Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Facebook Press WA For $40M For New UW CS Building
theodp (442580) writes "Nice computer industry you got there. Hate to see something bad happen to it." That's the gist of a letter sent by Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Google, Code.org, and other tech giants earlier this week asking the WA State Legislature to approve $40M in capital spending to help fund a new $110M University of Washington computer science building ($70M will be raised privately). "As representatives of companies and businesses that rely on a ready supply of high quality computer science graduates," wrote the letter's 23 signatories, "we believe it is critical for the State to invest in this sector in a way that ensures its vibrancy and growth. Our vision is for Washington to continue to lead the way in technology and computer science, but we must keep pace with the vast demand." The UW Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering profusely thanked tech leaders for pressing for a new building, which UW explained "will accommodate a doubling of our enrollment." Coincidentally, the corporate full-press came not long after the ACM Education Council Diversity Taskforce laid out plans "to get companies to press universities to use more resources to create more seats in CS classes" to address what it called "the desperate gap between the rising demand for CS education and the too-few seats available.
This is the worst kind of corporate welfare: public costs for private benefits.
I'm going to bet its so we can get cheaper labor but wtf do I know other than my superiors keep lowering by hiring budgets.
But dang, MS, you could write a check and it'd be a fucking rounding error on your earnings last year...
If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
Back when I was an undergrad in that program they limited themselves to 100 undergrads. EE was a separate program.
And the CS department was in a very dumpy building right across from the Student Union building that was a notorious firetrap.` That was a couple of buildings ago. If I remember they remodeled their current building (the old EE building) in 2003.
Translation:
"As representatives of companies and businesses that rely on recent graduates that are ignorant of their own value, we believe it is critical for the State to invest in our bottom line in a way that ensures continued profit delivered to our shareholders. Our vision is for Washington to continue to lead the way in producing an abundance of CS graduates, so that the few that actually negotiate their salary can't get what they want because the market is flooded."
They should build colleges in india , china and such . They are going to outsource as soon as anything makes business sense anyways .
The new classic view is ugly as shit.
I mean, holy crap, what facilities do you need to teach CS? A climate-controlled room with whiteboards, markers, chairs, some electrical outlets, and wifi. Bonus points for a projector.
Most CS happens in your own head, on your laptop, or by talking with other people. You don't need to be on the Starship Enterprise.
I have a counter suggestion: make the bastards pay reasonable taxes, and then the state will be able to afford to put up a nice shiny new building. Instead of having to say, beg $70 million in the first place.
Why is Snark Required?
Apple literally has $178,000M in cash on hand, and the state had better ensure that $40M go to educating their future workforce.
Seriously. The good press Apple would have received to fund that project would be mind numbing, and probably pay for itself in terms of the PR and 'free' advertising that would result.
"Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
It'd be nice if they'd go to bat in other states, as well.
It's getting in the way of the free market entrepreneurs again!
I bet I could set up a CS program for half that.
Every single state should tell them all of F*ck off until they stop pushing for cheap foreign programmers. Why even have CS/Eng programs domestically when all they want to do is drive the wages for those grads down with more foreign workers? I'm sick of these companies talking out of both sides of their mouths.
Restart some real mentoring/apprenticeship programs within your companies too, while you're at it, so universities can stop trying to be technical schools where students only learn the language-de-jour so their grads can 'hit the ground running' (ie., companies don't need to do any work training them in domain-specific frameworks).
Bitter? Nah.
You drop your H-1B visa requests.
Ken
Would it perhaps be better to take sharp kids straight out of HS who have the interest and the aptitude, and give them 2-3 year internships where they learn 'on the job'?
(I'm a web guy, so I'm not sure if that style of training would carry over to things like embedded systems.)
Public Disclosure Commission records show that five of those who signed the letter calling for increased WA State spending - Microsoft General Counsel and Code.org Director Brad Smith, Code.org CEO Hadi Partovi, Madrona VC and Amazon.com Director Tom Alberg, Ignition Partners VC Brad Silverberg, Trilogy VC John Stanton - contributed money in 2010 to defeat I-1098, an initiative for a WA state income tax. Other contributors to Defeat 1098 included Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Amazon exec and Code.org Director Jeff Wilke, Microsoft Corporation, and other Microsoft execs, including then-CEO Steve Ballmer. After I-1098 went down in flames, Ballmer announced plans to sell $2B of Microsoft stock that might have been subject to as much as $180 million in state taxes under the quashed proposal.
You know, if these companies were good corporate citizens, and paid their fair share of taxes, then I'd certainly feel they have a right to comment on the disposition of said taxes.
But they don't do they?
"Cats like plain crisps"
Aren't these the same companies that pushed so hard for h1-b visa expansion?
who gives a shit about doubling undergrad enrollment when there aren't enough seats for all the people who want masters or phds to begin with
It seems to be a rather constant thing that corporations don't train anymore. They simply fob much of their expenses back to the public. With the current financial problems associated with higher education at the moment coupled with it's low quality due to lack of online acumen from professors why don't these multi billionaires simply flip out some pocket change to solve the problem?
They don't seem to be very eager for new talent, or to care that much, they hire H1-B workers and displace locals. They don't do internally training generally, and they have a high tendency to create products not for the betterment of mankind but more for their shareholders.
I hope congress doesn't listen to them, and more or less tells them to go fuck themselves which is really the answer they should be receiving. Our existence is not defined by them. It's not up to our government or public to create the corporate citizens they desire, it is to them and their massive war chests to invest in their own and potentially future employees.
Our education system is meant to facilitate and further our personal skills and interests, often in pursuit of a job but also because it's just what we're passionate about. It is not a corporate training facility.
$40M divided amongst those four companies (Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Google) is a drop in the bucket. If it's so important to them, let them pony up the money.
The CS facilities will help THEM get jobseekers that have competitive knowledge, increasing THEIR profitability.
So they should damn well pay for it themselves, not nick taxpayer money to help themselves.
If they want $40M from a government starved of cash, they ought to have damn well paid their taxes, then the state could have made the facilities without needing threats from the industry.
Why do they themselves claim to be in Nevada? So they don't have to pay Washington taxes. Washington taxes they're trying to get spent for their benefit. A cost to the state that you and your daughter will pay because you can't decide that despite having your home in Washington, you have decided to domicile at some tax haven elsewhere.
Unlike a corporation.
As long as you can find an interpretation that disobeys the spirit.
But forget that, what legal mandate requires the Washington State to pay $40M for a new CS lab and obey the threats of corporations not even registered in the state?
None?
Well, then, if we're going to accept "they obey the law as far as they must", then there's no reason to obey the threats of MS et al, is there?
Please give free money to help us compete in the glorious free market.
Regards,
The tech industries of Washinton State
P.S. - Remember, it's not socialism when you give welfare to corporations.
I heard those poor corporations could hardly afford the cost of bigger golden parachutes if they had to pay fair market value for American graduates.
Won't somebody think of the golden parachutes!
And how would they pay for newer yachts if they had to pay a state income tax?
Won't somebody think of the boats!
Plus 1,000,000!