Slashdot Mirror


Republicans Introduce a Bill To Overturn Net Neutrality

New submitter grimmjeeper writes: IDG News reports, "A group of Republican lawmakers has introduced a bill that would invalidate the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's recently passed net neutrality rules. The legislation (PDF), introduced by Representative Doug Collins, a Georgia Republican, is called a resolution of disapproval, a move that allows Congress to review new federal regulations from government agencies, using an expedited legislative process."

This move should come as little surprise to anyone. While the main battle in getting net neutrality has been won, the war is far from over.
The legislation was only proposed now because the FCC's net neutrality rules were just published in the Federal Register today. In addition to the legislation, a new lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by USTelecom, a trade group representing ISPs.

2 of 441 comments (clear)

  1. Government != Internet engineers by diamondmagic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Net Neutrality is a routing rule that has been with the Internet since the beginning. You don't "overturn" it with an act of congress. How the Internet is designed is a job for engineers and no one else.

    What's at issue is if the FCC's unconstitutional, unregulated expansion of power. Without identifying any previous violations, without even utilizing the courts, and without any act of Congress, they single-handedly declared their authority over one of the most free realms of commerce we have today. This wasn't OK when it was the Broadcast Flag, and it's not OK even if they call it "light touch".

    Just because you can send copyrighted material over p2p protocols, doesn't make them illegal. And just because you can send VoIP over the Internet doesn't make it a telecommunications service.

  2. Re:Why is it even a discussion? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    shhh

    you'll upset the libertarian morons and free market fundamentalists and their ignorant, wrong simpleton's mythology

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it