Slashdot Mirror


Crystal Pattern Matching Recovers Obliterated Serial Numbers From Metal

chicksdaddy writes Criminals beware: researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have figured out how to recover serial numbers obliterated from metal surfaces such as firearms and automobiles — a common problem in forensic examinations. According to this report, NIST researchers used a technique called electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to read, in the crystal structure pattern, imprints on steel that had been removed by polishing. ... The more perfect the crystal structure, the stronger and clearer the pattern. Software can then calculate the pattern quality to reveal crystal damage; areas with more damage produce lower quality patterns. In the NIST experiments, described in Forensic Science International, researchers hammered the letter 'X' into a polished stainless steel plate. The letter stamps were as deep as 140 micrometers, meeting federal regulations for firearm serial numbers. The researchers then polished the metal again to remove all visible traces of the letters, and collected the EBSD diffraction patterns and pattern quality data and analyzed them for evidence of the imprints.

133 comments

  1. Overstamp First? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What if you use some tool and hammer to overstamp the serial numbers. Like scribbling over it. Then grind it down. Or if it is in a place that can be heated and cooled... like annealing... where any loss in strength from the operation, were it to happen, wouldn't be an issue. Would that change the underlying crystal structure significantly. I'm sure it would affect it some, but would it be enough to allow the crystal structure to 'reset' and erase the original stamp marks?

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    1. Re:Overstamp First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My first thought as well, a cheap punch kit and a hammer seems like a way to disrupt the "background" crystal pattern.

      If you do it stupidly, like put a "1" through an "A", it would be fairly obvious and narrow the search down. But using a variety of punches and changing "1"s into "l"s and overlapping repeatedly might do the trick.

    2. Re:Overstamp First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's exactly what gun thieves do. using a gun for crime is already decades in prison, a little unserialized stolen gun bonus dont mean shit at that point. so they overstamp it with a fine pitch chisel then grind/mill it out. most serial locations arent even relavent to gun integrity.

    3. Re:Overstamp First? by Kardos · · Score: 2

      You'd want to match the force used on the original stamp, else your 'decoy' numbers and letters will leave crystal deformation pattern that differs in intensity from the real digits. Probably easy if you're the manufacturer, but a touch harder if you're some guy with a hammer.

    4. Re:Overstamp First? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      You think the purpose of the research is to help FBI find the original numbers? ha! The real purpose is to let an FBI expert witness testify that "FBI forensic labs recovered this A12345 X73464, of the weapon known to be owned by the defendant from this weapon entered into evidence as prosecution exhibit A23".

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re: Overstamp First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you have any troubles with justice ?

    6. Re:Overstamp First? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      The serial is usually in a non critical spot. Just drill it out and fill it with silver solder.

      If you want a perfect solution, live in a state in the US which isn't a liberal distopia you can build your own firearm legally as long as it's not covered under the NFA.

      If it's one of the cast zinc firearms have your cat pee on it. It will be destroyed within days. ;)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    7. Re:Overstamp First? by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but they polished the test plate down. What happens when you use a nasty low grit number sandpaper that will leave behind gauges and scratches?

      Not only that, but:
      What happens when water gets in the crystal structure? It may take weeks+ but water can and will diffuse into the material.
      What happens after firing? It doesn't take extreme amounts of heat to alter the crystal structure of steels... you can change the structure of regular / high carbon steel with a home oven quite easily, and destroy the properties of stainless readily to boot.

      Typically, if a firearm will be used in a crime the serial number will either be 1: on a stolen weapon, or 2: ground off, not polished off.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    8. Re:Overstamp First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. First obliterate the number with a centre punch, then grind it down and then stamp the new number. This is very old knowledge and the better crooks likely know this.

    9. Re: Overstamp First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you have any troubles with justice ?

      Yes, it is too imaginary.

    10. Re:Overstamp First? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call the side of the receiver block "non-critical".

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    11. Re:Overstamp First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So obviously we should just ignore this method despite it having some succes - since it is not pefect. Or what exactly are you arguing?

    12. Re:Overstamp First? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      What happens when you use a nasty low grit number sandpaper

      If you use if for long enough you can completely remove the layer damaged by the stamp.
      With weld testing (an extreme case of it using microscopes in high temperature high pressure pipes) you have to go pretty deep to remove the damage from an angle grinder, then a bit of time with fine grit to remove the damage from course grit, then finer again until you polish to get rid of the damage from fine grit. If you haven't gone anywhere near deep enough your mirror finish will still show obvious grinding marks all over it once you put some weak acid on it to make the crystal structure visible. By obvious that can mean with the naked eye at arms length. So then it's back to the 120 grit, 240, 600 etc or a similar sequence before a polish.

      2: ground off

      Deep enough and it's just gone. Not deep enough and you can polish the ground surface and either hit it with acid (which will attack the stressed areas more deeply) or use a SEM like in the article and see where the metal is stressed from being stamped.

    13. Re:Overstamp First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes between over stamping, and heating and annealing the metal the crystal structure would change making this process useless in court.
      It would be a lot of work but it can be done.

      Still wait till 3D metal printing gets better and people make their own guns.

