Slashdot Mirror


HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings With Criminals

An anonymous reader writes: Data in a massive cache of leaked secret bank account files lift the lid on questionable practices at a subsidiary of one of the world's biggest financial institutions. HSBC's Swiss banking arm did the following: Routinely allowed clients to withdraw bricks of cash, often in foreign currencies of little use in Switzerland; Aggressively marketed schemes likely to enable wealthy clients to avoid European taxes; Colluded with some clients to conceal undeclared "black" accounts from their domestic tax authorities; and provided accounts to international criminals, corrupt businessmen and other high-risk individuals. For its part, HSBC admits that it is liable for past transgressions but claims its practices have changed.

129 comments

  1. Questionable banking? by burtosis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So shady characters were using Swiss bank accounts? Really?

    In other news some of the users of the pirate bay were found to be distributing copyrighted material. Also the sun found to be yellow.

    1. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what neutrality looks like. It's not supposed to be any of the bank's business how its clients make or spend their money.
      Do you want your bank asking you questions about this stuff?

    2. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the sun is white.

    3. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also the sun found to be yellow.

      Really? The Sun is a yellow dwarf. But the Sun is not yellow... it is white!

    4. Re: Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dood RTFA. Or even just the summary. HSBC was marketing products that allowed them to do the dodgy...

    5. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Revolting, perfidious country. Should have been thrown under the bus at the end of WW2.

    6. Re:Questionable banking? by MrDoh! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just wish we'd find out who some of these clients are. Yes, the bank should be in hot water for this, but so should the politicians, err.. I mean, random businesses who also use these services.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    7. Re: Questionable banking? by burtosis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I actually read it yesterday on another site it's kind of older news. Does it really suprise anyone? All those billions of dollars are from only 10k accounts so the % of shady customers probably is reaching 100.

      when I was in grade school i was pretty damn sure earth like planets were very common. There had to be countless quadrillions of them at a minimum. It's actually a pretty obvious assumption. But a surprising number of people, given a total lack of evidence at the time of other planets outside our solar system, told me there were none at all. Whenever you have such large systems it isn't really a stretch to take evidence you have from a small sample and extend it to the whole - true it's not proof but you can't rule it out and pretty much by definition is plausible.

    8. Re: Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I actually read it yesterday on another site it's kind of older news. Does it really suprise anyone? All those billions of dollars are from only 10k accounts so the % of shady customers probably is reaching 100.

      Perhaps % of shady accounts, not customers?

      There are reporting requirements in some places (don't know if it applies here) that kick in around 10k, so if I wanted to avoid attention and had that sort of money, I'd put it into a lot of little accounts, and pay someone some money to manage them all like they're one big account.

    9. Re:Questionable banking? by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So shady characters were using Swiss bank accounts? Really?

      Laws are for poor people.

      Don't believe it? Well, have you seen a single arrest of any HSBC employee for doing any of this? A single arrest for any of the customers who where committing these crimes? And even if you did see an arrest, do you really think they'll get convicted? Actually do any prison time?

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    10. Re: Questionable banking? by burtosis · · Score: 1

      The average account size is 2.5 to 10 million dollars. It's a we hide your identity and ask no questions banking system. Outside of that they offer no special perks. How many people would chose to bank half way around the earth for no reason? What does your gut say?

    11. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
      Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
      Everybody knows that the war is over
      Everybody knows the good guys lost
      Everybody knows the fight was fixed
      The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
      That's how it goes
      Everybody knows
      Everybody knows that the boat is leaking
      Everybody knows that the captain lied
      Everybody got this broken feeling
      Like their father or their dog just died

    12. Re:Questionable banking? by burtosis · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not sure why you would bring race or medical conditions into this argument. I'm sick of people using ad hominem on our son. You, sir, are a horrible person!

    13. Re:Questionable banking? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Informative

      We essentially have a class of people above the law.

      However, Kayne West jumped on stage again at the Grammys so we need to pay attention to that, first...

    14. Re:Questionable banking? by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      Laws are for poor people.

      Don't believe it? Well, have you seen a single arrest of any HSBC employee for doing any of this? A single arrest for any of the customers who where committing these crimes? And even if you did see an arrest, do you really think they'll get convicted? Actually do any prison time?

      More specifically, laws are to prevent the poor (who greatly outnumber the rich) from pillaging the rich.

      All is not lost. It has remained this way for centuries. Every once in a while, a revolution comes along which supplants the power structure with some new nobles.

      The new rich invariably concern themselves with protecting their money from the poor. The King is dead. Long live the King.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    15. Re:Questionable banking? by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      G2 on the stellar classification as I recall. Not hot enough to be white. Too hot to be orange. Yellow seems a good enough label.

    16. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So shady characters were using Swiss bank accounts? Really?

      In other news some of the users of the pirate bay were found to be distributing copyrighted material. Also the sun found to be yellow.

