Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Ghost-Writes Politician's Letters To Support Time Warner Mega-Merger

WheezyJoe writes: As the FCC considers the merger between Comcast/Universal and Time-Warner Cable, which would create the largest cable company in the U.S. and is entering the final stages of federal review, politicians are pressuring the FCC with pro-merger letters actually written by Comcast. According to documents obtained through public records requests, politicians are passing letters nearly word-for-word written by Comcast as their own. "Not only do records show that a Comcast official sent the councilman the exact wording of the letter he would submit to the FCC, but also that finishing touches were put on the letter by a former FCC official named Rosemary Harold, who is now a partner at one of the nation's foremost telecom law firms in Washington, DC. Comcast has enlisted Harold to help persuade her former agency to approve the proposed merger."

Ars Technica had already reported that politicians have closely mimicked Comcast talking points and re-used Comcast's own statements without attribution. The documents revealed today show just how deeply Comcast is involved with certain politicians, and how they were able to get them on board.

10 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Money *needs* to be removed from Politics ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When companies can "effectively" just "buy laws" (and/or Politicians) corruption knows no bounds for price gouging.

    1. Re:Money *needs* to be removed from Politics ... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's indeed disgusting. We are largely a plutocracy and few citizens seem to give a fudge. We chastise China, Cuba, N. Korea etc. for not having democracies, but neither do we, making us hypocrites.

      (I know, technically we were a "republic", not a "democracy", but they functioned as mostly the same thing for most of our history.)

    2. Re:Money *needs* to be removed from Politics ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As opposed to only getting to hear the ones paid for by the elite ruling class?

    3. Re:Money *needs* to be removed from Politics ... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In other words, only the popular opinions get to be heard and the unpopular ones have no chance at all.

      Yes. And the candidate with the least need for funding is the incumbent. It takes more spending to get into office, than to stay in office. Public funding is a job protection racket for incumbents.

    4. Re:Money *needs* to be removed from Politics ... by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Democracy doesn't mean we get the government we want, just the government we voted for. The people in congress were elected in free and fair elections.

      Technically, perhaps. Effectively, no. Contrast our typical ballot:

      [__] Bribed Politician A.
      [__] Bribed Politician B.
      [__] No-name who has no chance of winning such that you are throwing away your vote.

      with a typical dictatorship ballot for representatives:

      [__] Dictator-selected Candidate A.
      [__] Dictator-selected Candidate B.
      [__] Dictator-selected Candidate C.

      This difference is relatively minor. The plutocrats are pretty much fulfilling the same role as the dictator(s).

  2. On behalf of the rest of the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...get your fucking shit together...create a new political party that actually represents the people...use social media to spread the word and fucking challenge both your shitty corporate owned parties.
    What the FUCK are you waiting for???

    1. Re:On behalf of the rest of the world... by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The public at large is too engrossed in shows like American Idol to be concerned with what's going on in the country.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  3. The system is corrupt ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like it or not, the corporations have more or less rigged the game.

    There is no chance in hell we get what we want, because the politicians have all quite literally been bought and paid for, and are little more than corporate shills.

    This is precisely why all of those people who bray about deregulation and the free market are either deluded, or in on the scam -- because these systems will always become horribly corrupt, and be sold to the highest bidder. And it's a lie to believe that system is self correcting -- because the system is rigged.

    American politics (and, indeed, much of the world) is a cesspool of cronyism, and rich assholes cutting through the laws which prevent other rich assholes from raping the system.

    Corporate lawyers and lobbyists have far more clout than "the people".

    Welcome to the dystopian future where the corporations and the surveillance state work hand in hand, but the state is on the corporate payroll -- at least, the ones who hold any real power.

    This is the reason why the bankers who ripped us all off in the housing meltdown never saw any charges -- because they all advise the fucking presidents on economic policy.

    It really is time to eat the rich, because they're not in the least concerned about us in this equation.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:The system is corrupt ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would love for the free market approach to work with Comcast. Really, I would. Sadly, Comcast has taken the free market, bent it over, and is currently doing some unspeakable things to it

      I would love for the free market approach to work if it weren't a lie. Really, I would. Sadly, everybody always has taken the free market, bent it over, and have always been doing some unspeakable things to it.

      Just like always.

      All of those nice simplifying assumptions about people being honest, playing by the rules, not willing to swindle to get ahead, not willing to collude to cheat everybody else, and not outright paying bribes ...

      See, all of that stuff is precisely why, exactly like communism , any economic theory which assumes the honesty of humans to adhere to your perfect system and achieve perfect outcomes ... is a complete fucking lie.

      The assumptions of laissez-faire Capitalism are impossible to have hold true. So everything ascribed to what 'the market' should accomplish is a fairy tale, because humans don't play according to your ideology.

      There is no free market. Never has been. Never will be.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  4. Re:There should be a law by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best proposal I heard was to require members of Congress to wear the emblems of their major sponsors, the way Nascar Drivers do. At least then we can easily see who's paying for them.