Slashdot Mirror


Obama Administration Claims There Are 545,000 IT Job Openings

dcblogs writes The White House has established a $100 million program that endorses fast-track, boot camp IT training efforts and other four-year degree alternatives. But this plan is drawing criticism because of the underlying message it sends in the H-1B battle. The federal program, called TechHire, will get its money from H-1B visa fees, and the major users of this visa are IT services firms that outsource jobs. Another source of controversy will be the White House's assertion that there are 545,000 unfilled IT jobs. It has not explained how it arrived at this number, but the estimate will likely be used as a talking point by lawmakers seeking to raise the H-1B cap.

20 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. if that were true by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people in the tech sector would not be looking for jobs for months at a time. Id love to see the breakdown on where they came up with this number.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    1. Re:if that were true by poet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My experience is the people looking for tech jobs now either:

      A. Want more money than they are worth (no offense)
      B. Are skilled in an area that is saturated (Windows admins)
      C. Expect the world to be like the Google Campus (Hipsters)
      D. Frankly, aren't worth hiring.

      --
      Get your PostgreSQL here: http://www.commandprompt.com/
    2. Re:if that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My experience is that the companies hiring tech workers now either:

      A. Want to pay less than people are worth (and therefore want to hire easily exploited foreign workers)
      B. Want specific experience with technology that hasn't existed long enough to create it
      C. Want to provide crappy working environments with clueless management
      D. Frankly, won't be in business very long because they can't adapt.

    3. Re:if that were true by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      B. Want specific experience with technology that hasn't existed long enough to create it

      THIS!!

      I cant tell you how many job postings I read that said things like you need 5 years experience with X,Y, and Z.... only problem is Y and Z have only been out for 2 years and 4 years respectively.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:if that were true by epyT-R · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My experience is the people hiring for tech jobs now either:

      A. Offer shit pay for crazy hours and expectations.
      B. Expect to pay unlivable wages under the guise of 'saturation' and then bitch they need more h1-bs.
      C. Expect conformance with hipster ideals/opinions/politics. Hipsters are a pain to manage, but even worse to work for.
      D. Frankly, aren't worth working for. This includes things like those manufactured corporate cultures (open offices, chaotic group work sessions designed by people who aren't engineers, buzzword infested behavioral expectations), esp the ones that push particular brands of politics as components.

    5. Re:if that were true by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Id love to see the breakdown on where they came up with this number.

      Being that Obama just pulled that number out of his ass . . . I don't think you would want to see it in any detail.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:if that were true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A. That works both ways. Jobs are worth what the market says they're worth, too. If you can't hire anybody at a given rate, that is a market signal that you are not offering enough. If you artificially inflate the supply, then claim you're paying "market rates", there's something a bit off there...

      B. That is a lame excuse. Train. You're getting a market signal that you're demanding too many skills for too little money. You just don't want to hear what the market is telling you.

    7. Re:if that were true by bzipitidoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Employers are to blame for the mess. It's been an employers' market for years now, and they still aren't satisfied?! Affordable Healthcare relieves them of the burden of handling employee health insurance themselves, but many don't like it. They actually preferred having that as another hold on employees. Be a real shame if you and your whole family lost your health insurance, wouldn't it? You will do what it takes, even if that means putting in 80 hour weeks for the next 6 months, won't you?

      On B, it's pretty crappy to put the burden on candidates to train for positions they might not get. Especially when the training wanted is very esoteric. Learning on the job is something many are quite capable of doing, but employers won't even accept that arrangement. Nor will they admit that closely related experience is relevant. Seems the only people companies are willing to train are cheap foreign replacements.

      I have to agree on D. It's not startups exactly, it's failing companies. Startups merely experience higher rates of failure. Working on a sinking ship is horrible. As management desperation increases, what fairness and good sense they have vanishes. They began demanding extreme performance, asking for long hours with no extra pay, refusing to see that even if they get it, it won't be enough to save the company. They can turn very abusive. They also look for scapegoats. Soon they're blaming everyone but themselves. They make examples of people, firing some hapless low level employees on trumped up baseless reasons, just in case anyone doesn't get it. You're going to sweat visibly to give 110%, or they will fire you. Then for the grand finale, they don't tell anyone they've run out of money until they can't make payroll, screwing everyone out of a month of pay, and having the nerve to whine that the employees not only shouldn't complain about being cheated, but should feel sorry for them that their glorious vision didn't work out. Their pain is more important! And maybe everyone should keep on working for free in the faint hope that soon fortunes will make a dramatic u-turn and the company will profit enough to pay all the back pay.

      Employers also engage in illegal and unfair hiring practices. All this talk of not beimg able to find competent people is simply not true, and is only cover for the real reasons. If they want to, they can always find a reason why someone won't do. And too often, they want to. Often they've already settled on a hire, who can be some incompetent doofus who is related to the boss. They are merely going through the motions of interviewing others, to satisfy the EEOC, knowing that they have no intention of hiring any of them.

