Slashdot Mirror


Cuba's Pending Tech Revolution

dcblogs writes The White House order last week lifting economic sanctions against Cuba specifically singles out technology, from telecommunication networks to consumer tech. There's much potential and many obstacles. Cuba has an educated population craving technology, but it has little income for new tech. The Cuban government wants to trade with the U.S., but is paranoid about the outside world and has limited Internet access to 5% to 10% of the population, at best. "The government has been very reluctant to have open Internet access," said Harley Shaiken, chairman of the Center for Latin American Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. But "there is real hunger for technology," and with the easing of the embargo, the government "will be facing new pressures," he said. The country needs a complete technology upgrade, including to its electric grid, and the money to finance these improvements. "Markets like Cuba, which will require a wholesale construction of new infrastructure, don't come along often, if ever," said Todd Thibodeaux, president and CEO of CompTIA, a tech industry trade group. "The flood of companies lining up to get in should be quite substantial," he said. Cuba has a population of about 11 million, about the same size as the Dominican Republic, which spends about $1 billion annually on technology and related services, according to IDC. But capital spending today on IT in Cuba may be no more than $200 million annually.

122 comments

  1. Did Congress pass a law? by HBI · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Didn't think so. That means the sanctions are still in effect...

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Informative

      As we know, there is quite a bit that the President can do without congress. As well, with the lifting of restrictions that are within the President's power, a "critical mass" for full lifting will build. Don't fool yourself, it will - and should - happen.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Did Congress pass a law? by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then Congress should pass that law ASAP. It's ridiculous, just like a child throwing a temper tantrum.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    3. Re:Did Congress pass a law? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Indeed, the parts of the sanctions that are required by law remain in effect. Congress did give the executive pretty broad discretion over parts of them, though, which is what Obama is using to modify the sanction regime (something previous presidents have also done, in both directions). Specifically the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA) authorizes exports to Cuba in certain areas, such as agriculture and medicine. The law directs the Treasury Department to come up with regulations governing such exports, such as procedures for receiving a permit, and/or annual quotas, but doesn't specify these procedures in any detail. The president therefore has quite a bit of leeway regarding whether he wants the export-licensing process to be easier or harder. A president who wanted to maximally restrict exports could institute a very onerous licensing process with low limits (effectively the current process), while a president who wanted to loosen the restrictions could institute a more streamlined licensing process.

    4. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by citizenr · · Score: 2

      As we know, there is quite a bit that the President can do without congress

      like close guantanamo for example ....

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    5. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As much as I like what's happening recently, I'm really troubled by the *way* it's happening.

      Eric holder just gutted civil forfeiture. That's a good move, should have been repealed 30 years ago, I'm all for it.

      Has anyone noticed that a single man who was not elected gets to pick-and-choose which laws he will enforce? Here's a man in the executive branch who decided unilaterally to dump an entire law. The legislature can pass or repeal laws, that's their job. The supreme court can bless or condemn laws, that's their job.

      But the executive branch?

      Can they just unilaterally pick and choose which laws(*) they will prosecute?

      Similarly, Obama told Holder awhile back not to pursue "Defense of marriage" cases. That's fine too, the law should never have been passed and should have been dumped long ago.

      Has anyone noticed that this was done by the executive branch all on its own, with no oversight?

      I'm troubled by this because everyone accepts the outcome because the results are so good. The ends justify the means in these cases, it's so good to get these laws off the books that we don't notice *how* they got repealed.

      To be specific, in the future we will see the executive branch gutting laws more often, and if people complain they will point to these good results and say "it's OK for us to do this now because no one complained when we did it previously".

      This is a troubling turn of events.

      (*) I'm making a distinction between pick-and-choose laws, as opposed to pick-and-choose cases, the latter of which is within the discretion of the prosecutor. Yes, there's line, and yes it can be abused.

    6. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me ask you a question from another direction, do you want individuals who stand

    7. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obama can close guantamo. He can't transfer prisoners. He can't get them trials on american soil.

      Congress didn't stop the closing of that base the govenors did by refusing transfer requests.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, messed up my post there.

      Let me ask you a question from another direction, do you want individuals who stand by their judgment and act on it, or ones who heedlessly follow orders and rules without consideration for them?

      Congress has ordered some stupid and foolish things, and expecting the executive branch to follow them, to even defend them on court, is a bit much. The Defense of Marriage Act was wrong. Clinton was a coward for signing it into law. No honest individual on any level of government should have cooperated with it.

      They should have been declining to follow it at all levels. That would show moral fortitude.

      Instead, we had an evil law obeyed because "Following the laws is more important than doing what is right" and that is also a troubling course of events. One that frightens me more.

      Though actually there is oversight. Congress could act. Unfortunately, the most prominent times it has done so have been more in the way of partisan gambits than anything in the way of justice. And the Supreme Court has dropped the ball a few times itself.

      (The forfeiture laws are a bit different, those are ones where the problem is more the method, and less the law. With the exception of marijuana in particular and others in some cases)

    9. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Has anyone noticed that this was done by the executive branch all on its own, with no oversight?

      No, the executive branch is the oversight. Congress wanted those people prosecuted, but the president acted as a check and prevented it from happening.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, how the DOJ operates is 100% backwards. They start at the end then work backwards to build a case.

      Why is that wrong? Do you remember being in school labs where they drill into you: 1) Gather data, then and only then 2) Make a hypothesis. Instead, the DOJ takes a political/marketing idea then works backwards to build a fraudulent prosecution. It's all a lie.

