Slashdot Mirror


'We the People' Petition To Revoke Scientology's Tax Exempt Status

An anonymous reader writes: There has been a lot of interest in the activities of the Church of Scientology recently, especially since the release of Alex Gibney's documentary Going Clear. A petition against tax-exempt status for Scientology has been started on the U.S. White House petition website. If it receives more than 100,000 signatures, it will qualify for an official White House response. Even Slashdot has had its own run-ins with Scientology in the past — one of many internet sites to face legal threats from the Church. Has the time come for Scientology go "clear?"

28 of 700 comments (clear)

  1. A first: We should follow Germany's lead by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, they got the Nazi thing wrong. But they definitely got the Scientology thing RIGHT.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those who don't haven't heard the story:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      Basically, Germany has refused to recognize Scientology as a religion, a position that has more-or-less lead to an all-out war by Scientology against the whole country. In fact, one of the most bizarre revelations of the Scooter Libby scandal was that Tom Cruise had been actively lobbying Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby, and the Bush administration to actually PUT U.S. SANCTIONS on Germany for it (you can't make this shit up).

    2. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then lets avoid picking on Scientology and revoke tax exempt status for all churches.

    3. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by peragrin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One step at a time. First you do the churches no one likes. Then you do the churches very few like. Then you wait a couple of generations and you can do blanket associations across all churches.

      Your way leads to revolt. My way takes 2-3 generations but is done peacefully.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The cult of Scientology is a criminal organization. Churches don't harass people who leave, so we can be confident that Scientology is a cult, rather than a church. You seem to either be a member of the cult, or to be a very stupid person. I'd be fine with removing tax exempt status from all these fantasy-based groups, but especially that of toxic, blackmailing cults.

    5. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah.. The Nazis' way...

    6. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by jbolden · · Score: 5, Informative

      Churches don't harass people who leave

      Harassing people who are not members is illegal.

      However, not only do churches do this but the right to church discipline was one of the reasons the America was a land of religious freedom. Mennonite churches (think the Amish), most certainly do harass those who quit. And that Baptist tradition was all during the 19th century quite common. The LDS church, Jehovah's Witnesses. Many of the stricter Protestant faiths do this. And of course Islam does this. So no what you are saying is just false.

    7. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's vastly different than giving the state the authority to destroy religions it disagrees with.

      Honestly, Scientology is a religion founded by a science fiction writer who famously said "You don't get rich writing science fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a religion."

      They use some unscientific piece of equipment to measure people and tell them about the concentration of aliens or somesuch, and then charge them to fix the issue -- and apparently keep charging them. I'm also fairly certain the medical community doesn't recognize Dianetics as being anything other than gibberish.

      Sorry, but it's awfully hard to take it seriously as a religion ... it has about as much credibility as being a Jedi or a Pastafarian.

      So, what exactly is our threshold for saying "sure, your wacky religion can have tax exempt status"? Because my "Church of the Big Titties" could definitely use some tax free status if we're just handing it out like that, that way we can have more "Sacraments of the Holy Wet T-Shirt" while imbibing "The Blessed Beer".

      You're kvetching about giving the state the authority to destroy religions it disagrees with, I have yet to see why we should acknowledge it as actually being a religion.

      Can I just make up any old crap and call it a religion? Or are there rules about it? Clearly logical consistency or proof aren't required.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who appointed you the Godwin Nazi?

      lol. Is that a first?

    9. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Umm... In 2-3 generations the Czech Republic will have a significantly lower percent of Atheists than it does today. You think the atheists are going to win a multi-generational war of ideology when they pop out kids below replacement level vs. an adversary which discourages birth control and consequently has average birthrates that double their population every couple of decades?

      If Stalin was trying to purge religion from the world 200 years later he did a shit job of it. Why do you think moral conservatives are opposed to education spending? Religious zealotry and birthrate decline with education attained(inverse relationship) such that a college educated public threatens the revenue streams of the churches.

      Church is a protection racket with Satan as the enforcer. Access to information and dissenting perspectives via the internet and a more connected society is what is causing a temporary dip in religious participation by the general public, but when the dystopia hits "peak misery" the church will be waiting with open arms to sell various alternative forms of euphoria like sexual repression "edging" and fasting. Nothing like a fairy tale's promise to escape accountability for your own victimization via economic castes, hedonism, and bad decision making.

    10. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point of giving tax breaks IN THE FIRST PLACE, is to encourage charitable work in the community. If they are not doing that, then why are we giving them a pass?

      --
      Good-bye
    11. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The obvious solution is to remove tax exempt status for religious institutions altogether. It's not just Scientology taking advantage of this, it's so-called megachurches and televangelists too. If they want to have a charitable division, fine, but a religious organization should pay taxes like any other.

      "Well, then," Jesus said, "give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, and give to God what belongs to God." His reply completely amazed them.

    12. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by ShaunC · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, pretty funny story.

      A local church that has been hosting naked paint parties and slumber-party Sundays with the "sexiest ladies on the beach" will now have to pay taxes on the property as officers investigate the church's practices, authorities said Tuesday. [...] Sheriff Frank McKeithen said it is a "blatant slap in the face" to taxpayers and law enforcement. "They're trying to get around the laws, and they're using the church to get there," McKeithen said.

