Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Most Useful Browser Extensions?

An anonymous reader writes: One of the most powerful features of modern browsers is the ability to install third-party extensions. They allow third-party developers to work on really useful niche functionality, and let users customize their browser with the tools they need. Unfortunately, this environment has the same discover-ability and security problems as standalone software. Thus, my question: what are your most useful (and safe) browser extensions? I can't live without some privacy basics like NoScript, AdBlock, and Ghostery. I also find FoxyProxy helpful for getting around geolocation requirements for media streaming. OneTab works pretty well for saving groups of browser tabs, and Pushbullet keeps getting better at managing my phone while I'm at my PC.

11 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. Adblock by master_kaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Adblock is the 2nd thing I install on a fresh install (right after Chrome)
    I had the misfortune of having to use a computer that did not have it installed. The internet pretty much seemed unusable.

    1. Re:Adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had the same experience. I actually tried to give no ad blocker a chance but so many of the websites I tried to go to would not load in a reasonable amount of time. At first I just stopped following links, but eventually a case came up where really wanted to know what was said on the other side... so installed the ad blocker. It is very strange behavior to make your page unreadable due to advertisements.

  2. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by master_kaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well think aboout it, why would Google want to have adblock enabled by default, when most of there revenue comes from ads.
    Similar with mozilla where a lot of there revenue comes from google (or I guess yahoo now)
    Microsoft with bing.

  3. Clearly AdBlock by GroeFaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I do regret the real financial consequences for creators whose content I consume and appreciate, the annoyance factor and sometimes security risks of online advertising far outstrip my capacity for caring. Pure text ads would be fine by me, but as soon as ads start screaming at me audio-visually, I turn them the fuck off, no matter how much I like the content they surround.

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
  4. Re:web designers by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So you're saying that the customer demands cross-site scripting hell, where to look at a simple article I have to have fifteen different sites' javascript enabled, including probably half a dozen ad/tracking sites that have nothing to do with reading text on a screen?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  5. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I almost always want the new tab to open in the back. I'm usually opening shit that I want to read after I finish whatever I'm currently reading.

  6. Re:web designers by pspahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, that's exactly what they're saying. Was there something you weren't clear about?

    Do you think developers just sit around all day looking for tracking scripts to start installing on client's sites?

    Since the advent of saving markup in the DB, clients have become empowered on what code runs on their site. They google something, find a script snippet that they don't understand, copy and paste it into their CMS' "additional header scripts" field and save. They don't understand the concept of optimizing image files, let alone be concerned with the number HTTP requests on each load.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  7. Exactly! by dfm3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I had mod points, I'd mod you up.

    First, having a platform onto which developers can build plugins that users can choose from and enable as needed is far superior to being stuck with the single half-baked implementation that is built in to the browser.

    Second, building features directly into browsers eliminates any chance of security-through-obscurity that comes with an ecosystem of security and ad blocking plugins. Two examples: popup blockers (everything is done in javascript now), and the do not track header (arguably, useless even before major browsers implemented it, but even more useless now...)

  8. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by gsslay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having them as addons is the browser makers getting the message. Some people want what an addon does, some people don't. Providing capability for addons to deliver functionality is giving people exactly what they want, and not burdening them with stuff they don't want.

    Or would you rather have your browsers provided as bloatware full of functionality you don't want and can't get rid of?

  9. Give me less. by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By far the most useful extensions are the ones that reduce my "browsing experience"
    Things which prevent things from being pushed at me (NoScript, AdBlock)
    Things which allow me watch videos at my pace and choice of quality instead of "streaming". (youtube downloader)
    And in general things which reduce the number of features I'm forced to contend with.

  10. Re:web designers by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's not the web designers' fault! I'm a small time self employed web designer. When it comes to designing a website, we don't do what we want! We don't even do what the customer needs. We end up doing what he asks. Most of the time what they ask for sucks, and that's what they/you get.

    If you have so little input into the process as that, you're not a technical professional, you're a prostitute.