    11. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by Fencepost · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more that Congress stopped it by barring spending any money on transfers. So Obama could likely close Gitmo, but only by actually just closing it - take the fences down, leave the prisoners to their own devices.

      I'm pretty sure that's a level of "F*ck you" to Congress that he didn't want to get into, but maybe now.... After all, what are they going to do, stop cooperating with him? Attempt to roll back what's arguably his biggest domestic achievement?

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    12. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by fafalone · · Score: 2

      Eric holder just gutted civil forfeiture. That's a good move, should have been repealed 30 years ago, I'm all for it.

      I see you've fallen for the PR-spin version. The administration loves making it SEEM like they're reformers when they really did very little. What Holder actually did was limit the ability of state and local governments to seize assets under federal law, then later have a federal agency 'adopt' the seizure and take a percent cut under the 'equitable sharing' program. This is bypassed by simply categorizing something as a joint investigation and sticking some feds name on the papers. As if that wasn't a hole big enough to drive a truck through, there's also an exemption where the seizure 'protects public safety' where the feds may still adopt it (this was in the damn headline of the announcement on justice.gov)
      The bigger deal is that this is ultimately trivial, as it does nothing to stop seizures under state law. The yet even bigger than that deal is that STILL not a god damn thing has been done about the fact that seizures still require no criminal activity; they can (and do) seize property without ever even filing charges against the owner, who must now go to court and PROVE HE'S INNOCENT to get it back. Nor does it address highway patrols that seize any large amount of cash they find. That's right, when police find you with a lot of money, they'll take it and you'll have to pay for a lawyer to go to court and prove it's NOT drug money. Nothing in Holder's new policy even touches on any of this.
      Even with criminal activity... your kid got caught selling a little pot? The car you bought for him and your house are now subject to seizure under state law, and the new federal policy won't help you there either.

    13. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I seem to remember one US capital that is outside that legal requirement and when they wanted to legalise MJ the Republican led congress and senate sought to block it. It is pretty obvious Uncle Tom Obama the Choom gang coward only seeks to do many things when he is sure the Republicans will be able to block it, so nothing more than PR=B$ to try to keep gullible voters on side. So lets push net neutrality when they are sure that Republicans can block it. Next up it will be universal health care, whoops, the Republicans will block that too. The maverick Mcain was infamous for that only voting against legislation that he knew would win because he wanted to play at being the maverick for his gullible electorate. Even Fox not-News attacks are so laughable that it should be obvious by now they are just a masquerade that Obama can hide his corporate controlled conservatism behind. As for Guantanamo Bay exactly how big a bag of dicks does the US have to be to continue to force that upon the Cubans under threat of annihilation.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can they just unilaterally pick and choose which laws(*) they will prosecute?

      Yes, it's called checks and balances and it's the way the government was designed.

    15. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's unconstitutional for the president to refuse to enforce laws. That's kind of a good thing, because it gives him power to not prosecute whistleblowers, for example. Or if congress passes any other stupid, punitive law, it's one extra check that keeps people from losing their freedoms as a result.

      On the other hand, if Ted Cruz becomes president, things could get wildly crazy as a result of this precedent. "President Cruz has decreed he will not enforce laws requiring people to pay taxes, and pardons all tax cheats." Or some variation of that.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re:Did Congress pass a law? by HBI · · Score: 1

      Yup. Which can be almost immediately reversed by an incoming administration with differing objectives. As can the flood of EOs and regulatory actions going on lately.

      There's a reason why these things generally didn't happen in past administrations at the six plus year mark, and the reason why was that they didn't want to salt the fields for their party's next nominee and the assorted congressional candidates who'd have to run on this record. It appears the current occupant doesn't care about that.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    17. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Has anyone noticed that this was done by the executive branch all on its own, with no oversight?

      No, the executive branch is the oversight. Congress wanted those people prosecuted, but the president acted as a check and prevented it from happening.

      So, like he said, you think it's OK because you like the outcome.

    18. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So, like he said, you think it's OK because you like the outcome.

      No, I like the outcome, and I think it's OK because nothing happened.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      But the executive branch?

      Can they just unilaterally pick and choose which laws(*) they will prosecute?

      Thats how the law has always worked. Don't blame Obama, blame the founding fathers. (Not that they'll hear, being dead and all that)

      Similarly, Obama told Holder awhile back [google.com] not to pursue "Defense of marriage" cases. That's fine too, the law should never have been passed and should have been dumped long ago.

      Well within his legal rights, as envisioned by the founding fathers.

      Has anyone noticed that this was done by the executive branch all on its own, with no oversight?

      The whitehouse *IS* the oversight, as envisioned.

      I'm troubled by this because everyone accepts the outcome because the results are so good. The ends justify the means in these cases, it's so good to get these laws off the books that we don't notice *how* they got repealed.

      Why be troubled. The system is working as it was designed. Its not like Obama invented this, its how its been done since independence.

      To be specific, in the future we will see the executive branch gutting laws more often, and if people complain they will point to these good results and say "it's OK for us to do this now because no one complained when we did it previously".

      Why do you say that? Obama has done nothing here that every president before him hasn't done.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    20. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Has anyone noticed that this was done by the executive branch all on its own, with no oversight?

      Going from many of the comments in the place it's how a lot of Americans think their country is run anyway. "Why hasn't the President done X? Why hasn't he done Y?" ignores that there is a government and not a King.
      So since a lot of people are thinking they are run by a King already, well that makes it a whole lot easier for the executive branch to act like it is. The tea party dumbing down has backfired in a way that would horrify them. Be pretending they are opposing a harsh and all powerful King they have enabled him the act like one.

