Slashdot Mirror


Australia Passes Mandatory Data Retention Law

Bismillah writes Opposition from the Green Party and independent members of parliament wasn't enough to stop the ruling conservative Liberal-National coalition from passing Australia's new law that will force telcos and ISPs to store customer metadata for at least two years. Journalists' metadata is not exempted from the retention law, but requires a warrant to access. The metadata of everyone else can be accessed by unspecified government agencies without a warrant however.

3 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. A bit more worrisome... by Letophoro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    is that it also makes warrant canaries illegal.

  2. Re:What difference does it make by GumphMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Making the ISP keep it too:

    1. Makes it reliably available for litigation by big media over copyright infringement and removes the ability of ISP to defend customer privacy with inconvenient legal actions or by simply not holding the information. Hosting privacy protecting proxy/VPN services has essentially be outlawed on Australian soil... or will be as the holes in this legislation become evident and the scope creep continues.
    2. Makes it reliably available for abuse by political parties: want to know who leaked the embarrassing x? Simple warrantless search with no oversight.
    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
  3. Not sure if this is worse by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isn't it better for people in Australia to know their network data will be retained for two years, than for the people in the U.S. to be unaware data is being retained, but then in actuality have it retained forever by the NSA?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley