Slashdot Mirror
Windows Remains Vulnerable To Serious 18-Year-Old SMB Security Flaw
Mark Wilson writes A serious security hole leaves millions of Windows users open to attack, making it possible to extract encrypted credentials from a target machine. Researchers at Cylance say the problem affects "any Windows PC, tablet or server" (including Windows 10) and is a slight progression of the Redirect to SMB attack discovered by Aaron Spangler way back in 1997. Redirect to SMB is essentially a man-in-the-middle attack which involves taking control of a network connection. As the name suggests, victims are then redirected to a malicious SMB server which can extract usernames, domains and passwords. Cylance also reports that software from companies such as Adobe, Oracle and Symantec — including security and antivirus tools — are affected.
apparently this is how sony got hacked
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
IIRC, we discussed this in MSE classes, the same ones where the instructor assured us we need not register a domain name for our internal network (!), and agreed that despite the lack of information from Microsoft, It was worth it to block SMB ports from the public networks. As well as others, such as SQL Server (1433/1434 at a minimum), AD (135,389,5722, and the list goes on), and other services we need not expose to nor listen on for external traffic, we rapidly got to the point where the reasonably responsible admin blocked by default, opened only what was necessary, and then directed these to the proper hosts inside the network.
This is slightly older than the Y2K bug. And still not really fixed? Microsoft's choices here have always come back to haunt them. NetDDE, OLE, the HTML viewers, and this, all making Outlook once the premier distribution method for viruses and all form of malware,
Interprocess friendliness has its cost. Ease of use goes both ways. The crooks are happy to take advantage of your features.
deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
It requires a man in the middle attack on traffic that should never go across the internet outside a vpn. Yes it's a problem but not exactly a significant one for a well put together network.
No sir I dont like it.
original paper here: http://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/270968/SPEAR/RedirectToSMB_public_whitepaper.pdf
How hard is it to mandate any submission contain the source instead of some shill article?
I remain vulnerable to serious 18 year olds, if you catch my drift.
Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
I don't know how or why it came to this. The world is hooked on insecure authentication protocols. NTLMv2, Kerberos, plaintext, plaintext over encrypted tunnel protected by group secrets (sigh..) or certificates and dull thud of every flawed permutation of a challenge handshake system imaginable.
These things are employed virtually everywhere and the consequences are visible everywhere.
Haha I tricked you or your computer into connecting to my file system or my fake bank or my fake web site and because of that I now have your credentials and your f*****d.
Living with consequences has become so routine and institutionalized some find it difficult to see the problem at all ... instead resorting to blaming failure of a castle defense or operating in an unsafe environment rather than notice the root cause of the problem - broken authentication systems.
When the most widely deployed use of a secure authentication protocol is protecting an online role playing game I have no interest in Microsoft's (And all other vendors) lame excuses for not fixing these problems decades ago.
The article states "the encryption method used was devised in 1998 and is weak by today’s standards ... Microsoft has yet to release a patch to fix the Redirect to SMB vulnerability" as if Microsoft must remove the feature in order for Cylance to consider this resolved. Instead a number of improvements have been made to SMB since 1998 include support for HMAC-SHA256 (v2.0) and AES-CMAC (v3.0) hashing. http://www.windowsecurity.com/.... You are going need a little more than "$3000 worth of GPUs" to forward brute force the AES-CMAC hashed passwords.