Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

LG Accidentally Leaks Apple iMac 8K Is Coming Later This Year

Posted by samzenpus on from the going-big dept.

An anonymous reader writes LG accidentally revealed in blog post that Apple is planning to release a 8K iMac later this year. This news comes as a surprise as the leak came from a different company rather than Apple. LG is one of Apple's biggest display partners and has already demonstrated 8K monitors at CES in Las Vegas. They note that the panel boasts 16 times the number of pixels as a standard Full HD screen.

4 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Too many pixels = slooooooow by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, 4k is already overkill in most situations. 8k is just fetishism. And it may well be worse, as all those pixels have to be controlled somehow.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Too many pixels = slooooooow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fuck everything, we're doing five blades.

    2. Re:Too many pixels = slooooooow by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

      4K is the limit of human visual perception.

      The limit of visual perception is measured in pixels per angular distance. It doesn't depend on the number of pixels, but on their size and distance... at least until you get to the level where your entire field of view is covered by pixels that are small enough to be invisible at their given distance.

      At the distance from my eyes to my desktop monitor (about 20 inches), I expect I can resolve pixels down do about 200 pixels per inch. My 30" monitor is about 26" wide by about 16" tall, which means that to reach the limit of my visual perception (assuming my estimate of 200 ppi is accurate; it may be a little low), I need 5200 horizontal pixels, about 5K. I'm hoping that within the next couple of years I can upgrade to a 40" monitor, though, and 8K would be about right for a display that size.

      More pixels would be good if I sometimes want to lean closer to see fine details (and I do).

      And, really, we absolutely do want sufficient resolution that pixels are indistinguishable, so we can have what appear to be perfectly smooth curves and arbitrarily fine lines. Smooth text, in particular, is much easier on the eyes. I have a MacBook Pro with a high-resolution display on my desk right next to my big monitor and it is sooo much more pleasant to look at.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  2. What are those pixels for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought the "retina" display already has a higher resolution than the human eye can discern. Are these new Macs for cats?