Slashdot Mirror


Oldest Human Fossil Fills In 2.8-Million-Year-Old Gap In Evolution

GeekyKhan writes Archaeologists have unearthed a human jawbone—with teeth-- that is believed to be the oldest remains ever found from early humans. It belonged to the earliest specimen of Homo and dates back 2.8 million years. From NPR: "Although it's risky to say you've got the first or oldest of anything, Brian Villmoare, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, is sure he and his team have the earliest specimen of Homo, the human genus. 'Oh, yeah, it definitely is,' he says. 'We were looking for it — and by miraculous chance we happened to find it.' Villmoare and an international team from the U.S. and Ethiopia found a lower jaw with five teeth in a region of Ethiopia called Afar. They were working a hill that was full of fossils. 'I was on the other side of the hill,' he recalls, 'and they said, 'Brian! Brian! Come over here.' The partial jawbone — just the left side – was lying on the ground, having eroded out of the hill. Several dating methods confirmed its age as roughly 400,000 years older than the previous record for a human-related fossil."

94 comments

  1. Damn... A win for the creationists by Maritz · · Score: 5, Funny

    This particular gap has become two gaps.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    1. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This particular gap has become two gaps.

      one gap becomes two gaps two gaps become N gaps, ...... In the software business we call that an infinite recursion.

    2. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just like global warming the "scientists" keep changing the data and models. This is not science, science is only clear cut provable and reproducible common sense facts. How can anyone believe this is not just a huge scam from money-grabbing scientists.

    3. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      And they made my coffee get cold too! Damn those "scientists"! I heard they're responsible for getting Firefly cancelled also.

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    4. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by jandersen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, to a creationist, the fact that there are no intermediaries between you and your parents is proof that you are not related.

    5. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No amount of gaps is enough for the God of Gaps. Splitting a gap is a fine way to fill a gapping hole in the market coverage of a clothing seller.

    6. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And Achilles failed to catch up with the tortoise.

    7. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Let us just be glad that we are dealing with hominids, rather than real numbers; down that road lie the really, really, nasty tricks of the god-of-the-gaps...

    8. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, to a creationist, the fact that there are no intermediaries between you and your parents is proof that you are not related.

      And the "logic" behind that "thinking" is risible.

      "Irreducible complexity" is the same as "I can't figure out how it happened so God must have done it!" As if the limits of one's intellect constrain reality. Talk about intellectual arrogance.

    9. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Well, to a creationist, the fact that there are no intermediaries between you and your parents is proof that you are not related.

      To the religious fundamentalists, this is just more proof that Satan and his evil hoardes place false evidence to lure those whose faith is not solid away from Biblical truth.

    10. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really hope you're trolling. Please...please be trolling.

    11. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Well, to a creationist, the fact that there are no intermediaries between you and your parents is proof that you are not related.

      And the "logic" behind that "thinking" is risible.

      "Irreducible complexity" is the same as "I can't figure out how it happened so God must have done it!" As if the limits of one's intellect constrain reality. Talk about intellectual arrogance.

      Clarifying the argument: It is not merely "I can't figure out how it happened". It is "If *I* can't figure it out, no one can, because I am the brainiest, wickedly smart, scientist ever to have walked on this planet".

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    12. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, to a creationist, the fact that there are no intermediaries between you and your parents is proof that you are not related.

      To the religious fundamentalists, this is just more proof that Satan and his evil hoardes place false evidence to lure those whose faith is not solid away from Biblical truth.

      It is not just Satan who is planting all those evil evidence. Satan is being actively aided and abetted by the Omnipotent who is *not* removing the false evidence as soon as Satan does the planting. It am sure the Omniscient All Knowing God is just testing the faithful to find out how strong their faith is, which He already knows, by definition.

      Please give yourself a few minutes to let the brain return from that complex Yoga pose to return to normal.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    13. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Hey now, the whole point of Yoga (originally at least) was to *gain* enlightenment. That line of reasoning is more like playing Twister with an octopus.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    14. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Would you accept that they're joking? Seems likely as not.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    15. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

      I know you are joking, but in a way it is a win for creationists. After 2.8 million years, we have under 8 billion people on earth. Statistical models just don't support it. You have creationists that believe there could have been more people on earth prior to the flood than there are now, in just 1656 years when the lifespan was ~900 years per person. My great great grandparents had 11 children that lived to adulthood, and my grandparents had 6...try running those numbers. At just 4 surviving children per parents, using 33 years per "generation", you easily hit 8 billion in 1000 years.

    16. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      human ARE apes

    17. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      You've got it almost right...
      Just like muscles need exercise to grow, so does faith.

      Either that, or maybe he's trying to make a point?

    18. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some make a distinction between 'science' and 'stamp collecting'

    19. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      Both humans and Europeans are primates, evolved from primates. Apes also evolved from primates.

