Slashdot Mirror


Rosetta Photographs Its Own Shadow On Comet 67P/C-G

mpicpp notes an image release from the European Space Agency showing the shadow of its Rosetta probe on the comet it's currently orbiting. The probe snapped the picture from a very low flyby — only six kilometers off the surface. The image has a resolution of 11cm/pixel. The shadow is fuzzy and somewhat larger than Rosetta itself, measuring approximately 20 x 50 metres. If the Sun were a point source, the shadow would be sharp and almost exactly the same size as Rosetta (approximately 2 x 32 m). However, even at 347 million km from 67P/C-G on 14 February, the Sun appeared as a disc about 0.2 degrees across (about 2.3 times smaller than on Earth), resulting in a fuzzy “penumbra” around the spacecraft’s shadow on the surface. In this scenario and with Rosetta 6 km above the surface, the penumbra effect adds roughly 20 metres to the spacecraft’s dimensions, and which is cast onto the tilted surface of the comet.

21 comments

  1. This is becoming a new trend? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    Between Curiosity and Rosetta we seem to be in an age of Space Selfies.

    And they say that robots don't take after their creators....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:This is becoming a new trend? by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      And they say that robots don't take after their creators....

      ...as long as they don't take off *after* their creators...

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:This is becoming a new trend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Between Curiosity and Rosetta we seem to be in an age of Space Selfies.

      And they say that robots don't take after their creators....

      At least NASA is finally starting to get the shadows right after those embarassing "moon" photos.

  2. There is science here by hamjudo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is more than just a selfie, the shadow cast by a known object adds depth, scale, and many other scientifically interesting details about the comet, and about the space craft itself.

    And for those who like science fiction... If any aliens are riding the Rosetta probe, they will have to duck while the picture is being taken.

    1. Re:There is science here by idji · · Score: 1

      it's also a highly reflective photo, add immeasurably to the scientific value as the sun is DIRECTLY overhead.

    2. Re:There is science here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's indeed an interesting photo. What I don't understand is why we can see dark shadow lines when the light source is clearly directly behind the camera. Does anyone have an explanation for this?

    3. Re:There is science here by Pikoro · · Score: 2

      The sun is not a point source. This is the same reason you get 2 shadows during a solar eclipse. The umbra and penumbra. The probe is 6km above the surface and it's not big enough to completely block the sun at that range, hence the fuzzy shadow.

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    4. Re:There is science here by hey! · · Score: 2

      Hmmm. While your explanation is unquestionably true, I don't think you quite understood what the poster was asking. His question is, I think, about the sharp shadows behind ridges on the surface, not the shadow of the vehicle itself.

      I think his problem is an implicit assumption that if you drew a line from the center of the sun through the spacecraft, it would intersect the surface at a right angle. In that case you wouldn't expect cracks on the surface to display in such relief. However I believe that assumption is faulty, and that the rays of the sun intersect the surface at a considerable angle.

      This is not unlike seeing the shadow of a plane you are riding in on the surface of the Earth. Unless you are in the tropics, that shadow won't be directly beneath you. It will be off to one side. It will also be distorted as it is spread out across the non-perpendicular surface, but you won't necessarily notice that because of foreshortening.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  3. Re:Systemd, for or against? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel mostly against systemd. I think its sad its our only option and a sign that GNU has outlived their lifecycle, however system admins say systemd is over all more reliable. I dislike binary log files.

  4. Does this mean 6 more weeks of winter ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As per Groundhog Day ?

  5. Re:Systemd, for or against? by sysrammer · · Score: 1, Funny

    If Philae had been running systemd, it wouldn't have crashed.

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  6. Does that mean by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2

    Six more weeks of winter? Brrr.

  7. The important story is missing by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
    We seem to have, as is usual, a deficient summary. It does not mention the #1 important issue in this announcement:

    WHAT KIND OF SHIRT WAS HE WEARING?

    Because we can't move forward until we know this information. It's more important than anything the announcer said, that's for certain.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  8. Nice work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The detail in this overview is artistic. Well said....

  9. It saw its own shadow? So it means.... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1, Troll

    Six more years of budget cuts for NASA.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  10. 6 more weeks of asteroid showers? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    We're past groundhog day..

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  11. Philae by xSander · · Score: 1

    Too bad there's still no news on Philae. A flyby like this at the right spot would uncover where the damn lander is, right?

  12. I can't remember... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Does this mean there will or won't be 4 more weeks of winter on the comet?

  13. Ice "boulders" visible in photo by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

    What I notice in this photo (hi-res version) around the area of the shadow are the apparent shapes of the ice "boulders" that came together to form the comet in the first place. It reminds me of looking at chondrules in meteorites, that show the siliceous "hailstones" that formed as the planetary disc that would go on the form the planets cooled.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  14. fire a flare? by idanity · · Score: 0

    how difficult would it be for Rosetta to fire a flare behind itself (perhaps on the dark side) to take a better selfie? .............. it's that, or send up the lasers.

    --
    happy trials