    21. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      if Ted Cruz becomes president

      Tricky, because if the oil price stays low he'll have to explain to a lot of Texans that have lost their jobs why he's personally in the pockets of those Saudis that caused to job losses.

    22. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      lol I hope it's tricky for more reasons than that. If Ted Cruz becomes president, the best I can hope for is entertainment.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re:Did Congress pass a law? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      their party's next nominee

      I gather there's not much lost between the Obama and Clinton camps...

    24. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      It's pretty funny, actually, for those of us with memory. When George Bush was in office the lefties screamed, howled, and wailed about how he was "shredding the constitution" with executive over reach. Then Obama gets in there, on promises he would do no such thing, and doubles down on damn near everything. And what are the lefties saying "Well, Obama has done nothing here that every president before him hasn't done"

      And when a Republican gets elected, the howling and screaming about executive over-reach will come back - within a day.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    25. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He cannot legally do these things... he is outside the law... just no one will stand up to him without fear of being labeled a racist and thereby ending their own careers.

      It should NOT happen! Cuba still has human rights violations that have not been addressed yet we are caving into their socialistic and communist ways. They win - we gave it away!

    26. Re:Did Congress pass a law? by HBI · · Score: 1
      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    27. Re: Did Congress pass a law? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      As we know, there is quite a bit that the President can do without congress. As well, with the lifting of restrictions that are within the President's power, a "critical mass" for full lifting will build. Don't fool yourself, it will - and should - happen.

      As far as I know, its only the USA that has that embargo. The rest of the world enjoys the beached of Cuba in the winter, and the superb education and healthcare system. Yes, the politics there has created poverty, but it would be dreamland to think that the standard of living would jump of the USA suddenly recognized a dying regime. There are always individuals who are being groomed to take over if the Castro brothers die.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. What Can Cuba Trade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that both tobacco and sugar are out of style, the country has problems.

    1. Re:What Can Cuba Trade? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      They have oil and tourism is still around.

    2. Re:What Can Cuba Trade? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What, rum doesn't get sold anymore? I'd be surprised to hear that.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:What Can Cuba Trade? by fizzer06 · · Score: 1
      From Wikipedia, who references CNN, Cuba derives $200 million a year from cigar sales.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_Cuba#Tobacco/

  3. Cuba should try to join the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's their only hope. They can't pay for tech with sugar and tobacco.

    1. Re:Cuba should try to join the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They should stay socialist.

      Wait for the impending collapse of US, and have fun with China!

  4. A great place to dump old hardware by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Okay, okay, not "dump", but we all know there's a lot of old hardware here which would be genuinely useful someplace like Cuba, where they're not yet jaded.

    The question is, how will they have a tech revolution without an open internet?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:A great place to dump old hardware by retroworks · · Score: 4, Informative

      In fact this is exactly what should and does happen. All the phone switching gear upgraded in the USA in the 70s and 80s set up Latin America, and Africa used 90s cell phone towers (and used phones). According to Digitimes in 2006, most of the display devices sold worldwide (in units, not in dollars) were "remanufactured" CRTs purchased from EU, Japan and USA and rebuilt with analog-to-digital converter boards. And most American teenagers learn to drive in a used car. Three billion people earning $3,000 per year were the "rapidly emerging markets" of the past two decades, and they make the "secondary market" for used tech worth several billion dollars per year. What's the mystery?

      --
      Gently reply
    2. Re:A great place to dump old hardware by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      The question is, how will they have a tech revolution without an open internet?

      I wonder if they seek advice from other countries besides US. I'm thinking of places like Bulgaria have faster internet service than most of US. Then there is the higher ups in Cuba, are they willing to delegate authority? Only big transition is from Fidel to his brother Raul. Cuba could easily do business with other countries in spite of US embargo, I heard Cuban govt is terrible at doing business with other countries.

      However, it will be interesting to see some Cubans wire up their 57 Chevy with internet access as JoeyRox suggested with various homebrew gadgets. At least many are mechanically creative like fabricating parts for these old cars.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    3. Re:A great place to dump old hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Cuba, tech 'revolution' means electric typewriters.

  5. Toothpaste by rikkards · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think they probably want decent toothpaste more than the latest iThingie. They love getting toothpaste as tips.

    1. Re:Toothpaste by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Why? Don't they have toothpaste in Cuba? I thought they were like a medical paradise.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Toothpaste by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      People-wise, perhaps. Supplies-wise, no.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Toothpaste by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, here in Venezuela we accept: USD, toothpaste, toilet paper, cooking oil, margarine/butter, diapers, coffee, sugar, flour, ketchup, shampoo, bath soap, detergent and quite a lot more, and that's with no embargo.

    4. Re:Toothpaste by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Venezuela has shortages because of price controls. That's a well-understood economic principle.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Toothpaste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Venezuela has shortages because of price controls. That's a well-understood economic principle.

      Price controls is a favoured policy of unorthodox (think populist) economic thinking.

    6. Re:Toothpaste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't just that. Venezuelan companies can make more money by purchasing dollars to import products and, instead of importing said products, selling those dollars on the black market. They really should drop the price controls though, not that it'd fix anything as the prices would be sky-high.

      What I don't get is why they don't use the oil dollars to invest in local industry instead of importing everything and hoping oil prices won't go down. Not that the current government is the only one to blame on this, as past governments did the same, but god damn it, the oil prices have always been manipulated so unless you're one of the manipulators you can't trust the price to not accidentally fuck you over eventually.

