Slashdot Mirror


Russian Official Proposes Road That Could Connect London To NYC

An anonymous reader writes There's great news coming out of Russia for epic road trip lovers. Russian Railways president Vladimir Yakunin has proposed building a highway that would reach from London to Alaska via Russia, a 13,000-mile stretch of road. "This is an inter-state, inter-civilization, project," the Siberian Times quoted Yakunin. "The project should be turned into a world 'future zone,' and it must be based on leading, not catching, technologies."

35 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Cool idea with a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a nifty idea, but the major problem is that it would have to go through Russia.

    1. Re:Cool idea with a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, jokes aside about Putler and his Ukrainian invasion, it's probably relevant to note that Russia has one of the worst road death rates in the world, it's 5x higher than that of the UK which it's proposing to connect. It's much worse than even countries like Peru that likes to balance roads precariously on the side of mountains without any kind of safety barriers or landslide prevention.

      It's probably down to all the ice, or Vodka, or both. Either way, it'd be far safer to fly. Well, not over Russia obviously, but in the other direction, you know, to avoid Putin's airliner murdering Buk SAM launchers and all that.

    2. Re:Cool idea with a problem by thedonger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a nifty idea, but the major problem is that it would have to go through Russia.

      I'm sure buried somewhere in an engineering spec is the requirement that it support a weight that coincidentally is the same as that of a Russian tank division.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    3. Re:Cool idea with a problem by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      It's OK -- the guy who wrote the article doesn't seem to understand that a "high speed rail" system is a type of train, not a road....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  2. Re:They don't have the funds for that also that pa by siddesu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, they may even have the money. They just have to put Yakunin in jail and get back what he stole -- for himself, and for his boss. http://navalny-en.livejournal....

  3. So with Russia still under sanctionsq by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Funny

    The US would of course have to block the road where it hits NYC to prevent trade with them... leading to a 13-thousand mile traffic jam ?

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    1. Re:So with Russia still under sanctionsq by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 2

      It would probably be easier to block it where it hits Alaska, given that's where it enters the US.

      New Jersey. Leave it to Christie.

  4. hmmm by sociocapitalist · · Score: 2

    So...a train company president is suggesting a road be built...

    Couldn't be that he's waiting for someone to suggest that it would be better to build, oh I don't know...a train line instead?

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    1. Re:hmmm by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      it would be better to build, oh I don't know...a train line instead?

      No, skip the roads and train lines . . . go straight for the flying cars!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:hmmm by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2

      When I first saw this story it reminded me of an old magazine cover, so I went digging.

      http://books.google.com/books?...

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  5. Miles != kilometers by Mini-Geek · · Score: 2

    a 13,000-mile stretch of road

    The article:

    A theoretical drive (as fancifully calculated by CNN) from London to Alaska via Moscow might cover about 12,978 kilometers (8,064 miles).

    --
    do {print "Mini-Geek Rules!\n";}
    until ($TheEndOfTheWorld);
  6. Snowpiercer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I know where the movie inspiration came from.

    I can imagine my kids sitting in the back at mile 500 asking 'are we there yet'... no kids, only 12,500 f*ck'n miles to go

  7. Long on dream, short on planning & engineering by rmdingler · · Score: 2
    TFA doesn't go into very much detail either, such as how the Bering Strait might be circumvented or how exactly the "massive economic returns would more than make up for the massive cash outlay".

    In the plus column:

    It does mention Yakunin is considered a likely successor to Putin, so if you consider the excursions of the current Russian leader, perhaps this dreamer is still an improvement.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  8. NYC != Alaska by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    The headline says NYC, the summary says Alaska, but even that's not another 5k miles. And there might already be a road there.

    I think I'm almost as confused as the author.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. Russia can't even build and maintain roads already by NotDrWho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Russian roads across the bulk of the country are shit. And they haven't even built a decent interstate system going across the country. And they can't even properly maintain the shit roads they already have. And the country is NOTORIOUS for intentional accident scams (why do you think that they have those dash cams?). And a sizable percentage of drivers there are drunk and/or crazy.

    In short, who the fuck would want to drive across Russia if the alternative of even a slow boat is available?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  10. They're still paving the trans-Siberian highway by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... and they're talking about bridging Alaska and Siberia....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Siberian_Highway

  11. Real porpose of the road by Catmeat · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Russian's don't give a damn about connecting London to North America.

    What would be of more importance to them is better transport infrastructure between European Russia and the Russian Far East. Across much of thet route, roads are simply non-existant even today. If you drive from Moscow to Vladivostok then you're not taking a journey, you're mounting an expedition

    Why would they want this infrastructure? Well large numbers of Chinese are moving north to settle in Russia. There's speculation that Chinese will be a majority in the Russian Far East few decades. See:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Internat... http://newobserveronline.com/r...