    14. Re:Overstamp First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drill in to the metal

  2. Criminals, have no fear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you need do is gain employment at any Bank and work your way up the slimy corporate ladder. Steal money legally by getting a job where the money is.

    1. Re:Criminals, have no fear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wouldn't work for the average citizen. You must know that one has to go successfully through the education system to get a job that allows climbing the corporate ladder. Or at least, a rich parent.

  3. 3D print the gun, by invictusvoyd · · Score: 2

    And this becomes largely irrelevant

    1. Re:3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why 3d print? Easier to just go to the hardware store and get some plumbing parts. Also won't explode in your hands after a few shots.

    2. Re:3D print the gun, by ls671 · · Score: 2

      There is a legislation coming up forcing all 3d printers to incorporate a serial number in all 3d printed guns.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re:3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Removing markings from metal is an easy process that can be done with hand tools and power tools. If you were to remove all of the metal behind the markings i would expect the analysis to fail.
      A polymer gun is easier, as you only have to grind off the metal plate holding the markings and are still left with an intact tool.
      Creating a working gun, or the part of the gun that requires a serial number is not easy. You can try to use a 3D printer, a CnC Mill or in come cases, like the AK-47, a shovel and hammer. It is not easy.
      You now have to procure the rest of the weapon and assemble it. Purchasing lots of parts that should fit, usually do not. If someone has the time, intelligence, resources and skills required to make a gun, they can use those four things to build far worse things. Someone shooting up a mall is going to yield fewer casualties than someone blowing up a large portion of it or releasing poisonous gas into an enclosed space.
      Crying wolf with 3D printing did wonders for ratings but it's not putting guns into the hands of criminals. A pipe and a nail, steel and a welder, the black market, are all much easier methods to procure a gun. A quick look at prisoners and oppressed cultures shows how easy it can be to make a weapon. 3D printing isn't one of them.

      If you happen to have access to something awesome like a metal or commercial plastics (much stronger than PLA and ABS) 3D printer, please use it. If you do make a gun and are worried, you can always add your own markings and register it.

    4. Re:3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how is a 3D printer supposed to be able to tell if it's printing a gun?

    5. Re:3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creating a working gun, or the part of the gun that requires a serial number is not easy. You can try to use a 3D printer, a CnC Mill or in come cases, like the AK-47, a shovel and hammer. It is not easy.

      Wat?

      The entire thing with the AK-47, the thing that made it so popular, is that it is an extremely simple design that is cheap and easy to manufacture.
      Like, just like baking a cake you can find a bunch of DIY videos on YouTube and you can select how much work you want to put into it, either you buy a prefab kit and put it together or you do all the parts yourself. A lot of people prefers to get the barrel pre-made and make their own receiver. (Typically you don't have a drill of sufficient length at home for the barrel.)
      The whole 3D printing gun thing is a bit like the Arduino, great for people who doesn't really have the know-how but wants to get started quickly without doing the grunt work.

    6. Re:3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encode serial numbers into every printed object?

    7. Re:3D print the gun, by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      The only way this would work is if everything printed was serialized and that data was accessible by law enforcement. Good luck with that.

    8. Re: 3D print the gun, by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2

      Yea, you can literally buy a piece of plastic that just requires a Dremel to roughly hollow out, and from there build a complete AR-15 in less than an hour. No serial number, little to no knowhow, just a hammer, pin punches, a Dremel, and about $600. 3D printed guns are nothing more than moral panic bullshit. But so is gun-grabbing. Statistically speaking, there are few rational reasons to ban firearms, but this discussion is popular amongst people who have gun phobias. You are 50x more likely to be sent to the hospital due to a dog attack than to be killed by a firearm. I know those two things are in no way equivalent, but I have never heard someone suggest banning dogs, despite the greater frequency of harm. The reason why the largest demographic (by a large margin) for the victims of the 11,000 or so gun deaths unrelated to suicide each year are young black men, and the highest proportion of those deaths (also by a large margin) are from handguns, is largely due to the reason why that same demographic is the highest (by a large margin) in prison. The drug economy. But no, let's discuss banning "scary" looking guns like AKs and ARs, despite these being the most popular rifles in the U.S. while simultaneously their use in homicide and crime is almost unheard of (except for the black swan mass (10-30) shootings that happen with them once every decade or so).

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    9. Re:3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which would be easily hacked out just like the rest of the copy protection they've put in software for the past 30 years.. These ignorant fucks think they can just legislate their way out of everything.

    10. Re: 3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC here. I'm actually for stricter gun control (That is not the same thing as banning guns.) but public decisions have to be made on rational arguments, not fear-mongering. And lets face it, most arguments from both sides in the gun debate is irrational fear-mongering.
      The thing is that I'm also allergic to new fads like 3D-printing, Arduino, whatever the hyped scripting language of the month is and blaming all problems on whatever group of people suddenly is to blame for everything.
      What I want right now is for people to realize that 3D-printing is completely irrelevant for the gun control debate. It doesn't change the landscape a bit.