    7. Re:Toothpaste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, price controls are favored by people who think you can wish away the basic principles of economics.

    8. Re:Toothpaste by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Well, here in Venezuela we accept: USD, toothpaste, toilet paper, cooking oil, margarine/butter, diapers, coffee, sugar, flour, ketchup, shampoo, bath soap, detergent and quite a lot more, and that's with no embargo.

      Yep, that's the beauty of socialism. Sure makes tipping and barter easier.

      Oh wait, this is Slashdot. I should surround the word socialism with scare quotes, and act like it's crazy to believe that it even exists. Or has any negative effects.

    9. Re:Toothpaste by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      People-wise, perhaps. Supplies-wise, no.

      They don't do that well people wise either. Not because Cubans are stupid. It has more to do with their isolation. Their medical textbooks are probably so old that 'leeches' might be in the index.

      I don't think they really have access to post-revolution medical knowledge. It's not like they can go to pubmed or something. Owning a personal computer has actually been illegal there until quite recently. Only prostitutes and drug dealers could afford to buy one anyway.

      And look at things from the pov of a medical student. Even the cheapest paperback textbooks still usually cost like $30 USD. That's two months income for most Cubans or maybe the equivalent of a $3000 textbook to us.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    10. Re:Toothpaste by isilrion · · Score: 1

      I don't think they really have access to post-revolution medical knowledge.

      They have. If you can read spanish, take a look at this book, around page 293. If you can't read spanish, this the end of Castro's quote: "And our country adopted, in fact, the decision of abolishing intelectual property." This was decided in the context of ensuring that students and researchers had access to the literature.

      Not all cubans can afford or are allowed (embargo) to pay for modern books. But not all cubans have to: once the book is acquired, it can be photocopied legally... in fact, the government will photocopy the textbooks and loan them to the students "for free" (you pay only if you don't return them at the end of the school year).

      It's not like they can go to pubmed or something.

      Ironically... the cuban "ISP" with most home users, Infomed, was created to facilitate access to information to doctors and health professionals. Nearly every doctor can get a free dial-up account with Infomed. This includes retired doctors. I quoted "ISP" because they only give access to email and some whitelisted sites... pubmed is among them.

      (Source: I used to be an Infomed suscriber. I am not a doctor, but there are doctors in the family. They still use Infomed.)

  6. Cuba paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you call the Cuban governement paranoid, you need a new word for the american governement.

    Paai

  7. Don't know why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't understand why any company would line up to put their assets in Cuba where the Castro brothers will seize them like they did in 1960 to the tune of a billion dollars before the US put the embargo in place to stop it...

    1. Re:Don't know why... by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the contrary, they'll be falling all over themselves to do it. We'd be talking about property rights that are granted by the existing government, rather than a previous one that was overthrown in a revolution. Property exists when a government pledges to defend your exclusive interest in something, and in general it's not guaranteed to survive a successful revolution. Or are you one of those people who thinks that property rights are granted by God?

    2. Re:Don't know why... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why any company would line up to put their assets in Cuba where the Castro brothers will seize them like they did in 1960 to the tune of a billion dollars before the US put the embargo in place to stop it...

      That's the sort of thing that happens when you can route profits to yourself, but loses only go to shareholders (note that is true of most of us with stock in our companies: if the company makes a ton of money, your stock becomes valuable. If the company loses a lot of money, eh, you still get your salary. Which is why the silicon-valley startup industry is full of con-artists and liars).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Don't know why... by gizmo2199 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm still boggled how Western companies do business in countries like China and Vietnam, that have Communist governments. Wouldn't the government just seize all their assets?!

      Oh wait, no they don't...

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    4. Re:Don't know why... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Can the UK have its assets back the US government stole? And I'm not just talking about back in 1776.

    5. Re: Don't know why... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, things COULD change, but, so far, they haven't.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    6. Re:Don't know why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's at issue is that the present regime of kleptocrats does not respect property rights, as evidenced by their revolution.

    7. Re:Don't know why... by jodido · · Score: 2

      The embargo, which followed the nationalizations, of course didn't stop anything, which is why the US finally gave up. But more important, the Cuban government offered every property owner compensation based on the owner's valuation of the property for tax purposes in the previous year. You won't be surprised to hear that no one accepted. BTW it has been illegal for many years for any US firm to accept compensation from Cuba for nationalized property.

    8. Re:Don't know why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you even studied history, and what Batista was doing to the country? Sure the rich had property rights, and everyone else didn't have property.

    9. Re:Don't know why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether they respect property rights in principle is irrelevant. The only relevant thing is whether companies calculate that there is really a significant risk of the Cuban regime actually seizing their property.

      So far, they've proven that they're really quite willing to work with companies as long as their activities are helping to prop up their totalitarian regime.

    10. Re:Don't know why... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      So far, they've proven that they're really quite willing to work with companies as long as their activities are helping to prop up their totalitarian regime.

      Citation needed. Cubans themselves are not even allowed to own property. They cannot sell their houses for instance. They can only trade them for other houses and even then it's mostly illegal to do.

      IMO you'd have to be a total fucking moron to put any money into Cuba the way things are there now. The Cuban government would have no problem whatsoever just telling you to fuck off any time they feel like it. And no they wouldn't let you keep any of "your" stuff.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    11. Re:Don't know why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cubans CAN sell their houses. This is a recent development. Things are changing in Cuba.

