Slashdot Mirror


Outside Beijing, a Military-style Bootcamp For "Internet Addiction"

Press2ToContinue writes Last year, China recognized internet addiction as an official disorder. Since then, over 6,000 patients have submitted themselves for treatment, after some spent up to 14 hours a day online. And as these amazing pictures show, dealing with it is serious. The Daxing Internet Addiction Treatment Centre (IATC) is a military-style bootcamp nestled in the suburbs of Bejing. The young men that enter its doors are subjected to a strict military regime of exercise, medication and solitary confinement. Any kind of electronic gadgetry is completely banned. Additionally, patients are frequently subjected to psychiatric assessments and brain scans to make sure they stay on the straight and narrow. And the concept is gaining steam; the first Internet Congress on Internet Addiction Disorders was held in Milan in early 2014. Despite its recent official classification, Is internet addiction a real disorder? Or is it a red herring masking depression and escapism? And to make things more indeterminate, Isn't more and more time online the inevitable future?

12 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Addiction is not a red herring by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    "Internet" addiction is scapegoating the medium.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. It is Bullshit, IMO by gweihir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back in the day when I was a pupil I had "library addiction" for several years. I spent most of my free time in the library reading books. I event took a lot of books with me to read somewhere else. It was a fascinating experience with all the knowledge in there. Nobody in their right mind would have thought it was a problem. This "Internet addiction" is not different in any way I can see.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:It is Bullshit, IMO by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Back in the day when I was a pupil I had "library addiction" for several years. I spent most of my free time in the library reading books.

      If you were reading books, that's completely different.

      However, if you had been going to the library to stare at the same page of your year book day after day pining over a classmate you had a crush on, or going to the library only to hide behind a bookshelf staring at your crush while she's studying with her boyfriend, that would be a closer analogue to what people do on the internet nowadays.

    2. Re:It is Bullshit, IMO by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except 'online gaming' is far from useless. I use it(along with regular gaming) as part of my pain management under the recommendation of my neurologist and pain specialist. It helps reduce the amount of addicting narcotics I need to take, which in my book is a good thing. The reality is, some people can have a problem with anything. I rank 'internet addiction' far below actual social/societal problems in terms of things that should be looked at. You know, like poverty, substance abuse, general run of the mill abuse, malnutrition, etc., this entire thing comes off as the 'new boogeyman' that someone thought would be great to rally around so government busybodies look like they're doing something.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:It is Bullshit, IMO by functor0 · · Score: 2

      An addiction is only a problem if it interferes with life to the point where it's detrimental. It's the same whether it's a "library addiction", "drinking addiction", or an "internet addiction". Doing something a lot isn't bad, but if you do it it to the point where it can harm yourself or someone else is a totally different matter. Take this story for example: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asi... where a couple inadvertently starved their 3 month old baby to death while spending 12 hour days at an internet cafe playing an MMO.

  3. Re:Well by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is certainly true, and you do not even need to be in China for that. Most smart, perceptive people will develop an intense dislike for the way this installment of the human race is behaving in short order.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  4. I should go on hiding... by MinamataHG · · Score: 2

    Because I would have been executed a long ago as a serious repeated offender...

  5. Re:answers: by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not a disorder in the sense that the average person means it though. In some ways this is similar to all those stupid "X with a computer" patents, in that somehow people think that adding a computer into the equation makes it magically different. Obsessive compulsive behavior already is a disorder, and is entirely different from what people usually mean when they talk about "internet addiction." The internet, and anything associated with it, be that "excessive" gaming or Facebook or whatever, are at most a symptom of something else. There is no inherent chemical dependency involved any more than with any other activity.

    If anything, this gets scapegoated by many people because it does not fit the old norms of human society. If those same youths were obsessively studying for schoolwork all day long, it would not elicit nearly the same reaction. If they spent their entire day socializing with friends in person, would anyone be surprised?

    As for the definition of online versus offline, that's a somewhat tricky distinction to make. It would be safer to say that in an increasingly connected world it will be harder to find anything that is "completely offline" unless you specifically seek it out - but, again, it's not like there's some ethernet port in my body that I plug a cable into that's delivering euphoric sensations I'm addicted to.

  6. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone please help me. I can't stop reading and posting to Slashdot!

    That's not internet addiction, that's masochism. Totally different disorder.

  7. Re:answers: by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, your statement "there is no inherent chemical dependency involved any more than with any other activity", although prima facie true, as the neurological basis of psychological habituation is fairly-well understood and the same mechanisms are involved. However, this facile statement hides the fact that people become psychologically habituated to certain activities to varying degrees - saying that the mechanism is the same simplifies OCD into nail biting, even though treatment in each case would be completely different.

    Second, this disregard of severity of psychological habituation (I'll call it PH for brevity from here on out) seems to be matched by a notion that a communication medium has no bearing on how well material delivered through that medium can reinforce behavior, leading to astonishing statement "people think that adding a computer into the equation makes it magically different"! This is astonishing mainly because by trying to be sarcastic, you've actually stumbled upon the truth: Different mediums for reinforcement DO lead to different levels of reinforcement. Each medium provides a different experience - aesthetic experience, information content, activity levels, etc., etc., etc. In fact, it would be pretty fucking amazing if a new communications medium did not reinforce particular behaviors very well.

    Finally, it's odd that you see the internet as a neutral distribution medium. The atomized and fragmented nature of the internet makes it a lovely market for short, facile responses such as yours. It eschews long form thought and substitutes trope. In many ways, twitch response is a perfect metaphor for the internet - all reaction, no thought. And FPS games take this to a new level - all reaction, no thought, pretty much all the time. It is no surprise that you come to the defence of games as it is a perfect avatar for you. Your inability to achieve even shallow thought, coupled with nothing but sarcasm and a few common rhetorical tricks are the perfect prestidigitation for our commonly awful internet age. I fully expect to see you up-modded here.

    P.S. I normally don't swat at flies. But in this case, you gamesters are all swarming around a decaying corpse that you helped devour. Get the fuck out of the way so smart people can perform an autopsy.

    --
    That is all.
  8. Re:answers: by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    Actually, I don't give a rat's ass about games, just the antisocial tendencies they seem to encourage among some of their devotees - it's not the game, it's the asshattery. And as long as the asshats of gaming band together and are a problem for the rest of the web, I'm sure your fellow non-asshat gamers will eventually isolate you as well. Have a good time playing with each other, you little homoerotic man boys.

    --
    That is all.
  9. Re:Well by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 2

    And how is this different from the US? Life must be pretty fucking depressing, living in a repressive, xenophoic, totalitarian capitalist regime, riddled with corruption, that doesn't value human life as anything more than a resource to be used like a toilet, then cast aside like so much offal.