    11. Re: 3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Expect 3d printer file for 3d printer soon.

    12. Re:3D print the gun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3D print your own 3D printer that you can print your own 3D gun with that doesn't have a serial number. Problem solved.

  4. Is this new? by tsotha · · Score: 3, Informative

    The FBI has been recovering filed off serial numbers for at least a decade based on the changes in metal grain that result from stamping. Is this just a more sensitive method for doing that?

    1. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closer to 20 years, now. Old news is old.

    2. Re:Is this new? by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      It looks like this is a more advanced method to accomplish the same thing. Meaning that recovering sanded serial numbers is not new, but this particular way of doing it is.

    3. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it mentions SEM reading of filed off numbers, but says this can get results where SEM results are too muddy

    4. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am not even really sure what use the serial number is. A serial number will get you the original manufacturer data, the original distributor, the DoR (Dealer of Record) and the police report stating when it was first stolen. Thats pretty much it. Even all of that assumes that it is a firearm manufactured in the last 50 years only. I suppose if a firearm is serially stolen, or a cache of firearms was stolen you could link them together, but normally a cache is broken up and distributed.

      Now the rifling and or other firing marks will connect a firearm to a fired bullet, that seems useful, but rarely (very very rarely) is a legally purchased firearm used by its owner in the commission of a crime. In fact it is so uncommon that you are more likely to have a cop shoot you while they commit an ancillary crime than to have the lawful owner shoot you while they committed another crime.

      Yes, I am an arms merchant, yes, I have an FFL.

    5. Re:Is this new? by felrom · · Score: 2

      The problem is that most people have watched too much CSI and think that a serial number on a gun is equivalent to a magical beacon that instantly homes in on the person who committed the crime. Just look at all the hysteria in the last few years over 3d printed guns and 80% firearms: it all revolves around the line of reasoning of, "if a criminal used this in a crime, we couldn't trace it back to them." The whole breathless panic never stops long enough to understand that criminals aren't going out and buying new guns from licensed dealers and having their names linked with serial numbers in the first place.

    6. Re:Is this new? by robbyb20 · · Score: 2

      I'd be interested to see the life of a gun. From first initial theft(or undocumented sale) to how many hands one firearm passes thru. It would be interesting to see how much separator there is from the original documented owner.

    7. Re: Is this new? by BlueTrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that if you base yourself on declared data you will have a massive bias as criminals are unlikely to provide information. Therefore your data will be about legally owned guns which is not the data you would need for crimes. I still agree with you that it would be interesting.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    8. Re: Is this new? by robbyb20 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, it is a problem gathering that information but would be quite an interesting read.

    9. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You deserve more insightful points that you know.

      I would like to know what the serial number does for an investigation beyond knowing which purchaser the gun was stolen from. It doesn't tie the gun to other crimes, unless criminals are in the habit of stating, "and then I pulled out my gun, with the filed off serial number of ACQJ3235235 and shot the guy." "Where's the gun, then?" "I don't know".

      I mean you would practically have to have a confession, at which point the gun _and the gun's serial number_ is irrelevant.

      I suspect this is more about the FBI tracking guns from known internal leaks. For example, I've heard rumors of guns being sold by the federal government to many of the criminals near the southern border. I suspect it is probably 90% rubbish paranoid psycho talk, but such a technique could link a gun to one that law enforcement had acquired previously for destruction. Without such a technique, it would be much more difficult.

      There are already enough guns that have dropped off the books in the USA that knowing a gun's serial number is not nearly as much of a benefit as one might think. And if you can come up with examples to the contrary, I'd love to hear them.

    10. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect this is more about the FBI tracking guns from known internal leaks. For example, I've heard rumors of guns being sold by the federal government to many of the criminals near the southern border. I suspect it is probably 90% rubbish paranoid psycho talk, but such a technique could link a gun to one that law enforcement had acquired previously for destruction. Without such a technique, it would be much more difficult.

      As an FFL, I can assure you that it is not rubbish paranoid psycho talk. Need proof? Now I hate linking to wikipedia, but it is a useful summary and contains sufficient useable links to get you started. Fast and Furious

    11. Re:Is this new? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes. The usual method uses acid to preferentially attack the stamped areas that are more stressed than the surrounding metal. That needs a bit more damage than the SEM could pick up with this alternative.

    12. Re:Is this new? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's also using an SEM but in a different mode - collecting a backscattered image from under the surface instead of a direct reflection from the surface.

    13. Re:Is this new? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Far older than you'd think - blacksmiths of antiquity put stamps on things, polished the surface, then applied a weak acid so, their stamp would be seen on a nice polished surface.
      This new technique is for when the old one doesn't work.

    14. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1970s more like it so about 40 years

    15. Re:Is this new? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      The article does not mention if this still works after the common acid test failed.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    16. Re:Is this new? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      It's even less clear than an IP address.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  5. Re:How to get around the problem: by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

    What the fuck are you waffling on about?

  6. Overstamp twice. by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you do it stupidly, like put a "1" through an "A", it would be fairly obvious and narrow the search down.

    Punching 1 through an A leaves the firearm with two possible choices in that digit. Do this for 9 digits, and you get 2^9 = 512 possibilities. Punch twice through each digit and you get 3^9 possibilities.

