Slashdot Mirror


In Response to Pollution Spike, Paris Temporarily Halves Traffic By Decree

As reported by News.com.au, the city of Paris has implemented a harsh (but temporary) measure for drivers, in response to a surge in pollution: banning cars with even-numbered registration plates from the streets. According to the article, City mayor Anne Hidalgo had asked authorities to prevent one in every two cars from taking to the capital’s streets and make all public transport temporarily free in a bid to drive down pollution. Only vehicles with numberplates ending in an odd number will be allowed to drive, though exceptions exist for vehicles like taxis, electric cars and ambulances. ... Public transportation is to be free until at least Monday in Paris and its surrounding towns in an effort to force pollution down by coaxing drivers to give up their cars for a few days. Similar emergency measures were last implemented almost exactly a year ago — on March 17 — during a particularly bad spike in the pollution levels.

8 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Re:They should go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, but you're missing the crucial point that "No Diesel" is very hard to enforce -- typically diesel commuter cars have only a small badge (if that) to distinguish them from the petrol versions, and the badge is different in appearance and placement between manufacturers and models. By contrast, banning cars based on license plate is very easy to enforce, as they are standard across vehicles and police are already accustomed to inspecting them by habit.

    In short, a non-optimal rule that can be enforced is much better than an optimal rule that can't.

  2. Re:Temporary by GrandCow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We've been doing this for years, both with cap&trade and with better emissions standards. Countries need to start doing a lot more and not just passing the buck so politicians can get reelected again. At some point we as a whole need to make some changes that are going to make people comfortable with the norm pretty unhappy. They can deal with it and adjust, but the norm isn't going to work.

    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
  3. Re:Good. by lorinc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They'll likely convince some people to continue with public transportation, which would be a victory, even if small.

    Probably not. We are voting this Sunday. My guess is that people will be so upset not to be allowed to take their car tomorrow, that they will vote for the very first idiot that will promise to ban the measure. Usually, these idiots are right wing extremists.

    I'm not very optimistic. Mankind is greedy by nature and probably can't understand the logic of environment preservation as long as it generates a net individual loss.

  4. Re:But are cars the source by itzly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In this case, talking about Paris, the pollution will be dominated by cars. There aren't many industrial sources in the city.

  5. Why isn't public transport 'free'? by Brulath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Public transport uptake would likely increase dramatically, at least here in Australia, if it were free. It probably wouldn't change train usage, but for buses and trams there would likely be a marked uptake. I suppose it might be a hard sell due to the cost, though the benefits of fewer cars on the road might sell that pretty well.

    At a guess, I'd say there are two main reasons people don't use public transport: it's inconvenient to schedule your transport around someone else's timetable and path, and it's inconvenient to have to carry the correct quantity of cash / make sure a bus card has enough money on it; for the poorer demographic the cost part is probably a greater component. Having more people using public transport would probably result in increased availability / paths for public transport, mitigating the first problem a bit.

    Just seems a bit weird; if you want cars off the road, reduce the benefits of using one (using a bus would eliminate wear & tear, fuel, and parking costs). As a bonus your population's health might improve very slightly as people are walking to and from the bus stops.

  6. Re:They should go by BlackPignouf · · Score: 5, Funny

    What?
    You cannot masturbate while driving a diesel car in France?
    I'm shocked.

  7. Re:They should go by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Informative

    I agree, but there's nothing in the article to suggest that it'll be half the vehicles today and the other half tomorrow. Instead it says "Only vehicles with numberplates ending in an odd number will be allowed to drive... for a few days" You'd think it'd be odd numbered plates on odd numbered days and even plates on even days, but that's not what it says.

    "It" being an Australian news source that is being a bit vague. What actually happens in Paris is that it goes by whether the day of the month is odd or even. Monday is 23rd, so only odd digit cars are allowed on the road. If it extends to the 24th, then only even numbered cars will be allowed.

    And the ban certainly does apply within the city. Pleading ignorance will still get you a fine.

  8. Re:They should go by maestroX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nonsense? There should be a law against driving Picasso.
    For god sake, did you even looked at the pictures in the links?!?