Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Leaked Snowden Docs Show Canada's "False Flag" Operations

Posted by samzenpus on from the it-wasn't-us dept.

An anonymous reader writes Documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and The Intercept show the extent to which Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC) cooperates with the NSA — and perhaps most interestingly details CSEC's "false flag" operations, whereby cyberattacks are designed and carried out with the intention of attribution to another individual, group or nation state. The revelations come in the midst of Canadian controversy regarding the C-51 anti-terrorism bill.

1 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Same as JTRIG only JTRIG also attack UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    JTRIG is UK cyber-psych-ops version of this. They too have access to that big surveillance database, and can use it to change images on social media, change posts, fake emails and so on.

    THEY, A UK AGENCY, HAVE USED THIS AGAINST HACKERS IN THE UK.

    The Snowden leak shows they acted against Anonymous hackers after they hacked a US military website. Those hackers were Brits. Whether they hacked the website or not, we cannot now be sure of, because JTRIG can fake evidence, and whether the judge took evidence into consideration that was fake, we cannot know. It's all secret, pissing on UK legal system.

    JTRIG blockops propaganda leaks:
    https://firstlook.org/theintercept/document/2014/02/24/art-deception-training-new-generation-online-covert-operations/

    How they rig polls to get political decisions in their favor:
    https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/07/14/manipulating-online-polls-ways-british-spies-seek-control-internet/

    There tools:
    https://firstlook.org/theintercept/document/2014/07/14/jtrig-tools-techniques/

    They target British alleged hackers:
    http://www.dailydot.com/politics/snowden-anonymous-jtrig-gchq-ddos/

    With UK judges (like Judge John Evans) permitting evidence to be heard in private without the prosecution present, we won't know if a load of lies were put into his head by this lot either.

    Oh, but one thing: THEY'LL CLAIM IT LEGAL. Because the law gives them immunity from everything if the Secretary of State asked them to do it, and the rules that limit the Secretary of States actions are things IN HIS OWN JUDGEMENT, i.e. meaningless.

    So Stasi is legal in Great Stasiland.