    In fact, punch *all* the digits in each position, then file it down.

    This will rapidly be entered into the "big book of best practices" for criminals.

    And it's also a moot point, since easy access to guns reduces crime, and it's likely that 3-d printed guns will be easily available in the next decade or so.

    (And so what if the 3-d printed gun is reliable for only the first couple or shots? That only means that you use your 3-d printed gun that took 2 hours to print and $3 to build a couple of times and then melt it down.)

    1. Re:Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Furthermore it will be easy to distinguish the different fonts of the letters you stamp into the gun. Criminals got to have a machine that can stamp with the same font of the official serial numbers and how many criminals really have such a device?

    2. Re:Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This will rapidly be entered into the "big book of best practices" for criminals.

      And it's also a moot point, since easy access to guns reduces crime, and it's likely that 3-d printed guns will be easily available in the next decade or so.

      Criminals are pretty notorious for not following "best practices". A majority of violent criminals suffers from ADHD and acts without thinking. It is unlikely that the few that thinks about getting rid of the serial number are bright enough to know about technologies like this.
      As for easy access to guns reducing crime that sound like bullshit propaganda to me, do you have a credible source for that?

    3. Re: Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "since easy access to guns reduces crime".

      Yeah, this must be the reason the UK has such a high crime rate in comparison with the US.

      Oh wait...

    4. Re: Overstamp twice. by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      I think the result may differ depending of the number of guns already circulating and also if guns are illegal/legal and how strong is law enforcement in this regards and the previous absolute level of gun crime. Would be good if people quote studies rather than just saying studies, as you could find pretty rubbish studies on any topic.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    5. Re: Overstamp twice. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1, Insightful

      US states with tougher gun laws have less relative crime than even neighbouring states with weak gun laws. The parent poster is obviously an NRA type who has drank too much of the Koo-aid.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    6. Re: Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Compare the violent crime rates in Chicago to Dallas then and get back to me.

    7. Re: Overstamp twice. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      You can't pick and choose data points to establish a trend.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    8. Re: Overstamp twice. by chihowa · · Score: 1

      But you can vaguely allude to data points and make sweeping conclusions? He actually presented some data points at all. Where are yours?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    9. Re: Overstamp twice. by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      Pot, meet kettle.

      You can't pick and choose between which states have tougher gun laws either for the simple reason that CRIMINALS DON'T GIVE A FUCK FOR THE LAW!

      Gun crime statistics follow the trends as to 1. places where it is EASIER to get your hands on a weapon and 2. how easily you can move said weapons across borders. Absent water barriers such as THE ENGLISH CHANNEL which makes it more difficult to move weapons across land borders, gun ownership in England is clearly lower than in the rest of Europe whether or not and immaterial as to whether or not it is LEGAL to own a firearm. In Europe you can take a gun from your starting point in Syria and NEVER GET YOUR FEET WET ALL THE WAY TO PORTUGAL and shoot up a hotel lobby.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    10. Re: Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Did you even read the post you responded to?

      Would be good if people quote studies rather than just saying studies, as you could find pretty rubbish studies on any topic.

      You're adding soooo much to this conversation...

    11. Re:Overstamp twice. by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      I know old school forensics teams put acid on the site and the cold-worked area would have more fractures in the microstructure which would reveal a scraped serial number. If they did this with EBDS, I would guess you could see differences in the cumulative cold work and still resolve the original pattern (you only need a few reference points).

      If a criminal wants to use the gun, or bike, I'm not sure how much stamping they could do before they damage the material enough to prevent use.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    12. Re: Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did we change the topic to "gun crime" only?

    13. Re: Overstamp twice. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      about four or five messages ago. Keep the fuck up or go sit in the corner and suck on your Mountain Dew.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    14. Re: Overstamp twice. by pollarda · · Score: 1

      Let's see: I live in Utah. In the vast majority of cities in Utah, there is a 50% ownership per household. (Of those households, the majority own more than one firearm.) There are LOTS of firearms here to be had. There is very little crime. The same holds in Wyoming, Nevada, Idaho, Texas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, South Carolina, etc. etc. etc.

      On the other hand states like California, New York, Illinois (Chicago especially), Massachusetts, Hawai'i etc.etc. etc. by in large have significantly higher crime rates and stricter gun laws to the states mentioned.

    15. Re:Overstamp twice. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      now? probably not many. as soon as this tech is mainstream? probably alot

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    16. Re: Overstamp twice. by ganjadude · · Score: 1
      actually the UK does have a fairly high crime rate https://stevengoddard.wordpres...

      According to the FBI, there were 1.2 million violent crimes committed in the US during 2011. FBI — Violent Crime

      According to the UK government, there were 1.94 million violent crimes in the UK during 2011. www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_296191.pdf

      There are almost exactly five times as many people in the US as in the UK – 314 million vs. 63 million. The violent crime rate in the UK is 3,100 per 100,000, and in the US it is 380 per 100,000 population.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    17. Re: Overstamp twice. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      it always resorts to that

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    18. Re: Overstamp twice. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this must be the reason the UK has such a high crime rate in comparison with the US.

