Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Create World's First 3D-Printed Jet Engines

Zothecula writes: Working with colleagues from Deakin University and CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization), researchers from Australia's Monash University have created the world's first 3D-printed jet engine. While they were at it, they created the world's second one, too. One of them is currently on display at the International Air Show in Avalon, Australia, while the other can be seen at the headquarters of French aerospace company Microturbo, in Toulouse.

58 comments

  1. is it an engine or a display model? by fche · · Score: 1

    No word on whether the thing was ever powered up, or is simply a neat toy.

    1. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative

      No word on whether the thing was ever powered up, or is simply a neat toy.

      From the gizmodo link:

      According to Wu, the next step will be to fine-tune the finish of the components, with testing of a 3D-printed engine expected to take place within a couple of years.

      So what the have produced right now could be considered a static display model, but their aim is produce a working engine.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> According to Wu, the next step will be to fine-tune the finish of the components, with testing of a 3D-printed engine expected to take place within a couple of years.

      It is a display model.

    3. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by mlts · · Score: 1

      That is what I wonder about as well. Sintering requires heat, so that makes me wonder if the metal can handle the high temperatures that a turbine spins at.

      However, TFA states a 3D printed rocket engine was made and actually used by UCSD researches in 2013, so there is a good chance that this can be made to function.

      The rocket was 3D printed via DMLS, but then "hardened, polished, and assembled." I have zero clue on the hardening method, because non-ferrous metals can't be really heated and quenched.

      I'm hoping this is something that can see actual use, because if done right, maybe we can get more people researching jet/turbine engines.

      There is always the fact that a turbine engine can be used for a vehicle. With the 7+ speed transmissions available, as well as CVTs, the limitation of a turbine's narrow power band can be overcome at the gearbox.

    4. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this is just a press piece to throw out there so all of the jet engine patent trolls can start licking their lips? (Its not like you can just start cranking out your own jet engines and not pay the trolls under the bridge!)

    5. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      i want to see them 3d print a turbine blade. those fuckers are not easy to produce, and i dont think a 3d printed one would hold up.

    6. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the title should be: "World's first 3D-Printed Jet engine MODEL".

    7. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a printed turbine could run in a de-rated or less efficient engine, but the turbine wheel is THE most critical part of a good engine.

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    8. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed: if it hasn't been 'lit up' it's not an engine - it's a MODEL of an engine.

    9. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which actually means ... they haven't produced a 3d printed turbine. They've produced a model of one. Higher quality than I can produce, sure, but not one thats actually any more useful than one I can produce.

      This is a really good example of a stupid place to 3d print something, you're not going to get the strength you can get in traditional manufacturing techniques, its going to cost way more and you'll never find anyone with a clue about mechanical engineering trusting his/her life to one.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    10. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      Laser sintering of titanium is a well established process and should produce excellent turbine blades. 3d printing plus thermal spraying (a new one I've seen uses a form of laser spraying) might actually be able to produce parts better than would be possibly by any other means (such as machining cast metal) because you're not only heating the grains to join them together, but compacting them at high velocity.

      Even for the more "primitive" 3d printing metal techs, they're just lost wax casting where the original mold is 3d printed. So the results are no worse than any other lost wax cast metal.

      And yes, I was hopeful that this was a fully finished, working product. And that I'd be able to download the model. There's little that I'd be willing to pay the premium of laser titanium sintering for, but a micro jet turbine is one of those things. ;)

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    11. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Is there such a thing as a "simple" jet engine that a 3D metal printer could build?

    12. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by bkmoore · · Score: 2

      Even for the more "primitive" 3d printing metal techs, they're just lost wax casting where the original mold is 3d printed. So the results are no worse than any other lost wax cast metal.

      The problem with lost-wax and other molded metals is that the fatigue strength is much lower than forged or machined parts. Tolerances are also much looser because the tolerances from each step - wax positive, ceramic negative, poured positive, etc. add up. Fatigue life might not be an issue for a model airplane engine, but it is a safety issue for anything carrying humans.

    13. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Progress has to start somewhere, usually at the bottom of the learning curve.

    14. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Microturbines are one of those few things where 3d printing might actually prove an economical means of production - the keys being small, intricate, and very expensive.

      I wonder how effective it'd be to print out one of these, minus the windings. They've got crazy power output (up to 100kW sustained / 200kW peak) and efficiency (up to 98%) in a motor small enough (20kg; significantly less without the windings) to make a 3d printing service (or more realistically in this case, a custom CNC milling service) cost effective. Buying them commercially, they're something like $4k USD each. But there's a 3d model available, so....

      All I can say is, I'd love an electric car with one of those driving each wheel....

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    15. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Rei · · Score: 2

      The precision is actually pretty impressive, I've had a model I designed printed out in brass before, and some of the detail, I can't imagine milling achieving it. But yeah, no question that milling or sintering will get your stronger parts.

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    16. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Maybe a pulse jet? But I'd think they're even worse, with the white-hot parts...

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    17. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by mlts · · Score: 2

      For a more pedestrian use, there is one thing that an engine like this that has a specific power band range would be ideal at... and that would be a generator. Here in the US, it would need to be geared to 3600 RPM unless an inverter is used.

