Slashdot Mirror


Feds Attempt To Censor Parts of a New Book About the Hydrogen Bomb

HughPickens.com writes: The atom bomb — leveler of Hiroshima and instant killer of some 80,000 people — is just a pale cousin compared to the hydrogen bomb, which easily packs the punch of a thousand Hiroshimas. That is why Washington has for decades done everything in its power to keep the details of its design out of the public domain. Now William J. Broad reports in the NY Times that Kenneth W. Ford has defied a federal order to cut material from his new book that the government says teems with thermonuclear secrets. Ford says he included the disputed material because it had already been disclosed elsewhere and helped him paint a fuller picture of an important chapter of American history. But after he volunteered the manuscript for a security review, federal officials told him to remove about 10 percent of the text, or roughly 5,000 words. "They wanted to eviscerate the book," says Ford. "My first thought was, 'This is so ridiculous I won't even respond.'" For instance, the federal agency wanted him to strike a reference to the size of the first hydrogen test device — its base was seven feet wide and 20 feet high. Dr. Ford responded that public photographs of the device, with men, jeeps and a forklift nearby, gave a scale of comparison that clearly revealed its overall dimensions.

Though difficult to make, hydrogen bombs are attractive to nations and militaries because their fuel is relatively cheap. Inside a thick metal casing, the weapon relies on a small atom bomb that works like a match to ignite the hydrogen fuel. Today, Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States are the only declared members of the thermonuclear club, each possessing hundreds or thousands of hydrogen bombs. Military experts suspect that Israel has dozens of hydrogen bombs. India, Pakistan and North Korea are seen as interested in acquiring the potent weapon. The big secret the book discusses is thermal equilibrium, the discovery that the temperature of the hydrogen fuel and the radiation could match each other during the explosion (PDF). World Scientific, a publisher in Singapore, recently made Dr. Ford's book public in electronic form, with print versions to follow. Ford remains convinced the book "contains nothing whatsoever whose dissemination could, by any stretch of the imagination, damage the United States or help a country that is trying to build a hydrogen bomb." "Were I to follow all — or even most — of your suggestions," says Ford, "it would destroy the book."

5 of 341 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hmmm... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're assuming that the author is being truthful about its availability and not merely lying or minimizing in order to protect his sales.

    Quite a few years back, Tom Clancy wrote a book called "Sum of All Fears" about a bunch of terrorists building an H-bomb using Pu they recovered from an Israeli bomb lost during the '73 war.
    Clancy's Afterward included this:

    BLOCKQUOTE>It is generally known that nuclear secrets are not as secret as we would like - in fact, the situation is even worse than well-informed people appreciate. what required billions of dollars in the 1940s is much less expensive today. A modern personal computer has far more power and reliability than the first Eniac, and the "hydrocodes" which enable a computer to test and validate a weapon's design are easily duplicated. The exquisite machine tools used to fabricate parts can be had for the asking. When I asked explicitly for the specifications for the very machines used at Oak Ridge and elsewhere, they arrived Federal Express the next day. Some highly specialized items designed specifically for bomb manufacture may now be found in stereo speakers. The fact of the matter is that a sufficiently wealthy individual could, over a period of from five to ten years, produce a multistage nuclear device.

    Based on what I learned about the subject as a young man, I see no particular reason to doubt him...

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  2. Re:Silly by sconeu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Years ago, I remember reading about some dude who designed an A-bomb for his senior thesis.

    His last stumbling block was the proper explosives for the implosion. So he called up the sales arm of some manufacturer, said he was a building contractor, and that he would need an explosive with $CHARACTERISTICS.... and that he was ready to buy in quantity.

    The sales guy fell all over himself providing the exact info the dude needed.

    He turned in his thesis, and then when no grade was published, he went to see his professor, who told him that DOE was considering classifying it.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  3. Re:it always amazes me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think you have been reading the Hamas propaganda that pops up on Occupy facebook groups too much.

    Lets get off the anti-Israel axe-grinding for a moment here. The US is not going to attack Iran, even if they decides to plop water poppers in the Strait again:

    1: Iran is a sovereign power, with a distinct race (Persians are not Arabs). When the mullahs took over, Iran's top generals were killed. This enticed Saddam into invading... and Iranians pushed back by strapping bombs onto their kids and having them run under Iraqi tanks. This shows a will that makes the Alamo rally pale in comparison.

    2: An attack on Iran would rally every Mecca-facing worshiper to attack the US and Israel. This is why the US did their best to keep Israel out of the first Gulf War when Saddam was sending SCUDs their way (SCUDs with chemical weapons.)

    3: Iran is pretty damn powerful. They sell plenty of oil to China and Turkey. Even with sanctions, they are the top producing car maker in the region.

    4: Iran is no "shit-o-stan". Attacking Iran would be like attacking Germany or France, with retaliation that a First World government would return with. Tehran's jubes are now fully working buried sewers.

    5: If shit hit the fan, Iran would get China to help, stationing PLA nukes and garrisons. This was considered with Russia in the past, and could be done again. China is a thirsty country, and they would be more than happy to come in.

    So, lets be real. Israel isn't going to sneak and grab territory, unlike the Hezbollah propaganda or the usual anti-Semite crap says.

  4. Re:the US 'probably' wont use a nuke first.... by Mantrid42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For some perspective, in preparation for Operation Downfall, 500,000 Purple Hearts were made. They made so many that we were still using that same batch in Afghanistan and Iraq in the 2000s.

    THAT'S how many people were expected to be wounded, let alone killed, and that was just the American side of the conflict.

  5. Re:the US 'probably' wont use a nuke first.... by DaveyJJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    BS. Utter BS. Here is the one documented fact about the end of the PTO war that everyone in your country who spews this BS about a necessary invasion of the Japanese homeland islands wants to conveniently forget ... The Japanese had made it clear through diplomatic channels by June of 1945 that were willing to completely surrender and end the war with one condition ... the Emperor (alone) would be immune from any war crimes charges. Military generals etc were fair game, but the Emperor gets off without any war crimes charges brought against him. (Remember that until May 1947 when the Japanese Constitution was changed, Hirohito was considered by many a "living god" and remained even afterwards "a descendent of the Sun Goddess".) The United Sates refused to accept this single condition for surrender and carried on with the plans to use atomic weapons so that they could dictate the surrender terms.

    --
    DaveyJJ