Slashdot Mirror


Indian Supreme Court Strikes Down Law Against Posting 'Offensive' Content Online

palemantle writes: The Indian Supreme Court has overturned the controversial Section 66A of the IT Act which included a provision for a three-year jail term for sending "offensive" messages through a "computer resource or a communication device." In its judgement, the Supreme Court held "liberty of thought and expression as cardinal" and overturned the provision (66A) deeming it "unconstitutional." It's been in the news recently for an incident involving the arrest of a high school student for posting allegedly "offensive" content on Facebook about a local politician.

10 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What is "offensive" in their legal system? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

    Neither, now that it's been found unconstitutional.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  2. Re:This is why... by invictusvoyd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But nobody cares about local polititions on slashdot ..

  3. Re:What is "offensive" in their legal system? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 2

    Depends on whom you address it to .

  4. What is "offensive"... by msobkow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is "offensive" is politicians who try to censor discontent with their policies and behaviour. I realize it's mere fantasy, but politicians should always be held accountable under both the law and public opinion. They're supposed to be there to represent us, not line their own pockets.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:What is "offensive"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But that doesn't stop the Republicans. That's why it's so hard to find porn on the Internet.

  5. Incidentally... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    It isn't every day that you see a law that would make posting a copy of itself online a punishable act...

  6. Re:What is "offensive" in their legal system? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

    I'd guess the general answer is: "Anything that pisses off a person in a position of authority."

    The articles don't really get into specifics, but here's one example:

    The first PIL on the issue was filed in 2012 by law student Shreya Singhal, who sought amendment in Section 66A of the Act, after two girls -- Shaheen Dhada and Rinu Shrinivasan -- were arrested in Palghar in Thane district as one of them posted a comment against the shutdown in Mumbai following Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray's death and the other 'liked' it.

    Translated into the US equivalent (as near as I can tell), if you said "I don't think the city of Trenton, New Jersey should be shut down for a day just because Governor Chris Christie died from a heart attack." (probably worded less politely, knowing teenagers), and then your friend "liked" that statement on Facebook, you BOTH could be arrested.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  7. Re:rapistis is as rapist does by invictusvoyd · · Score: 2

    well 9 out of 10 women in the US military have been raped . There's that documentary about it too . Too bad the US military is full of Indians . Only if ...

  8. Re:rapistis is as rapist does by quenda · · Score: 2

    There is a kernel of truth to the racist AC comment.
    There are plenty of Indian immigrants in Australia, and they are mostly known as a decent law-abiding bunch, but somehow a minority keep getting in the news for sex offences. Everything from Indian cabbies having sex with drunk young female passengers to Indian doctors touching up their patients inappropriately. And of course always recent arrivals. There is something in the culture.

  9. Re:rapistis is as rapist does by quenda · · Score: 3, Funny

    OMG, you got up voted for this?

    No upvote, just Karma. But what would you Indians know about that?