Slashdot Mirror


Behind the MOOC Harassment Charges That Stunned MIT

An anonymous reader writes: The complainant in a sexual harassment case has come forward and told her story about what happened when she was a student in a MOOC led by a rockstar professor. "It would take almost a year before Harbi, with the help of MIT’s investigators, said she came to understand that Lewin’s interest in her was not motivated by empathy, and that their first conversations included inappropriate language. Shortly after contacting her, Harbi said, Lewin quickly moved their friendship into uncomfortable territory, and she was pushed to participate in online sexual role-playing and send naked pictures and videos of herself."

52 of 376 comments (clear)

  1. Popcorn time! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Woo hoo!

    Another ahrassment thread. I'm here with a big bag of popcorn and ready to post.

    Wiggle out of this one, harassment denialists!

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:Popcorn time! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So you see nothing wrong with a professor using his status to obtain sexual favors?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Popcorn time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh get over it. It's just words.

      No, it is words from a person in authority whose job it was to help her, not take advantage of her.

      It isn't criminal, hence the reason the guy is not in jail. But it is not acceptable behavior from someone representing the school and if the school knew about it, then they've abused the trust of the community.

    3. Re:Popcorn time! by DaHat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So you see nothing wrong with a professor using his status to obtain sexual favors?

      Even if they are offered?

      I've a friend who spent some time as a college level instructor and on quite a few occasions would have rather attractive co-ed here or there who would put on the water works or even make veiled sexual offers if he to try to get him to bump their grade or allow late work to be turned in for full credit.

      My friend was at least smart and professional enough to refuse all such advances, not all are so.

      I'm not excusing anything, I've just heard plenty from the other side.

    4. Re: Popcorn time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know it is the modern age when:
      If a man talks dirty to a woman it is sexual harrasement
      If a woman talks dirty to a man it is 4.99/minute

    5. Re:Popcorn time! by XXongo · · Score: 2

      So you see nothing wrong with a professor using his status to obtain sexual favors?

      Even if they are offered?

      I have two friends, one of whom is a professor and the other is the student that he married 45 years ago (which was before I knew them). Sometimes it works.

      That was a bit before the present-day restrictions on "harassment," though.

      It's a tricky question. I would say that the dividing line is coercion-- is the professor using some form of threat, or promising good grades?

    6. Re:Popcorn time! by gizmo2199 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a tricky question. I would say that the dividing line is coercion-- is the professor using some form of threat, or promising good grades?

      I think that's where you have to draw the line. I mean a college-aged girl has to get over the fact that older men will be attracted to her, and make advances. Just because she's creeped-out by it, doesn't necessarily mean it's inappropriate. Ultimately gender equality means others have the right to hit on her, and she has the right to tell them to fuck-off. That's what you do as an adult.

      And it's not as if women don't use their sex-appeal when it suits them.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    7. Re:Popcorn time! by Rakarra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you need his physical address? Do you want to step up and do more then mere words?

      If you want to show how words hurt you can do that right here, in this thread.

      So that maybe he can send some threatening or harassing words to the AC's home address, where his family will also see it.

      See, the problem isn't that "he sent her some words." People do that all the time online, I close stupid spam IMs every week. What differentiates just regular words from situations like this is when one person does hold some power over another that makes it difficult for the harassee to avoid the harasser. Say, if your boss starts sexually harassing you, and you can't risk jeopardizing your job. Or your teacher starts to harass you, and you can't afford to fail the class. Sexual harassment isn't something you should have to suffer with, as the fault is always with the harasser, and our various harassment laws handle the cases of workplace harassment.

    8. Re:Popcorn time! by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody's ever said harassment didn't exist. It does, as does rape, murder, fraud, and pickpocketing. Usually perpetrated by psychos and disturbed individuals.

      Psychos and seriously disturbed people also exist, of course - unfortunately some of them seem to think that there's an enormous epidemic of rape and harassment.

    9. Re:Popcorn time! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a tricky question. I would say that the dividing line is coercion-- is the professor using some form of threat, or promising good grades?

      I think that's where you have to draw the line. I mean a college-aged girl has to get over the fact that older men will be attracted to her, and make advances. Just because she's creeped-out by it, doesn't necessarily mean it's inappropriate.

      I guess you didn't read the story. Let's ay you were married to one of those hot college aged girls, and one of her professors keeps asking her ot send nude photos and videos of herself. Now you might find that hot as hell yourself, most of us would be a little annoyed. I'd certainy expect my wife ot be annoyed.