      On the plus side, if that's enough justification to strip this church of its tax-exempt status, maybe it'll work on the scienos, too.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    13. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The USA system has worked well for centuries why mess it up?

      Because there's a significant number of people here that are hostile towards religion in any shape or form. The mere fact that it exists drives them insane.

      As an atheist, I can safely say that my view of religion is essentially the same as towards people who believe in astrology, fairies or alien abductions, i.e. it's your problem

      The difference is that religions think they have the right to make it my problem too.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Churches are tax exempt because they're churches. If they satisfy the requirements of a tax exempt non-profit or charity, that's great. If not, pay your taxes. Scientology, for example, would likely fail quite badly as a non-profit.

    15. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by blackanvil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If a church wants non-profit status, they should need to separate the religious elements from the charity. Oh, your small-town church with a pastor who has four different congregations he moves between has nothing to worry about, but if a megachurch can afford a huge all-glass cathedral, $ multi-million salaries for the charismatic preacher begging for more donations, and toys like private jets and limos, nope, that's a for-profit enterprise, even if you cook the books so there's no money left over at the end of the day.

    16. Re:A first: We should follow Germany's lead by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but if a megachurch can afford a huge all-glass cathedral, $ multi-million salaries for the charismatic preacher begging for more donations, and toys like private jets and limos, nope, that's a for-profit enterprise, even if you cook the books so there's no money left over at the end of the day.

      I'm not disagreeing with you, because I think that stuff is disgusting. But. As a programmer, how would you write a function that returns a boolean value: "is this church a legitimate non-profit?" Because that's ultimately what you're asking, and I'm having a hard time formulating such a thing.

      Test cases:

      * A small-town church with a pastor who has four different congregations: True
      * A huge all-glass cathedral, $ multi-million salaries for the charismatic preacher begging for more donations, and toys like private jets and limos: False
      * A small local all-volunteer charity that feeds the homeless: True
      * A small, all-volunteer, poorly run charity who means well but sucks at their mission: True
      * A large national charity with a well-paid CEO who effectively uses their resources to do amazing things: True
      * A large national charity with a well-paid CEO who isn't very effective, but everyone agrees means well: True?
      * A large national charity with a well-paid CEO who doesn't effectively uses their resources: Um...

      Step one: agree on the test cases. Step two: specific the input parameters that lets you distinguish between outcomes. Step three: non-profit?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  2. See Tony Ortega's take on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://tonyortega.org/2015/04/13/if-you-want-the-irs-to-reexamine-scientologys-tax-exempt-status-its-time-to-get-real/

  3. Re:What? Why discriminate? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would be ok with removing all tax exempt statuses from churches as long as charity work was deductible for them. We could then see which churches really do put their money where their mouth is in charitable work and donations. It would also encourage any religions which don't put much effort in helping the poor to change that behavior rather quickly.

  4. Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a lot of experience with the We the People petitions. Specifically, how they don't work like people think they do.

    How people think it works: You gather enough signatures and then somehow, you introduce bills to congress with your stated goal
    How it actually works: A white house rep sends you a generically worded statement about how in this case, the IRS is the agency in control of determining tax exempt status of the church.

    There have been dozens of petitions for Westburough baptist church and Scientology and they always get the same response. "I have no control over this".

  5. Re:What? Why discriminate? by zarthrag · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This. I tend to cringe at these megachurches that collect (metric) tons of money from poor people with the (false) promise of "health, wealth, and prosperity" - only to turn-around and spend hundreds of thousands, or even millions, to buy a fancy plane, property for a bigger parking-lot (I've personally seen that same church humiliate a poor, homeless person - by putting a suit jacket on them for service, then refuse to provide any kind of real material help.

    The bible's position on it is pretty simple, "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's..." - "USA" is printed on the dollar, churches ought to pay taxes. Even money that falls out of the sky counts as income.

    --
    Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  6. Re:What? Why discriminate? by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Show me another religion that hides their religious texts behind the concept of "trade secrets".

    I mean, I can go to pretty much any church and read a Bible. Heck, I can buy a copy at practically any bookstore. Same with the Qur'an. Or the Torah.

    I can have religious discussions with Christians (of varying denominations) or Muslims or Jews and find out pretty much anything I want to know about their religion and it doesn't cost me anything other than time.

    You want to officially learn about Scientology? Start forking over the cash. (Yes, officially. According to the Church of Scientology, practicing Scientology outside of the auspices of the CoS is bad, mmkay? Not even the Pope tries to insist that you can't be a real Christian unless you're Catholic.)

    A lot of that stuff that we know about the Church of Scientology... like Xenu, and the Galactic Confederation, and all that (from the OT III docs)? We're not supposed to know that. We only know about it because of civil trials involving the CoS, and they tried to suppress that stuff under the concept of it being trade secrets.

    So yeah, show me another religion that has trade secrets. Where's that other major religion that you don't learn the 'true faith' until and unless you've invested a substantial whack of cash?

