Slashdot Mirror


Paris Terror Spurs Plan For Military Zones Around Nuclear Plants

mdsolar sends this report from Bloomberg: Lawmakers in France want to create military zones around its 58 atomic reactors to boost security after this month's Paris terror attacks and almost two dozen mystery drone flights over nuclear plants that have baffled authorities.

"There's a legal void that needs to be plugged," said Claude de Ganay, the opposition member of the National Assembly spearheading legislation to be considered by parliament on Feb. 5. The proposals would classify atomic energy sites as "highly sensitive military zones" under the control of the Ministry of Defense, according to an outline provided by de Ganay.

3 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sounds about reasonable for once... by Roodvlees · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The same can be said for any measure.
    The area around nuclear plants is already highly controlled.
    So activists always get stopped within it, they don't make it to the actual nuclear reactor.
    Changing that area into a military area just means it becomes illegal to fly over it and allow them to shoot those drones down.
    And maybe the activists will get more severe punishments for trying to breach.

    --
    Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
  2. Re:Sounds about reasonable for once... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Using the military for police is common outside the US. The US doesn't do it because the military is too high strung and trained to kill everything that moves to use as a police force. But elsewhere, it works out much better.

  3. Police by prefec2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fighting local terror is a police task. They are trained for that. They normally don't shoot people, they try to apprehend them. It would be a total disaster if we would think that we are on war with something. True the US is at war with all number of problems, like drugs, terror, violence you name it, but that is not a solving strategy. Beside the will of "security people" we should fight terrorists with good police work and we should address the core issues which trigger people to become terrorists. One key ingredient for radicalization (which is a requirement to become a terrorist of any kind) is a feeling of powerlessness and the feeling of lack of communication. The latter includes that nobody really listens to you. It is not enough when you are allowed to post or say anything, as long as no one is really engaging in a personal discussion (not debate) then there is no real communication in terms of the problems the people have. Also people get frustrated and angry, because what ever they do they are not getting anywhere. For instance in Germany or France it is harder to get an apprenticeship training position if you have a foreign name, especially if it sounds Turkish or Arabic. It is worse with small companies than with bigger ones and it is worse if you are male. In addition your school grades are similar effected (males) when you have a foreign name or if you have a name which is typical associated with low income (e.g. Kevin in Germany).