Security-Focused BlackPhone Was Vulnerable To Simple Text Message Bug
mask.of.sanity sends this report from El Reg: The maker of BlackPhone – a mobile marketed as offering unusually high levels of security – has patched a critical vulnerability that allows hackers to run malicious code on the handsets. Attackers need little more than a phone number to send a message that can compromise the devices via the Silent Text application.
The impact of the flaw is troubling because BlackPhone attracts what hackers see as high-value victims: those willing to invest AU$765 (£415, $630) in a phone that claims to put security above form and features may well have valuable calls and texts to hide from eavesdroppers.
The impact of the flaw is troubling because BlackPhone attracts what hackers see as high-value victims: those willing to invest AU$765 (£415, $630) in a phone that claims to put security above form and features may well have valuable calls and texts to hide from eavesdroppers.
Blackphone arguably isnt interested in real security at all, just theatre. Their phone is Android, but their entire range of security applications (the part that keeps you safe) is proprietary, closed source, and subscription based. Blackphone exists for the paranoid executive banging the mistress, the paranoid trophy wife banging the pool boy, and the paranoid celebrity with a panic room.
Check out https://prism-break.org/ for real security. The open source community has worked hard for decades to help keep you safe and secure. Sometimes we dont have the sexiest branding, but for that tradeoff you get more than a promise. you get the source.
Good people go to bed earlier.
They should have called it 'GreyPhone', maybe one day, after many updates, 'DarkGreyPhone'. But lets face it...BlackPhone may just be unobtainable.
It does have its appeal. For the average user who isn't that technical, and who doesn't know/care how to use PGP or gnuPG, this phone is a step up. At least a user who bought this will get better fixes with regards to security issues than with a lot of smartphones.
My biggest complaint is that it is a closed ecosystem. It would be nice if other devices that are not BlackPhones can run the apps so there can be a wider customer base. Otherwise, the device's acceptance will be hindered because everyone has to have that specific maker's phone. Plus, for every closed application, there is an open alternative.
Maybe the ideal would be to get PGP working independently and transparently with text messaging [1], mail, voice, video, and other items. That way, the metadata can be protected via one layer, but the actual contents are protected no matter what, even if the protocol is completely broken wide open.
[1]: An ideal would be something where sender's device would check if the receiver had the ability to receive (likely having the app poll a server every so often), and if so, send it over the Internet (mainly so it can be acknowledged it was received). If not, send it via SMS/MMS. Unlike iMessage, it would fall back and not assume that a specific app was installed and running.