Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Silk Road Drug Dealer Pleads Guilty After Federal Sting

Posted by timothy on from the today's-oxymoron-is-consensual-crime dept.

Ars Technica reports that A 26-year-old Columbus, Ohio man has pleaded guilty to selling drugs through the Silk Road website. David Lawrence Handel apparently obtained methylone and other drugs from a supplier in China, which he then sold to buyers on the online black market. Among those buyers were Maryland federal agents, who were making undercover purchases. Handel shipped the drugs to them through the US Postal Service, according to the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland. ... Handel faces up to 20 years in prison for drug trafficking and up to life for using and possessing a firearm. His sentencing is scheduled for May 15.

7 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. uh... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Handel faces up to 20 years in prison for drug trafficking and up to life for using and possessing a firearm.

    No. For using and possessing a firearm in the commission of a crime. Using and possessing a firearm is not itself a crime.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:uh... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So he "used" a firearm thru the internet or thru the mail, pretty neat trick. The IoT is more interesting than I thought. :)

      He carried it on him while he was doing the rubber meets the road part of his business, and that's using it in the commission of a crime these days. Society's logic goes like this: He wouldn't have been carrying the weapon, nor would he have been risking wanting to use one to protect himself, if he hadn't been transporting illegal goods for commercial gain. Of course, there is also a certain amount of logic to the view that if those substances weren't illegal, none of that shit would have been going on at all, and society not only wouldn't have been risking gun violence but also would be able to tax whatever economic activity did occur. Arguably, it's the state that has created the dangerous situation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:uh... by careysub · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Right, because legalizing something instantly removes the criminal aspect. Look at Colorado. Legalized marijuana and the Mexican gangs are moving in to supply cheaper product.

      Citation please? I did some Googling to confirm this claim, but found nothing supporting it. The claim itself is odd, how is there more money to be made in a legal regulated market?

      I did find this however. The story asserts that Mexican gangs are getting involved in the Colorado pot business for money laundering since it is a cash only business. In other words, they aren't really selling pot, only pretending to do so to legalize money from other sources.

      And why is Colorado pot a cash only business? Because Federal pressure prevents them from using the same payment processing and banking systems other legal businesses use. Banks and payment processors won't take their money or the Feds will drop the hammer on them. In other words, the Federal government is creating this business opportunity by prohibiting normal business practice. If you prohibited any other business from using banks, forcing them to be cash only, the same thing would happen.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  2. Re:Life for Firearm Possession? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tell that to the store owner who goes through the psychological trauma of having a gun pointed in there face, many people are seriously fucked up after such incidents. The difference between the two incidents for the victims is massive.

  3. Re:Using a Firearm According to the Supreme Court by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But that additional offense is a 5-year "enhancement" of the other sentence. Nowhere does that say anything about "life". So I'm wondering where the life sentence supposedly came from.

    Here is a link directly to the prosecutor's statement. They claim the penalty for possessing a firearm while trafficking drugs is "5 years to life". Either way, he has already accepted a plea bargain, so it is likely in the low end of that range.

    He was dumb. He took a gun with him to pick up the package at the post office. Was he really planning to have a shoot out over a $4800 package? Don't carry a gun unless you are prepared to use it. He shouldn't have even picked it up himself. Instead he should have paid some underage kid to do the pickup.

  4. Re:Life for Firearm Possession? by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tell that to the store owner who goes through the psychological trauma of having a gun pointed in there face, many people are seriously fucked up after such incidents. The difference between the two incidents for the victims is massive.

    That would only happen if the store owner is *threatened* with the gun. If the crook simply had the gun hidden on his person, the end result would have been the same whether he had the gun on him or not. Of course, a crook simply carrying a gun does increase the chances that he'd panic and shoot someone. On the other hand, a crook using a knife instead has a much higher risk that some idiot will get himself killed playing the hero because "it's only a knife".

    Of course, a life sentence for merely carrying a gun seems like begging for said gun carrier to start using it.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  5. Re:glad to know judge got 28 federal years, until by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This attitude is part of everything that's wrong with the prison system. The idea that prisoners should be relied upon and expected to met out additional extrajudicial punishment to other prisoners. The idea that prison rape is "ok" because it's happening to other prisoners.