      Oh wait...

      It does have relatively high crime rates (just not murder), and those rates were significantly lower when gun ownership was common and anyone could carry one so long as they had ten shillings to pay for a license.

    19. Re:Overstamp twice. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      See... why we should require the manufacturer of every firearm to include microstamping technology, where the serial number will be imprinted on the cartridge of every round fired.

      Also, should include scannable RFID tags, one scannable by the public, another RFID tag only detectable and scannable by law enforcement.

      And some concealed serial number imprints, also scannable.

      I figure the manufacturer could punch out a pinhole in certain places with a punch containing adjustable ridges and serial number indicated by the bitting of the punch with digital signature and error recovery codes to verify the authenticity of the number, to get the message through even in a high-noise environment, then seal the holes with a liquified metal or epoxy to prevent criminals altering the code.

    20. Re:Overstamp twice. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      No need for such over-complicated and over-engineered solutions.

      Each gun already imprints a unique microscopic signature on a bullet and casing. Just submit a scan of a fired bullet and cartridge to a central database for each new firearm sold, where it's linked to the serial number. They're test-fired before use anyhow, so I'll bet the manufacturer could easily add a forensic-type scanner to the manufacturing process, likely completely automated as well. Then we wouldn't have to rely on serial numbers on the gun at all then. Any bullet in good condition could likely be linked with the serial number using that database.

      Law enforcement already uses this technique, but can only perform matching tests if the gun or additional fired rounds are found. This wouldn't require any new technology at all, only new procedures.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    21. Re:Overstamp twice. by stoploss · · Score: 1

      See... why we should require the manufacturer of every firearm to include microstamping technology, where the serial number will be imprinted on the cartridge of every round fired.

      As long as you believe in fairy tale technology like microstamping, why not just require every crime lab have a CSI-type "enhancing" microscope? That way you could code a GUI in Visual Basic and then have the computer tell you who committed the crime.

      For those who are uninformed, read about how cartridge microstamping (doesn't) work in practice, and even if it *did* work, think about how trivial it is to defeat. The microstamping system is supposed to use a rather weak force to stamp a tiny serial number? Nope, I can't see how that could ever be trivially defeated, even if it *did* work in the first place.

    22. Re:Overstamp twice. by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      If you do it stupidly, like put a "1" through an "A", it would be fairly obvious and narrow the search down.

      Punching 1 through an A leaves the firearm with two possible choices in that digit. Do this for 9 digits, and you get 2^9 = 512 possibilities. Punch twice through each digit and you get 3^9 possibilities.

      In fact, punch *all* the digits in each position, then file it down.

      This will rapidly be entered into the "big book of best practices" for criminals.

      And it's also a moot point, since easy access to guns reduces crime, and it's likely that 3-d printed guns will be easily available in the next decade or so.

      (And so what if the 3-d printed gun is reliable for only the first couple or shots? That only means that you use your 3-d printed gun that took 2 hours to print and $3 to build a couple of times and then melt it down.)

      It's also simply illegal (to various degrees in various states and jurisdictions) to have a serial number removed.

      Knowing it goes only a little ways toward solving the crime it was used in.

      On the other hand, it is VERY useful if you are a gun grabber and want to make a political point.

      This particular technique has been known for over two decades. I heard about it in college.

      Up next on slashdot! New device for putting on an axle to reduce friction of your cart! Carry heavier loads longer distances more easily!

    23. Re:Overstamp twice. by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      No need for such over-complicated and over-engineered solutions.

      Each gun already imprints a unique microscopic signature on a bullet and casing. Just submit a scan of a fired bullet and cartridge to a central database for each new firearm sold, where it's linked to the serial number. They're test-fired before use anyhow, so I'll bet the manufacturer could easily add a forensic-type scanner to the manufacturing process, likely completely automated as well. Then we wouldn't have to rely on serial numbers on the gun at all then. Any bullet in good condition could likely be linked with the serial number using that database.

      Law enforcement already uses this technique, but can only perform matching tests if the gun or additional fired rounds are found. This wouldn't require any new technology at all, only new procedures.

      Not really. Those "unique" qualities are only such for a limited time.

      Using, or even cleaning, the firearm will cause them to change.

      Someone wanting to use the firearm, and change it's ballistics characteristics needs only a few minutes with the a few tools. File, sandpaper, perhaps a punch.

      If the gun is fired and then tossed, they can match them. Fired and kept and the owner wants to change it's profile, it's really easy.

      Get yourself a firearm, and use it. Stop watching so much TV.

    24. Re:Overstamp twice. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I own several guns already, thanks. No need for the snarky attitude though.

      I suppose you're right that those characteristics can be easily modified, as from what I understand, they're largely there because of the hand-finishing / cleanup that guns go through during the manufacturing process. So, it would make sense that they'd rapidly change as well.