    Better commincations across Russia will help them counter this and help tie the country together.

    1. Re:Real porpose of the road by dywolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except for the fact that a robust national highway system is a key factor in fostering and supporting economic growth.
      People also used to question why we needed links between LA and NY.

      It's not about people wanting to drive their families.
      It's about the economic support and stimulus that such infrastructure provides.

      China has already learned this lesson, having observed how it benefited our country and helped fuel our greatest period of prosperity and growth. China began its massive interstate (interprovince i guess is more accurate) highway project a little more than a decade or two ago, and in the space of 7 years had more highway miles than the US. and the results have been dramatic, spurring economic activity far inland where prior to the highways there used to be little or none. the majority of economic activity was clustered around the seaports and only as far inland as the roads reached. with a modern highway system constructed the potential reach of freight, and the volume of freight the roads had the capacity to handle, was increased by several orders of magnitude, and it's been pivotal in the expansion of their economy.

      As for Russia, there is economic activity on the east (largely based around exporting oil and other resources), and economic activity on the west, but there is little in between and the two areas of activity are currently tenuously linked at best, mostly by rail. More capacity and capability to move people and goods between them would be very beneficial to the country.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  12. High-speed rail instead? by Comboman · · Score: 2

    While still ridiculously expensive, a high-speed (or even regular-speed) rail line linking Asia and North America would at least be a little more practical. No need to build (and man, and resupply) gas stations/rest stops/etc every 50 miles or so across thousands of miles of frozen tundra. I'm not sure how far a train can go without needing to refuel, but they never have to stop to pee.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  13. Re:Bloody Hell! by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great idea. We definitely need 13,000 miles of this.

  14. prepare for unforeseen compliactions by nimbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    some things we may not have considered:
    1. Having to learn the phrase "can i have the key to the bathroom" in 7 languages.
    2. understanding, yet never being entirely certain, when left or right lane driving applies but being totally sure your wife is probably wrong.
    3. switching road trip snacks from potato chips, to Kotlety, to pea pats, to landjager, and finally back to potato chips but now you have to call them crisps while youre stuck in gridlock piccadilly traffic.
    4. having to keep multiple bribe currencies for various checkpoints and rolling infractions.
    5. The phrasebook doesnt have anything to get hungarian insurance scammers off the bonnet of your car at 3 am
    6. GPS may not be capable of routing you safely around a drunken and somewhat bloated Jeremy Clarkson as he hurls homophobic remarks at you from the doorway of a run down pub in leeds.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  15. No one trusts Russia by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No one is going to get involved in a big project like that unless they're comfortable with the Russians remaining reasonable.

    We're not seeing that. So... yet again, russia is fucking themselves out of fiancial opportunities.

    Think of where Russia is... the land. It is extremely valuable. And do they use it effectively? Are trains running from China to Europe over Russian rail? Not really. Everyone bypasses them because they're too crazy and stupid to realize that their behavior damns them to being a backwater even though they're in the fucking middle of everything.

    We trust the fucking Saudis more than we trust the Russians... and they are basically funding most of the crazy terrorism we're dealing with. That's how little we trust the Russians.

    And amongst that, the Russians want to know if we want to build an expensive road through their territory? Why would we do that? That would just give them leverage. They already give us shit about the generally meaningless space launches. They try and exert leverage everywhere. Especially where it is extremely stupid to do it.

    I'd love for the Russians to not be fucking retards. I really would. I'd love for us all to be happy hands across the universe. But who is holding their breath for that to happen?

    Till then... what evhs.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:No one trusts Russia by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      Pretty much. The russians are unbelievably stupid to put an ex KGB guy that that pines for the good old soviet days in charge of the country.

      He takes his shirt off and makes creepy faces while riding horses and then systematically sabatogues his country's future.

      The west was in the process of economically integrating Russia into the world economy after decades of economic isolation. We wanted to put factories in Russia, we wanted to run rail through Russia, we wanted help them create lots of great paying jobs... and they've done "this"...

      The Russians could be a very rich and powerful country. And instead they're destroying themselves.

      They are the last remnant of the Eastern Empire. That's where their religion comes from. It is where their alphabet comes from. And it is where those onion domes come from.

      The Eastern empire was always proud to a fault. Putin is on record saying that the Americans have come to him and said the US and Russia should ally. We have common interests.

      And he openly scoffs at the notion. He says "we are not like you." Which means what exactly? That we don't have common interests? Because we do. That his people don't like having a prosperous society? The man is a terrible leader. He was handed everything. He was handed piece of bread and all he had to do to win... was make toast. And he fucked it up. He pulled down his paints and took a dump on the piece of bread.

