Starting This Week, Wireless Carriers Must Unlock Your Phone

HughPickens.com writes Andrew Moore-Crispin reports that beginning today, as result of an agreement major wireless carriers made with FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler in late 2013, wireless carriers in the US must unlock your phone as soon as a contract term is fulfilled if asked to do so unless a phone is connected in some way to an account that owes the carrier money. Carriers must also post unlocking policies on their websites (here are links for AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile), provide notice to customers when their devices are eligible for unlocking, respond to unlock requests within two business days, and unlock devices for deployed military personnel. So why unlock your phone? Unlocking a phone allows it to be used on any compatible network, regardless of carrier which could result in significant savings. Or you could go with an MVNO, stay on the same network, and pay much less for the same cellular service.

Comments

Welcome to the 90's, USA

[ledow]

Welcome to the 90's, USA.

I don't think I've ever had a phone on contract that couldn't be unlocked on demand after the initial period.

Re:Welcome to the 90's, USA

[Shakrai]

Nice American slam and you got FP to boot.

If you're willing to consider facts instead of punchlines:

T-Mobile: Always had a reasonable (90 days) unlock policy, which was and remains fairly well advertised.

Verizon: Never really locked their phones to begin with, except for certain iPhone models, but that's an Apple issue and not a Verizon one. The Verizon phones that were "locked" always used 123456 or 000000 as the code, which was well documented in Verizon's T&Cs. The usefulness of unlocked IS-95/IS-2000 phones was somewhat questionable, though you could activate Verizon phones on Alltel and vice versa back in the day. I never tried it with US Cellular but I've heard anecdotes from people who did and were successful. In the LTE era Verizon has never locked any of their phones; virtually every Verizon branded LTE capable phone has the required GSM and WCDMA bands to operate globally, on any network, and they're SIM unlocked out of the box.

AT&T/Cingular: Had a policy similar to T-Mobile back in the day, though they didn't advertise it and their CSRs weren't well trained on it. Finding someone to process the request was tedious but possible

The big offender amongst the "big four" was Sprint. They've long had a fairly draconian policy but the damages resulting therefrom were insignificant before LTE came on the scene. Sprint's phones were only useful on Sprint's network, most of them lacked the bands to be useful on other CDMA networks, whereas Verizon and Alltel (before they got assimilated) had phones that were fully interoperable with one another. I used an Alltel branded RAZR on Verizon for many years without any issues.

Why should you ask them to?

[140Mandak262Jamuna]

Why shouldn't we require them to unlock it at the preset time, on preset conditions. 2 year contract, paid up, unlock the phone.

Did you guys know that Samsung's EULA actually allows it to push ads at odd times of the night, ring you and make you look at the ads? In fact it has the right to put you call on hold and make you listen to an ad for 15 seconds once in 3 minutes. And finally the government wheels have started moving against locking the phone. By the time they understand Samsung's smart-tv/smart-phone pushed ad model, we all would by dead ...

Read the MVNO plan really carefully.

[damnbunni]

Before switching from a prepaid carrier to an MVNO, make sure you read the MVNO's plan closely.

Some don't allow roaming at all, or only allow a minimal amount (like say, 25 megs of data). Some don't allow tethering/hotspot use, or charge an extra fee for it. Some shut off data when you hit the cap instead of throttling.

You can save money with an MVNO, but make sure you're actually getting the services you need.