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  7. Re:What? Why discriminate? by RDW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The question, I believe, is whether the CoS really is a belief organization, or a financial scam.

    Cost of reading the most sacred beliefs of all major religions: free online, or $10 for the paperback. Jedi may also need to invest in the DVDs.

    Cost of reading the most sacred beliefs of CoS: $380,000 (2006 pricing: http://www.xenu.net/archive/pr... ). Discounts available by signing a billion year contract and working full time in return for food.

  8. Re:What? Why discriminate? by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, the N.F.L., N.H.L., P.G.A. and L.G.P.A are tax exempt
    http://www.nytimes.com/roomfor...

  9. Re:What? Why discriminate? by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was agreeing with the thread until this point.

    Here's the problem with your statement:

    "prime real estate" got that way over a very long time. In the downtown parts of pretty much every major city, those churches were built long ago, when the land was essentially considered unsuitable for anything else (for commerce, farming, industry etc). Many of these places have, over time, become part church, part museum, part heritage - for both its congregation *and* the city it sits in.

    Bringing down crushing property taxes on such places would eventually force any religion out of a downtown area, as it almost does for private residents now. It's bad enough that most downtown areas have pushed out anything except for ultra-wealthy corporate and private interests... if it weren't for tax exemption, the museums, churches, libraries, and most other public edifices would have been driven out of the city long ago. Now you want to start eroding that? Sure, you may say it would stop there, but fact is, it won't... someone else will find another reason to start relocating museums out to the 'burbs in order to free up uber-profitable land, then someone else entirely will start whining that big-assed libraries full of paper books on "prime real estate" are totally unnecessary in this digital age, so maybe we should just, you know...

    For every "palatial manor" your proposal would dismantle, at least 2-3 small rectory houses, convents/monasteries, strip-mall-churches, *schools*, etc would be forced on the auction block, or funds would be diverted from actual charitable efforts just to pay the property tax bill (money is fungible that way). Note that I haven't even come near bringing up all the religious-run hospitals in the nation and the impact on them (there's a whole lot more than you think - enough that their absence would cripple healthcare rather harshly nation-wide.)

    TL;DR - This thing is a bit more complex than you might realize, given the blanket statement. Find a better way

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  10. Re:What? Why discriminate? by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Informative

    The difference is, when you've been a faithful Catholic for 20 years, and tithed the whole time and whatever else, they don't take you aside one day and say "Hey, here's the super-duper secret Bible that almost no one gets to look at. You're going to love the chapter where after Jesus' resurrection, grey aliens from Proxima 9 took him on a 2-millienium mission to the stars."

    Scientology does just that. If you have no idea, going in, about what thetans are, or where they come from, you don't find out about them until you're so invested in Scientology that it's very difficult to break away from it. "It has to be true, look how much time and money I've invested in it."

    And that's another thing.

    Let's say, for whatever reason, that I want to study up on Christianity. Well, one option that a lot of churches have are discussion groups/classes on it, especially for people who are converting to that church.

    A lot of those classes are pretty cheap, if not outright free, and here's the important bit. You don't actually have to take them. I could, right now, walk into practically any church in the country and join, for free.

    In Scientology, if you want to learn more (or are peer-pressured to do so), every class costs money. The higher you go, the pricier the classes. Oh, but you can get around some of the costs by signing a billion-year contract.

    Yeah, that's all completely normal and above board.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  11. Re:What? Why discriminate? by Cito · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always tithe, but God doesn't want it.

    end of each month I take my money and throw it in air, whatever God wants he can take, whatever lands on ground I keep.

    so far he's never wanted any.

  12. Re:Horrible arguments. by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's it to you if the religious text is a trade secret, you have to fork over cash to read their texts, and as far as civil trials are concerned they are operating withing the law.

    The only people who are "victimized" by Scientology are Scientologists. It's not my problem nor yours.

    Every organization sued or otherwise attacked by Scientology is also "victimized" by them. Are you interested in warning people against joining Scientology by telling them what it's really about? Prepare to be sued for releasing their Trade Secrets. Scientology's victims are hardly limited to their membership.

    Now, if they break the law and really hurt someone - like institutionalizing the molesting small children - then that's for the cops to handle and they SHOULD be punished.

    If Tom Cruise and other movie stars want to spend millions supporting the Scientolgists, that's their problem, not mine. The only problem I have with Tom Cruise is I wish he'd make more kick-ass science fiction movies.

    But if we're gonna pick on kooky religions, I think we should start with the Mormons first. They actually have a history of murdering people.

    In 1978 11 high ranking Scientology leaders were convicted in one of the largest counts of internal espionage of the IRS and federal attorney's offices.
    In 1978 France convicted, in absentia, L Ron Hubbard of fraud.
    In 1988 in Spain the Spanish head of Scientology and ten others were arrested on charges of fraud, coercion and labour law violations.
    In 2009, a Paris court found the French Church of Scientology guilty of organized fraud and imposed a fine of nearly US$900,000.

    Noah Lottick, died 1990
    Lisa McPherson, died 1995