Slashdot Mirror


Former MLB Pitcher Doxes Internet Trolls, Delivers Real-World Consequences

An anonymous reader writes: When Twitter trolls began posting obscene, sexually explicit comments about his teenage daughter, former MLB pitcher Curt Schilling responded by recording their comments and gathering personal information readily available to the public. He then doxxed two of them on his blog, resulting in one being suspended from his community college and the other being fired from his part-time job as a ticket seller for the New York Yankees. There were seven others in Curt's crosshairs, all college athletes, but although he hasn't publicly doxxed those individuals, he hints, "I found it rather funny at how quickly tone changed when I heard via email from a few athletes who'd been suspended by their coaches. Gone was the tough guy tweeter, replaced by the 'I'm so sorry' apology used by those only sorry because they got caught."

36 of 467 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Uh ...wat? by ckatko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's using information to garner a public lynching response. Just because the information exists somewhere public doesn't mean it's not doxxing. My drivers license is public information. But if you put it next to a "guy flips old lady the bird" video on YouTube, you are inciting a public response. You are conveniently linking data to the emotional information that would incite someone to act.

    But that's just like, uh, my opinion man. So feel free to disagree.

  2. Re:Uh ...wat? by mattventura · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Better question is how dumb does a troll have to be to actually be linked to their real-life identity without someone actually cracking their account security?

  3. Re:Uh ...wat? by sabri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's using information to garner a public lynching response

    which, in this particular case, was the best thing he could have done.

    His only three alternatives were, in order of saneability:

    - do nothing;
    - go to a local police station and see the complaint archived in a desk;
    - do what I probably have done and get a shotgun out to protect his little girl from threats of sexual assault and worse;

    This guy is the best dad this girl could have right now.

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  4. Re:And the escalation continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So shitposters are allowed to be as vile as is possible to be, and nobody is allowed to do anything to fight back or we're "stooping to their level."

    How very convenient... for the shitposters.

    Let me guess, you still believe the "don't feed the trolls" line? And I guess you also fell for "if you ignore them they'll stop teasing you" too? Most kids eventually discover that the only way to actually make that stop is to, completely out of the blue and unexpectedly, knock the teaser's front teeth out... and that's basically what Schilling did.

  5. Should be more common by Rigel47 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All too often we assume that dealing with trolls is like pissing in the wind but a few crushing responses now and then (being made "famous" and getting fired) is a start. The idiocy of these guys writing stuff like that to a dude who has a wide audience is nothing short of astounding. It's akin to threatening Obama and then being surprised when the Secret Service shows up.

    At any rate, screw the scumbags, they deserve their comeuppance.

  6. Re:And the escalation continues by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, 'cause it's so much better to let the trolls troll.

    "The wiser head gives in" only means that the assholes get their way. Nothing else.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Re:Doxing is asking for trouble. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A truly intelligent person ignores the taunts of idiots on the internet

    Not always. Sometimes the best thing is TO confront someone. My first year of high school I was bullied. Right up until the day I laid him flat with a bloody nose. After that there were 0 taunts. He thought I was easy pickings coming 'from a christian school'. That just means we hide what we do from the teacher better than you.

    The internet is forever. It is good to end it sooner than before you get to 'comfortable' behind your keyboard.

    Actually, fucking with people you do know is a bad idea too,
    Which was his EXACT point. He could have within a couple hours drive been on their doorstep with a baseball bat and a little fun time for himself in the driveway. Instead he just called them out. They were basically fucking with someone they thought they could safely bully. They found out otherwise. These jackasses are little more than cowards and bullies.

    Yes they are just words but words carry power to many. Do not dismiss it. You are basically saying the bullies have the right to do so and everyone should just suck it from them. Well the bullied ALSO has rights. Some will be bullies themselves and know how to handle it like a proper alpha male.

