Slashdot Mirror


Gen Con Threatens To Leave Indianapolis Over Religious Freedom Bill

Grymalkin writes A controversial religious freedom bill has passed the Indianapolis Senate and is now awaiting Governor Mike Pence's signature to become law. Supporters claim that this bill will protect business owners from excessive government control while opponents argue it is just a veiled attempt to allow those same business owners to deny services to individuals because of their sexual orientation. Now, Gen Con has released a statement saying this bill will influence their decision to keep the convention in Indiana. This announcement has tourism officials worried as Gen Con brings in roughly 50,000 visitors each year, contributing $50 million to the local economy. So far Gen Con's announcement has not swayed the Governor who says he is looking forward to signing the bill into law. Gen Con currently has a contract with the Indy Convention Center through 2020. No word yet as to exactly when the convention would be moved should the bill become law.

15 of 886 comments (clear)

  1. Do It, it worked in AZ by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Arizona was trying to attract conventions while enacting regressive policies

    The conventions went elsewhere and Arizona changed the policies to bring them back

    Voting with your pocketbook is a fundamental tenet of the free market

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:Do It, it worked in AZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being homophobic or racist is also a freedom, but has a price, which usually involves being called a douchbag.

    2. Re:Do It, it worked in AZ by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm going to instruct my chain of burger joints to check ID's at the door... Anybody with a first name of "Ralph" will be turned away at the door. My holy book over here clearly states that "Ralph shall be name of the demon who will eat the world." I'm disinclined to have people named Ralph in my establishment who're likely to go into a demonic craze and start eating people. Also any "hussies" named "Roberta" or "Rebecca" they're just tricky sluts, they're not allowed in either.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    3. Re:Do It, it worked in AZ by ralphsiegler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Suppose you owned a business, would you serve a white-hooded KKK Grand Wizard who came in for supplies for his next hate rally? I'd rather not. You imagine calling names will change someone? You are being silly, would might change a place would be a boycott organized against a business, dropping sales even ten percent would probably wake them up.

    4. Re:Do It, it worked in AZ by Zirbert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So the KKK can force a black or Jewish printer to print posters for their next rally, then?

      If you answer no, you agree with the govenrnor of Indianapolis. If you answer yes, you're in favour of slavery (forcing the printer to serve against their will). Pick one.

    5. Re:Do It, it worked in AZ by Microlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      in order to get them to curtail the freedom of people that don't agree with them.

      What is this nonsense? They aren't trying to "curtail the freedom" of anyone. Businesses are already prohibited from acting in an arbitrarily discriminatory manner towards people. They're calling it the "Religious Freedom Restoration Act" to feed a bullshit persecution complex, while enshrining their hateful nonsense into law. If you can refuse business to gays because your religion says so, then you can refuse business to anyone, and that's bullshit.

      Well, religion is bullshit, by and large, which is why laws like this are terrible. You have the First Amendment, you don't need to have your superstition put on a privileged pedestal.

    6. Re: Do It, it worked in AZ by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the deal. Society says that if you want the protections of incorporation you have to abide by the rules, which say you can't discriminate on the grounds of pretty much anything involuntary (race, gender, sexual orientation etc.)

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Re:Leave then by j2.718ff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For that matter a gay baker shouldn't have to bake a cake for a real marriage.

    A "real marriage"? Which marriages are real, and which are fake?

  3. Re:Leave then by Sowelu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Swap the word "gay" for "black" and try again. The country already learned, rather painfully, that letting businesses refuse to serve whole segments of the population causes one hell of a lot of unrest.

  4. Hmmm .... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't it amazing how people who enjoy protection from being discriminated against want to use that same protection to allow them to discriminate against others?

    Sorry, but if you think your religion should allow you to discriminate, you should be subject to the same thing.

    Oh, what's that, your religion is a magic double standard which exempts you from logic and you are special? Go piss up a rope.

    You're just as stupid as the people who want to force Sharia law on the rest of us. Stop pretending otherwise.

    Your religion doesn't make you some special little flower who operates under a special set of rules.

    "Asshole" is universal, no matter what you believe in.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  5. Re:Leave then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Christian baker should not have to bake a wedding cake for a gay "marriage"

    You know, I get really tired of the way the term "Christian" has been co-opted to mean "member of the bigoted, extremist Christian right".

    I'm a Christian. I have been a Christian all my life, and I bet I read the Bible and pray far more often than a lot of these "Christian" blowhards. (Currently doing one of those read-the-Bible-through-in-a-year thingies.) I've been a camp counsellor at a Christian summer camp, I teach Sunday School, I sing in the choir, I occasionally play piano for the worship services, I have helped advise our pastor on sermon topics, and I was at one time the president of my congregation,

    And you know what? Gay marriage doesn't bother me one bit, Leviticus notwithstanding. Being gay isn't a choice, so if someone is gay, God must have made him that way. If that's the case, who am I to condemn it?

  6. Re:I wonder how the Gen Con people would feel by fightinfilipino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they had to accommodate groups they found objectionable.

    Lets say 4th Reich games wanted a booth at the convention ? Or Klansman entertainment.

    Really ticks me off how the left has completely destroyed the meaning of words like freedom and liberty.

    it really ticks me off how the right has characterized the ability to be openly racist, sexist, misogynist, transphobic, and homophobic as "freedom and liberty. absolutely disgusting.

    society cannot and will not have actual liberty when businesses and public-facing organizations are permitted to discriminate against people for who they are under the guise of "religious freedom" or "liberty." the very notion is abhorrent to an open democracy, and it amazes how the right uses mental gymnastics to reach the conclusions they have.

  7. Re:Leave then by Sowelu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you run a public business, the government gives you nice shiny benefits in exchange for you following certain standards. You can't kick out service dogs, you can't advertise sales on things you don't have, and as a public business, you have to serve the public. That's what your business license says!

    When your city says "yes, you can own this land and open a storefront"--they sold that land to you because it's zoned for businesses that sell to everyone. They don't sell land on main street to warehouses, they sell it to companies that bring foot traffic and make that area into a commercial hub. Again--you own (or rent) the land because you agreed to serve the public.

    If you're baking cakes out the back door of your house and selling them on Etsy (never mind how that works), fine, the government probably didn't support you, and you didn't promise them you'd participate in the economy they set up. But if you have a storefront, or if you pay taxes as a corporation, then society gave you special consideration and you MUST return the favor by doing what you agreed...serve everyone, regardless of skin color or orientation.

  8. Re:Leave then by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After all, divorce statistics show that most people live happily ever after, right?

    Actually, they do. Half of all marriages end in divorce, but more two thirds of all people that get married don't get divorced. How is that possible? Many people get married and divorced repeatedly, and that throws the numbers way off. Second marriages have a 75% chance of divorce.

  9. Re:Leave then by itzly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Allowing people to express their sincere religious belief in how and who they choose to do business with SHOULD be allowed regardless, as a matter of law.

    Why 'sincere religious belief' ? Why not any other arbitrary made-up criterion ?