      Well, John the Baptist after torturing a thief
      Looks up at his hero the Commander-in-Chief
      Saying, "Tell me great hero, but please make it brief
      Is there a hole for me to get sick in ?"

      The Commander-in-Chief answers him while chasing a fly
      Saying, "Death to all those who would whimper and cry"
      And dropping a bar bell he points to the sky
      Saying, "The sun's not yellow, it's chicken!

    17. Re:Questionable banking? by Coisiche · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A BBC new site article yesterday had this passage...

      The bank now faces criminal investigations in the US, France, Belgium and Argentina. HSBC said it is "co-operating with relevant authorities". But in the UK, where the bank is based, no such action has been taken.

      Whether anything happens as a result of those investigations remains to be seen. And in case you're wondering why there is no such action taken in the UK, the reason can be inferred from the next paragraph...

      The man in charge of HSBC at the time, Stephen Green, was made a Conservative peer and appointed to the government.

    18. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Laws are for poor people.

      It's not so much that, but that breaking the law is necessary in order to accumulate great wealth, and in fact to conduct operations in a general business environment where profits are obtained. The law then becomes a stupid, sick game, and the poor and middle class end up losing most of the time.

    19. Re:Questionable banking? by ultranova · · Score: 2

      All is not lost. It has remained this way for centuries. Every once in a while, a revolution comes along which supplants the power structure with some new nobles.

      All the while the basic assumption - that some have the right to more than others - remains unchallenged. It'll be interesting to see whether it can be overthrown before weapons of mass destruction beyond mere bombs will trickle down into common hands. 3D printing the parts for a home laboratory to assemble your homebrewn airborne Ebola strain isn't that far ahead.

      As luck would have it, we're approaching an opportunite time in history for such radical shifts. Capitalism has been so succesful at concentrating wealth and making people economically insecure in the name of efficiency it's collapsing due to the resulting lack of demand. Painful as it might be, a lot of people are getting their faces forcefully shoved into the faults of the system as individual crises start melding into one huge ongoing one. Such breaks make it possible to see, for a brief time, what parts are objective reality and what was merely self-delusion. So I suppose there's at least a slight hope of surviving the coming storm.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    20. Re: Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The average account size is 2.5 to 10 million dollars. It's a we hide your identity and ask no questions banking system. Outside of that they offer no special perks. How many people would chose to bank half way around the earth for no reason? What does your gut say?

      That I wish I had one? :)

    21. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the sun is white.

      At least someone on this supposedly inteligent site knows what they are talking about. The sun is white, the refraction of our atmosphere makes it appear yellow.

    22. Re: Questionable banking? by fgouget · · Score: 1

      All those billions of dollars are from only 10k accounts so the % of shady customers probably is reaching 100.

      The leak actually concerns 106k accounts from 203 countries and totalling 180 billion euros (strangely the BBC claims only $118bn), with half of them actively trying to evade taxes (accounts in tax havens) and the rest at least hiding money. That said not all of them are really shady: there are really a number of accounts that the current holders inherited and never got the courage to declare to their country's revenue service. But if you know what percentage of the accounts that is you're better informed than me.

    23. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sun is white. It appears yellow because of the optical properties of our atmosphere.
       
      I'm willing to bet that our view of this story is just as obscured, and the statements made thus far are equally as open to observer bias.

    24. Re:Questionable banking? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      It gets worse, HMRC basically let everybody off, they were asked to pay 10% of the tax owed and gave immunity from prosecution. The guy runnning HSBC at the time was made a gov't minister.

      Someone from HMRC should be fired at the very least, the action gives a very clear signal that it is OK to hide your money abroad in order to avoid tax.

      Conservative party, government of the people, by the millionaires, for the billionaires.

      http://www.theguardian.com/bus...

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    25. Re:Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a stupid comment. Just because criminal behavior is not surprising doesn't mean that it should be overlooked.

      If anyone else steals, would you comment, "Oh that's no surprise, let's just ignore it". They get prosecuted, just as these individuals and the bank should

    26. Re: Questionable banking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking of closing mine abd taking out my $15. Peace of mind is everything.

  2. Criminal Organisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It never turns out well when the staff starts helping themselves to the product.

  3. Withdrawing bricks of cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nefarious!

    1. Re: Withdrawing bricks of cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you use a brick of cash to buy a Chinese iPhone? What is a brick of cash, anyway?

    2. Re: Withdrawing bricks of cash by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      What is a brick of cash, anyway?

      Something you needn't concern yourself with. (If you were rich, you'd know.)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re: Withdrawing bricks of cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a stack of bank notes tall enough that it looks like it's shaped like a brick. If it's low denominations, it could be a very small amount. Useful for traveling abroad.

  4. And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Water is wet. Dirt makes you dirty. Cows go "moo" and Dogs go "woof".