  8. The thing about witch hunts... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is that sooner or later we're all witches.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:The thing about witch hunts... by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      we're talking about targeted low grade comeuppance for bad behavior, directed at the actual douchebags who committed the bad behavior

      we're not talking about targeting waves of completely innocent teenage girls for hysterical spasms of imagined delusional fantastic crimes, and then murdering them brutally

      so no, sorry, your analogy sucks and you don't know what you're talking about

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. Pandora's Box by mrex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The irresponsibility with which the modern media operates astounds me. The cheerleading tone of this article is unmissable. We are supposed to rise from our seats and applaud this sportsmensch who hunted down the skeeves speaking ill of his daughter. And hey, on one level, I do.

    But here's a little perspective that NJ.com apparently can't be counted on to supply. Just because this case is pretty black and white doesn't mean they all will be. The next time, some jackass will create social networking profiles with breadcrumbs leading back to their real target, and with minimal effort will get a Curt Schilling to do the dirty work, and bear the legal liability, for them.

    This is why we have police departments. I fully recognize that they've deteriorated in capability and trustworthiness, losing their role as guardians of the real public interest to politics and less esoteric concerns like meeting budgets and justifying headcounts, but that's a reason to fix what's broken about our system, not replace it with every-man-for-himself vigilantism.

    1. Re:Pandora's Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I'll take vigilantism that gets things done over police that doesn't, and furthermore is unlikely to change.

  10. I read some of the comments to her by Skynyrd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The comments were horrific. Directed at her, because she was his daughter. Her only "crime" was being the daughter of a sports star. She had done nothing, but comments ranged from raping her, to penetrating her with a baseball bat.

    I hope every one of these sick little fuckers loses their job, gets kicked out of school *and* has their name attached to the story. I want somebody to find these comments *every* time that one of these guys is googled, forever.

    This shit won't stop until there are actual consequences. It won't ever stop completely, but it could certainly help.

    1. Re:I read some of the comments to her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope every one of these sick little fuckers loses their job, gets kicked out of school *and* has their name attached to the story.

      And then what? Go on welfare? Be homeless? Beg on the street? Never get an education or an opportunity to better himself? Life in jail? Never be able to get a job again?

      What's your plan that doesn't somebody else (likely us taxpayers) having to support them for the rest of their lives? Are you comfortable with angry people walking around with no money, nothing to do, and completely desperate?

      Patting them on the head and tell them it's ok there won't be any repercussions ain't the damn answer either.

    2. Re:I read some of the comments to her by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's your plan that doesn't somebody else (likely us taxpayers) having to support them for the rest of their lives? Are you comfortable with angry people walking around with no money, nothing to do, and completely desperate?

      Perhaps that's something they should've thought about before they applied for that cushy Object Lesson opening.

      How much vile and inexcusable behavior are you ready to tolerate "so taxpayers don't have to support them"?

    3. Re:I read some of the comments to her by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure these kids will be fine in the long term. They will likely suffer for awhile until they get themselves back on their feet - perhaps at a different job or school. However, they will hopefully learn that actions (including stuff you post online) have consequences and there are actual people on the other side of that screen. Hopefully, other people who would otherwise have engaged in the same actions will learn from this as well and not post horrific "I'm going to rape you" threats (which is their horrid way of saying "you've said something online that I don't like but I'm horrible at debating my position without resorting to graphic threats of violence").

      Maybe if more trolls found themselves victims of the consequences of their own actions, the Internet would be a nicer place.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  11. Re: Uh ...wat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Sounds like they should have no problems getting a job as a cop then.

  12. Re:Uh ...wat? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's a story about Curt Schilling calling out the guys who are talking about fisting and raping his underage daughter, and you're "uncomfortable" with how people use the word "doxing." Way to keep things in perspective.

    Here, here's a definition for you:

    search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  13. Re:And the escalation continues by Skidborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny how the person who recommends violent responses to trouble hides their identity to prevent anyone from responding in kind to them.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  14. The Metaphor by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Salem Witch Trials were good thing. After all, there might have been some real witches there.

    In this case you have people literally flying around on metaphorical brooms on Twitter.

    If there had been actual witches eating children, are you saying they should have done nothing? Because that's what you are saying should be done in the case of people talking on Twitter about how they want to rape his daughter.

    We aren't talking about witch-hunts here against people who have done nothing. We are talking about bringing consequences to people who in fact HAVE done something and expect nothing to happen as a result.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The Metaphor by Skidborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In this one case. However, the methodology is still extremely dangerous to use. The Salem witch trial methods would still have killed many innocents even if witches did exist. And that's what is going to happen here.