      Ultimately gender equality means others have the right to hit on her, and she has the right to tell them to fuck-off.

      And if he or she doesn't stop? This really isn't about getting the nerve up to ask for a date. This is an almost classic example of a person in a position of power finding a mark to go after. This woman had a few problems of her own - she takes anti-anxiety and anti-depressants. Which some folks do find easy to manipulate. But taking medications is neither a crime, nor an excuse to take advantage of.

      And apparently she documented this also after some time when it had progressed too far. This is creepy to most people not just her.

      And it's not as if women don't use their sex-appeal when it suits them.

      Well sure. But now you're using the "she asked to be raped" stupidity. There is a difference between dressing nicely, flirting, and being your mythical "harassment bait". I enjoy looking at pretty women. I don't ask them to send me naked videos of themselves on the internet.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:Popcorn time! by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      No, I don't think someone should "just get over the fact that...". Don't excuse your fellow troglogdytes, hold them to account.
      In many cases things cross the line from being creeped out and into very clearly illegal territory, and this case sounds like one.
      This is not about some construction workers whistling at someone walking by, this is about one's own professor coercing a student.

      In real life you can't say "fuckoff" because the response may be "you're fired" or "I thought you wanted to get that A" or other things like that. The "fuckoff" response very often leads to a much more intense harrassment. As long as we tolerate this it will continue, we need to point fingers at people who do the harrassment and stop telling women to ignore it. Bosses of these harassers should fire them (whether construction worker or senior partner), their friends should not make excuses for them, and so forth.

      This should NEVER be something one gets used to and deals with, it should NEVER be a case of students having to grow a thicker skin.

      Equality does not mean that one side has to emulate the dominant side: ie, women shouldn't have to act like men to be equal, racial minorities shouldn't have to "fit in" to get jobs.

    11. Re:Popcorn time! by Immerman · · Score: 2

      I've heard claims that one in four women will be raped at some point in their lives, and have yet to hear any sort of data-based rebuttal. Now certainly when you consider the millions of men your average woman encounters over the 20-30 thousand days of her life that doesn't constitute anything most reasonable people would consider an epidemic - most people will get chicken pox at some point in their life, but nobody talks about there being a chicken pox epidemic - you need a much higher event density for that.

      On the other hand rape tends to be pretty traumatic, and if that 25% statistic is valid that means that in any group of 8 women there's a 90% chance that at least one of them has been or will be raped. If you have 16 female friends there's only a 1% chance that none of them will ever be raped. Personally I think the near guarantee that someone I care about will eventually be raped is a social problem that should be addressed.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    12. Re:Popcorn time! by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've heard claims that one in four women will be raped at some point in their lives, and have yet to hear any sort of data-based rebuttal.

      Look at the actual crime reporting figures, locally rape convictions stand at around 8 per 100,000. Now let's get crazy and say only one in twenty rapes and or sexual assault charges result in a conviction. Let's get even crazier and say one in twenty people who are raped even report the matter. That leaves us with 3200 per 100,000, or about one in thirty. Still almost an order of magnitude smaller than feminist figures and almost certainly still a gigantic exaggeration.

      So where do they come up with these moral panic inducing mountains of statistical tripe?

      To understand this we have to look at the methods they use to take these surveys. Look at the technical reports. You'll find lots of stuff like:

      Drafting the questionnaire, it was important to avoid terms such as ‘rape’, ‘violence’ or ‘stalking’, because different women might have different preconceived ideas on the types of violence usually associated with these terms, and the types of perpetrators involved.

      Terms such as rape are left out of questionnaires and it's left to the researchers (all of whom happen to be feminist trained) to decide whether or not rape took place. So if someone answered that they were verbally abused using a sexual slur or had sex while drunk, it's the researcher who decides if the women was sexually attacked.

      And take a look at California's shiny new feminist inspired affirmative consent laws if you want to know whether having sex after a drink is rape or not.

      This gets further distorted by the public mouthpieces, who translate these numbers into 25% of all women were raped. No, they weren't. That one in four women in modern western democracies, one in forty was raped is not a prospect that the rational mind can entertain.

      This is a technique that was pioneered by Mary Koss, a feminist researcher who decided that the official unbiased government reports weren't giving her the answers she wanted, so she set up her own surveys in order to amend the statistics accordingly.

      Post survey examination of the outcomes however revealed that around three quarters of the women she identified as having been raped did not consider themselves victims of rape, and almost half of them had sex with their supposed attackers after the event identified as a rape had occurred, and continued dating them.