  8. '57 Chevys with internet access would be neat by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Think the Cuban scene in "The Godfather" but with people watching YouTube videos of Taylor Swift as they ride around in their vintage cars.

  9. I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they show Cubans what capitalism has done, they might want to stay their current course.

  10. limited internet access in Cuba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point: I don't think I've visited any websites that are located on servers in Cuba. It will be interesting to see if the internet and other technical infrastructure/services (TV, Radio, Cell phone networks) will grow in the next few years. Slightly off topic: I wonder if tourists will flock to Cuba from planes or cruise ships too. I would comment more, but I don't want to start a big political debate.

    1. Re:limited internet access in Cuba by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Castro has been blogging. Website probably not located in Cuba, but it seems legit?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  11. I've worked with Cubans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not very nice people. I guess they're so used to screwing each other over for the limited resources they have, it's second nature to them to screw first or be screwed.

    They're also very emotional, be prepared to deal with men more emotional than western women.

    1. Re:I've worked with Cubans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't be worse than the bloody Eyeties. Can they?

    2. Re:I've worked with Cubans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Yes they can. You have no idea. First of all, they're pretentious. This is because they are poor and like to put on a show. They also like to pretend to have knowledge they don't really have.

      None of this is a problem if they would acknowledge it, but they won't, or even worse, can't.

      I've worked with Cuban electronics technicians. Sure, they're resourceful, but once you're in the West, there's not much point in spending hours trying to repair a problem that could have been solved in 5 minutes by simply buying a new part for 5$.

      Then there's the whole pretentious thing, they can't really explain how or why what they do works, they did it, it works, therefore that's all there is to it. Which is fine if you're repairing a washing machine for someone who lives in a dirt floor room. Not fine if you're trying to design something and want to learn about failures and how to prevent them. Since they don't actually understand what they're doing, they can't learn.

      But they're aggressive about it, and very vengeful. They'll interpret any criticism as a personal slight and hold on to that grudge like a drowning man hanging on to a 2x4 in the ocean.

  12. US Ego by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cuba is NOT about to make any big changes. At least not unless the man who has been busy trying to destroy this country by Executive Action decides to prop up the Communist Government at our expense. The idea that Cuba has been suffering from an isolationist policy imposed by the United States is bogus. We were (somewhat) cut off from Cuba by our government, but we are only one country. Canada and most of the rest of the world has still been trading with them. Sure, Cubans drive around old American cars from the 50's, but they keep them running and keep fueling them with imported gasoline. Other countries would be glad to sell them newer cars, it is just that when you have a communist mindset keeping the economy depressed, no one has the money to buy new modern expensive cars.

    Sure, they might sell Americans some cigars, although there has been a supply of them coming in through Canada already. They will not be selling us sugar, but not because of any real barrier. Rather because of a completely artificial barrier, Cubans who moved to Florida when Castro took power have gotten laws in place that impose such high tariffs on imported sugar that we can't import it, and we have higher prices on Sugar than the rest of the world, with all of that money going into the pockets of a few politically powerful Cubans in America who grow sugar and trickling down to the politicians they buy to keep the system in place.

    Cuba is going to see a little bump in tourism, at least while the novelty is still there, but it will not be that much or make a big impact, they already have tourism from the rest of the world and from Americans going there through Canada who show their American passports and ask that they not be stamped to avoid problems back home. We will still over pay for sugar compared to the rest of the world and have tariffs that keep us from importing it from Cuba.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:US Ego by willworkforbeer · · Score: 1

      A strategy of wide open free markets without barriers might give the people the power to effect change. Communism has, in the long run, a poor record of being favored by those with free market options. Maybe we've been going about this backwards, 'punishing' the few Communists leaders has instead hurt the populace. Launching an unending barrage of free market options might have brought those 'leaders' down more quickly.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    2. Re:US Ego by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Cuba is going to see a little bump in tourism, at least while the novelty is still there, but it will not be that much or make a big impact, they already have tourism from the rest of the world and from Americans going there through Canada who show their American passports and ask that they not be stamped to avoid problems back home.

      Going through Canada or Mexico, it takes longer to get to Cuba than it does to get to England. If flights go directly to Cuba, then it will be a few hour flight from New York to Cuba, something you can do in a weekend. Tourism from America will go way up, just like it was before the embargo.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:US Ego by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Maybe we've been going about this backwards, 'punishing' the few Communists leaders has instead hurt the populace.

      Not 'maybe'. It's intentional. Collective punishment is all the rage. It is the pretext behind and the result of all sanctions. Global bullies stealing lunch money. If the US really didn't like Castro, They would have done like they did in Chile, and the rest of Central America. This is a charade.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:US Ego by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      If flights go directly to Cuba, then it will be a few hour flight from New York to Cuba, something you can do in a weekend.

      It will devastate Mexico, especially since Mexico isn't so cheap anymore.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re: US Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, actually practicing something close to the actual tenets of Communism would work to fight the authoritarian states claiming to be Communist.

      Though China does seem to be taking a while.

    6. Re:US Ego by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Think so? Getting from California to Cuba will still be a pain. Tourists will still head there from the west coast.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:US Ego by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You're right. I should have specified Caribbean side, where pretty much everybody east of the Mississippi goes because of the embargo. Puerto Vallarta and Baja won't know the difference. The Pacific is an entirely different scene anyway.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re: US Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When I went to Cuba (I'm Canadian) years ago, they didn't even ask about the passport. Instead they had little pre cut slips of paper that they tucked in your passport and then stamped that, so when you left you could just toss the Cuban stamp. Honestly, what I'm noisy worried about for Cuba is that it will turn into a stale, de-cultured tourist trap like Mexico.