    Meanwhile Apple stores massive reserves of cash offshore. Simultaneously taking out a loan to pay its taxes... And why you ask per say? Because when you lend money to pay the IRS you get tax breaks.

    They all do it. We all let them do it and only get off our collective asses to protest when the Govt hits us with a 50c surcharge on "whateverthefark".

  5. HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings Wi by khr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings With Criminals

    In other words, just another day of business as usual...

  6. HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the US decade or so ago. They are a blatant and repeat offender. Their main profits come from servicing organized crime and criminals, and should have been shut down years ago.

    1. Re: HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So revoke their banking licence and freeze all funds. Make everyone claim funds against a full disclosure.

    2. Re:HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by ihtoit · · Score: 4, Informative

      HSBC was FOUNDED on the ORIGINAL Silk Road. That heroin highway that ran through the Far East and extended tendrils through Hong Kong, Shanghai (hence the name) and London, Paris, Berlin and Rome.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

      You realize that the original silk road was founded on trade in legal products, right? Like... silk?

    4. Re:HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by ihtoit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      yes, and diamorphine, too.

      Back when opium dens were to be found next door to the Old Bailey and off the reception atria of every barrister in London. Often in the same building, too - occasionally you'd even find a room full of very young girls (or boys, if that was your poison). It all came in on the East India Company Docks. Where CANARY WHARF now stands.

      Funny, that.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    5. Re:HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the original silk road was a land route through Asia, right? And that the European trade route by sea was a way AROUND the silk road because they were tired of the Turks dominating it?

    6. Re:HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      ...Shanghai (hence the name)...

      *snort*

      "Shanghai" means "on the ocean". The rest of your assertions are also highly suspect.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    7. Re:HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      HSBC: Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Company.

      Fuck me, do I have to spell it out for you??

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    8. Re:HSBC was laundering money for drug cartels by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      yes, and diamorphine, too.

      Back when opium dens were to be found next door to the Old Bailey and off the reception atria of every barrister in London. Often in the same building, too - occasionally you'd even find a room full of very young girls (or boys, if that was your poison). It all came in on the East India Company Docks. Where CANARY WHARF now stands.

      Funny, that.

      Thus, not over the silk road, which was a trans-Asian caravan route.

  7. Punishment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A fine, no more.

  8. Avoiding versus evading by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Avoiding is not illegal. Evading is illegal. Avoiding paying road tolls is when you take surface streets so you don't have to pay tolls on the highway. Evading paying tolls is when you take the highway put don't put any money in the till when you get to the toll booth.
    If the bank is helping clients to avoid paying taxes, then the bank is to be congratulated for providing good sound business advice to their clients and enabling them to take advantage of tax situations set up on purpose by various taxing districts in order to lure business to their jurisdiction. If they are helping clients to evade taxes, then they need to be thrown in jail along with their clients.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Avoiding versus evading by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1, Funny

      Avoiding is not illegal. Evading is illegal.

      Bill Clinton: "I did not evade tax with that woman! . . . I just avoided it . . . a bit . . ."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re: Avoiding versus evading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The bit where it classifies them as "undeclared" "black" accounts means _evasion_. But I wont ruin the idealistic dream that a difference even really exists. HSBC is too big to fail remember. So lets see the account holders pass the buck because the bank advised it. And they can't really penalize the bank because as seen on numerious occasions they are above the law.

    3. Re:Avoiding versus evading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not even close the to the same thing, fuckwit.

    4. Re:Avoiding versus evading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You expect a big party goosestepper to get the facts right? Never going to happen unless they come out and admit that they hate the common man.

    5. Re:Avoiding versus evading by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Ah but you see the title is bogus and the fact is HSBC had both tax avoidance and tax evasion products. e.g. the EU has an agreement with Switzerland where Swiss banks are supposed to collect taxes on the bank accounts of EU citizens and pass them on. They weren't doing it. The operation was illegal.

    6. Re:Avoiding versus evading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were hiding income, not using highly complex loopholes only the wealthy have access too. That is illegal. Watch it disappear from the press with no details coming forth and no one seeing jail.

    7. Re:Avoiding versus evading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should they be thrown in jail? Evading taxes is simply evading theft. If anything they should be applauded, much like an old woman who kicks a robber in the man zone to avoid being robbed should be applauded.

      It's sort of like how in many countries, escaping prison is not considered a crime (but they'll of course try to re-apprehend the person). Why should people attempting to escape what amounts to little more than legalized theft be thrown in jail?

    8. Re:Avoiding versus evading by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

      That's what I always thought but here in New Zealand, avoiding tax is also illegal. Any mechanism designed solely to reduce one's legal tax liability is considered to be unlawful avoidance of tax and punishable as such.

      Don't you love the way that governments put the collection of taxes above all else -- giving the IRS and their equivalent more power than any other arm of the state.