      Someone moderately clever will post horrifically offensive content under someone else's name, then "catch" the designated offender and post their info and purported crimes to social media.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  15. Re:Virtual Self Defense by mrex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on, you realistically expect the police to handle every case like this?

    Police departments that currently exist? Not in every case we'd be talking about, no. We evidently need something new, but that something new is more like a police department than mob justice.

    This is no different from having a reasonable right to self defense to protect your life.

    The claim that mob internet justice is "no different" than individual right to self-defense is so utterly ridiculous that it borders on not worth responding to. Here is a rather meaningful difference: when you're going to shoot someone, you can see them and know what you're aiming at. I guess you didn't think of that.

    If you are being harassed online you should be able to do something about it

    I completely concur. That's the point of what I'm saying. You totally should be able to do something about it, and that something should not require you to become a private investigator, politician, lawyer, judge, and security guard. Nor should it only be available to those with enough resources: time, money, knowledge, physical or intellectual capabilities, etcetera.

    The earlier you take action, the more you cut off the really bad stuff.

    This behavior pattern - acting before thinking it through - leads to what's called "flailing". Experts will tell you pretty universally that this is one of the worst things to do if you're being stalked and harassed on the internet.

    What if what is broken is having inherent trust in the system to do everything for you?

    Then you've engaged in a strawman. Nothing about what I've just said demands "having inherent trust in the system to do everything for you".

  16. Re:Uh ...wat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No it is NOT the best thing he could do. He is completely reliant on the information he gathered being factual and correct, which he has no way to verify. If someone had decided to leave a trail to an innocent person he could well be up for some serious legal trouble not to mention the pain he inflicted on them. vigilante responses are dangerous. His targets may have been correct this time, but I will almost bet everything I have that someone will now try and take advantage of what he has done to screw over someone innocent next time.

  17. Re:Don't poke the internet by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    trolls are common pathetic cowards. they're middle school bullies in adult bodies if they aren't in fact actual middle school bullies. any effective defense against their lame efforts immediately chases them away like shining a light on a bunch of cockroaches

    you're talking about another kind of douchebag: the stalker

    but what gets the kind of person who becomes a celebrity stalker excited isn't avenging trolls

    if curt schilling or his daughter attract an actual griefing stalker, it won't be because of this episode

    and even then, the proper defense is the response he's already engaged in: a good offense. shut the shitbag down, hard, immediately. schilling sounds like he has his act together. his daughter will be protected and taken care of from the slime out there

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  18. How? Reaction is equal and opposite. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Salem witch trial methods would still have killed many innocents even if witches did exist

    But all that we are seeing in THIS case is someone pointing out what people are saying to others. So the harm done is directly proportional ONLY to the persons own actions.

    Someone moderately clever will post horrifically offensive content under someone else's name, then "catch" the designated offender and post their info and purported crimes to social media.

    So since that might happen one in 500 million times of ACTUAL trolling - so we should do nothing at all about real trolls that we can actually combat. Even though it can be disproved...

    The good of the many and all that. We should not back down from preventing common crime because of a hypothetical.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How? Reaction is equal and opposite. by Skidborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We should combat crime using methods that do not lend themselves so readily to abuse. A legal system exists for the purpose of punishing crime. Mob vigilantism has proven throughout history to be dangerously unjust.

      Don't get caught up in your superhero fantasies and think that they can be applied to the real world.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  19. Re:Uh ...wat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    No it is NOT the best thing he could do. He is completely reliant on the information he gathered being factual and correct, which he has no way to verify. If someone had decided to leave a trail to an innocent person he could well be up for some serious legal trouble not to mention the pain he inflicted on them. vigilante responses are dangerous. His targets may have been correct this time, but I will almost bet everything I have that someone will now try and take advantage of what he has done to screw over someone innocent next time.

    Agree 100%. Cheer-leading for SJWs makes me sick. But, it makes sense. Many people have trouble seeing consequences past the next 30 seconds. Pretty scary, isn't it?