    9. Re:US Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is just that when you have a communist mindset keeping the economy depressed, no one has the money to buy new modern expensive cars.

      It wouldn't matter how much money a Cuban had because it's quite literally illegal for a private Cuban citizen to own any vehicle that wasn't registered before the revolution in 1959. That's why you never see a Cuban vehicle in private hands newer than the 1959 model year. Supposedly that's in the process of being changed, but change comes slowly in Cuba if it comes at all so I wouldn't hold my breath. In fact, Cubans take great care to preserve and nurture their vehicles as prized family heirlooms precisely because they're so valuable in a country where owning one makes such a huge difference in status and standard of living. In American and Europe the closest comparison would be a grand old house or country estate passed down through the generations in a well preserved state.

    10. Re:US Ego by dbIII · · Score: 1

      decides to prop up the Communist Government at our expense

      Why not? Republicans have been doing that by outsourcing to China haven't they? Who do you think gets most of the profits in China - little orphan Annie or Communist Party Officials?

    11. Re:US Ego by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      It will devastate Mexico, especially since Mexico isn't so cheap anymore.

      You may not be able to imagine going to Cancun for any reason other than a stopover on the way to Cuba, but believe it or not a lot of people really do vacation there. The flights are super cheap and it's warm and exotic and different from the US. With a pretty girl at my side I wouldn't mind spending some time in the Yucatan either. The food is way better than in Cuba at least.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  13. Investing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stories like this really make me wish I had the money to invest in... something. Just, some company out there that's poised to make the next cheap electronic widget that Cubans could buy and use. Doesn't matter what it is or does, as long as it's not harmful and it's something they want to buy a lot of.

    1. Re:Investing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, maybe you can buy their whole country for a handful of beads.

  14. Not to mention... by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Car collectors dribbling all over themselves, at the chance to get their hands on some vintage automobiles from the 50's through early 60's. From what I have read, the Cuban's have become pretty creative at making parts from scratch, for cars they cannot get parts for. I'm sure some of them will try to find their way over here, as vintage autobody/mechanics, since if they lifted the hood on a modern car, it would be like having the Wright Brothers, looking at a jet engine of today.

    1. Re:Not to mention... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

      I used to work for an after-market brake parts supplier. They had a full-line catalog: if you needed a master cylinder for a 55 Checker cab, they could sell you one. The sales and marketing guys used to have wet dreams about the day when Cuba would open up.

  15. How do I send my old computers to Cuba? by Theovon · · Score: 2

    I have some "old" computers that really aren't that old and are in fabulous condition. Is there an organization I can contact to send it to Cuba so that it ends up in the hands of people who would make good use of it (instead of one of those scams that makes it end up in a dump in China)?

    For that matter, I have other things like old clothes destined for the garage sale I could send there too. Seriously. I would feel good about sending clothes that no longer fit me (I lost weight) to people who would benefit.

    1. Re:How do I send my old computers to Cuba? by DaTrueDave · · Score: 1

      Good question. I have 4 computers sitting up in the attic that just need peripherals. They were good enough to game on, so they'll still be just fine for email/web surfing despite their age.

    2. Re:How do I send my old computers to Cuba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donate to people in your own country/state/neighborhood instead.

    3. Re:How do I send my old computers to Cuba? by isilrion · · Score: 1

      I second the AC above. (Replying to you so you get the notification). Donate them locally. A few computers or clothes wont make much difference and will probably not reach the intended target. Trying to get Customs to release computers is not fun, even if you have all the paperwork in order. Been there, wouldn't want to do that again.

      Now, if you plan on going to Cuba and have stuff you want to give away, by all means, carry extra clothes and a laptop. Check what you can bring in without paying extra and pay attention if they write down the details of the laptop (it may mean that they are going to fine you if you don't take it with you. I've never seen that, but I've heard stories). If you fly in to a small airport, most likely no one will bat an eye. Don't stay in a hotel, stay at a B&B (I hate the name tourists give them, "casas particulares"). Hopefully it will be obvious who will benefit the most from your gift. Just keep in mind that those who work with tourists (e.g., your hosts, bartenders, etc) are statistically better off than those who don't.

  16. The word is IMpending! Not pending. by monkeyzoo · · Score: 1

    Previously, one could have said that Cuba's tech revolution was stifled *pending* the lifting of sanctions, but now that that obstacle has been removed, the author means to say the revolution is now impending!

    Two letters; big difference.

  17. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear Sir/Madam

    This letter is not intended to to cause any embarrassment but just to contact your esteem self-following the knowledge of your high repute and trustworthiness.

    I am Huevo Ranchero,the son of the late Cuban Rum Minister who died on the 8th of June 1998.If you are conversant with world news,you would understand better,while I got your contacts through my personal research.

    You must have heard over the media reports and the Internet on the recovery of various huge sums of money deposited by my late father in different Banks and security firms abroad.

    I shall be grateful if you could receive this fund into your Bank account for safekeeping. This arrangement is known to you and my junior brother (Abbas) only. So I will deal directly with you.I am proposing a 20% share of the fund to you for your kind assistance.I shall provide for you all the documents of the fund deposit with the security firm, and raise a power of attorney to enable you claim and receive this fund into your bank account.

    etc...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  18. Re:Cuban people run, as fast as you can run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise your population will be enslaved like us.

