Taxpayer Subsidies To ULA To End

Posted by timothy on Friday March 27, 2015 @10:54PM from the but-don't-they-know-about-the-multiplier? dept.

schwit1 writes Because it has concluded that they make it impossible to have a fair competition for contracts, the Air Force has decided to phase out taxpayer subsidies to the United Launch Alliance (ULA). The specific amounts of these subsidies have been effectively buried by the Air Force in many different contracts, so we the taxpayers really don't know how much the are. Nonetheless, this decision, combined with the military report released yesterday that criticized the Air Force's over-bearing and restrictive certification process with SpaceX indicates that the political pressure is now pushing them hard to open up bidding to multiple companies, which in turn will help lower cost and save the taxpayer money.

1 of 42 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Re:Say what you will about ULA... by jonwil · 2015-03-27 23:44 · Score: 3, Interesting

Considering how many successful launches SpaceX has had to date (including launches where the launch was successful but the land-and-reuse part of the mission failed) I recon SpaceX will be just as good at launching stuff into space as ULA is. And they (per the figures I have seen quoted) are cheaper than ULA too.