      As is so often the case, if there's a "simple" idea that hasn't been implemented, there's probably a pretty good reason *why* it hasn't been implemented. I've seen that quite often in so many other fields that I'm actually an expert in, so it was probably overly-presumptuous of me to think I'd not be susceptible to that a field I'm not an expert in either.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    25. Re:Overstamp twice. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Each gun already imprints a unique microscopic signature on a bullet and casing. Just submit a scan of a fired bullet and cartridge to a central database for each new firearm sold

      They already tried that in Maryland, and I understand it turned out very poorly, the government itself instead of the manufacturer wound up bearing huge costs; there were error-prone and labor-intensive steps involved in taking in test-fired casings submitted by manufacturer, photographing , logging to database.

      But it was also noted California DOJ survey less than 70% of the casings of the same make as the fingerprinted device yielded the correct result anywhere in the top 15 matches of the database search, for the same type of ammunition. When a different type of ammunition was used, less than a 40% success rate.

      Conclusion? Capturing the natural ballistics to a database is not the way to go, if you can do better.

    26. Re: Overstamp twice. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      So there you go - people cause crime and there's not a lot of it when they are not many people. Who would have thought?

      If you have to drive half an hour to shoot that neighbour that is pissing you off how many would bother?

    27. Re:Overstamp twice. by Altrag · · Score: 1

      What they really need to do is figure out a way to etch the serial number inside the metal.. similar to how they laser-etch diamonds. That way it could essentially only be removed by melting the weapon down.

      Of course while they could probably figure out a way to manufacture it, I'm not sure how easy it is to scan the internals of the metal. Maybe encode it in some sort of magnetic material that could be encased in the metal during casting? Of course it would have to be something that couldn't get "overwritten" by holding it next to a speaker magnet or whatever.

    28. Re:Overstamp twice. by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

      Why would you need anything resembling the original font? You are trying to disrupt the original number shape enough so that the crystallized pattern remaining after everything is filed off won't resemble the original number.

      You could overstamp the original number with a symbol of a duck if this would disrupt the original pattern enough.

      ~~

    29. Re:Overstamp twice. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's not so much for future reference as it is that the technique could be used to trace guns already in the possession of the police.. cold cases and such.

      "zip" guns aren't popular in USA only because proper guns are so easy to get.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    30. Re:Overstamp twice. by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      This will rapidly be entered into the "big book of best practices" for criminals.

      Are these the same criminals that post photos of themselves bragging about their crimes on social media? I think you're overestimating the IQ of your average thug.

    31. Re: Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure what obliterating the s\n gets ya... Unless maybe you are running around stealing guns and trying to resell them.... If you want untraceable.... In that case, it is easier to just make your own receiver and buy barrels and other components. And melt the barrel down and replace it after every use.

    32. Re:Overstamp twice. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how easy it is to scan the internals of the metal.

      Acoustic microscopy.

      Also, since the identification info could be encoded in various formats... such as microscopic dimples in the metal, magnetic elements, digital circuit elements such as passive RFID, or other methods

      It's possible that the criminal could be unable to know whether or not there is a serial number that is still readable which the criminal themselves cannot see, since mostly just law enforcement and gun shops would have both the scanning equipment and the know-how to operate it.

    33. Re:Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conclusion? Capturing the natural ballistics to a database is not the way to go

      FTFY. I wanted to point out the extreme uselessness of MD's ballistics database. It never—not once—helped to solve a crime.

    34. Re:Overstamp twice. by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd think it would be the opposite... the criminals who are already going through the trouble of erasing serial numbers would be exactly the type to know about how to do it properly. Because it's usually not done by the lowest level guys. Guns are an organized crime type deal, and when it comes to things like that, only the very bottom rungs are populated by truly stupid people. Especially for larger gun running or drug dealing or car theft rings, towards the top you tend to find fairly intelligent, if not educated, people. (people that are educated AND criminals steal their money through "white collar" crimes).

    35. Re: Overstamp twice. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Hum, so unless you are diverting through Russian the Bosporus will get in your way I am afraid.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

      Oh, and please stop using England when you mean United Kingdom.

    36. Re: Overstamp twice. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      There's this invention called a "bridge". They're been around in ENGLAND since at least the ninth Century. I mean fucking England. Take your PC junk and stick it up your arse.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    37. Re: Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Massachusetts has a high crime rate?
      If we're looking at just gun violence the numbers between gun ownership and gun violence don't seem to be connected.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States_by_state
      There really doesn't seem to be a correlation between gun ownership and deaths by state or gun laws.

    38. Re: Overstamp twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Did you even read the post you responded to?

      Would be good if people quote studies rather than just saying studies, as you could find pretty rubbish studies on any topic.

      You're adding soooo much to this conversation...

      Well I was agreeing with him on his criticism of his parent post. I think it is always useful to point out how NRA sponsored studies can be biased. This is actually pretty fundamental but it went past your head and childish brain ?

  7. Millions of dollars in research. by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Defeated by a $59 Dremel tool that completely removes the metal from that area of the frame...