    Maybe you'd like to move somewhere else, Mr Big Mouth? Don't let us get in your way.

  19. 200 Million? That's more than enough by KDiPietro · · Score: 1

    The entire country of Macedonia was connected in less than a year for about 2% of that $200,000,000. Through in open source cell phone infrastructure and Cuba could be pretty much fully connected quickly and cheaply - depending on what they are willing to accept for infrastructure.

    http://solutionscenter.nethope.org/case_studies/view/macedonia-connects

    http://www.wired.com/2015/01/diy-cellular-phone-networks-mexico/

  20. Re:Cuban people run, as fast as you can run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise your population will be enslaved like us.

    As if they weren't enslaved already...

  21. The bad news is, this means another million H-1Bs by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    The good news is, they're all Fortran programmers.

  22. Cuba can buy from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason Cuba doesn't have modern stuff, is because it doesn't have the money. I'm sure Cuba could have bought networking gear and computers from Chinese companies. Hell, it could buy CNG cars from Iran.

  23. high import taxe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tech boom won't happen.
    They want companies to go there and open factories and manufactures, won't happen. Because if it did, other dumb countries would look at it and think "well if Cuba did it, so can we!" and raise the import tax to the extreme in order to force manufacturers to open up shop there as well... in the end, what will happen is exactly what already did with Cuba and Nintendo, companies PULLING OUT of the entire country because it's just not viable.

  24. What can the U.S. do the rest of the world cannot? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The U.S. may have had an embargo with Cuba, the rest of the world did not. Consider just Canada alone, from which Cuba could have had any technology they wished.

    So what do people imagine will change with the U.S. embargo lifted? Change has to come from Cuban leadership, if at all..

    What is very telling is that the cuban community in Florida is really, really angry we are lifting the embargo - because all it does is empower the people that made Cuba what it is today.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. Re:What can the U.S. do the rest of the world cann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. may have had an embargo with Cuba, the rest of the world did not. Consider just Canada alone, from which Cuba could have had any technology they wished.

    So what do people imagine will change with the U.S. embargo lifted? Change has to come from Cuban leadership, if at all..

    What is very telling is that the cuban community in Florida is really, really angry we are lifting the embargo - because all it does is empower the people that made Cuba what it is today.

    The Miami Cubans are hypocrites and should be returned by the US government to the Cuban government immediately. But the politicians continue to placate the Miami Cuban lobbyists as they suckle at the government teat.

  26. Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this may mean the Americanization of Cuba, it's people, society, unique culture, and the inevitable absorption of its economy by U.S interests.

    1. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S aren't rescuing anyone, anywhere. The sanctions are what put Cuba in the place it is today. Is that by the way what killing many tens of thousands of innocent people after WW2 in countries you have no business in, is? Korea, Vietnam, the Middle East? To "rescue", "liberate" and "free"? You got your head in the sand, and you're willing to hate whoever your government tells you to hate, like a good American.

  27. nice multinationals by bigtreeman · · Score: 2

    Maybe some nice multinationals might come in and improve life for all those poor Cubans.
    Bring them into the new millennium of corporate servitude.

    --
    Go well
    1. Re:nice multinationals by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      They'd welcome it if it meant an improvement to their 50 cent per day salary. Would you bother to even show up for a shitty boring job that only paid 50 cents per 8 hour day? I don't think I would.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  28. Are you forgetting the fascists and communists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mao, and Pol Pot are at the top of the leaderboard for killing the human race.

  29. Re:What can the U.S. do the rest of the world cann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. may have had an embargo with Cuba, the rest of the world did not. Consider just Canada alone, from which Cuba could have had any technology they wished.

    Any Canadian-produced tech, yes. Unfortunately, there's no CanuckIntel, and American goods can only be sold or resold to friendly countries. If your company is caught violating the contract you're fucked, and any large sale will be found out.
    Furthermore, ships that stop in Cuban ports cannot stop in US ports for a certain amount of time. That means delivery prices go way up and they have fewer trading partners available.

    That isn't to say Cuba doesn't have computers and Windows. They do, but they must jump through hoops to get them.

  30. Re:What can the U.S. do the rest of the world cann by Microlith · · Score: 2

    Consider just Canada alone, from which Cuba could have had any technology they wished.

    Given they haven't gotten it, I suspect it's more complex than that! Part of it may be that companies that operate in violation of U.S. embargoes cannot do business in the U.S., thus making Cuba not worth their attention might be part of it.

    Change has to come from Cuban leadership, if at all.

    Indeed, when dealing with a regime on the wrong side of an embargo or blockade, it's always the one at the bottom of the power slope that is responsible, right?

    What is very telling is that the cuban community in Florida is really, really angry we are lifting the embargo - because all it does is empower the people that made Cuba what it is today.

    They're angry because their property was seized - but their kids don't generally care. On the other hand, the Cuban government released a bunch of political prisoners in the past week or two, which at least suggests that Raul and the party are at least cognizant of the changes coming down the pipe.

  31. Re:What can the U.S. do the rest of the world cann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadian companies that do business with Cuba would be punished by the Helms-Burton Act.

    Imagine you're a telecom. Which business would you rather have, the USA, or Cuba?

  32. Re:CUBA has a GAY NIGGER Fetish - Niggers fuck Cas by davidshenba · · Score: 1

    Homeopathy won't work for your mental illness... Try bloodletting!

  33. Re:What can the U.S. do the rest of the world cann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't they just buy it direct from the Chinks?