      So, having internalised that, now you'll have to start asking questions like "how did these flim flam artists manage to pull the wool over everyone's eyes for 40 years" and "why are people in power listening to them" and so on. These are good questions to ponder. While you're pondering them some light reading for you:

      http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/...

    13. Re:Popcorn time! by MisterSquid · · Score: 2

      Look at the actual crime reporting figures, locally rape convictions stand at around 8 per 100,000. Now let's get crazy and say only one in twenty rapes and or sexual assault charges result in a conviction. Let's get even crazier and say one in twenty people who are raped even report the matter. That leaves us with 3200 per 100,000, or about one in thirty. Still almost an order of magnitude smaller than feminist figures and almost certainly still a gigantic exaggeration.

      You're missing the dimension of time which crime statistics do include (you didn't include a link, btw). If your hypothesized/extrapolated numbers for rape is multiplied for the same population over a period of, say, 10 years and presuming each year produces new victims, that would mean than a relatively stable population base of 100,000 would yield 32,000 rapes.

      It's not like rape (or any crime) only happens in a given population for only one year. People have lifespans and the number of victims accumulate over time, increasing the percentage of people who fall victim.

      Your mistake was so easy to catch that if I didn't know better I'd say someone such a miss by someone who's looking so carefully at the data probably has an axe to grind.

      Then again, maybe I don't know better and I'll say it anyway.

      --
      blog
  2. Not trying to excuse what he did by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But how exactly did he force them to do what they did *Over the internet*

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      that's harassment.

      ... and it took her a year to realize that it was harassment. But once she finally figured out what happened, MIT was stunned!

    2. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Informative

      But how exactly did he force them to do what they did *Over the internet*

      If you read the full article, towards the end it talks about this particular woman having various emotion issues including abandonment. It would seem that the prof in question exploited theses weaknesses in order to groom the woman into sending the naked pics etc.

      In addition the article talks about various victims being from cultures where speaking out is not the done thing.

      So while no-one was physically compelled to send anything, it sure sounds as if they were psychologically compelled.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First of all, Lewin is guilty of violation of the MIT code of conduct, no doubt. However, we are talking here about adult women. Are they responsible for what they engage into? Shouldn't be assumed, whatever their past and culture? Or do you have to asssume each time you engage a conversation with someone he/she is not responsible for what he/she says? And if it eventually turn into flirt, it will become sexual harassment because the other party can plea it is not her/his culture, etc. Is it she/he responsible for reading these f... email and answering them? And what about her culture when time came to take and send naked pictures of herself? Is it a normal conduct in Algeria? Lewin was an idiot and was framed.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    4. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And they could have stopped it immediately by blocking him on FB and/or just stopped the course they paid a whole $0 for.

      In the whole history of people being psychologically manipulated and abused, they *all* could have stopped it simply by saying no, and walking away. Yet they don't. Kinda suggests that doing so is very difficult to do, and that there are things in play that you are not crediting.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by sjames · · Score: 2

      Or it took a year to realize that she might either be able to actually do something about it that wouldn't harm her worse or to decide that the harm it would do her was better than the harassment.

    6. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I actively groomed my wife to marry me through Charm and Seduction. If we had not married would it then be harassment a year later if she had decided she didn't like me for whatever reason?

    7. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Oh man... This whole "They where manipulated into doing this by some guy" is just plain SAD. I have no doubt this guy did some pretty despicable things and violated the rules he agreed too. I also have no doubt that these women where at least partially responsible for what happened because they didn't say "NO!" to the guy in authority for what ever reason.

      Clearly Lewin gets punished for violating the code of conduct, but it's just as clear that he was taking advantage of a set of women who where ill prepared to tell him to bugger off. I know it's not PC to ascribe blame, but these poor women do need to realize that they do have control and are not powerless to say no and they need to respect themselves enough to give the abuser the boot, and thus have some level of responsibility for what happened to them.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    8. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, maybe in the real world, face to face interaction where you can't click block and they're gone.

      And that comes across as a "True Scotsman" logical fallacy, by suggesting that psychological manipulation is erased by distance.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    9. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by XXongo · · Score: 5, Informative

      She thought she was sending naked pictures and could maybe win some extra points when grade time came around but it turned out she was just sending naked pictures with no long game payout and that's harassment.

      More like she was told she would not get good grades if she didn't and she really needed this. Fear can do weird things to people.

      From the article, it was apparently an open course online, with no grades and no credit. (And she was in another country, so there was no personal contact, either.)

    10. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I actively groomed my wife to marry me through Charm and Seduction. If we had not married would it then be harassment a year later if she had decided she didn't like me for whatever reason?

      Sadly, after the point in time a woman decides she doesn't like you, a single flirt could cause all previous grooming to be used against you as evidence of a history of harassment. Happened to a person I know. Sad, but true.

    11. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So while no-one was physically compelled to send anything, it sure sounds as if they were psychologically compelled.

      Well, it does sound like he lied to them (about exclusivity).

      Lewin confessed his love for several of them, chat logs show, but often denied those feelings to women who asked about the others.

      It's probably just me being cynical, but had the first degree women friends of the Professor on Facebook not replied to that first woman saying that they were also in an online sexual relationship with the Professor, then the first woman wouldn't have considered his behavior sexual harassment, and she would have never retroactively taken back her consent to the online relationship.

      She also said she felt trap near the end, but really how trapped could she have been? She started all of this more than a year after the fact. Wasn't she finished with the course by that time? Shouldn't the power relationship be nullified once all the grades are in and the course finished? Also the Professor was already pushing 80 years old and had already retired? How much power did have from across the ocean as an 80 year old?

      Did he try to blackmail her with the pictures he already had? From the detailed article, that doesn't seem to be the case. If the detail of him lying about other women is any indication, that seems to be the most relevant part of her grievance, and that's how he "psychologically compelled" her -- by lying to her. And by the time she found out about the online infidelity, she was already emotionally attached to him, that's why she felt trapped (at least, that would be my cynical interpretation of her statements, because I just don't buy the I-felt trapped-because-he-kept-on-contacted-me reason.).

    12. Re:Not trying to excuse what he did by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Does not apply here: The course in question does not award grades, costs nothing and is exceptionally easy to walk away from. The only thing you lose is the course itself.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  3. Blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tell me more about how women are being oppressed by men and how I, as a man, should be ashamed of myself.

    1. Re:Blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Saying all men are responsible for all sexual harassment is like saying all Muslims are responsible for all Islamic terrorism.

  4. Not trying to excuse what he did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    She thought she was sending naked pictures and could maybe win some extra points when grade time came around but it turned out she was just sending naked pictures with no long game payout and that's harassment.

  5. WTF! She was 32 years old by AchilleTalon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WTF! How a 32 years old private English tutor can naively believe sending naked pictures was not involving her into sexual activities? I would consider this as consent, dot period. Perhaps Lewin was infringing the MIT policies, however I would not qualify this as harassment since she, as an adult, decided to go ahead with this from the beginning.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
    1. Re:WTF! She was 32 years old by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She made the mistake of opening up to Lewin about her psychological problems (anxiety, abandonment) and he manipulated her (sweet lies about helping her get her self-esteem back) so she'd cough up the nudes.

      Shockingly, despite age, people with psychological problems can be manipulated into doing things contrary to their best interests by sociopaths.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  6. Do You Even Literate, Bro?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    She thought she was sending naked pictures and could maybe win some extra points when grade time came around but it turned out she was just sending naked pictures with no long game payout and that's harassment.

    No, wrong wrong wrong wrong. Goddamnit how many illiterate people manage to get this far on Slashdot?! From THE FUCKING ARTICLE:

    What may be most difficult to understand, Harbi said, is why anyone would respond to Lewin’s requests. Harbi, who is originally from Algiers, Algeria, is open about having been sexually assaulted in the past, and said she struggles with abandonment issues. The more she tried to distance herself from Lewin, she said, the more he attempted to contact her through email and social media. Ultimately, Harbi said, she felt forced to “obey.”

    “We all felt trapped,” Harbi said.

    Dziech said Harbi’s history as a victim of sexual assault was relevant.

    “That stays with you all of your life,” Dziech, who this quarter teaches a seminar on child and adolescent abuse, said. “You never get beyond it no matter how much therapy. It’s terrifying, and it raises another problem for all institutions: They can never know the background of the student -- in what way the student is vulnerable.”

    Slashdot: The place where the most "interesting" and "insightful" comments are completely made up fantasies about what actually happened.

    1. Re:Do You Even Literate, Bro?! by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well I've hit the point where "actual evidence is required" after UAV and Dalhousie(both being the most recent). Fuck this noise. Seriously, fuck it right in the neck. I don't "trust the articles" I don't "trust the admins" I expect actual evidence.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Do You Even Literate, Bro?! by nwf · · Score: 2

      Slashdot: The place where the most "interesting" and "insightful" comments are completely made up fantasies about what actually happened.

