Slashdot Mirror


Quebec Plans To Require Website Blocking, Studies New Internet Access Tax

An anonymous reader writes: Michael Geist reports that the Government of Quebec released its budget (PDF) yesterday featuring two Internet-related measures that are sure to attract attention and possible litigation. First, it is moving forward with plans to study a new tax on residential Internet services in order to provide support for the cultural sector. Second, the government says it will be introducing a new law requiring ISPs to block access to online gambling sites. The list of blocked sites will be developed by Loto-Quebec, a government agency. The government views this as a revenue enhancing measure because it wants to channel gamblers to its own Espacejeux, the government's own online gaming site.

10 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. I hate not being culture by jader3rd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate it how everything I create, enjoy doing, or enjoy consuming isn't considered culture, and policies need to be put in place to defend so call culture. Just let the free market decide what we want self sustaining art to be.

  2. "to provide support for the cultural sector" by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anytime you hear the word "culture" in Quebec, watch out. It has a much more ominous overtone there than in most of the rest of the world.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:"to provide support for the cultural sector" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Essentially, yes.

      In Quebec they choose to actively suppress English and promote French ... the the extent you can't have English signage unless it's smaller than French, and they've ever tried to get companies like Best Buy and Home Depot to change to French names,

      Basically they've been told to piss up a rope by those companies, and that they'd rather leave than to undermine their own existing brands.

      Quebec are a bunch of whiny assholes, who increasingly are trying to pass laws which actively discriminate against anybody who isn't white, French, and Catholic -- to the extent that they want to ban religious symbols, unless of course it's a cross, and then it's OK.

      That and they don't even realize they're barely capable of speaking in French -- they're illiterate in both offficial languages. I've known people from France who have to speak to people from Quebec in English because Quebecoise is such a mongrel of a language.

      They think they're preserving their culture ... when their "culture" is bigotry, a ruined version of the language, and a sense of entitlement mixed in with being whiny cunts.

    2. Re:"to provide support for the cultural sector" by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      And remember, when you're a Quebecer and want to participate in a contest, you're excluded, just like Iranians and North Koreans. Banana Republic of Quebec.

      Quebec is an oddity because they have a ton of things that no one else does - they are ... special.

      So if you want to hold a contest Canada-wide, you follow basic legislation that applies federally (generally easy) and maybe have to make adjustments for each province (again, easy). But if you want to add QC, you suddenly are beholden to a TON more regulations. Most companies simply choose to avoid it because the benefit of adding QC is very small compared to the burden.

      It's also why in Canada you often run into things like "Not for sale in Quebec". Electronic toys are even more fascinating because you often have "Quebec edition" and "Not for Quebec edition" (usually marked as "Not for sale in Quebec").

      It's really an independent nation of its own - they just happen to use the Canadian dollar and passport.

    3. Re:"to provide support for the cultural sector" by dbsnstuf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What you describe is (mostly) what our federal system of government in the US was supposed to accomplish. Independent states bound together only by common commerce, money, and security. If the federal government hadn't grown to the size/scope it is today, we wouldn't bat an eye when one state enacted a particular law and the next did not.

  3. Dangerous Precedent by timrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sets a dangerous precedent that it is perfectly okay for the government to block websites in order to generate more revenue. If this passes, expect states in the US to try the same thing, especially if they have casinos that aren't doing well.

  4. Tax Bullshit by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a resident of Quebec, let me laugh at that statement. Help culture? The Liberals don't give a toss about culture, they're just completely fixed on the notion of having a zero-deficit budget by any means necessary. They'll slash health and education funding, they'll add hidden taxes while claiming none are added, they'll do whatever it takes to reach this, because they're considered to be the "economically focused" party. To give context, when a journalist asked them if they could promise that the significant cuts in healthcare funding would not affect services, they straight up said that they can't say that because there might be "obstruction" or "slow uptake" of their new magical plan which makes more with less.

    If culture sees a single cent of that tax, I'll be impressed. This is strictly a way of balancing their budget without raising the tax rates, which would've caused furor. This internet tax sailed past all major news organizations as far as I can tell.

  5. Re:Cher gouvernement by Eloking · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Allez chier ma gang d'osti de calisse de lèche-cul de tabarnaks.

    Christ de modérateur, mon commentaire est 100% on-topic.

    Dear Anonymous Coward,

    I'm also a Quebecer (and french) and I understand your frustration toward the government (even if I don't share it). But I completely miss the purpose behind the idea of writing a hateful post (not to mention in Quebecer french) about the government in a English and worldwide news website. Did you expect sympathy from this community? Did it make you fell better?

    I find this not only useless, it's plain stupid.

    --
    Elok
  6. What makes you unique by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quebec is an island of francophone culture off a continent that is dominated by the U.S. Either you embrace protectionism or risk losing all that makes you unique.

    That is a nonsense argument. If one needs to resort to protectionist measures to "preserve" your culture from a peaceful (to you) neighbor, then your people don't really support said measures even if they claim to. Actions speak louder than words. People claim to hate McDonalds and yet they sell millions of burgers every year to many of those same people. If the people of Quebec really want to speak French or engage in Francophile activities then they will do so. If they don't then they shouldn't be forced to. Cultural norms shift over time and there is nothing fundamentally bad about that.

    I spend a fair bit of time in Canada. I was married in Alberta and regularly vacation in Ontario. Canada is a wonderful country. Most of Canada has little difficulty maintaining what makes them unique because what makes them truly unique isn't stuff the government needs to pass laws to protect.

  7. Re: Cher gouvernement by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    English as spoken in, say, the southern US had its origin in Elizabethan times. But no law has ever prevented the dialect from changing from its original form or required that visitors use a specific set of words and expressions. Meanwhile in France and every other part of Europe, stop signs say STOP. In Montréal, they have to say ARRÊT.