    9. Re:Avoiding versus evading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for this. More and more I am considering dropping Slashdot. It seems that the majority of readers and responders want to live in a one world Utopia where births are strictly controlled, there is no private property and no dissent of any kind from what that society's governors dictate to be moral, legal and ethical.

      More and more it seems to me that what Progressives want is not fairness but complete removal of responsibility of any kind from the individual. Total State devotion and servitude.

    10. Re:Avoiding versus evading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      <--- door

    11. Re:Avoiding versus evading by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      And if your that wealthy you can throw lawyers at debating the issue in court until it eventually goes away.

    12. Re:Avoiding versus evading by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      That's what I always thought but here in New Zealand, avoiding tax is also illegal.

      So if you were to buy a home and deduct the mortgage interest rather than renting a home, they throw you in jail? That is what avoiding taxes is, taking advantage of the programs put in place by the government to encourage citizens to partake (or to not partake) in an activity. Some taxing districts offer incentives to lure businesses to do business in their district. How can somebody be punished for partaking in what was legally offered to them by a legal entity?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  9. Hong Kong and drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why I'm SHOCKED! That's un heard of! Why positively scandalous!

  10. Theyre not alone by fred911 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bank of America, Citi and Deutsche Bank have all been implicated in laundering funds.

    http://www.ibtimes.com/citi-de...

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Theyre not alone by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      funnily enough, Citi own the other tall building that isn't Canary Wharf Tower (AKA Canary Wharf Group) or HSBC UK HQ on the Wharf... lowrises include Morgan Stanley, Barclays, Reuters news agency, Waitrose, Jamie Oliver's Kitchen, and the Financial Conduct Authority hidden away in the middle there somewhere... influence much?

      (that has to be the most money-dense twenty acres on the entire fucking planet).

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    2. Re:Theyre not alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they've not draped a large banner to The Great God Mammon down the side of the Canary Wharf tower yet, although undereath the Reuters ticker would work too, I guess.

      It's pretty much what those obelisks are raised to.

  11. Proportionality by PvtVoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to defend Ross Ulbricht, but given what's coming to light, does anybody really doubt that HSBC enabled more drug trafficking than a dozen Silk Roads? And that's not even counting things like the arms trade and tax evasion.

    Steal ten thousand dollars and you go to jail for decades. Steal ten billion and you get a slap on the wrist and an engraved invitation to the next campaign fundraising dinner.

    1. Re:Proportionality by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Steal ten thousand dollars and you go to jail for decades. Steal ten billion and you get a slap on the wrist and an engraved invitation to the next campaign fundraising dinner.

      This is unfortunately the nature of the world. I am afraid the only moral is go big or go home. There is another eerily similar adage about banking. "Borrow a hundred thousand you can't pay back and you have a problem, borrow 100 million you can't pay back and they have a problem." Although you have to adjust the sums for inflation somewhat the basic principle is: rules are only for the little guy.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Proportionality by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      HSBC ran the original Silk Road. It actually moved silk and opium. HSBC's fortune was made on opium.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:Proportionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steal ten thousand dollars and you go to jail for decades. Steal ten billion and you get a slap on the wrist and an engraved invitation to the next campaign fundraising dinner.

      Well, not _always_... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Madoff

    4. Re:Proportionality by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      To this day. A deeper investigation is needed into the Afghanistan opium war. The Taliban had nearly cut off the flow in 2001. The following year it was business as usual.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Proportionality by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      go beyond the BBC, and you'll find that not only had the Taliban throttled opium, they'd actually gotten farmers around to the shocking idea of growing food crops.

      Now, if that's not evil and despotic, you tell me what is?

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    6. Re:Proportionality by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      Now, if that's not evil and despotic, you tell me what is?

      Well, obviously this was much worse. They had to be stopped.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Proportionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Steal ten thousand dollars and you go to jail for decades. Steal ten billion and you get a slap on the wrist and an engraved invitation to the next campaign fundraising dinner.

      Well, not _always_... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

      Bernie's problem was he stole from the wrong people. If he'd stolen from normal people he'd have gotten off, but he mostly stole from the 1%... that's no allowed in those circles.

    8. Re:Proportionality by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      the bastards!

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  12. Changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought they said that the last time they were caught doing this.

    1. Re:Changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now their bricks of cash come with a bit of local currency for "paying customs duties" to get it out of the country.

    2. Re:Changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They say that EVERY TIME they get caught!

      I'd bet they say the same thing NEXT TIME they get caught!

      AND, it's not just banks. Congress, POTUS, SCOTUS, NSA, Jessie, Al, etc. Pretend to help dumb fucks while you rob them blind and help get them killed. ...

  13. Remember, kids.. by BVis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's only illegal if you get caught. Even if you DO get caught, remember that rich people don't go to jail.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    1. Re:Remember, kids.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can somebody correct the header - it shouldn't read 'leaked' it should read 'stolen secret bank files'. These files were stolen by a disgruntled employee and sold to various governments. Rather different from a pro bono leaker like Snowden.

