Slashdot Mirror


Employees In Swedish Office Complex Volunteer For RFID Implants For Access

Lucas123 writes A Swedish office building is enabling corporate tenants to implant RFID chips into employee's hands in order to gain access through security doors and use services such as photocopiers. The employees working at Epicenter, a 15,000-square-foot building in Stockholm, can even pay for lunch with a swipe of their hand. Hannes Sjöblad, founder of Bionyfiken, a Swedish association of Biohackers, said Epicenter is not alone in a movement to experiment with uses for implanted chips that use RFID/NFC technology. There are also several other offices, companies, gyms and education institutions in Stockholm where people access the facilities with implanted chips. Bionyfiken just began a nationwide study using volunteers implanted with RFID/NFC. "It's a small, but indeed fast-growing, fraction which has chosen to try it out." The goal of the Bionyfiken project is to create a user community of at least 100 people with RFID implants who experiment with and help develop possible uses. But, not everyone is convinced it's a good idea.

John Kindervag, a principal security and privacy analyst at Forrester Research, said RFID/NFC chip implants are simply "scary" and pose a major threat to privacy and security. The fact that the NFC can't be shielded like a fob or chip in a credit card can with a sleeve means it can be activated without the user's knowledge, and information can be accessed. "I think it's pretty scary that people would want to do that [implant chips]," Kindervag said.

11 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. How long until mandatory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look, if you want to be that stupid, as long as it only affects you, go right ahead. But don't bother anyone else with it, thanks. Yet there's the rub: Before you know it, it's become de rigeur and everyone is expected to follow, something I'll never do voluntarily. So force it is going to be. I object to that.

    1. Re:How long until mandatory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your objection has been noted, and will be ignored when the time comes. You're strongly advised to think your position over, to rationally analyze your fears and to understand that change is inevitable so you might as well embrace it. The consequences of some misgiven "rebellion" would be... Unpleasant to you and your family.

  2. Insecure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't it like extremely easy to copy passive NFC/RFID tags? You just record them and replay them.
    So in essence this adds nothing to security and only harms privacy. (But I guess that is pretty much the norm everywhere these days.)
    Well, at least it might be a bit convenient since the people doesn't need to remember their keys.
    Not that it should be an issue, they would probably rather be caught dead than forgetting their smartphone somewhere.

    1. Re: Insecure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even when you can't just replay them you're often able to relay them.

      Shake hands with a person in one place and in another your partner is able to authenticate as being them.

  3. Comment by easyTree · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The NSA declined to comment although a muffled "W0000000t!!!!" could be heard in the background.

  4. Is it really that bad for privacy? by Scorpinox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm no RFID expert, but it's just used for identification, right? It won't be long until face scanning is good enough that you can identify someone from even further away than the range of an RFID chip. The potential for people cloning the chips seems worse than any sort of privacy/tracking worries.

    1. Re:Is it really that bad for privacy? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is one big concern: the chip cannot be removed. Outside the company you're a person, not an employee. So when things turn awry, some guy installed a RFID reader and knows (and can prove) you were at that place at that time, or some better ideas yet unknown, your surgery skills will be at test.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  5. Christian fundamentalists will smile knowingly by Bruce66423 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They've been predicting this technology for decades, based on the 'mark of the beast' being necessary to buy anything

    [The Beast] also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. (Rev 13:16,17)

  6. Re:You could just... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to have the chip implanted in my dick. I have a tiny little mind, and am easily amused by puerile shenanigans . . . so whipping out my dick and waving it around to open doors and pay for stuff . . . priceless!

    MasterCard, Visa and American Express, please take note of this post! This is the "Innovative Cloud of Internet of Things," that everyone is talking about!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  7. Re:This is stupid by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Funny

    Our company uses a chip in our employee IDs. I get into our Stockholm office by turning around and banging the scanner with my ass--it's just the right height to read the card in my wallet just fine that way. The fact that the corporate logo is pasted across the front of the card scanner just makes it all the more heartwarming.

    We use a separate fob for the outside door (we share the building with several other firms). That works just fine, too, and people seldom if ever come to the office without their house and/or car keys.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  8. Re:This is stupid by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I get into our Stockholm office by turning around and banging the scanner with my ass

    TWERK TO ENTER WORK

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"