    1. Re:Millions of dollars in research. by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      I was wondering when this would be brought up. Once the word on the street gets around that you need to remove a millimeter of metal under the serial number for it to be really obliterated, Dremel tool sales will go through the roof.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
  8. For those of you who don't read foreign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    140 micrometers is 0.0055 inches

    which is about 6 thousandths of an inch

    which is about 3 head hairs stacked

    which is why I need more crystal to stay ahead of this blue persuasion that has been following me

    1. Re:For those of you who don't read foreign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many football fields?

    2. Re:For those of you who don't read foreign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      0.000001527777778 football fields

  9. Have figured out how to recover serial numbers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah they figured it out years ago, like back in the 1990's.

  10. Trivia. by jcr · · Score: 1

    All you need is a spot welder.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Trivia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, grind the number, put some spot welding spots on that place, grind it, spot weld some more, grind it.
      Welding (heating) rearranges the crystal structure.

  11. Etching does the same thing by hankwang · · Score: 2

    It has been possible for decades to recover serial numbers by chemical etching, which is sensitive to changes in the crystal structure. All you need is a polishing implement and a bottle of etching gel. What is the added value of this EBSD technique? I can see a big disadvantage: you need equipment (a scanning electron microscope) worth a few hundred kEUR and the object with the erased serial number needs to fit into the vacuum chamber of said equipment.

    The article mentions that etching techniques don't always work, but they don't state that their technique does work on samples for which the etching method doesn't work...

    1. Re:Etching does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What is the added value of this EBSD technique?"

      It allows law enforcement agencies to ask for bigger budgets.

    2. Re:Etching does the same thing by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      It also doesn't state whether this technique works after the etching technique failed.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  12. Where's the news? by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    there is techniques to read pulished-out stamped numbers (eg. on car frames) since ages.

  13. yes but no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clever scientific method meet 4.5inch angle grinder.

  14. Obliterated by Threni · · Score: 0

    Wrong choice of word, surely?

    "destroy utterly; wipe out."

    If you did obliterate it then they've have zero chance of recovering the information.

  15. Ok, what about recrystalization? by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Metal grain boundries change if you heat the metal up. This also removes the temper, but rapid heating followed by rapid cooling (Such as by very high speed friction sanding, then submersion in water or oil) will change the crystal grain structure of the metal pretty deeply if done right.

    Failing that, sanding off the top layer, then applying heat with a heat gun for a few minutes, then clenching with a cold oil pour will have the same effect, but more reliably.

    Seriously, this is how heat treatment of steels works. Steels and other metal alloys go through various phases of crystal growth types under different temperature and pressure environments. They grow when hot (but not molten) which is why the metal weakens. If you heat it up hot enough, this processes changes into annealing where the crystals break down from thermal forces and the metal becomes amorphous. Flash cooling results in a densely packed matrix of tiny metal grains, which strengthens the metal.

    Seriously-- all you have to do is alter the crystal growth pattern under where the serial number was. Heat treatment will do exactly that.

    1. Re: Ok, what about recrystalization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, after removing serial#, a new message is imprinted; eg. 'crystals', or 'equalizer', 'allmine', 'nunyabitches', 'criminaldevice', 'tool#86'd', 'bangbang!'.
      Slahdot is very informatif.

  16. Re:How to get around the problem: by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 0

    Yessss, goooood. Let the hate flow through you...

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  17. Heating the metal to erase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to melt the metal so that it flows and reforms. Blowtorch? Erase with a laser?

    1. Re: Heating the metal to erase by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know how a person could melt a bullet without buying expensive equipment ? I was thinking of this and I could find an easy and cheap way that would not make the person looks suspicious.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    2. Re: Heating the metal to erase by Qzukk · · Score: 2

      Maybe not in Europe, but here in the US reloading casings is a thing. http://www.wikihow.com/Reload-... You do need to buy the right equipment though and these days it probably does get you put on lists on either side of the pond.

      Casting bullets isn't the preferred way to make them (since these days people want jacketed bullets hollow points etc) but melting lead and casting them from molds is trivial.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re: Heating the metal to erase by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      I make my own slugs. It's easy. I don't load casings though. I use air rifles. Don't need gunpowder. Just need lead. As for jacketing, laminate electrodepositing is a thing I've been doing for a decade. Fifty or so layers of copper on a slug and it's pretty damn hard (and plated up to maybe a fiftieth of an inch). It's also a handy way to bring a .20 cast up to match barrel tolerance.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  18. Could Be Handy in the Gun Shop by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This could actually be useful for gun shops, since we have to meticulously catalog the serial numbers of all firearms that come in and go out. We often get older (like, 150 year older), used firearms where the serials are worn down and difficult to read, even with a jewelers loupe.

    Or rather it would be useful for gun shops, if the process isn't as cost-prohibitive as I presume it will be.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Could Be Handy in the Gun Shop by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

      I own several guns < 150 years old which never had a serial number - prior to 1968 it wasn't required on most firearms. Of course most guns did get serial numbers just for inventory purposes, but things like cheap .22 rifles or cheap shotguns sometimes didn't.

    2. Re:Could Be Handy in the Gun Shop by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      yeah, it's a requirement in England now and retroactive to firearms made after 1968. That said I have a Webley Junior Mk.II from 1949 with a serial on it (pretty much all Webleys have serial numbers, they've been going since 1925 - my two Stingrays also have serials).