      So, if I buy documents stolen from a bank I'll end up in jail, but if the government obtains stolen documents that's fine... and politicians wonder why nobody trusts them.

    2. Re:Remember, kids.. by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Illegal is a meaningless term. It is the right thing to do to avoid and evade taxes, to provide services that people want (drugs, whatever). It is the wrong thing to do to steal from people and to use violence as a method of running a society but violence is what all governments are.

      I cheer for the bank and wish all banks would do the right thing. Of course the governments need to be neutralized as well, since legality / illegality gives them their violent power.

    3. Re:Remember, kids.. by BlueScreenO'Life · · Score: 2

      These files were stolen by a disgruntled employee and sold to various governments.

      That's not an undisputed fact. It is the version of the story supported by Swiss authorities and banks. In his own version, mostly supported by some French officials, he claims that he never asked for any money and that he first contacted the authorities of Switzerland and of other countries, and decided to leak the data when they ignored him.

    4. Re:Remember, kids.. by BVis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you stalking me or what?

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  14. Prison Time by StormReaver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bet not one of these bankers does any non-neglible prison time.

    1. Re:Prison Time by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course not. Because they're essentially protected by the corporate veil.

      So they can do all sorts of malfeasance, and HSBC will say "ooops, sorry", and possibly pay some fines. If they get sacked, they'll still keep their huge bonuses and severance.

      The problem with corporations is it more or less encourages people to break the law, since they end up bearing no legal responsibility.

      Rich bankers do prison time for ripping people off? Don't make me laugh.

      Not a single one of the assholes who ripped off the world leading up to 2008 was charged with anything, despite essentially running an enormous Ponzi scheme to foist off bad debt to other people and make it look like it was AAA rated debt. It was theft, writ large, but not ONE of them was charged.

      Because those people advise the government of financial matters.

      Being a banker is practically a license to commit fraud on a massive scale, with no personal liability.

      Being a banker on a large scale probably means some of the politicians who are supposed to be fixing this probably have an account with you and will give you a wink.

      Because the politicians are just as corrupt as the bankers. All of these millionaire politicians are hiding their money in offshore accounts, right along with the drug cartels.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Prison Time by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > problem with corporations is it more or less encourages people to break the law, since they end up bearing no legal responsibility.

      I know to the guy on the street this seems irrelevant, but this is a major, major issue. It also is backed up by one of the worst pieces of doublethink that you have to believe in corporate culture.

      CEO pay is through the roof, and in the US it's always "justified" by the amount of responsibility a CEO supposedly has in a company. However, every time there is a huge case of corporate malfeasance the CEO always claims that he/she had no knowledge of the lawbreaking. So which one is it: does the CEO take responsibility for the company or not?

      The best example I know of this in modern life is Rick Scott. He was the CEO of a company that perpetrated the largest fraud in Medicare history. However (at least in the minds of the pro-corporate masses) he didn't even get a scratch on his reputation, let alone get indited for anything. It takes too many mental gymnastics for me to believe that his company's Medicare fraud did not personally enrich him.

      To me this seems to be one of the worst societal problems we have to deal with right now. However no one even talks about it.

    3. Re:Prison Time by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      To me this seems to be one of the worst societal problems we have to deal with right now. However no one even talks about it.

      The biggest lie perpetuated on the world is that corporations are there for any other reason than greed, and that collectively "the market" will arrive at optimal outcomes.

      Corporations will always lie, cheat, and steal to make more money -- and they don't give a crap about us.

      And many many politicians start out owning corporations, and are likely already quite corrupt before they even get into office.

      All those millionaire businessmen in politics telling us how awesome corporations are and how they deserve tax breaks which will magically make our lives better? They're lining their pockets.

      Between the corporations, the lobbyists, and the politicians who tell us the corporations and lobbyists are our friends ... the game is so corrupt and rigged as to be laughable. If it wasn't so corrupt and rigged.

      I'd bet an awful lot of global politicians have accounts like this they'd rather we didn't know about. Because they're part of the problem.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Prison Time by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Another big myth is that the ideas you point out above, while accurate, are somehow handed down from god and not changeable.

      The history of the US corporation is a sorted affair, and in the beginning the country actually put limits in corporate charters to keep corporations under control for the very reasons you describe. The corporation isn't some god given construct, it is actually a creature of the state. What we see right now is what happens when the society refuses to regulate it.

    5. Re:Prison Time by gstoddart · · Score: 1, Informative

      What we see right now is what happens when the society refuses to regulate it.

      It's also what happens when you have lawmakers (who profit from this stuff) removing regulation under the absurd notion that regulating corporations is somehow unfair to them.

      Look at who is actively preventing companies from being regulated, or dismantling existing ones ... they're the people who are essentially trying to legalize theft on a massive scale. And they keep lying to us and say that we benefit from that.