    20. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Faith is a 'slow grift' that much is true.

      You can't get people to accept obvious nonsense until they are emotionally invested in slightly less obvious nonsense.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    21. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly, my fitness trainer already knows how fit I am, so why test it? I might accidentally get more fit, or recognize my need to be, in the process.

      But, let he frivolity regarding what a very small minority of people believe continue. Be sure to tell yourself that represents Christianity as a whole, as your own personal "evidence plant".

      And for the record, Satan works for God. We do not live in a Manichean Dualist universe.

    22. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      That line of reasoning is more like playing Twister with an octopus.

      Throw in some nudity and body oil and you've got some good Hentai.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    23. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      No, but they're related from a common ancestor. We went down one fork, the great apes went down another.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    24. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Dualism vs non-Dualism is not unique to Christianity. Hinduism has its flavor of dualism (dwaitham) and non-dualism (adwaitham). But there the question are the souls of people same as the divinity (adwaitham) or is the soul of living beings distinct from the divine soul of the cosmos(dwaitham)?

      BTW I don't believe creationists are the majority among the Christians or they speak for all Christians. But they do wield political power way out of proportion to their true numbers.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    25. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well to be fair that's juts tortoises.

      They have the whole "something with a one in a million chance will happen 9 times out of ten" thing going for them when toy try to race one. Achilles could total have caught a slightly faster animal like a 3 legged dog.

    26. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      human ARE apes

      No, but they're related from a common ancestor. We went down one fork, the great apes went down another.

      Guess you missed the news... we're not "special" anymore, in our own family or subfamily anymore:

      "The Hominidae, also known as great apes, form a taxonomic family of primates, including four extant genera: the chimpanzees (Pan) with 2 species; gorillas (Gorilla) with 2 species; humans (Homo) with 1 species; and orangutans (Pongo) with 2 species."

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae

    27. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Troed · · Score: 1

      The Toba catastrophe theory suggests that a bottleneck of the human population occurred about 70,000 years ago, reducing the total human population to around 15,000 individuals

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    28. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a horde and a hoard are very different things, and since odds are that Satan would have both a Horde and a Hoard you need to be a bit more accurate in your statement

    29. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by Askmum · · Score: 1

      I know you are joking, but in a way it is a win for creationists. After 2.8 million years, we have under 8 billion people on earth. Statistical models just don't support it. You have creationists that believe there could have been more people on earth prior to the flood than there are now, in just 1656 years when the lifespan was ~900 years per person. My great great grandparents had 11 children that lived to adulthood, and my grandparents had 6...try running those numbers. At just 4 surviving children per parents, using 33 years per "generation", you easily hit 8 billion in 1000 years.

      You mean that the best possible model is statistically significant? Wouldn't you think there is a higher possibility that the population growth is not exponentially at all times? Surely, there are lies, damn lies and statistics.

      Do read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    30. Re:Damn... A win for the creationists by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I feel snubbed. Everyone else got two species! =)

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  2. teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that species of homo needed a toothbrush.

  3. Oh come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop badgering Larry King for information!

  4. So what's the new chain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone link the new/latest chain of ancestors?

    1. Re:So what's the new chain? by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      So far they're calling this an early H. habilis. That may change with further study or it may get a subspecies designator, but for now at least, it's H. habilis.

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
  5. East Indies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From NPR: "Although it's risky to say you've done it first Christopher Columbus, is sure he and his team have found westward passage to India"

      'Oh, yeah, it definitely is,' he says. 'We were looking for it — and by miraculous chance we happened to find it.'

    1. Re: East Indies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the science in that one is strong.

  6. Human origin by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 5, Funny

    So humans come from Afar?

    --
    -- Make America hate again!
    1. Re:Human origin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, humans come from jAfar, a very panicky sorcerer .

    2. Re:Human origin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And later in a cave nearby ...
      A Volkswagen Bug is hidden away in a cave.
      Turning the key, to everyone's amazement, it starts right up.
      Unlike today's cars, in the past they really built these things to last didn't they?

    3. Re:Human origin by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      This fossil comes from a long time ago in a region Afar away. Cue title scroll and John Williams music.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  7. Re:As if by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is not claimed to be a new species, but the earlies known remains from a wellknown genus: Homo. It probably is from a very early Homo habilis.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  8. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Complete line isn't good enough: I'll need two fossils and the sex tape before I agree that a gap in ancestry has been filled.

  9. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by Threni · · Score: 1

    You say that, but the faithheads won't be happy even with that. They'll probably just continue the "testing our faith" line, perhaps suggesting the devil put them there or something. Of course, they won't offer any proof for this but.. you know....look at my robes, hat.. come on...you can trust me.

