Slashdot Mirror


Verizon About To End Construction of Its Fiber Network

WheezyJoe writes: If you've been holding out hope that FiOS would rescue you from your local cable monopoly, it's probably time to give up. Making good on their statements five years ago, Verizon announced this week it is nearing "the end" of its fiber construction and is reducing wireline capital expenditures while spending more on wireless.

The expense of replacing old copper lines with fiber has allegedly led Verizon to stop building in new regions and to complete wiring up the areas where it had already begun. The fiber network was profitable, but nowhere near as profitable as their wireless network. So, if Verizon hasn't started in your neighborhood by now, they never will, and you'd best ignore all those ads for FiOS.

10 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Why lay fiber at all when you can gouge wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The free market strikes again!

  2. Re:Why lay fiber at all when you can gouge wireles by ogdenk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yup, FiOS isn't as profitable because users won't tolerate overage charges or massive throttling on wired connections but they'll bend over when it comes to wireless. Even though their wireless connections are NOWHERE near as good as wired connections.

    Yet in even some of the poorest countries you can get 20Mbit connections with no cap for less money than you pay in the US.

  3. Re:Why lay fiber at all when you can gouge wireles by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That is in fact exactly what the article says. While the profit margin on FiOS is apparently 4.4%, the wireless side had a 23.5% profit margin. While those numbers are heavily encrusted with bullshit, they do show the relative value of the technologies to Verizon.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  4. Whats really going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're going to say they've stopped, wait for local municipalities to take care of it themselves, then pop back up and say, "Actually, we want to provide service in this area anyway - you need to give up your infrastructure to us cause FREE MARKET!"

  5. Re:You're really not missing much.... by bulled · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I last had both available in an area, it didn't make much difference who you picked, the service was decent and close to the same cost. However, I now live in an area where only Comcast is avaiable and I am being screwed for a connection that barely sees 10% of the max throughput and Comcast couldn't care less. Even if there isn't a significant difference in cost for performance, having the option forces them both to be a little more honest.

  6. Re:All I know is... by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But somehow, over in Europe where most stuff seems outrageously expensive to us Americans, people can get high-speed internet connections to their homes for a fraction of the price we Americans are paying.

  7. Re:Fuck You Verizon by OhPlz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I seem to recall our tax money going to these companies to pay for a fiber infrastructure. It's more like the landscaper you hired and paid for mowed the neighbor's lawn but not yours.

  8. Re:Why lay fiber at all when you can gouge wireles by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No you misread. FiOS isn't AS profitable, it's profitable. Someone without a conflict of interest, willing to compete with wireless, could set up a business and make money, give good service, employ people and return value to an investor. Verizon won't, they see it as a cannibalizing their wireless market.

    This is an example of all that is wrong with telecom.

  9. Re:Why lay fiber at all when you can gouge wireles by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is VZ and ATT, and then there is Sprint and T-Mo.

    I've had all four in my area, and VZ by far has the best coverage. It isn't even close. I curently have T-Mo and the speed is much better, but coverage much worse than ATT and VZ. I'll give up a bit of coverage for better speeds.

    As for Fiber vs Cable vs Wireless, Fiber will win on raw speed every time. The issue is the cost for last mile, and always will be. Which is why I recommend that Municipalities start looking at building out their own infrastructure and offering CONTENT/INTERNET providers the opportunity to compete for the last mile customers.

    Right now, there is no competition, only franchise agreements that limit competition.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  10. No... by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    lets get the Gov't to enforce the law. It's our Government. I never said we trusted it. I don't trust fire, but I use it to cook my food.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/