Slashdot Mirror


US Wireless Spectrum Auction Raises $44.9 Billion

An anonymous reader writes: The FCC's recent wireless spectrum auction closed on Thursday, and the agency has raked in far more money than anyone expected. Sales totaled $44.89 billion, demonstrating that demand for wireless spectrum is higher than ever. The winners have not yet been disclosed, but the FCC will soon make all bidding activity public. "The money will be used to fund FirstNet, the government agency tasked with creating the nation's first interoperable broadband network for first responders, to finance technological upgrades to our 911 emergency systems, and to contribute over $20 billion to deficit reduction. In addition, the auction brought 65 Megahertz of spectrum to market to fuel our nation's mobile broadband networks. The wireless industry estimates that for every 10 Megahertz of spectrum licensed for wireless broadband, 7,000 American jobs are created and U.S. gross domestic product increases by $1.7 billion."

12 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. And more importantly ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

    The wireless industry estimates that for every 10 Megahertz of spectrum licensed for wireless broadband, 7,000 American jobs are created and U.S. gross domestic product increases by $1.7 billion.

    And more importantly, this correlates to a 5% increase in executive compensation, and a 2% increase in the hookers and cocaine fund.

    This will also increase the pool for bribing politicians by an additional 1.5%, ensuring the best opportunities to purchase favorable legislation.

    CEOs are said to be pleased with the forecasted pillaging of the American public, and look forward to raising your rates and finding new and creative ways to give you less for your money, while optimizing long-term executive compensation.

    Suckers.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. Unbiased estimates... by JoeIsuzu83 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The wireless industry estimates that for every 10 Megahertz of spectrum licensed for wireless broadband, 7,000 American jobs are created and U.S. gross domestic product increases by $1.7 billion."
    Yes, of course they do. That's a nice press release for both the wireless industry, and the politicians they paid for.

  3. Great financial justification by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The money will be used to fund FirstNet, the government agency tasked with creating the nation's first interoperable broadband network..."

    You could just as well put the money in a pile and burn it. Heck, given the inevitable follow-on costs, burning it would be cheaper...

    "...contribute over $20 billion to deficit reduction". Meaning it's going into the general fund, where it will be promptly spent three or four times over, each time with the justification that the expenditure has already been paid for by the wireless auction.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  4. Spectrum by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yellow everybody. Let's hope those who lost out in this auction aren't feeling blue about it. It'd be understandable to be green with envy, sure, but I hope no-one's seeing red, because the last thing we want is for things to turn violet. Orange you glad this hasn't happened? Best just to heave a cy-an move on.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  5. $45 Billion is just another tax, different form by Trachman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    $45 Billion? True, this is the amount raised. All of it has been paid to Uncle Sam.

    The same amount of $45 Billion is also telecomunication companies' best estimate, a modelled amount, equal to the net present value of all their clients' prospective fees, less their expenses, to be collected in the future.

    If a customer would ever ask a question, why his wireless service bill is so high, he would be given an answer that the bill includes amortization of $45 Billion of previously capitalized expenses, which companies had to pay.

    The GDP increase by $1.7 B is merely an additional tax, that the parties will need to pay, and represents increase in prices that the customers will sooner or later pay.

    1. Re:$45 Billion is just another tax, different form by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One could argue that the Government didn't create the monopolies here, physics did. There's only so much spectrum and it doesn't work if multiple people are trying to use the same frequencies at the same time in the same area.

      Unless you can find the political will to separate highly regulated tower operators and the phone carriers (so airtime would be a utility and there would be competition with the carriers), then it's always going to be like this. It could be worse, at least there is some competition in the wireless space. It's not wireline broadband.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:$45 Billion is just another tax, different form by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Informative

      and that's exactly how wireline should work

      government should build and maintain the fiber, and companies should lease it for any and every service, comprehensive or fractional, that the free market commands

      the current american system is a fucking joke- there's no competition in wireline because the barrier to entry is too high, it's just too expensive to build the shit

      so we have a monopoly. it should be the government that governs it. because letting an economic parasite drain us like a vampire for shoddy service is certainly worse than any criticism you want to level at government, and competition from google isn't coming for another 40-50 years to your town

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  6. Why Sell, they should Rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As spectrum is a finite resource, why sell it, instead of rent it? It goes up in value each year, so the stuff we sold years ago is now worth MUCH more than we sold it for.
    And, since the frequencies are owned by the general public, why the transfer to private corporations, who then hide income offshore? Heck, if the feds put up cell towers and little buildings to house the radios, they could easily earn enough money to fund the government's basic needs for MANY years to come.

  7. Yes, we should give it away for free! by Kludge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, we should give that obviously highly valuable wireless spectrum to cell phone companies for free! Because they will pass those savings directly to us, and not horde the profits for themselves!

  8. Re:Spectrum is measured in Hz? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Informative

    The space between 100 MHz and 165 MHz would constitute 65 MHz of spectrum. So would the space between 1 GHz and 1.065 GHz, or 1 KHz and 65.001 MHz.

    According to this US government source, this auction was for 1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz and 2155-2180 MHz -- a 15 MHz band and two 25-MHz bands, totaling 65 MHz.

    To a first approximation, 65MHz of spectrum gives you a fixed amount of capacity, regardless of its start and end points.

  9. Re:Just curious who decides.. by jratcliffe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Broadly, it is general revenue to the treasury. In this case, a chunk of it was allocated ahead of time. Congress passed (and the President signed) the "Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012." That legislation instructed the FCC to find spectrum in this set of bands to auction off, and allocated a portion of the proceeds to (a) defray the cost of moving the existing users of the spectrum and (b) building a public safety wireless network.

    So, the FCC, while it conducts the auction, does so at the request of, and on the behalf of, Congress.

  10. Re:Always Check the Source by jratcliffe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Congress and the President did. It's Title VI, Subtitle D of the "Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012."

    http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/P...