Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Pushes For Public Education Funding While Avoiding State Taxes
theodp writes: After stressing how important the funding of Washington State education — particularly CS Ed — is to Microsoft, company general counsel Brad Smith encountered one of those awkward interview moments (audio at 28:25). GeekWire Radio: "So, would you ever consider ending that practice [ducking WA taxes by routing software licensing royalties through Nevada-based Microsoft Licensing, GP] in Nevada [to help improve WA education]?" Smith: "I think there are better ways for us to address the state's needs than that kind of step." Back in 2010, Smith, Steve Ballmer, and Microsoft Corporation joined forces to defeat Proposition I-1098, apparently deciding there were better ways to address the state's needs than a progressive income tax.
What do you can it when you put the costs of doing business off onto anyone and everyone else?
Profit!
What do you think they study in MBA school, civics?
Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
Most "ganjadudes" tend to be progressive. You sound decidedly far right/Tea Party. Perhaps you should consider getting a more accurate handle, like, perhaps, IveGotMineLet'mStarve.