Obama Administration Claims There Are 545,000 IT Job Openings

dcblogs writes The White House has established a $100 million program that endorses fast-track, boot camp IT training efforts and other four-year degree alternatives. But this plan is drawing criticism because of the underlying message it sends in the H-1B battle. The federal program, called TechHire, will get its money from H-1B visa fees, and the major users of this visa are IT services firms that outsource jobs. Another source of controversy will be the White House's assertion that there are 545,000 unfilled IT jobs. It has not explained how it arrived at this number, but the estimate will likely be used as a talking point by lawmakers seeking to raise the H-1B cap.

Comments

if that were true

[ganjadude]

people in the tech sector would not be looking for jobs for months at a time. Id love to see the breakdown on where they came up with this number.

Re:if that were true

[Anonymous Coward]

My experience is that the companies hiring tech workers now either:

A. Want to pay less than people are worth (and therefore want to hire easily exploited foreign workers)
B. Want specific experience with technology that hasn't existed long enough to create it
C. Want to provide crappy working environments with clueless management
D. Frankly, won't be in business very long because they can't adapt.

Re:if that were true

[ganjadude]

B. Want specific experience with technology that hasn't existed long enough to create it

THIS!!

I cant tell you how many job postings I read that said things like you need 5 years experience with X,Y, and Z.... only problem is Y and Z have only been out for 2 years and 4 years respectively.

Re:if that were true

[epyT-R]

My experience is the people hiring for tech jobs now either:

A. Offer shit pay for crazy hours and expectations.
B. Expect to pay unlivable wages under the guise of 'saturation' and then bitch they need more h1-bs.
C. Expect conformance with hipster ideals/opinions/politics. Hipsters are a pain to manage, but even worse to work for.
D. Frankly, aren't worth working for. This includes things like those manufactured corporate cultures (open offices, chaotic group work sessions designed by people who aren't engineers, buzzword infested behavioral expectations), esp the ones that push particular brands of politics as components.

Re:if that were true

[Anonymous Coward]

A. That works both ways. Jobs are worth what the market says they're worth, too. If you can't hire anybody at a given rate, that is a market signal that you are not offering enough. If you artificially inflate the supply, then claim you're paying "market rates", there's something a bit off there...

B. That is a lame excuse. Train. You're getting a market signal that you're demanding too many skills for too little money. You just don't want to hear what the market is telling you.

Re:Here's one

[crywalt]

This is basically what I see all the time. The listings all want experts in some stupidly named tech less than ten years old. Hadoop, Mongo, Tomcat, Pullwilly, Crankyank, GULP, GRUNT, and, god, still PHP. Also HTML5, which hasn't even been settled yet. They want all of that plus knowledge of ninety acronyms which don't really mean anything (RESTful). And there's absolutely NO ROOM for anyone to come in and pick things up as they go along. Every interviewer wants someone who can hit the ground running. Twenty years of experience on the web and a CS degree count for nothing if you're not an expert backwards and forwards in obscure minutia of SQL syntax, all tested using an online quiz designed to break your brain. Not to mention that the last job offer I got was for less money (accounting for inflation) than I got two years out of college twenty years ago, and in Manhattan to boot. After commuting I'd probably have lost money.