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:Could Be Handy in the Gun Shop by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

      The last time I heard of a gun with an obfuscated serial number it involved a cop "throw down". Really, it's pretty rare when somebody buys a gun legally and then removes the serial number before committing a crime. It's so much easier to just buy a stolen gun.

    4. Re:Could Be Handy in the Gun Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely useless to a gun shop actually.

      I own a gun shop, the law says when we get in a firearm with no serial number visible, we log it as NSN (no serial number).

      When a serial number is removed/defaced it is illegal for an FFL to take it in, we must contact BATFE and have them issue a new serial number. What you suggest would actually cause you to loose your FFL,(if you had one which from your initial reply and obvious lack of FFL knowledge I infer you do not have)

      The ONLY case where it might be even vaguely useful would be on a firearm that is so valuable and so rare that the only remaining ones are all altered, manufactured after 1968, and such a "restoration" would not destroy the value. So basically there is no such firearm in existence.

      Please stop rendering opinions, claiming to be licensed, and giving fraudulent info

  19. Here's a study by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    It's a well-established fact at this point.

    The study cited includes data from the UK, which is seeing a massive increase in crime over the last two decades. From that study:

    bytheyear2000violentcrimehadsoincreasedthatEnglandandWaleshadEurope’shighestviolent
    crimerate,farsurpassingeventheUnitedStates.

    This should, at the very least, satisfy everyone's demand for a study, which includes England and the UK.

    Also, US states with relatively easy access to guns *do* see a lower crime rate. Compare New Hampshire and Texas with, for example, Illinois and Louisiana.

  20. This is 20 year old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heard about this decades ago.

  21. Anecdotal, admittedly, but.... by codeButcher · · Score: 2

    ... how to recover serial numbers obliterated from metal surfaces such as firearms and automobiles ... In the NIST experiments... researchers hammered the letter 'X' into a polished stainless steel plate.

    Just had a look at the few automobiles and firearms I own. None are made out of polished stainless steel plate.

    Also, while my oldtimers are stamped, I recall seeing a few items of more recent manufacture that had the s/n milled into the substrate.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  22. Shot Peen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this case, use micro-beads for the peening. There are commercial alumina (a hard ceramic) microbeads available. The object is to get enough subsurface damage ro mask any imprint damage.

  23. Defund the NIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, time to defund the NIST. This is an attack against the rights of gun owners everywhere. This slippery slope will inevitably lead to mass gun confiscation and imprisonment for anyone daring to express their second amendment rights.

  24. Meanwhile by terrywirth5 · · Score: 1

    Banksters can loot trillions at will sans steenking serial numbers. Let's see some Magical Chrystal Pattern Matching to put a stop to that.

  25. Yes, but it doesn't happen in isolation by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Or if it is in a place that can be heated and cooled... like annealing

    Then it's gone - but with steels the time and temperatures required not only make it impractical but would also make the thing the numbers are stamped on useless. Even though iron (thus steel) is not a good conductor it's still enough of a conductor that if you anneal one part of it the rest of the engine block (for example) is going to be heated up enough for long enough that it will ruin the structure that makes the steel useful. Annealing steel is a lot more time consuming than many other metals. However, if it's an aluminium alloy it's probably even worse because it conducts much better and is even more dependant on cooling/heat treating to get a useful structure - you can anneal it but end up with a large area not strong enough or tough enough to do the job.
    Grinding it out deeper than the damage done by the stamp is a different story.

    A very very old smithing trick, maybe Hittites old, is to stamp the metal grind it flat, polish and then apply a weak acid, even vinegar, which will preferentially attack the metal that was damaged by the stamp and make whatever pattern was applied visible on the polished surface. With iron and steel it's a darker grey on a light grey surface.

  26. This is for the difficult cases by dbIII · · Score: 1

    None are made out of polished stainless steel plate

    It works exactly the same way with plain carbon steel with a rough surface or even mill scale still on it. They just used polished plate to reduce the variables. Stainless is also a bit of a bastard to etch so the usual method of just acid etching to recover serial numbers is less likely to work on stainless than with your carbon steel automobile and firearm parts.

    s/n milled into the substrate

    That will still distort the metal underneath though probably not a deep as stamping.

  27. Idiots by redwraith94 · · Score: 1

    Who erases serial numbers, and doesn't anneal the base material? Idiots.

    --
    I art more snarky, and terse than thou. I art Slashdot!
  28. Something I've never understood.. by jcr · · Score: 1

    Why is it that cops ever recover murder weapons at all? Seems to me that if you have a gun that could incriminate you, the obvious thing to do is get a bench grinder and turn it into a pile of filings.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Something I've never understood.. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Dumping a gun in a trash can or river is fast. Grinding it to filings is not fast.
      Now I don't know how fast the cops often gets the perpetrator but I imagine some crooks are afraid they'd get caught before grinding it down.
      Also, grinding it down is a lot of work. People are lazy.
      The serial number can be filed down before the crime.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    2. Re:Something I've never understood.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Grinding it to filings is not fast.

      Less than fifteen minutes to totally destroy it, I would say.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."