      If they were this efficient that they could get that much power output, it might be something to have as a backup generator for a house, as it could run from natural gas, propane, gasoline, or diesel.

    18. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by slacktide · · Score: 4, Informative

      Many commercial jet aircraft components are produced with lost wax casting using titanium, with subsequent hot isostatic pressing. (HIP.) Source: I am a propulsion design engineer at an large commercial aircraft manufacturer. Also "3D Printing" (we call it additive manufacturing) has been used in the aircraft industry for at least 10 years that I have experience with, although it is typically used for either tooling or test parts. I few a 3D printed titanium exhaust duct on a flight test in 2010, then implemented the same part for production using conventional manufacturing methods. 304 of them in service so far with no issues.

    19. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by necro81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      3D-printed metal has been used for quite a while in some of the lower-performance stages (lower pressure, lower temperature). Examples here. The key benefit is that they are able to integrate convoluted channels within the structure for cooling or mixing. You can also reduce weight by taking away significant internal volume, replacing it with ribs or a sparse matrix. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's mainstream, but it's close.

    20. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out some of the new EBM printers that print titanium.

      http://www.arcam.com/

      G.E. is planning on using this company's printers for turbine blades.

    21. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's one that was powered up.

      http://www.mmsonline.com/blog/post/video-miniature-jet-engine-made-through-additive-manufacturing

    22. Re: is it an engine or a display model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me 3d printing sounds like the worst approach for avoiding thermal creep. It would be fine for low tolerance parts or parts that wouldn't suffer a range of temperatures.

    23. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about what I was talking about? I was talking about an electric motor, not a fuel-driven one.

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    24. Re:is it an engine or a display model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pulse jet is, if anything, too simple. The capabilities of a 3D printer are wasted on something that is basically a metal pipe with a reed valve welded to one end -- you could build one with a welding torch and a pair of tin snips while you were waiting for the 3D printer to warm up.

  2. It's a nice sculpture, for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has it produced so much as a millinewton of thrust? A single rotation of the compressor? Been heated to a degree above room temperature?

    1. Re:It's a nice sculpture, for sure by stjobe · · Score: 1

      No, no, and no.

      But it's 3D-PRINTED! It's THE FUTURE! :/

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    2. Re:It's a nice sculpture, for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is no more a jet engine than the models used to build and paint as a kid were airplanes. FFS.

    3. Re:It's a nice sculpture, for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      My orgasm shall be seen from Andromeda. Millions of years hence, my jizz, travelling at the speed of light, will be a reminder of the Great 3D Printing Revolution. Never again shall a Luddite operate a factory, or melt metal ore, NAY! LUDDITE! We shall enter the GLORIOUS GAME CHANGING POST-SCARCITY ERA!!!

      (healing severed spinal cords forever forbidden, however)

    4. Re:It's a nice sculpture, for sure by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Just think, the world's first 3-D printed jet crash debris field.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  3. Not a functioning engine - Only engine parts by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    "According to Wu, the next step will be to fine-tune the finish of the components, with testing of a 3D-printed engine expected to take place within a couple of years."

    1. Re:Not a functioning engine - Only engine parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But head transplants "within a couple of years", totally impossible. 3D printed jet engines? Sure, two years!

  4. Stop the hype by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

    Clickbaity hype like this doesn't just waste my time, it tends to cause apathy and skepticism of science and engineering in the populace at large. Stop it.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Stop the hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing my first 3D printed object at an engineering job almost 20 years ago caused apathy and skepticism. Pointing out the limitations caused much derision from the church of 3D printing.

  5. Legitimate use for 3D printing by monkeyxpress · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is just a display model, but this is actually one of the applications of 3D printing worth getting excited about.

    Jet engines are a good candidate because they are low volume, high margin, and the current designs are compromised somewhat by the existing manufacturing technologies available. The ability to make more complex aerodynamic forms, create single parts with variations in material composition throughout, and the potential to speed up development and testing of different designs is huge for this industry.

    However there are still a lot of issues to work through, and I’m not sure how they are ever going to produce a sintered turbine blade that can perform as well as an existing one. I would imagine much of their research is going into this area but these are tough problems to solve.

    1. Re:Legitimate use for 3D printing by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      The limitations of the existing manufacturing technologies really aren't in the realm of designing new parts or putting them together. It's keeping them together after the thing has been spinning for a couple thousand hours. Computerized CNC is a well advanced, constantly improving technology that works pretty well. You just don't slap a new turbine spindle in an engine and blast down the runway - you have to test it for hundreds of hours before you even put it under the wing.

      So 3D 'printing' (which isn't really what this technique is) won't get you out of design and test any faster. It probably won't even help you create a one off part for an older engine - if you have drawings detailed enough to print it, you have drawings detailed enough to mill it.

      Next thing you know, we're going to be printing jet engines on the Internet.....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Legitimate use for 3D printing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jet engines are an awful candidate. The tolerances and material requirements to not tear themselves apart are tremendous. We're talking about turbine blades spinning at 5k-45k RPM, at temperatures of several hundred degrees, and pressures far above atmospheric, and an airstream a few hundred MPH in velocity.