  20. This is about accountability by wickerprints · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The police only investigate serious crimes or imminent threats where either a lot of money or someone's life is on the line, and even then, they aren't fast, accurate, or trustworthy. The legal system does not have the time or the motivation or the resources to deal with what is the online equivalent of schoolyard antics.

    That is not to say what these idiots were doing was trivial or harmless. But let's put it this way: suppose every time you had someone come up to you and say something completely disgusting and violent to your face, that your response was to do absolutely NOTHING except file a police report, do you really think that would stop such behavior? If someone punched you, are you just going to stand there and not defend yourself, instead electing to wait until you can go to the nearest station and file a report?

    The bottom line is that you cannot reasonably expect to have a free internet while at the same time tell the government or law enforcement that users must be held accountable for their online actions. People suggesting that victims simply shrug off such behavior are either themselves psychopaths or have never themselves been the target of such abuse. And to then call out the victim for vigilantism is the height of delusion. Oh, but what if this opens up a slippery slope of unchecked vigilantism and real-world consequences for people who are the mistaken subject of retaliation?

    Um,... I have some news for you: it's already lawless out there. It has always been. You can't simultaneously tell people to shrug off the trolls because "oh well that's the internet for you," yet cry foul when people fight back, saying "but what if innocent people lose their jobs?" That's hypocrisy. People are already suffering real-world consequences of the behaviors of trolls. You are just selectively inured to it because it happens a LOT more often and it's been going on for a lot longer than people successfully fighting back...and when they do fight back, it goes viral and makes the news because so many people are so desperate for a solution that it feels good to see the good guy winning for once.

    That should tell you how completely nonexistent civility is in the online realm. People SHOULD be accountable for their actions online. But don't fucking tell me that it's the job of the government to do that for me, because we all know how PERFECTLY that works. What a joke. Accountability is not actually kicking someone in the balls for being a jackass. It's being able to carry out the promise of that consequence.

  21. Re:Uh ...wat? by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Awesome is doxxing trolls?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  22. Re:Sure... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How could you dox Curt Schilling? He's got better name recognition then most of the politicians in DC. Maybe you could release home address, but if you're a dad and the options are a) read tweets discussing the rape of your daughter, and b) deal with a bunch of dorks trying to vandalize your house you better not pick a.

    The same principle applies to drawing trolls to himself. He's a grown man who has put up with Yankees fans and enraged Rhode island taxpayers. He can handle abuse. She's a teenager who happens to have a famous father and enough softball talent to play at the college level. She can probably handle it, but why should she have to?

  23. Re:Uh ...wat? by sg_oneill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Agree 100%. Cheer-leading for SJWs makes me sick. But, it makes sense. Many people have trouble seeing consequences past the next 30 seconds. Pretty scary, isn't it?

    Is this ever expanding definition of "SJW" now including protective fathers pissed off that creeps are harassing their daughters?

    Well I guess I'm an SJW then, because anyone hurts my little girl and I'll put a bullet in their head.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  24. Re:And the escalation continues by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The trolls threatened to rape his daughter.

    He exposed their identity leading them to be kicked off their teams due to their actions.

    I fail to see how he "stooped to their level." Did he threaten them with violence? Did he pledge to jam a baseball bat up their rear? Did he post their address and claim he was going there to beat them to a bloody pulp? No. He just mentioned who they were. That was it.

    I'm sick of this "posting graphic statements saying you're going to rape someone and then claiming 'just joking' when you're called on it." I'm sick of people even trying to claim freedom of speech. We have freedom of speech, but not freedom of consequence. If you threaten someone with violence (and, yes, raping someone *IS* violence), don't expect to use "freedom of speech" as a Get Out Of Jail Free card.

    Part of this is personal for me. Growing up, I was bullied by a group of kids. I'm male, so the bullying didn't involve rape threats, but it did involve following me around and taunting me. Every. Single. School Day. Multiple times a day. Doors to my classroom would be blocked so I'd have to push past them enduring more taunts. I began to become paranoid that anyone who was laughing was laughing at me. One push one way or another and I could have been another story of a teen taking his own life or going out in a blaze of bullets. Luckily, a friend of mine spoke with my bullies who backed off. Turns out they just thought they were "having a little fun".

