Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Hit With Lawsuit Over Superfish Adware

An anonymous reader writes with news that the fallout from the Superfish fiasco might just be starting for Lenovo. "Lenovo admitted to pre-loading the Superfish adware on some consumer PCs, and unhappy customers are now dragging the company to court on the matter. A proposed class-action suit was filed late last week against Lenovo and Superfish, which charges both companies with 'fraudulent' business practices and of making Lenovo PCs vulnerable to malware and malicious attacks by pre-loading the adware. Plaintiff Jessica Bennett said her laptop was damaged as a result of Superfish, which was called 'spyware' in court documents. She also accused Lenovo and Superfish of invading her privacy and making money by studying her Internet browsing habits."

8 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope it costs both of them twice what they earned

  2. Re:Lawyers rejoice!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how about the security flaws in the spyware? if it's a "BFD" go ahead and install it on you own system.

  3. Is this the right way? by GrooveNeedle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we all want Lenovo's feet held to the fire for this one, but what is the right course of action? A class action lawsuit, that benefits few people in the class, but enriches lawyers... Or a criminal prosecution under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for aiding malicious actors in installing their malware/spyware?

  4. Re:Lawyers rejoice!! by Microlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Home customers get to see different ads on their screen besides Google's own Adsense garbage. BFD!

    Yeah it's a BFD, Lenovo took money to install an application that deliberately reduced end user security for the sake of inserting ads into their browsing activities! Not only is it completely bereft of ethics and respect for their customers, it's actively dangerous.

    They shouldn't just be hit via a class action suit (assuming Lenovo isn't sticking a "binding arbitration" clause to defeat the ability for consumers to seek recourse) but Federal prosecution under one of the many computer security laws that would string up anyone else.

  5. Re:Lawyers rejoice!! by dj245 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a feeling this is less about recovering from damages and more about teaching them a formal lesson (well, cashing-in under the guise of teaching them a formal lesson).

    That's the entire point of a class action suit. To stop powerful companies from doing a large number of small harms and getting away with it.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  6. Common misconception about class action suits by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a common refrain to say that nobody benefits from class action suits except the lawyers. While that may be true for the class litigants themselves it is entirely untrue for the public at large. The purpose of large punitive rewards is to penalize corporate misbehavior and in turn incentivize good behavior. By that measure we all benefit from these suits.

  7. Lenovo is NOT IBM for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it should be clear to everyone now. Lenovo is not IBM and it may have managed to retain some of the reputation of the IBM branding that went with its computers. But with one mistake it has managed to wipe that all away with SuperFish. I learned my lesson a couple years ago that Lenovo was not IBM and it would never be anything close. I would not buy another Lenovo PC if they sold them for a dollar. I hope Lenovo pays dearly for this mistake, and I hope other PC makers see this as a lesson to not sell out its customers to some two bit crapware company to earn a few bucks.

  8. It was a matter of time... by ameoba · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is exactly the sort of crap everyone was predicting when IBM sold their PC line to Lenovo.

    The only thing that surprises me is that it took so long.

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.