      The inspection process for the individual blades, and then then for their attachment to the mount, to ensure that an imbalance doesn't destroy the engine is tremendously demanding.

    3. Re:Legitimate use for 3D printing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be excited when I see strength and durability comparison tests done between traditionally manufactured jet engines and their 3d printed counterparts. I think everyone already knew it was possible to print something that looks like a jet engine.

    4. Re:Legitimate use for 3D printing by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      compromised somewhat by the existing manufacturing technologies available.

      Yea, like strength of materials ... guess what you're not getting out of something 3d printed ...

      This is a stupid place to use 3d printing.

      Its fine research for other things, but turbines aren't so low a volume that it makes sense to print them. They are pretty trivial to make using traditional methods and are easy to make reliable using traditional methods. It is FAR easier to make a safe turbine than it is a V8 internal combustion engine like in most cars, which is why so many aircraft use turbines (excluding situations where piston engines simply don't work)

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:Legitimate use for 3D printing by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2

      Jet engines are an awful candidate. The tolerances and material requirements to not tear themselves apart are tremendous. We're talking about turbine blades spinning at 5k-45k RPM, at temperatures of several hundred degrees, and pressures far above atmospheric, and an airstream a few hundred MPH in velocity.

      The inspection process for the individual blades, and then then for their attachment to the mount, to ensure that an imbalance doesn't destroy the engine is tremendously demanding.

      On the other hand, there is a case to be made for an aim-for-the-stars strategy. If you can build a turbine blade you can build anything. I would have thought compressor blades would be a much more likely candidate, but if they can get this to work, more power to them. And maybe 3d printing will give them options they would not otherwise have: internal bleed air cooling channels that follow the leading edge along its curvature, for instance. It's possible that given completely different design and manufacturing capabilities, they'll be able to make something that can do the same job with different tradeoffs.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    6. Re:Legitimate use for 3D printing by fche · · Score: 1

      "I think everyone already knew it was possible to print something that looks like a jet engine." ... except the university's funding agencies.

    7. Re:Legitimate use for 3D printing by maestroX · · Score: 1

      speed up development and testing? I'd guess they have computer models for that, waiting for a printer takes time

  6. fuck fuck fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck you Slashdot for autoplay video ads with sound on your front page

  7. Two years 'til power up? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    If they can create the parts that fast, why don't they just power it up, see which parts fail, and improve those, rather than trying to improve it before testing? After all, they can reprint broken/worn parts (and probably reassemble) within a 2-3 week period.

    Granted, I know the grad students and postdocs need to write their papers, and I know sintered metal isn't always as strong as parts made via other methods, but two years seems a bit long for the fire-up process.

    --
    That is all.
  8. China is in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Methinks that as 3D printing becomes more reliable and cheaper then the production of a lot of heavy industry goods will be taken back to Europe and North America. In fact, even the small and cheap items of everyday life will be produced at home.

    1. Re:China is in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you need a bit more reality and less sci-fi uncritical gee-whiz fanboyism.

      Even if what you said is possible, we need to drastically review how we operate our economy, indeed, revise what an "economy" even means anymore.

      When machines produce everything but consume nothing, and people consume everything and produce nothing, what does "employment" even mean anymore?

      Can we work on that first, please?

  9. Quality of metal? by chadkennedyonline · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's made from metal, which is very cool! But aircraft components undergo rigorous inspection looking for cracks, defects, etc in the structure of the metal itself. Will this 3D-printed metal meet those standards?

    1. Re:Quality of metal? by Rick+in+China · · Score: 1

      That's not the problem. The problem it it has been done before for rocket engines that have actually been fired up - the metals used were superalloys, in SpaceX case Inconel specifically. Those rocket engines have been in use for some time - and the problem with this story is that it lacks credibility in the "we're first' market for several reasons.

  10. Elon Musk had a video demo in 2013 by Layzej · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a video of Elon Musk printing titanium engine components way back in 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  11. Laser metal sintering by wired_parrot · · Score: 1

    Isn't the process used laser metal sintering? There's no need to use trendy buzzwords ("3-d printing") that give the false impression that this is a new technique that a hobbyist could do in his basement, when really this is just a variation of a well established industrial process, that requires large industrial tooling.

  12. What could possibly go wrong? by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    They want me to trust my life to this thing!

  13. come back when you get airworthy certification by swschrad · · Score: 1

    as in 10,000 hours between minors, and 50,000 hours between major rebuilds.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  14. Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a really good way to create a jet engine that flies apart without warning. 3D printed metals will never have the structural integrity of cast metals.

  15. Completely false headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GE aviation did this a while ago, and theirs ran.

  16. Another day... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

    Another stupid 3D printing story....

  17. CSIRO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, now we'll have to pay each time we see an airplane.

    Eat shit, patent trolls.

  18. the first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A set of models for a working jet engine was posted to Thingiverse (http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:114468) on July 7, 2913. It includes video. A second set of models for a working Low Bypass Turbofan Jet Engine was published by gahwar a few months later (http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:150694).

    Wut's all this, then?