Slashdot Mirror


Xeroxed Gene May Have Paved the Way For Large Human Brain

sciencehabit writes Last week, researchers expanded the size of the mouse brain by giving rodents a piece of human DNA. Now another team has topped that feat, pinpointing a human gene that not only grows the mouse brain but also gives it the distinctive folds found in primate brains. The work suggests that scientists are finally beginning to unravel some of the evolutionary steps that boosted the cognitive powers of our species. "This study represents a major milestone in our understanding of the developmental emergence of human uniqueness," says Victor Borrell Franco, a neurobiologist at the Institute of Neurosciences in Alicante, Spain, who was not involved with the work.

9 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Poor mice by jrumney · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a bugger when the species you genetically engineered to solve complex mathematical equations starts experimenting on your brain.

  2. Unintended Consequences by Limekiller42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look, I'm all about the advancement of science and human knowledge, but this feels like the neurobiological version of "Hold my beer and watch this." I'm sure it seemed like a good idea at the time, science people, but when our new rodent masters (who I, of course, welcome) enslave the human race and bring about Planet of the Apes: Mickey Mouse Edition maybe you'll be a bit more careful next time.

    1. Re:Unintended Consequences by dpilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At what point does it become unethical to consider and treat these as lab animals. How much brain complexity is enough? This probably isn't it, and our A.I. isn't good enough yet. But some year we're going to cross the line, and I'm sure that as a society we're going to be completely unaware and in denial when we do.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Unintended Consequences by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure the mice will tell us when we've reached that point.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  3. Are we calling this one Gamma? by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't care for this new UI. What I really don't care for though, is the increase in cross-site javascript. I've been using Slashdot since it had no client-side scripting, and it worked just fine without any javascript at all.

    I think that Slashdot/Dice is telling me that it's time to get off the computer and go out and live my life in the real world again. Perhaps I should listen.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Are we calling this one Gamma? by jrumney · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm calling it unreadable mess. (the bottom line of most posts, specifically).

  4. Why are we still using Xerox? by Stoutlimb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Xeroxing has become a seriously anachronistic term. Believe it or not, the target audience does know words like "duplicate" or "copy", but younger generations exposure to the "Xerox" company is very limited. Let that word die please.

  5. Re:I'm not saying aliens, but YEAH... ALIENS. by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, it's really so hard to believe.

    Denisova hominins and Neandertals are distinct, and separate from Homo Erectus. As well as Homo Sapiens.

    You should stop talking about anything related to this in public, or risk extreme mocking.

    How did we get from nothing to lower primates? I would posit that this is where the magic happened. Primates to humans was largely a bit of chance, but it could be easily replicated given many many years from tool inventing primates.

  6. Re:Pinky and the Brain by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The size of the brain is much less important than the brain to body mass ratio. Several animals have larger brains than humans (elephants being one), but they all have large bodies as well: http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/b...