how systems like this actually work, you'd know that not only are the control systems completely isolated from any outside networks, there's also at least one level of emergency failsafes to shut it down the reactor if it begins to heat up in a dangerous way. Mind you, these failsafes take a significant amount of effort to shut down. Even Soviet built reactors have these failsafes and the Chernobyl disaster had been avoided if these hadn't been turned off for the test that ended up going horribly wrong.

  24. Looks like a dud. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    Box Office Mojo reports that it took in $1.4 million on Friday, which puts it into eighth place, and it "could wind up with less than $4 million over the three-day weekend, which would be one of the worst debuts ever for a movie playing in at least 2,500 locations."

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:Looks like a dud. by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      It's a difficult genre, right? It would be very difficult to make a real film about hacking interesting or understandable to the average person. So you've got the difficult task of making it dramatic and understandable without turning it into cyber-fantasy.

    2. Re:Looks like a dud. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      So you've got the difficult task of making it dramatic and understandable without turning it into cyber-fantasy.

      I didn't mind "Hackers" where the excuse for the weird stuff was "that's no what they see on the computer screen, that's what they see in their heads". Of course that was stated afterwards in an interview and was not so clear in the actual film, where the cuts to complex computer graphics in no way matches the capability of the systems in use.

    3. Re:Looks like a dud. by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      I've heard that explanation before, but it always strikes me as a retcon made by people associated with the film once software professionals started lampooning it. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... )

    4. Re:Looks like a dud. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Could be a flimsy excuse after the fact, but it fits anyway.
      If you watch the movie as if it's a serious of music videos strung together with plot it works :)

  25. Pascal strings by tepples · · Score: 1

    That comment didn't have a $29 byte before it, did it? That'd be a length-prefixed literal string, which a lot of Pascal implementations and classic Mac OS used heavily.

    1. Re:Pascal strings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you have a look yourself? It's not like Youtube requires a subscription, is it?

  26. Great hacker film: "Track Down" (2000) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Track Down" (2000) ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Track_Down ) is a *dramatization* of Kevin Mitnik's hacking exploits. The film slightly intensifies some of the events, but all aspects of the film are plausible. I think this film might be the most realistic and comprehensive depiction of a typical elite hacker, including lifestyle, habits, activities, principles and motivations. This film is relatively low key, and almost resembles a journalistic documentary, but maintains the tension of the chase from beginning to end, with a few nice hacking thrills along the way. All characters are likeable, and hackers will like the excellent hacks and heckles against the establishment.

  27. Team Effort by ikhider · · Score: 2

    Generally, cracking (as opposed to hacking, which is a positive thing wherein one is clever with technology) is a team effort. I am skeptical of the notion of a "super cop", "super detective", "super computer cracker", "super soldier" or "super whatever". At some point, these super people need to sleep, urinate, defacate, eat, and so on. No one can stay on top of everything at all times. On top of that, no one acquires skill/knowledge in a vacuum, you need a community. Particularly when you are talking about specialized knowledge. So the idea of one person taking on an agressive collective is unrealistic. There has to be a lot of backing, both on the physical and tecnology sides with the same leves of exposure to danger. This provides a challenge to story telling in a film content because it is harder to have a character to relate to when you portray a group. However, if you want to depect these kinds of things in a realistic way, you need to highlight the importance of a team, a community, and a supportive environment. If you bring up any "cracker", you also need to bring her/his community into the picture. I saw the trailers, and it reminded me of Steven Segal/Van Damme film trailers--only the latter do it better. I would sooner believe JCVD as a super cracker than this thespian.

    --
    "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
  28. Land of the lone hero - Lord and serfs by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Remember that Hollywood pushes the "lone hero" idea really hard. The sort of thing where it's Lindberg alone who could cross that Atlantic, and not a similarly capable pilot with the same sort of team behind them. Great achievement, but represented not many notches short of deification for one and obscurity for the others, and set forth as a template for how team efforts have to be shown as really the work of a lone hero instead of just a damned good leader. The team has to vanish out of sight in case so they can't take any credit away from the hero.
    The lone hero can have servants, and they can be very capable, but without the hero they have no purpose in the story.

    It's a fun little fantasy but it reeks enough of old world aristocracy that the sheer volume of it would probably have Washington rolling in his grave.

    So Hollywood doesn't do teams much. Television is not quite so bad and many series have plot points where the hero goes to see the X guy and outsource the difficult task of X as part of catching the bad guys or whatever.