      Another thing I find hilarious is the recruiter. First those guys are in a big hurry to shove candidates into any job vaguely related to their skills, then once they get a hit, rather than go to bat for their candiadte, they're all over lhe candidate to do the heavy work to win that position. They demand that the candidate heavily alter the resume to the point of outright lies, and say all the right things. Some of the modifications they demand are just plain stupid, but they expect you to shut up and do it if you want a job. The candidates who refuse to cooperate in the mangling of their own resumes are dropped faster than a hot potato, because there are plenty more candidates where they came from.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  2. Change you can believe in! by lophophore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    2017 cannot come fast enough. The current administration in the white house does not even know what party it represents, what it stands for.

    This is lunacy. There are not 545,000 IT job openings in this country. Look at dice.com, indeed, monster, etc. TRY TO GET A JOB.

    I bet there are less than 100,000 real positions available.

    This is just a red herring to let them open up the H1-B faucet and drive wages down. This would have been unsurprising coming from the republicans, but from the obama administration? Just more incompetence. Disappointing, but not unexpected.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:Change you can believe in! by Sperbels · · Score: 3, Insightful

      2017 cannot come fast enough.

      You don't actually believe this will change anything, do you?

    2. Re:Change you can believe in! by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      2017 cannot come fast enough. The current administration...

      If you think the other party is anti-imported-labor, you will be in for a second surprise. Both parties do it because the Plutocrats pay them to, and not enough voters know or care about the issue to override the influence of legalized bribery.

      The available election choices kind of remind me of our family's ISP choices: Company A offers spotty connections and Company B keeps putting bogus "fees" on our bill, like insurance we never asked for. Company C only offers satellite TV, no Internet.

      I wish we could vote on specific Federal issues, not just representatives.

  3. Obama and his administration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Are Full of Shit.

    EOT

  4. Slashdot poll by amightywind · · Score: 0, Insightful

    He's a lying socialist, who puts the interests of indolent immigrants above the rights American citizens and the rule of law. But I knew that already. Let's take an honest slashdot pol. How many of you a$$holes voted for him? Thought so. What did you expect?

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  5. Re:Where the heck? by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could Obama have been reading the wrong newspaper?

    Obama says a lot of shit. The basic strategy is to say so much shit that some of it sticks. This works because the media is on his side.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  6. Re:Here's one by crywalt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is basically what I see all the time. The listings all want experts in some stupidly named tech less than ten years old. Hadoop, Mongo, Tomcat, Pullwilly, Crankyank, GULP, GRUNT, and, god, still PHP. Also HTML5, which hasn't even been settled yet. They want all of that plus knowledge of ninety acronyms which don't really mean anything (RESTful). And there's absolutely NO ROOM for anyone to come in and pick things up as they go along. Every interviewer wants someone who can hit the ground running. Twenty years of experience on the web and a CS degree count for nothing if you're not an expert backwards and forwards in obscure minutia of SQL syntax, all tested using an online quiz designed to break your brain. Not to mention that the last job offer I got was for less money (accounting for inflation) than I got two years out of college twenty years ago, and in Manhattan to boot. After commuting I'd probably have lost money.

  7. Re:Why aren't African-Americans doing these jobs? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm black and I've got a pretty technical job. It's not IT, it's better (to me). I could easily get a low level IT job if I wanted to.

    When I was a young teen, I saw a few kids like me but not very many (black OR white). Computers were very much a "nerd" thing. This was about 15 years ago, so I doubt anything has changed. These days it might even be worse, since back then it was a necessary evil, which can now be worked around with tablets and smart phones.

    These days, even the most run-down, underfunded inner-city libraries have computers with Internet connectivity, along with books about programming.

    I learned Basic in just such a place. The library in a Boys and Girls Club. They didn't have the internet until shortly before I moved on. They had rows of old Apple //e, Macs, and old DOS systems. I was practically their unpaid IT person, fixing all of the things the other kids would break. They even gave me one of those computers my last day there when I moved out of town.

    That doesn't answer your question exactly. Suffice it to say, kids don't want to be nerds if they can help it, especially black kids. Oh well. More jobs for me.

  8. Quickest Solution by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quick fix: send written* letters with solid facts to his staunchest critics in the other party. They have been very quick and eager to contradict him on other issues. Take advantage of such behavior and motivation.

    In particular, Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama) have shown skepticism about "techie shortages".

    * Paper tends to carry more weight (no pun intended) over email because it takes more effort to prepare, acting as a bit of a riff-raff filter, and thus screening staff pay more attention to it.

  9. Shortage Of by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a shortage of people with a decade of experience in C++, Java, Ruby, Python, Perl, Object Oriented COBOL, Linux, Windows, dot-net, oracle SQL and MS SQL who are also willing to accept $45,000 a year.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  10. Re:Here's one by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, exactly. So why don't the employers understand that? I mean, I have had my hands on 20 different technologies over the last 25 years of my career. The fact that I don't know their special inhouse purpose built software package should not be held against me because it is "just a tool", right?

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  11. Re:Here's one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    30/hr? Wow! That's fucking laughable, even if cost of living in Nashville was pennies!