  10. Woman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientists believe the find is of a woman. When asked how they knew that, a spokesperson said "well, it was open".

    1. Re: Woman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you posted that as an A/C or wifey might chase you.

  11. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I'll need two fossils and the sex tape

    And a marriage certificate.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  12. Did the find the dinosaur bones he rode on? by Kaitiff · · Score: 0

    I mean, I recently watched the video of the creation museum down south and they very explicitly state that humans and dinosaurs both co-habitated w/in the last 6,000 years, give or take a millennium. Cuz, you know, the Bible....

    --
    If I sound stupid, it's not me talking....
    1. Re:Did the find the dinosaur bones he rode on? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I mean, I recently watched the video of the creation museum down south and they very explicitly state that humans and dinosaurs both co-habitated w/in the last 6,000 years, give or take a millennium. Cuz, you know, the Bible....

      I recently saw some video series about Ancient Aliens. Cus, you know, the Bible.....

      Guess we can't please everyone.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    2. Re:Did the find the dinosaur bones he rode on? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, humans and dinosaurs cohabit right now. I'm looking at a Cyanocitta cristata (bluejay) out my back window right now.

      Yes, bluejays are dinosaurs, at least since they moved Aves into Dinosauria.

      Which makes the fundies right for the wrong reasons. It would drive them even more crazy if you pointed out that birds evolved from dinosaurs, eh?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:Did the find the dinosaur bones he rode on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, I recently watched the video of the creation museum down south and they very explicitly state that humans and dinosaurs both co-habitated w/in the last 6,000 years, give or take a millennium. Cuz, you know, the Bible....

      Either paleontology as a profession hasn't evolved at all in the past few thousand years or they're right:
      http://www.genesispark.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ancient65.jpg

    4. Re:Did the find the dinosaur bones he rode on? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Which is backed up by that documentary which clearly shows stone age families having a dinosaur as a pet and using various animals as household appliances. Apparently, they also loved saying "Yabba-Dabba-Doo."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:Did the find the dinosaur bones he rode on? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My wife's parents own a cockatoo. That thing is definitely dinosaur. On a related note, the idea of a 10+ foot tall cockatoo is frightening!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:Did the find the dinosaur bones he rode on? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      I guess that means that humans have ridden on dinosaurs then. Wild ride on a big ostrich.

    7. Re:Did the find the dinosaur bones he rode on? by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      There is a fairly large population of feral turkeys near where I live and work - the adult males are slightly terrifying. Every time I see one I think of the dinosaurs who eat Wayne Knight in "Jurassic Park". Only with [more] feathers.

  13. Probably just another hoax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just another Piltdown Man or Peking Man or Nebraska Man.

    "[B]y miraculous chance we happened to find it." Sure, and I got a rare Poloraoid of a T-rex eating one of the Geico cave men I can sell you for cheap.

  14. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    True. At this point, I say 'Welcome aboard!' to any of them who decide that maybe trying science would be cool after all; but it's not even worth the effort to try to convert through additional evidence.

    I just wish that there were more who were willing to be honest about it: "I'm a 6-day young earth creationist because I'm interested in faith, not empiricism." isn't my cup of tea; but I'm not interested in fighting with you about it. "No, no, empirical evidence actually proves creationism and a young earth for reasons wholly aside from my interest in it doing so!!!" effectively assures arbitrary amounts of bullshit, intellectual dishonesty, and atrociously bad science standards. Not Good.

  15. Miraculous yes, scientific no.,, by PortHaven · · Score: 0

    "We were looking for it — and by miraculous chance we happened to find it."

    Than you probably didn't find it. You created the result you desired. If you're conducting research science, and you got the result you want. You probably did "science" wrong!

    1. Re:Miraculous yes, scientific no.,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Satan has been around for a long time, he is wise, he knows how to use man's own hubris to condemn him
       
      Surely, the writers of the paper will receive their earthly glory, but is it worth spending an eternity writhing in the lake of fire, I should say not.

    2. Re:Miraculous yes, scientific no.,, by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2

      You do know the difference between excavation and an experiment, right.....

    3. Re:Miraculous yes, scientific no.,, by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      Archeology is more like looking for the lost TV remote... "We were looking for it — and by miraculous chance we happened to find it." after flipping the couch over and shaking it for the fifth time. These aren't result you make happen by not doing it right.

    4. Re:Miraculous yes, scientific no.,, by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where I'm going after I die, but I'm glad I'm not going to the same place as the people who tell me I'm going to hell.

      Mark Twain (para)

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  16. This theory gets muddied by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 2

    every time "missing gap" is used to discuss/describe evolution. We will never find all relevant fossils. Most intermediate iterations were never fossilized in the first place. The "fossil record" can never be complete. All we can do with the infinitesimally small percentage of fossils we do discover is use them to confirm, or refute, the theory of evolution as it currently exists, and, perhaps, revise the theory as required to account for new discoveries and observations. Science!