      Because they're rich, corrupt, and in on it. They do this to line their own pockets, at the expense of all of us.

      As far as they're concerned, if the corporations can rip us off, all the better.

      Trust me, you and I are on the same page on this one.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  15. "... its practices have changed." by jc42 · · Score: 2

    Lessee, what might they mean by this? I'm guessing that they set up a committee to review their data-security methods, and have modified them to make it more difficult for the "authorities" to get at the information.

    As with political campaigns, when a business uses the word "change" without being specific, you should generally assume that the change will not be to your advantage.

    I wonder if any journalist has good information on just what the supposed changes have been. But I wouldn't bet on anything, since it's routine for the PR folks to just make up things that they'd like the journalists to publish.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:"... its practices have changed." by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      They installed a copy of Microsoft "Security Essentials" on the main server. It's all fixed/

  16. that big building they occupy in London by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Funny

    can take care of the the entire homeless problem. Let's start with seizing that.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:that big building they occupy in London by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      who modded this funny? I was being serious.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    2. Re:that big building they occupy in London by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      and more and bigger guns and better trained marksmen than Boris Johnson's private army.

      When Government is so afraid of its people that it feels the need not only to disarm them, but to arm itself against an UNARMED foe, there is something SERIOUSLY FUCKED UP about the situation.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  17. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    People should always be trying to avoid taxes. Blindly paying whatever taxes are assessed is foolish and will always lead to the levying of more and more taxes because due to greed and human nature. Governments are incapable of ever lowering taxes in any real or meaningful way. The only way to avoid runaway taxation is perpetual tax avoidance. Many people go so far as to consider taxation theft, and avoidance patriotic.

  18. List includes Phil Collins, David Bowie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Phil Collins held money in a swiss bank account. What a crook! Where does Phil Collins live? Oh right. Launsanne SWITZERLAND.And OMG, David Bowie had a bank account in Switzerland.... where he lives. So did anyone actually stop to think that this guy stole bank details and sold them? And we're not enforcing our treaties with Switzerland, letting this man get off free, for a bit of extra tax?

    Now consider the situation with SWIFT, US stole the data, EU found out, Barosso (possible US operative) promises a tough response and instead signs away the SWIFT data on condition its only used within strict supervision on a supervised air-gapped computer. US of course ignores that, NSA gets a copy of all data and do the air-gapped computer thing for the EU supervisor to see as a floor show.

    Snowden blows the lid off that, tells the world the NSA had operators inside the treasury to give itself free access to that data, and EU Parliament demands the program be ended. EU national government politicians all dance around, like the US has them by the balls and don't act. All of their bank details are in the CIAs bag of tricks now.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/23/us-eu-pact-terrorism-funds-nsa

    So EU violated its treaty with Switzerland and refuses to prosecute this man, and US violates its treaty with EU and its the same thing.

    They reap what they sow.

    1. Re:List includes Phil Collins, David Bowie by zawarski · · Score: 1

      Phil Collins must first be put on trial for his crimes against music (and then sentenced to the Phantom Zone).

    2. Re:List includes Phil Collins, David Bowie by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      funny, according to this http://virtualglobetrotting.co... his Swiss home is in Féchy.

      And according to his biography "Starman" by Paul Trynka, Bowie hasn't lived in Switzerland since 1976. In fact he's spent most of his time between touring, in New York, London and Hamburg.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:List includes Phil Collins, David Bowie by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 2

      Phil Collins held money in a swiss bank account. What a crook! Where does Phil Collins live? Oh right. Launsanne SWITZERLAND.And OMG, David Bowie had a bank account in Switzerland.... where he lives.

      I'm not going to defend the rich musicians claiming to reside in tax advantageous locations (cough*Isle of Man*cough). Nor am I going to defend those who advocate revolution (wait till you see what the regime is trying to repress) and failed to study history (hint: France had three revolutions, technically 5) - and I'm definitely not going to defend those that complain from the comfort of their armchairs:-

      • while continually voting for major parties in the hope that optimism will overcome experience (or votes lost in a previous election to minor parties will set the agenda for following elections.
      • work for a wage (or worse, don't work) and expect the same returns as those that take risks and work for themselves (even if it's using daddies money).

      Anarchy is not destruction - it's the opposite of outsourcing responsibility to others.

      Enlightened self-interest is not shitting upstream, unenlightened self-interest is. Enlightened self-interest is creating a business that doesn't dump sewage upstream and marketing the non-polluting aspect to advantage. Unenlightened self-interest is demanding a bigger government (composed of people who claim/believe levying taxes = production) that will regulate sewage dumping - which is like hiring someone to train a cat not kill things.

      Sheep is a good analogy, they are stupid, but they feed themselves (and they don't go around saying other species can't be bred to be stupid). So just keep bitching, I won't call you sheep.
      Don't take that the wrong way.