      No, this is really Slashdot, so we need to figure out how to blame the victim. Then we'll be good. Bonus points if you can spin it to appear plausible that it was her fault (which it wasn't, of course.)

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    3. Re:Do You Even Literate, Bro?! by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      So she has a history of sexual assault, yet her reaction to a pervy prof asking for nude photos was to send the photos rather than saying to herself "learning some physics is not worth this crap" and blocking him on facebook/email/whatever and sending the logs/etc to the university.

      Yes he is the one abusing his position of authority. he is the one at fault (taking MIT's investigation of the matter at face value - I don't have the details they have after all). That doesn't mean she can't make some better decisions in the future.

      If it was a prof at a university you were attending who you will bump into over and over again over the next few years and who is respected by the rest of the academic staff you deal with you have an actual dilemma since they can screw you over if you don't comply with their abuse. But in this case there's no loss in just bailing out - well other not getting to have a perv teach you physics which sounds like a plus really.

       

    4. Re:Do You Even Literate, Bro?! by walterbyrd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you think accusing somebody automatically makes that person guilty? Like the witch hunts, or the communist hunts?

      If I accused you of being a child molester, would that automatically make you guilty?

      I think there is may something that can be said for an "innocent until proven guilty" system.

    5. Re:Do You Even Literate, Bro?! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      They have the chat logs and emails. Evidence enough for you?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:Do You Even Literate, Bro?! by sexconker · · Score: 2

      So then, you don't trust the professor saying he didn't do it either, right?
      Why do you automatically give credibility to the person in authority?

      He's not. He's adhering to the principle of "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" that our justice system is built upon.

    7. Re:Do You Even Literate, Bro?! by phayes · · Score: 2

      No. So far, we have only heard one side of the story & both sides need to be heard & in front of an impartial judge.

      80 years ago when they were stringing up black men in the south, they often had "proof" of their guilt and acted on it. Stop acting like a mob.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  7. Re:If Only the Article Addressed That ... by OzPeter · · Score: 2

    So what you're saying is women are weaker and more manipulable than men?

    What he is saying is that people with psychological issues are more vulnerable to manipulation that those without them.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  8. Re:If Only the Article Addressed That ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    So what you're saying is women are weaker and more manipulable than men?

    I think what he was saying is that people who have been abused in the past are more likely to permit abuse again.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Re:If Only the Article Addressed That ... by OverlordQ · · Score: 2

    I read the article. I'm just claiming bullshit on the argument that somehow this physics professor is such a master psychological manipulator that he coerced dozens of women halfway across the world to send him nudes over the internet for no good reason.

    If you're *that* emotionally troubled with abandonment issues that you're sending a guy over the internet that has no leverage over you nudes, I dont see how you can deal with offline interactions period.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  10. Unprofessional by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

    Whether or not there was a promise of quid quo, to trade dirty pictures with someone who is presently one's student is unacceptable. But you know what? I'm so numb from the constant barrage of social justice stories that I just don't give a shit anymore. Enough already.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  11. Re:Respect yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why are you post this question on slashdot? Do you assume women come here to get some sort of advice?

  12. Re:If Only the Article Addressed That ... by bobbied · · Score: 2

    So you didn't watch how the bullies worked all this out on the playground as a kid? Or better yet, when you where an adult, watch your kids playing with a group of kids?

    Seemed pretty straight forward to me how the abusers identify likely targets and how the suitable targets would react to situations. Even as adults, the behaviors are similar, even if the fine details of how it's done are a bit more nuanced.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  13. Re:Respect yourself by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look ladies, yea I'm a middle aged white male, but why do some of you let these things happen to you? [...] I raised my daughter to not be afraid to say no and mean it.

    With an attitude like that, it's clear that if your daughter does have something like this (or worse) happen to her, she's not going to tell you. But I guess ignorance is bliss, huh?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Re:Why is this site turning into SJWdot ? by guises · · Score: 2

    I grant that I wouldn't want endless stories about this sort of thing, but Walter Lewin is a special case. He's possibly the most celebrated (relatively) current physics lecturer there is - if you have any interest at all you should seek out some of the videos of his lectures, they are terrific. And that's reasonably nerdy. It's also MOOC (massive open online course) related, and that's a new thing and internet-centric.

