Slashdot Mirror
Collision With Earth's "Little Sister" Created the Moon
astroengine writes The primordial planet believed to have smashed into baby Earth, creating a cloud of debris that eventually formed into the moon, was chemically a near-match to Earth, a new study shows. The finding, reported in this week's Nature, helps resolve a long-standing puzzle about why Earth and the moon are nearly twins in terms of composition. Computer models show that most of the material that formed the moon would have come from the shattered impactor, a planetary body referred to as Theia, which should have a slightly different isotopic makeup than Earth.
It was only a matter of time before Earth-Two was discovered!
....if both planetary bodies formed in the same area of the accretion disk.
Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
What about this explanation: a planetoid smashed into early Earth and split Earth into two. The two halves eventually smashed back together, but created the moon in the process. One "half" may have mixed more with the collider than the other due to the angle of impact, creating the slightly different isotopes in the parts of it that became the moon.
Table-ized A.I.
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of them!
So Gaia banged her little sister and made the moon? I assume rule 34 has already been satisfied for this, right?
Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
Why should the material composition of Theia have differed all that much from the Proto-Earth? They formed from the same planetary nebula, and at relatively similar distances from the Sun; shouldn't they have been similar in composition? And how can anyone state with any certitude, 4+ billion years later, how much of the merged Earth's crust was from Theia, and how much from the proto-Earth, and whether the lunar material was one, the other, or mostly mixed? It was a long time ago, and the Early Heavy Bombardment period would have stirred things up further. In fact, it's not unlikely that the Early Heavy Bombardment material was long-period debris from the original collision.
If Theia had formed substantially closer, or substantially farther away from the Sun, then the debris from the collision could hardly have remained close enough that the shards would coalesce to form the Moon. The differing orbital velocities would have seen to that.
Our substantial magnetic field may be due to the merging of the iron cores of the Proto-Earth and Theia. Earth is the most dense planet in the solar system, and from what we know of Mars and Venus, we suspect that our iron core is far larger than the other terrestrial planets.
Venus has a super-thick poisonous atmosphere; it's at least possible that our large Moon has, over a period of 4+ billion years, "skimmed away" enough of our atmosphere to have protected the Earth from a similar fate.
Of course, we only think that our atmosphere is right because we evolved here, in this atmosphere; if the atmosphere had been different, we would have evolved differently, and (had intelligent life developed at all) we'd think that THAT was the right sort of atmosphere.
Of course, we only think that our atmosphere is right because we evolved here, in this atmosphere; if the atmosphere had been different, we would have evolved differently, and (had intelligent life developed at all) we'd think that THAT was the right sort of atmosphere.
IIRC earth's atmosphere was different. Our current atmosphere the result of life polluting that environment with oxygen. Causing an environmental catastrophe at the time.
You can call planets planets or call them aardvarks. It makes no difference. The name we give it has no meaning except to the person giving the name. Another person might call it something else. Who can say which is right? You because you give it a name in English, or a first nation's person who named it in their language? Which is correct? And which is wrong?
But no matter.
The planet itself does not care what we call it. Our names mean nothing to it. The planet simply is what it is, as it was before humans gave it names and as it will be long after humans have faded from this universe.
Sig for hire.
Venus and Mars both have no usable atmosphere because of the lack of a strong magnetic field. Venus has a dense (and poisonous) atmosphere because all the lighter gasses are forced to the top, and whisked away by the solar wind, leaving only the heaviest behind. If the planet had a magnetic field, the wind effect stripping away the atmosphere wouldn't have been as strong, and an equilibrium could have been achieved. Mars has the same effect, but not as much concentration of "heavy" because the lighter gravity. There's simply less to begin with. But what's there is CO2, heavier than O2 or N2, though some N2 is present. The elemental gasses were stripped away as well.
Learn to love Alaska
I remember when most of the Slashdot stories revolved around fire and the wheel.
Eh? Speak up, sonny..
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
In Soviet Russia, Beowulf cluster of Natalie Portman overlord garden ornaments with hot grits poured down their pants welcomes you!
[Soviet Russia is sounding good right about now...]
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
Or maybe the Moon was here first, and Earth crashed into it. So we're actually on the Moon, and the thing in the sky at night is actually Earth!
Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
I remember when all this was orange groves...
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.