Slashdot Mirror


$1B TSA Behavioral Screening Program Slammed As "Junk Science"

schwit1 writes The Transportation Security Administration has been accused of spending a billion dollars on a passenger-screening program that's based on junk science. The claim arose in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, which has tried unsuccessfully to get the TSA to release documents on its SPOT (Screening Passengers by Observation Techniques) program through the Freedom of Information Act. SPOT, whose techniques were first used in 2003 and formalized in 2007, uses "highly questionable" screening techniques, according to the ACLU complaint, while being "discriminatory, ineffective, pseudo-scientific, and wasteful of taxpayer money." TSA has spent at least $1 billion on SPOT. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported in 2010 that "TSA deployed SPOT nationwide before first determining whether there was a scientifically valid basis for using behavior detection and appearance indicators as a means for reliably identifying passengers as potential threats in airports," according to the ACLU. And in 2013, GAO recommended that the agency spend less money on the program, which uses 3,000 "behavior detection officers" whose jobs is to identify terrorists before they board jetliners.

11 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, except terrorists dress as average tourists. They aren't completely brain-dead. They are trained.

    The 'Arab guy or black guy who is shaking like a leaf, mumbling "allah-ackbar" over-and-over under his breath' probably just has fear of flying.

  2. Working as designed by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A vehicle to get money into the correct pockets.
    Who ever said that India and China could ever beat the USA at anything - even corruption.

  3. Re:Let me guess by Major+Blud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "They aren't completely brain-dead."

    I'm pretty sure that somebody willing to blow himself up on the premise that he'll receive 72 non-existing virgins in a place that doesn't exists ruled by a made-up deity fits of the definition of brain-dead pretty well.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  4. Re:Let me guess by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're confusing brain-washed with brain-dead. Different things.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  5. It is NOT 'Junk Science' by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The SPOT program is going exactly what it was created to do
    Funnel money from the government (my pocket), into the pocket of the consultants, companies, and employees of whoever built it.

  6. Re:Security theater by gewalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The TSA is bad you US citizens including those that don't fly.

    1. Over 7 billion dollars in 2014 budget for TSA
    2. Who know how many lost tourism dollars>
    3. Long distance driving to avoid TSA.
    4. Loss of freedom encouraging government to further encroachment of freedoms.
  7. Re: Security theater by knightghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem here isn't the science, it's the pork.

    Behavioral science is half of a police officer's job. Problem is (besides pork barrel mismanagement) is that minimum wage TSA don't have the training, experience, or often the intelligence to use it effectively. Many airports that do this effectively will simply hire a good local police department to accomplish it.

    As for bashing the TSA, every time they try to do something reasonable (like ok nail clippers) they get fired by the politicians. So track the problem down to the source - dishonest politicians and the apathetic and ignorant public that votes them in.

  8. Re:Security theater by dave420 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And he probably won't go to those places, either. You don't seem to have a point.

  9. Re:Security theater by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If you travel that often, why haven't you signed up for the PreCheck program?"

    Ihre Papiere Bitte.......

    --
    Good-bye
  10. Re: Security theater by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually thats demonstrably false. The only evidence I need is.... the entire history of airport security prior to the creation of the TSA.

    Was airport security always a joke? You bet it was. It was always as much of a joke as it is now, but, it was a lot cheaper and, private security was not NEARLY as abusive to paying customers.

    Fact is, without government intervention, all this security mumbo jumbo would quickly blow over and security would be downsized appropriately. We pay quite a lot for the ever present paranoia of committees charged only with pissing themselves at every shadow.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  11. Re:Let me guess by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Effective implies effect. Effect implies change, what is it you are looking to change? Currently we have an average of 0 terrorist attacks a day, adding up to 0 per year....a number which has, aside from a statistically insignificant number of anomalies, has been the case for well....more than my entire lifetime, which is a bit more than 3 and a half times the lifespan so far of the TSA.

    Implementing the invasive and expensive program of questioning everyone with trained staff seems excessive given the magnitude of the problem.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"