    Steven Segal/Van Damme film trailers--only the latter do it better

    They do - in those it's generally a set of tasks that require a specific narrow skillset over a short timeframe.
    Even that A-Team split the unlikely superskillmonster into several characters and it was not pretending to be anyway remotely near reality.

    1. Re:Land of the lone hero - Lord and serfs by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The Avengers, and most if not all of the recent Marvel movies, are a nice exception to the very common lazy "lone hero" plots. Even the Captain America movies get it right - despite revolving around one person it's teams that get the jobs done in those movies.

  29. What about "Hackers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in Hackers, they portrayed and referenced over 80 real-life hacking techniques or hacking lore (some friends and I watched it and counted, and we likely missed a couple). Starting right off with the lead character being a reference to Robert Morris, and moving on from there.

    Yeah, Dade Murphy (Jonny Lee Miller) has a thing for the hot chick Kate Burn (Angelina Jolie), but doesn't bang her in the movie. It probably has more of a realistic plot that Blackhat, given the recent hacks of Sony and revelations of Snowden.

  30. Land of the lone hero - Lord and serfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about The Avengers? It took all of them to defeat the bad guy. Well, except for the Hulk which threw Loki around like a rag dog (one of the funniest scenes in the movie, IMHO).

  31. Too blurry by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why don't you have a look yourself?

    Because it was too blurry for me to read at 480p.

    I followed the link to the trailer for Blackhat, but it was only 1 minute long and I couldn't seek in it. Then I realized it was showing the trailer for Blackhat as the advertisement before the full trailer for Blackhat (but why?), so I pressed Reload. I had to watch another ad because somehow YouTube couldn't save the fact that I had already watched an ad before that video, and it showed me another ad. And after skipping that ad, it would pause and play only audio whenever I would try to seek. I tried again later and it worked, kind of. At 1:45, all I saw on the screen was blur, not readable text. Even going up to 480p didn't make it exactly readable without squinting and puzzling out what each letter is.

    1. Re:Too blurry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, there was no $29 in front of the comment text. And next time, youtube-dl.

  32. Team Effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another reason I think "Hackers" is a better hacking movie. Besides all the real-life hacking references, they had to work as a team to defeat the bad guy.

  33. Re: Oh look by Buck+Feta · · Score: 1

    I'm confused, timothy. Are you implying the only form of advertisements on /. are the served ads? Companies don't occasionally pay for articles about their products?

    --
    I am Audience.
  34. The Evil Plan didn't make any sense at all by tomwood2 · · Score: 1

    The one thing that drives a thriller is a plausible Evil Plan, so that part needs to be right. SPOILERS SPOILERS Evil Guy is able to directly manipulate the stock market to get $74 million in cash, but then sets up an elaborate plan to cause a catastrophe so he can bet on the futures market. Why doesn't he just keep manipulating the stock market directly? It was a fun enough ride as long as you don't tear yourself out of the story by letting your mind object to the implausibilities that keep stacking up. "Why did they get OUT of their car and just stand in the street to fire handguns at guys with machine guns?" "Because Thor needed motivation to make it personal." Bleah. I'm really tired of movies that murder innocents so the main character is motivated to do what he does.

  35. ...how much they like Sneakers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I try not to post, really I do. I watched Sneakers until the moment the characters went back to their offices after the heist. Yeah. Right. I'm going to climb into bed with the Government and Organized Crime, then after I shafted everyone I'm going to go home.

    I couldn't get to the off switch fast enough.

  36. Should have been a direct to video release. by mycroftxxxx · · Score: 1

    Meh, rarely pay ten bucks to see a movie nowdays, and this is why. The write-ups on this one caught my interest, but god it was awful. Long, boring, little to no tech involved. "Do you have an Android phone"? hehehe..., brief mentions of DD-WRT, Onion routing, Bluetooth gadgets. All in all it's an average "Made for Lifetime TV" movie. Idiots hyping this movie are obviously on someone's payroll.

  37. Yes, hackers can be action stars. Eric S Raymod is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I'm a bit late to prevent a flood of highly upvoted "Hackers can't do action stuff" comments... BUT:

    Eric S. Raymond.

    Gun nut. Sword fighting enthusiast. Martial arts practitioner. Author of Hacker's Dictionary, and one of the main OSS founders.

    http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6568