    And this is what galls me the most. The trolls' friends telling Curt that this was all just kids "having fun." Because, apparently, some kids are so psychopathic that they can't even begin to fathom what their "fun" does to people until it is either made blindingly obvious to them or until they suffer personal consequences.

    As a father and as a victim of bullying, I applaud Curt for what he did. He didn't get violent. He didn't rant and rave. He just stood firm, acted like a protective father, and took down some nasty Internet trolls.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  25. Re:Idiotic by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sociopaths and Misanthropes are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

    The foundation of their illness, the description - basically - no, not basically. At every definition, these are completely different.

    LEARN 2 WORD.

    I won't beleaguer the point, but you need to be slapped on the ass with a dictionary.

    There are too many sociopaths. The internet seems to be a perfect playground where ignorant people can pretend to be informed, and hurt other people in the process.

  26. Re:Idiotic by the+phantom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since you refuse to clarify, and I, being relatively ignorant, must rely on the dictionary definitions, I don't understand the point you are trying to make:

    sociopath: a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

    misanthrope: a person who dislikes humankind and avoids human society.

    From those definitions, it appears that it is possible to be a misanthrope and not be sociopathic, but that one of the defining characteristics of being a sociopath is some level of misanthropy (or, at least, misanthropic behaviour). Of course, rather than berating the original poster, perhaps you could attempt to bring clarity. On the other hand, perhaps you were trying to exemplify the misanthropy suggested in the original post, in which case I apologize for missing the joke.

  27. Re:Uh ...wat? by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    SJW seems to be code words for people who don't like trolls. The definition is just so vague. Anyone trying to upset the sexist status quo, or even hinting that someone somewhere might be sexist, is an SJW. It's like a knee jerk reaction to political correctness, except that this has nothing to do with political correctness except in the mind of trolls.

  28. Most of the internet is like that now by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Only as dumb as more than 99% of Facebook users.
    Remember we used to tell kids not to give out their real name on the net? Then Facebook happened and what used to appear to be dumb is now the default.
    It would be truly ironic for you to post what you've written above if your name really is Matthew Ventura.
    Even more so if I was really the software dbaseIII that had become self aware over the years instead of someone taking the common form of it's name as a handle.

  29. Re:Uh ...wat? by Xyrus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But while I have little sympathy for these dickheads, and I completely understand his motivation, I don't like this eye-for-an-eye response.

    Easy to say when it isn't your daughter receiving death/rape threats. I don't know of a single parent who wouldn't do this (and more) if their children are threatened.

    There is no proportionality when something like this goes viral.

    Then the assholes shouldn't have said anything in the first place. We're not talking about a couple of screwed up kids thinking that they're funny. The people doing this were adults. There is no fucking excuse for this.

     

    Should these guys have their lives ruined over this?

    Actions have consequences. I don't know why people can't get this through their heads. The same freedom that allows you to post rape treats is the same freedom someone can use to hunt you down and expose you.

    If someone came onto your lawn and started yelling about how they were going to rape your daughter, they're not going to get a little slap on the wrist. They'd get arrested, thrown in jail, and possibly be put on a sex offender list.

    IF YOU WOULDN'T DO IT IN REAL LIFE, THEN DON'T FUCKING DO IT ON THE INTERNET.

    Should they be subjected to the same bullying magnified through the lens of a million internet users out for "justice"? I think not.

    Tough. Shit. They should have thought about that before publicly posting rape threats.

    If one of these idiots kills himself over the response Curt will have effectively sentenced him to death. We shouldn't be comfortable with that outcome as a society.

    No, he wouldn't. He's not responsible for what people do with the information. He's letting people know that there as some twisted fucks in their midst. That's a public service. I'm pretty sure most parents don't want to be associated with (or have their kids associated with) someone who thinks it's funny to make brutal rape threats.

    Actions have consequences. If you can't handle the consequences or potential consequences of your actions, THEN DON'T FUCKING DO THEM. The fact that these assholes/idiots didn't stop to think about all the ways this could come back and bite them on the ass is no excuse. We may be a society laws, but we are also a society of humans.

    --
    ~X~