  34. Make Cuba a GNU land by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Maybe RMS could be sent there to head their tech revolution. Give Cubans Lemote computers loaded w/ GNewSense and all GNU applications, and have them use those for all their computing needs. In fact, create a Libre Linux derivative of GNewSense just for Cuba.

    Oh, and maybe start them off directly on IPv6, w/o even touching IPv4. The sanctions regime will then work, since the rest of the world is still mostly on IPv4, while Cuba can be on an IPv6-only network. That way, they won't be able to communicate w/ the outside world. Heck, it's a model that even the North Koreans could have used - they just need to patch Red Star Linux accordingly.

    1. Re:Make Cuba a GNU land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe RMS could be sent there to head their tech revolution. Give Cubans Lemote computers loaded w/ GNewSense and all GNU applications, and have them use those for all their computing needs. In fact, create a Libre Linux derivative of GNewSense just for Cuba.

      He already tried, unsuccessfully. He has a lot of followers (everyone was surprised that I managed to fill a theater on the night of february 14th, with just a few hours notice. I sent out the announcement, "stallman, tonight, at this place, RSVP", and a lot of people showed up with their dates). But, alas, there are too many powerful people that feels (sometimes rightly) that will become obsolete if they stop pirating microsoft software. Some times I wonder what would happen if Obama lifted the embargo and said "and now you have to start paying for software."

      Oh, and maybe start them off directly on IPv6, w/o even touching IPv4. The sanctions regime will then work, since the rest of the world is still mostly on IPv4, while Cuba can be on an IPv6-only network. That way, they won't be able to communicate w/ the outside world. Heck, it's a model that even the North Koreans could have used - they just need to patch Red Star Linux accordingly.

      Meh, tried that. Half of the recently bought but already obsolete equipment didn't have IPV6 support, I didn't want to tunnel IPV6 over IPV4 within my own subnets. Also, 10.0.0.0/8 has a lot of IPs and they don't have to learn anything new. And with NAT, you barely need a firewall, you just don't NAT the users you don't want accessing the net. Bonus points, you don't even need a DNS server!

  35. another ignorant and stupid journalist by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    Why is it that journalists don't feel the need to check facts when they write about Cuba? Nearly everything in the article is quite demonstrably wrong. Too many utterly ridiculous ideas that simply don't apply to Cuba to debunk every one.

    The only way Cuba is going to have a tech revolution is if somehow their incomes multiply by a factor of 100 sometime soon. I suppose that *could* happen if Raul dies and their government becomes pro-capitalist. That will be huge news if it ever happens, but the end of the US embargo just means lots of US tourists. It won't change anything else. It will just piss off the Canadians who are used to having the place practically to themselves.

    Just ending the US embargo isn't going to do shit. The US isn't the only country in the world with tech. Cuba has been importing technology from China (you know that place where everything is actually made) for decades. This idea that Cuba needs US goods is utter bullshit. They don't. Castro liked to blame the US embargo for his total lack of understanding of economics, but Cuban poverty has nothing to do with the stupid useless and senseless "embargo". Does the US even still make anything?

    Also Cubans are not any more educated than the people in other Latin American nations. If anything their education is of less value because they are so much more isolated from the rest of the world. When the rest of the world figures out something new it could be decades before that information trickles into Cuba.

    Cuba won't represent any sort of business opportunity until the government there stops actively preventing people from making money. The government seems highly offended by the idea of anyone making more than around a dollar a day which is what doctors tend to make there. Most people make about half that much. They can barely afford to buy food let alone whatever high tech gadget some ignorant American who's never spent any time there thinks they need/want.

    Since no one likes citing sources when talking about Cuba let me cite mine: I lived there for more than a year. If there is a country in the world that has more misinformation about it just accepted as truth by the rest of the world I don't know what it might be. The Cuban government propaganda arm does their job well. If only Soviet proganda workers had such an easy time. The rest of the world just accepts whatever the Cuban government tells them because of course the government has no reason to lie or exaggerate, right?

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    1. Re:another ignorant and stupid journalist by dablow · · Score: 1

      You make some valid points....especially the part where Canadians are used to having the place to ourselves looool.

      Canada, Spain, Russia are also big trading partners with Cuba. It's ironic going to buy Cuban souvenirs and noticing "Made in China" stickers loool....

  36. American's perception of Cuba.... by dablow · · Score: 1

    Always makes me laugh whenever I read an article about US-Cuba relations, more specifically how Americans think Cubans are...

    Been to Cuba at least 8 times now? Possibly more, don't recall.

    I can assure you Cubans have Internet access, laptops, iPads and iPhones.....

    Obviously this is more of a city and tourist area thing. The poorer farmers and villagers on the other hand might not have access to such luxuries.....However generally speaking they all seem to be familiar with the devices, their capabilities and their ability to use them. They are as present as any other developing nation I have visited. Other than their inability to buy original OEM parts for their aging fleet of American produced cars, you would not have known there was an embargo from the US for the past 50-60 years.

    The only thing the embargo seems to have accomplished is limit the ability of US based corporations to exploit Cubans. Canada, Spain and Russia where more than happy to jump in and fill that gap....

  37. So ridiculous by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

    Cuba has been trading with every other country except us and none of this has happened. The U.S. is SO FULL OF ITSELF thinking it's going to make a difference....

    --
    Murphy was an optimist
  38. Cuba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst thing for Cuba is to deal with USA in anyway will ruin their country

  39. Re:The bad news is, this means another million H-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try C#, that seems to be their favorite language of instruction nowdays. And Cubans don't need H-1Bs to work in the US.