Slashdot Mirror


Tiny LIDAR Chip Could Add Cheap 3D Sensing to Cellphones and Tablets

There are expensive dedicated devices that do 3D scanning (like the high-end tablet in Google's Project Tango), and versatile but bulky add-ons, like the Sense from 3D Systems, but it's not a capability built into the typical cellphone or tablet. That could change, thanks to a microsensor being prototyped now (at low resolution) at CalTech. From The Verge's coverage: The tiny chip, called a nanophotonic coherent imager, uses a form of LIDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) technology to capture height, width, and depth information from each pixel. LIDAR, which shines a laser on the target and then analyzes the light waves that are reflected back to the sensor, are best known for their use in precision-guided missile systems and self-driving cars.

While LIDAR itself isn't new, [project lead Ali] Hajimiri explains that "by having an array of tiny LIDARs on our coherent imager, we can simultaneously image different parts of an object or a scene without the need for any mechanical movements within the imager." Each "pixel" on the new sensor can individually analyze the phase, frequency, and intensity of the reflected waves, producing a single piece of 3D data. The data from all of the pixels combined can produce a full 3D scan. In addition, the researchers' implementation allows for an incredibly tiny and low-cost scanner, all while maintaining accuracy. According to the researchers, the chip can produce scans that are within microns of the original.

9 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. Smartphone power by Twinbee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Honestly, it's insane how ludicrously powerful phones are getting. I meant take this one article for example - 4K 120fps slow-motion video recording is coming to smartphones in 2016.

    4K videoing at 120fps?! From a smartphone?

    Isn't progress wonderful.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:Smartphone power by Rei · · Score: 2

      Still tiny apertures, though :(

      I'll take more light coming into the sensor over high frame rates and pixel counts any day.

      --
      Trump's plan to get rid of Mueller appears to be 'be so guilty of so many things that Mueller works himself to death.'
    2. Re:Smartphone power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, as long as you're happy with progress only in information processing. How long does it take a passenger plane to fly over the Atlantic? Same as in 1969, the year of the maiden flight of the Boeing 747.

      We have no social progress towards a leisure society for all, even though all your "progress" is only used to make the rich richer.

      Keep playing with your phone while you're being robbed.

    3. Re:Smartphone power by ckatko · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's entirely false. Once an senor is reading at 100% of the time for a given interval, the only thing you can do is increase the time interval, which means any movement causes blur because you're averaging more time into a single image.

      There is no replacement for sensor size and lens quality. Read what an airy disc is. None. You cannot violate physics with a PR campaign.

    4. Re:Smartphone power by peragrin · · Score: 2

      Not quite true. Current 747 have a higher cruise speed and reduced fuel usage compared to the 1969 model. It isn't breathe taking difference but it does exist. Basically all new business jets run at mach .95 instead of the mach .6-.7 of 30 years ago. Why not faster well fuel usage goes up, and viable flight paths go down due to supersonic restriction laws.

      Like batteries we are at limits of chemical energy storage. Even hyper velocities are tough to maintain at a practical level. Improvements are only coming slowly. Without a major energy breakthrough we are going to be hitting some major roadblocks in the future.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  2. Re:Lidar ! = Acronym by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bookworm is a compound word (book + worm = bookworm). Lidar is a portmanteau, like spork or satisfice. Lidar is now a backronym for Light Detection and Ranging.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  3. Re:Needed for automated cars. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    I used to make those spinning mirrors and yes, this new tech is a huge step.

  4. Self-Driving Pedestrians by trenobus · · Score: 2

    Just imagine, there could be a phone app that displays an arrow to show the user which way to walk. Using the Lidar to detect obstacles, the app could enable a phone zombie to become almost self-driving, avoiding obstacles and other people. Almost like a real person.

  5. For a smartphone a TOF camera could be more suited by Cochonou · · Score: 2

    For a smartphones, I'd rather expect so-called "time of flight" cameras to catch-up before LIDARs. Basically, you have an array of LEDs which illuminate the scene using sine or square wave intensity modulation. The imager works at a high framerate (or uses other windowing techniques) to extract the phase shift in each pixel, which gives you 2D ranging information. Of course, there is still the problem of phase unwrapping.
    So in this kind of system, you trade off dynamic range for accuracy and cost. As most measurements with smartphones will probably be performed at short distance, this system seems more suitable than regular LIDARs.