      That is not how one makes toast. Maybe in Russia... I don't know... but the man's failure thus far has been epic.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  16. Re:How about Russian roads without pot holes? by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Generally, this is exactly what Russians really propose: pay us to fix our roads so you can, sometimes, having a lot of money and time, drive on them. The whole "proposal" consists of roads that currently exist. Outside Russia, they are even in a good state.

  17. Laugh by koan · · Score: 2

    Has this guy not seen the Russian dash cam videos?

    https://www.youtube.com/result...

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  18. Re:Bloody Hell! by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2

    I see you never heard of us Russians drinking eau de cologne. My American friend traveled from Khabarovsk to Irkutsk by train and was quite shocked to see Russians drinking cosmetics.

  19. Re:What a stupid idea by 91degrees · · Score: 2

    Mind you - a good chunk of this would be across Siberia and another chunk through Alaska and a sparsely populated chunk of Canada. Can't imagine the Irkutz - Fairbanks stretch being all that popular and there's really not a lot between them - about the same distance as London-NY.

    Essentially our big problem with going the short way round is that silly puddle between Europe and America.

  20. Re:They don't have the funds for that also that pa by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2

    Every one color revolution begins from requests to punish corruption and ends in total chaos. I don't need a color revolution in Soviet Russia.

  21. Re:How about Russian roads without pot holes? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2

    I personally traveled from Nizhneudinsk to Kabansk in 90-th and the car road was satisfactory. There was some bad place between Chita and Khabarovsk but the railway there was and is OK.

  22. Sounds like fun but... by Drakker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think they played way too much Ticket to Ride. There's no bonus points for the longest route in real life.

  23. First time ever by LeadSongDog · · Score: 2

    Never before has everyone on /. agreed that a proposal couldn't possibly be any good. When do the shovels hit the ground?

    --
    Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  24. Re:Bloody Hell! by TWX · · Score: 2

    I thought it was actually eau de toilette...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  25. Re:Why stop at NYC? by TWX · · Score: 2

    I don't have a map of them in front of me, but I'm fairly sure that it crosses plate boundaries. That might be a little difficult to achieve in an in-ground tunnel, and I can't deny that the thought of a suspended-in-water tunnel is a bit nerve-wracking given the possibility of maritime accidents...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  26. Re:They don't have the funds for that also that pa by siddesu · · Score: 2

    I didn't realize putting thieves and liars in prison for their crimes is 'revolution'. In my dictionary this is called 'due process' and is a function of a properly functioning government.

  27. Re:They don't have the funds for that also that pa by siddesu · · Score: 2

    It was NOT Russia who began a Donbass war.

    Yes, it was Russia. The war in Eastern Ukraine was started by a Mr. Igor Girkin, a Russian, allegedly ex-military, a war criminal from the Yugoslavia wars, who also participated in several of Russia's armed conflicts (Chechnya, Georgia, etc.), and who entered into Ukraine across a Russian border, on orders from Russia.

    He had done the same thing just two months before that, in Crimea. The only difference between his first and second marches was the changed attitude of the international community, which made Putin reconsider and change his plans.

    Along with him came a group of Russian soldiers and officers, allegedly 'on leave' and a lot of serious firepower: large guns, tanks, armored vehicles. The Russian regime has tried to deny this, but the evidence that a huge amount of Russian military equipment and military are pouring through the border is overwhelming, the confessions of Girkin notwithstanding.

    Girkin's activities in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine were financed with Russian money, partly by a Mr. Malofeev, a Russian oligarch with ties to the regime, who got his initial capital from state banks.

    Mr. Girkin himself addressed your theory about this non-existing local Russian movement long ago. Here are the relevant quotes from his interview in the Zavtra newspaper:

    Q: What about the phases of war: A: At first, nobody [neither Ukraine's armed forces nor the separatists] wanted to fight. The first weeks went with the two sides talking to each other, trying to get the other side to change views. In Slovyansk, the separatists and the army were very careful using arms... The Ukrainian army wasn't eager to fight at all.

    Q: Your role wasn't only military, you were the source of ideas for establishing a government, right? A: At the time, I understood well that the [regions of] Donetsk and Lohansk can't fight on their own. We went in with the understanding that the Crimea situation will be repeated, and the Russian army will enter [openly]... My task there was not to take the power, my task was to guard the [separatist] republic

    Still, it was me who squeezed the trigger of war. If our team hasn't crossed the border [to go into Ukraine], it would have ended like it did in Kharkiv or Odessa, a few people shot, burned or imprisoned. It would have stopped there. The pendulum of war, which is still going was released by us.