      So did anyone actually stop to think that this guy stole bank details and sold them?

      Yes, and no. Some of us thought "Maybe that's bullshit - let's check, before we believe the bank who makes it's money helping themselves to the profits from helping their clients break the law - 'cause, ya know, what if.... one crime gets lonely?"
      So maybe the question you ask should have been four questions:-

      1. Did the guy try and sell the data about illegal activities?
      2. If so - so what?
      3. Why am I so quick to hang him?
      4. Maybe the world ain't simple (no matter how much I wish it was so), and maybe, just maybe - there are more than two options

      And yeah - Phil Collins should go straight to jail for crimes against music (as should the rest of Genesis).
      Of course, if I thought he was a musician, like David Bowie, then spending the requisite amount of time in countries that charge him less tax on his complicated corporate tax structure than I would have to pay using obfscurated family trusts in my country, would be OK.

  19. Swiss Bank Accounts by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    If you don't like what HSBC is doing, you should get an account with a Swiss bank because Swiss Bank Accounts are not subject to... wait a second.

  20. Regulations? by conquistadorst · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Sarbanes-Oxley act has been on the books since 2002. Dodd-Frank bill since 2010. So are they working to keep companies in check and increase transparency? Or just costing both the government and the companies it affects a bunch of time and money? On one side you can say this activity was finally caught. On the other hand you have to ask when large banks are subject to regular audits how do they get away with it from year to year?

    From my own limited personal experience, the only thing I can say for sure is that those audits are usually pretty terrible. In theory they're looking for the right stuff, but the auditors themselves are usually green accountants who often lack the hybrid blend of accounting, technical, and IT skills needed to any proper analysis. They don't understand what they're looking at and don't know what to ask for. They usually just follow a sheet of instructions line by line and check those boxes to indicate their work is done. I don't think that quite captures the spirit of those laws.

    1. Re:Regulations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do I give you all my mod points? Every audit I've been though has been a joke.

  21. excuse me... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

    ...I'll go get my wrist slapper and this will all be taken care of right now.

  22. In the USA by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    In the USA the bank would pay a huge bribe, er, fine, to the Department of Justice and admit to no wrongdoing. Let's see what happens here.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  23. No it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Having capital abroad is not a crime, its only _evasion_ if they didn't pay tax on the generated income that made that money.

    If they could simply classify someone as 'guilty', then they would have classified the people on the list as 'guilty' and thus avoided the messy thing of going to court. It's noticeable that only a few have paid extra tax as a result, and many only on the tiny interest on the bank account, because the money was earned and tax, and sticking it in a bank account is not a crime.... yet.

    HSBC cannot be the enforcer who checks everyone's tax returns, and do you really want every bank in the world handing over its data to the US?

    1. Re:No it doesn't by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Tax evasion is a crime in the US and the EU. Yes HSBC are obliged to collect tax on EU citizens with Swiss banking accounts per a treaty between Switzerland and the EU.

    2. Re:No it doesn't by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      The US congress keeps wanting to make "repatriation holidays" as well that would mean, once again, a huge tax giveaway to multinationals.

      Our society is in deep shit.

    3. Re: No it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yawn." Rich people are using loop holes and stepping into "grey" areas of the law. And fuckhead over here thinks its fine. Hence why they keep doing it.

  24. The solution to the Bankster problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several well-placed explosions at Davos...

    1. Re:The solution to the Bankster problem by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Davos is just on letter from being "Davros."

      Think about it, won't you?

    2. Re:The solution to the Bankster problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Davos is just on letter from being "Davros."

      Think about it, won't you?

      So what you're saying is even if we managed to "destroy" Davos, it'd keep coming back every so often?

  25. The leaker will go to a FPMIA prison the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The leakier will go to a FPMIA prison the higher up's will get off or go a nice club fed.

  26. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    The article title is bunk. HSBC did both tax avoidance and tax evasion scheme4s.

  27. Actually a UK bank by bradley13 · · Score: 2

    The data comes from the Swiss subsidiary, but HSBC is actually a British bank. And you have to love this bit from TFA:

    "The man in charge of HSBC at the time, Stephen Green, was made a Conservative peer and appointed to the government. Lord Green was made a minister eight months after HMRC had been given the leaked documents from his bank. He served as a minister of trade and investment until 2013."

    The little fish will be prosecuted, while the big fish are made peers of the realm. Business as usual for all of the big banks.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Actually a UK bank by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
      This is far from the first time Cameron and the Tories have elevated a corrupt right winger to a high government position.

      Remember the News of the World phone hacking scandal? Cameron appointed Andy Coulson, former News of the World editor, to be his official Press Secretary. Coulson was eventually sentenced to 18 months in jail for conspiracy.