    I appreciate this update to the previous story about his removal, the lack of any sort of real explanation left me with a rather bitter taste in my mouth. It still... the new story says that all of the evidence of his transgression came from his accuser, which... well. It would have been nice if they had thrown in a line about confirming the chat logs with Facebook, and an additional something about confirming that it was indeed him who said / sent these things and not just someone who had access to his account (when I worked at a distance learning program, I had access to all of the faculties' account pages - this is what the article says he used as proof of his identity to the student). But I'm able to make the assumption that the people investigating this are not completely incompetent. I had come away from the previous story unclear on just how this harassment had taken place, so the new story gives me a bit of satisfaction in that this was indeed unacceptable behavior.

  15. huh? by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A 32 year old woman took a year to recognize that the harassment "started day one", and when she was "pushed" by her PHYSICS professor to participate in online sexual roleplay and send naked pictures (which she did?) she didn't comprehend that his interest in her might be more than academic?

    At what age is someone expected to be able to deploy the word "no" on their own behalf?

    --
    -Styopa
  16. Not a college kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that's where you have to draw the line. I mean a college-aged girl has to get over the fact that older men will be attracted to her, and make advances. Just because she's creeped-out by it, doesn't necessarily mean it's inappropriate.

    Just a quick note-- she wasn't a "college-aged girl"-- she was 32.

    Ultimately gender equality means others have the right to hit on her, and she has the right to tell them to fuck-off.

    And if he or she doesn't stop? This really isn't about getting the nerve up to ask for a date. This is an almost classic example of a person in a position of power finding a mark to go after.

    But, uh, he wasn't in a position with any power over her. She was a student in a not for credit, no grade course that he taught. He had no power whatsoever.

    And it's not as if women don't use their sex-appeal when it suits them.

    Well sure. But now you're using the "she asked to be raped" stupidity.

    Warning! Warning! Strawman argument! Warning!

    She wasn't raped. She was not raped . She--voluntarily-- send him nude pictures.

    1. Re:Not a college kid by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And if he or she doesn't stop? This really isn't about getting the nerve up to ask for a date. This is an almost classic example of a person in a position of power finding a mark to go after.

      But, uh, he wasn't in a position with any power over her. She was a student in a not for credit, no grade course that he taught. He had no power whatsoever.

      You don't understand how these things get started. If I might take na example from a recent pedophile scandal.

      Jerry Sandusky was a well known and loved football coach who ran a foundation and housing for "at risk" children.

      In his foundation, where he was around a lot of young boys, he could find ones who were vulnerable in one way or another. Long and short of it is that through coercing them over a period of time, he eventually molested them.

      He knew how to hunt. Most kids would give him a kick in the nuts or just avoid him, but those with the specific vulnerability ended up molested.

      These people know how to find people they can manipulate. Whether she was flattered at first, or a little insecure - I don't know. But a lot of people are, and that doesn't excuse him in the least.

      Eventually she found it way beyond the pale, and decided enough was enough. And if you RTFA she is not the only one. He's definitely sleazy. There are places that people can go if they want that sort of thing, either on the internet or in person. Then both parties are willing participants.

      Warning! Warning! Strawman argument! Warning!

      She wasn't raped.

      God, on slashdot any disagreement is called a "straw man" I know straw men,, and that was no straw man

      I suspect a degree of obtuseness here. So lets do the long form.

      No one deserves getting hauled into a sexual situation against their will. In my response to

      And it's not as if women don't use their sex-appeal when it suits them. I was saying, in a time honored fashion, but one that apparently needs dumbed down for you:

      Because a woman looks nice, or dresses nicely, or smiles at you, or even gives you a peck on the cheek, it in no way gives you the right to expect sexual favors from her, because her appearance does not give you the right for sexual favors, her clothing does not give you the right to expect sexual favors, and her basic sexuality , get ready for it......here it comes...... does not give you the right to expect sexual favors from her. Just sayin'.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Not a college kid by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Sounds plausible to me. And personally I don't think we need to eliminate sex from human interactions, we just need to figure out how to handle it gracefully. The sexual revolution fundamentally changed the rules of the game, and we still haven't really figured out a new social etiquette to handle it. I give it a few more generations, at least, before we find a new comfort zone. We are after all talking about arguably the largest social shift since the rise of patriarchy many thousands of years ago.

      However the large number of people who always chime in to these kinds of stories with variations on "she was asking for it" suggests we also have an uglier and more immediate social problem that needs to be addressed.

      And be it teachers, bosses, or parents, I agree there are good reasons to instill taboos against them sexually fraternizing with their charges. The potential for abuse is too great, and nothing compromises good judgment like desire.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.