    --
    The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
    1. Re: This theory gets muddied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infinitesimally small percentage of fossils of remarkably incomplete specimens, I'd say.

  17. Enjoy it now by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    Before ISIS bulldozes it.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:Enjoy it now by Bathroom+Humor · · Score: 1

      This is both hilarious and deeply depressing.

  18. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    True. At this point, I say 'Welcome aboard!' to any of them who decide that maybe trying science would be cool after all; but it's not even worth the effort to try to convert through additional evidence. I just wish that there were more who were willing to be honest about it: "I'm a 6-day young earth creationist because I'm interested in faith, not empiricism." isn't my cup of tea; but I'm not interested in fighting with you about it. "No, no, empirical evidence actually proves creationism and a young earth for reasons wholly aside from my interest in it doing so!!!" effectively assures arbitrary amounts of bullshit, intellectual dishonesty, and atrociously bad science standards. Not Good.

    Perhaps that's one the god belief set is still so strongly entrenched in the face of mountains of contrary evidence.... their missionary conversion drive is so much stronger than ours.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  19. English motherfucker! Do you speak it? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1
    "Getting the result you want" != "We were looking for it". - You did "quoting" wrong!

    Than you probably didn't find it.

    You did "english" wrong too!

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  20. -1 = 2 by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    It just created two new gaps. Just ask Ken Ham.

  21. This jawbone came from Afar! by kdub007 · · Score: 1

    That's a long way.

    --
    The correct answer is 42.
  22. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    I'll need two fossils and the sex tape

    And a marriage certificate.

    Not to mention a USA birth certificate.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  23. Re:This must be wrong - its totally against the bi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you drop out of 3rd grade or eat paint chips as a kid?

  24. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

    and the sex tape

    It's on a wall of the cave on the other side of the hill.

  25. Re:This must be wrong - its totally against the bi by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Yes he did. Hence he goes around posting strawmen for others to knock down. Thinks it's clever.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  26. no evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was no evolution. Watch Kent Hovinds movies.

  27. Oldest Homo Fossil, you mean to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The human genus does not a human make. Homo Sapien is only about 250K years old. Therefore a 2.8 million year gap makes no sense. What a misleading title... fracking say what you mean. The Oldest HOMO Fossil was found. Not human.

    1. Re:Oldest Homo Fossil, you mean to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... nevermind. It looks like the early homo hominids technically count as humans. Good to know.

  28. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    I've dealt with creationists in the past. Their main argument basically boiled down to "staying the same." They see the unchanging, religious answer of "God did it" as strong because the answer never changes. If you ask now or ten years from now, the answer would still be "God did it." Science, on the other hand, is constantly changing. We see it as a strength because science gets new information and changes theories based on this information. They see it as a weakness, though. Ask a scientist a question now and ten years from now and you could get different answers.

    Arguing with a creationist will never work because what we present as strengths, they will see as flaws. We have two completely different methods for determining how good an explanation is.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  29. smells fishy by dlt074 · · Score: 0

    how come it's always human ancestors we find and never ape or some other primates ancestors?

    this fact alone strikes me as funny. and not funny ha ha, funny.

    you'd think that just once, somebody would stumble upon one by mistake if nothing else. guess there is no money/glory in that so they're all ancestors to man.

    1. Re:smells fishy by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      Stunning ignorance and arrogance (from someone who cannot find the shift key).

      Excavations of the ancestor of other primate lineages are quite common.

      All you have to do is type "primate fossils" in Google or Bing and be buried in links to same.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  30. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    The next glaciation (ice age) has already been postponed indefinitely. It won't happen until atmospheric CO2 levels drop below 250 ppm again which is a long time in the future unless we start actively removing it.

  31. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a fossil to sell you that bridges all kinds of gaps.

  32. Re:... creates two gaps in evolution by the+gnat · · Score: 1

    This is what drives me up the wall too. I'm an atheist, with an academic background in the natural sciences, but I have zero interest trying to disabuse people of their sincerely held superstitions - especially I can't honestly claim to be a paragon of rationality most of the time. What offends me as a scientist (of sorts) is when people actively lie and distort the scientific evidence in support of their mythology. "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."

  33. Re:For all you evolutionists by sunsurfandsand · · Score: 2

    God created the Universe so I could make a living selling Intelligent Design textbooks. He also screwed it up quite a bit so I could follow with a line of Moronic Design texts. I am blessed.

  34. Can't lose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What "homo" is, is a matter of arbitrary definition.

    Want to make it the case that a fossil discovery is, or is not, the oldest example of a category you made up? No problem, just change your criteria to suit.

  35. Re:Just laying around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not anti-anything; it's science.