      Do you think that anything has really changed since then with any Murdoch new organization? Of course it hasn't. They are just more careful about not getting caught. The same goes for HBSC. Some underlings may be thrown under the bus, but no one of high rank will ever be brought to account.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
  28. Belgian TV responds with satire clip by lx76 · · Score: 1

    Just ingore Dutch article, or translate with browser.

    Click movie, starts of in german, english from 0m30s.
    http://newsmonkey.be/article/3...

    Enjoy.

  29. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many people go so far as to consider taxation theft, and avoidance patriotic.

    IOW, many people are self-centred twats.

    BTW, I live in a country with one of the highest rates of taxation on the planet (Sweden), and my taxes actually *decreased* a couple of years ago--in the same year that I received a bonus that should otherwise have resulted in me paying about 10% *more*.

    So much for your entertaining little theory Which is, as I said, entertaining, but not even worthy of modding down.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  30. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's good to know, because while I admit that I'm liable for killing all those people, I can assure you that my practices have now changed.

  31. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny

    People should always be trying to avoid taxes. Blindly paying whatever taxes are assessed is foolish and will always lead to the levying of more and more taxes because due to greed and human nature. Governments are incapable of ever lowering taxes in any real or meaningful way. The only way to avoid runaway taxation is perpetual tax avoidance. Many people go so far as to consider taxation theft, and avoidance patriotic.

    As I get older, it becomes easier to understand why most revolutions start with hanging a bunch of the rich and powerful from lampposts.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by Ksevio · · Score: 2

    No - as an HSBC customer it makes me quite annoyed since I have problems just cashing a check online.

    I mean this was suppose to be the #1 bank for money laundering- they could at least make is a smoother process.

  34. Hard hitting story you got there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that why you were knocked offline all day? C'mon, admit it.

  35. Sounds like HSBC hired a bunch of .... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    neo-cons and tea*.
    The corruption is strong in that party. Oddly, they still come up wtih good ideas on how to accomplish such illegal actions.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  36. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah, jealousy. They hate us 'cuz they ain't us, amirite?

  37. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    No, people realize they really do have first claim on what they earn and they rightfully want to keep what they earn.

    Any of you wealthy or upper middle class Americans who want to tax everyone to death, feel free to lead by example rather than government gunpoint. There is a form for you to rid yourself of all that nasty, nasty money here http://www.fms.treas.gov/faq/moretopics_gifts.html This is called the 'Gifts to the United States Government' account and I am sure it will alleviate all that liberal white guilt from which you suffer so magnificently.

    Also, in terms of being a twat, tax avoidance is perfectly legal and legitimate. No one is obligated to pay any tax from which they can escape. It is EVASION that is a crime and no, they are not synonyms under the law.

    Synonym = two words that mean the same for you American Progressive public school victims.

  38. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, my dear Sage, it is also why after such revolutions the dumbasses starve to death because everyone who knows how to generate jobs and build and conserve capital is dead.

  39. Chiemgauer by NewYork · · Score: 1
  40. Banks create money out of thin air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.positivemoney.org/

    When is Slashdot going to address this fact? Why are governments all over the world, borrowing money from private banks, instead of creating their own money? Why are they allowing said banks to issue the money used for these loans, out of thin air?

    Did you know that 97% of the money in the U.K. is 'debt money', issued by banks, out of thin air, and is OWED to banks? So the banks 'own' 97% of the country. Did the people vote for this? Were we asked?

    This article is just another attempt at smoke and mirrors - avoiding the REAL problem - which is that banks are allowed to print money out of nothing, every time they make a loan, and our governments work for the banks, not us.

  41. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you notice that he parent poster said he lived in Sweden?

    Anyway, I agree with you that undertaking all legal means to avoid taxes is good. You might, however, not agree with me if I explain why: I advocate taxes high enough to make charities redundant because there are so many problems with charities that can be avoided if the same function is managed by government instead. The three things I do to advance my goal are thust that (1) I vote according to which candidate will close most loopholes and increase taxes the most and (2) I do what I legally can to pay as little in taxes as possible and (3) I don't give anything to charity. Thereby I consistently vote for the solution, don't pay extra until forced to because when the force is finally implemented (i.e. the loophole closed) it applies to everyone and finally I reject the bad temporary solution that charities are. Gifts to the government seem really stupid to me - it would lessen the need for others to pay their fair share.

  42. Re: HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^^^ coming soon to a lamp-post near you.

  43. Re: HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah because people feed themselves with jobs and capital.

    Kill yourself.

  44. HSBC or CH? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    This doesn't seem to be HSBC particularly - rather just the way banking is (and has been) done in Switzerland.

    So long as the world has corrupt wealthy people, there will be countries who will be willing to help them hide their wealth...for a fee of course.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  45. Hey hey hey! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Let's not be hasty now...

  46. Re:HSBC Banking Leak Shows Tax Avoidance, Dealings by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    It's smart to minimise one's tax obligations. Portraying it as some sort of sacred duty is a bit over the top, though.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.