Slashdot Mirror


Jon Stewart Leaving 'The Daily Show'

slimjim8094 writes: According to the NY Times, Jon Stewart is leaving "The Daily Show." This was announced during the taping of this evening's show. He will "remain at the helm of 'The Daily Show' until later this year," but no word on exactly when the change will take place, or what the replacement (host or show) will be. Presumably the current and past correspondents would be the first choice for a new host. His program will be sorely missed by at least this viewer. Maybe Comedy Central can get John Oliver out of his HBO show...

5 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why is this on slashdot? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe Stewart is going to enter the singularity and become a permanent part of the IoT

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  2. Re:Who will take credit first? by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who will take credit first? I expect in the morning the conservative talking heads on radio and TV will trip over each other to be the first to take credit for Stewart's departure.

    Who will take "credit"? Try "none of them." The very idea is absurd. Who is it that you think had a running campaign to try to get Stewart removed ... from another network .... from a highly rated show? I can't imagine what would fill your head with such a bizzare idea.

    Considering how much he - the admitted source of fake news - has made them look like buffoons routinely over the years, they likely won't mourn him much.

    Stewar made pretty much everybody look like a buffoon at some point, including Democrats and President Obama. (I'm sure you have no recollection of his treatment of the entire Democratic party of South Carolina after the Alvin Green debacle - Alvin Greene Wins South Carolina Primary) The problem with Stewart is he isn't all that even handed.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  3. An old fashioned jester. by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Somebody doing a good delivery is what is required. That is much easier to find than the creative idea behind the show.

    Yes he is acting, but he's certainly not your average "news reader" reading everything from the autocue, it is HIS act, we have similar act here in Oz, but Stewart is the original and still the best. Aside from the ad-lib involved in his act, I'm pretty sure he would have full veto power over the script and who in the "creative pool" should be hired and fired. IMO he's the smartest and funniest act to come out of the US in a very long time, a true "jester" in the original medieval sense of the word. If people who can pull that off are a dime a dozen where you live, I want to move there.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  4. Re:Questionable by laird · · Score: 4, Informative

    Um, no. Jon isn't just a guy hired to read stuff to the camera, it's his show, he runs the staff that produces the show, and he's responsible for selecting everything that goes on the air. He even writes a fair amount of the material. The bit on camera is just the icing on the cake.

  5. Re:Stewart. by T.E.D. · · Score: 4, Informative

    The interviews are one more heavily edited than the corespondents pieces so I wouldn't trust them for either accuracy

    Clearly you don't watch much (or perhaps don't pay attention?) Whenever they have to edit content from the interviews, they tell the audience and make the full interview available online (URL posted on the broadcast). The edit breaks are *really* obvious too.

    If anything, the interview segment at the end is the most trustworthy interview segment you will find on television.