Slashdot Mirror


White House Office of Administration Not Subject to FOIA, Says White House

An anonymous reader writes with this story at USA Today: The White House is removing a federal regulation that subjects its Office of Administration to the Freedom of Information Act, making official a policy under Presidents Bush and Obama to reject requests for records to that office. The White House said the cleanup of FOIA regulations is consistent with court rulings that hold that the office is not subject to the transparency law.

9 of 334 comments (clear)

  1. Re:As president, I support a transparent governmen by Roodvlees · · Score: 4, Informative

    And I will harshly persecute anyone who dares to break that secrecy.

    --
    Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
  2. Re:Most transparent Admn ever.... by HBI · · Score: 5, Informative

    He wasn't ready for the job. He can't work with people - if Clinton managed it with Gingrich, he could have done the same today. Hell, Gingrich was smarter than these boobs today. He has a Nixonian level of paranoia and vindictiveness. Lastly, he has Valerie Jarrett to insulate him from reality. He gives a good prepared speech and has the best political team money can buy, but he's a freaking cipher otherwise and entirely lacks the personal touch unarmed with a teleprompter.

    Given the disconnect between his public persona and his actual performance, is it no wonder that most of the promises were broken? The promises were made by Axelrod and Plouffe...

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  3. Re:Transparency in Government is good! by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nobody reads anymore:

    "In 2009, a federal appeals court in Washington ruled that the Office of Administration was not subject to the FOIA, "because it performs only operational and administrative tasks in support of the president and his staff and therefore, under our precedent, lacks substantial independent authority."

    The appeals court ruled that the White House was required to archive the e-mails, but not release them under the FOIA. Instead, White House e-mails must be released under the Presidential Records Act — but not until at least five years after the end of the administration."

    Nothing to see her folks.

  4. Re:Fine. by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 4, Informative

    RTFA jackass. Nothing heinous is going on. Offices within the White House are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. However, the Office of Administration was the odd man out. In 2009, a Federal Court ruling confirmed that the Office of Administration is exempt from FOIA like other Offices within the White House.

    The White House is required to archive e-mails and release them under the Presidential Records Act; not until at least five years after the end of the administration.

    So the sky is not falling.

  5. Re:Sounds reasonable to me by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Considering the FOIA act does not apply to the White House, I don't know why you are whining.

  6. Re:the fix to the problem by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2, Informative

    LMOL scary when people don't read. The White House was always except from FIOA. Try again Zippy.

  7. Re:Transparency in Government is good! by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Informative

    The GOP had nothing to do with the ACA. They had no power to speak of at the time. The DNC owns the whole stinking pig fuck. And they no longer have to power to fix/change it. LOL.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  8. Re:Transparency in Government is good! by RingDev · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe you may be suffering from ODS.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/...

    The GOP introduced over 700 amendments to the ACA before it was put to the floor for a vote. Of those, 161 passed. Compared to the 36 Dem submitted amendments that passed.

    To claim that the "GOP had nothing to do with the ACA" is verifiably untrue. To further claim that "They had no power to speak of at the time" highlights a complete lack of knowledge and understanding of how the legislative branch of our government works.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  9. Re:Transparency in Government is good! by someone1234 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Vote for someone outside of the current two-in-one party system.

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry