Sony To Release Google Glass Competitor
jfruh writes: With Google retooling its Glass offering, Sony appears to have jumped into the breach to offer an Android-compatible wearable face-computer. The developer edition of SmartEyeglass will be available in March for $840, with a commercial release planned for 2016. The device must be manipulated with a separate, wired controller unit that houses a microphone, speakers and an NFC module.
And ads. But you should be able to manage everything by blacking them out by a magic marker. Presto!
In Before the Jokes about UMD, Betamax, and Minidisc.
sudo mod me up
They put the annoying camera on it. Bad idea, people hate that. It should be on the separate controller, so people will always know when you are photographing them rather than suspect it. At least it appears to be 3d, using two projectors.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
> The Internet-connected SmartEyeglass
Just the brand to trust with not just the wearer's privacy, but of everyone's in vicinity. What could go wrong?
Now one can look like a complete dork with products from two companies.
So Sony added a wired controller?! Because, yeah, nothing is sexier than wearing something on your head with wires coming off it.
They are competing against a product that essentially never made it out of public beta?
Maybe they will actually win this time.
Maybe not.
... Sony has a chance to beat Google! They only need to sell one to a genuine non-developer customer!
The last time I worked on a brand new Sony laptop, it was clear that Sony considered the laptop to be nothing more than a delivery vehicle for it's entertainment products. There was so much Sony crapware on the machine that, out of the box, it wasn't even usable until I uninstalled the majority of the junk.
I anticipate that Sony will force you to watch a movie trailer every time you turn it on, and won't let you use it until you've watched the whole thing.
Proper artificial reality. Although it's in monochrome, it actually has the ability to interact with most of your field of view... That means cool things like translating the sign you're reading or actually showing you which way to go. It's basically the entire opposite of what google glass was, which was the equivalent of putting your phone on a stick and gluing it to your head.
Even monochrome low resolution, it's a great start.
I have to say...
Every Sony product has weird connections, proprietary software and locked in usage, won't work with anything else, and makes Apple look like a BSD licensed product.
And, of course, the cost.
What's the point?
Or, for once, is Sony going to make it an open platform, with standardized connectors, and cheaper than everyone else?
"With pleasure, M, with pleasure"
The exclusivity is what really turned people off about it, not the "privacy" concerns that came up.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
If they box a pair of them with each new Play Station 5, they will become popular.
Integrated as an actual heads up display while game world content displays on screen,
the glasses could become as familiar as the Play Station game controllers.
The screen is projected directly on the lense: http://www.loadthegame.com/wp-...
This is fundamentally different than Google Glass with the eyepiece. Although the implementation is not ideal (it only projects green/yellow), it is the technology behind this design that is important. The ability to project directly on the lenses means that there are no external components that identify the wearer as any different than anyone else. Given time to shrink down and to eliminate the puck you have a device that the public could stomach at the right price.
So please don't sink the technology. Only the implementation. One day we will all be wearing something like this and happier for it.
So it is going to push weirdo glasses with cameras without the a history of "not being evil". With a wired handheld controller no less. Good luck with that. After the walkman in 1970, did Sony ever invent a new market category by itself?
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
I have to wonder how much of this in regards to a viable market is all smoke and mirrors? Just like smart watches, I think the product is designed for a yet to be determined market. Sony really does not need to venture into a market that so far has yet to impress one business (Google) yet alone create a market capable of providing good sales for multiple companies.
Might want to ask Nintendo how the Virtual Boy worked out for them.
Nah, all they need to do is put them on a store shelf ;)
...
google glass is no longer being sold, so there is literally no competition between the two.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
$840 dollars from Samsung translates roughly into $1600 from your optician.
I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
The single reason I'm interested in this tech is as a HUD for when I'm on my motorcycle. Having a satnav displaying just above my fov would be perfect.. Does anyone know how well this works for this purpose?
What the volume and tone of the comments would be if it were Apple rather than Sony. I'm sure we'd see at least a small fanboy flamewar.
What's the new name for someone who wears this product?
If you pirate something, it burns your eyes!
i think the kin lasted about 2 months. total investment by ms was 1 billion. i remember seeing the first ads (the first time i knew of it), i got a really good laugh. this thing will last about as long.
I was hoping for Sony hololens...
If Sony could also come up with a viable alternative to the Segway, they could really lock up the mall cop market.
Shoulda used more alliteration. #missedOpportunity
New in 2015! Sony presents: The SeeMan!
In three words: Sony Beta Max also Sony Mini Disc or in just two words: Sony Reader Unless they've learnt a lesson from failures which resulted from overly defensive licensing, we'll be talking about how the Sony device was better, but no-one used it.